Guest guest Posted April 27, 2000 Report Share Posted April 27, 2000 In a message dated 04/24/2000 10:43:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time, watts_pete@h... writes: [FOM site:] > we certainly do NOT think that > AA fits the BITE mind control model. & #34; > [Pete:] > Fair expression of opinion, and given it, again I admire the fact > that AA is on there at all. Actually, I do think that AA fits the BITE model, as my original post argued. I have argued all along that AA uses mind control methods that can be identified by models such as BITE and Lifton's thought reform themes. If you want a " fair expression, " here is one by E. Vaillant, a psychiatrist who authored the most extensive prospective study of " alcoholism " ever undertaken. In no way can Vaillant be characterized as an enemy or critic of AA. " AA certainly functions as a cult and systematically indoctrinates its members in ways common to cults the world over. The negative side effects of AA, however, are perhaps more benign than those of any other cult with which I am familiar. " E. Vaillant, 'The Natural History of Alcoholism Revisited,' 1995, page 266. I personally do not agree that AA's " negative side effects " are " benign. " It has to be remembered that a very large majority of " AA members " never achieve recovery in AA. Yet their core identity has been attacked and changed by AA and the 12-Step cabal. Because of XA's use of mind control indoctrination methods, and because of its hegemony (something that every cult wants but none other has) it is a group that merits concern. Right now, AA is an exception to the rule that those who are exposed to mind control should be educated about the possible negative side effects of that experience. Sincerely, Doc --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.