RE: Reply to re post subject headings

[Guest guest]

Hats off to !

.

>

>Reply-To: 12-step-freeegroups

>To: <12-step-freeegroups>

>Subject: RE: Reply to re post subject headings

>Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 03:58:08 -0500

>

>Regarding the subject tagging I agree with you but completely

>changing it when so many people are participating in it makes it

>extremely difficult to follow especially when the person who responds

>to yours changes the subject back to the original. Which happens

>here.

>

>I never said you should take an ice bath. You believed it was

>intended for you because I left it vague and possibly because it

>would have fit after your response to . As it happens I was

>referring to myself for the aggressive way I answered your subject

>change message.

>

>At any rate even if I were referring to you It would have been no

>more or less uncalled for and out of line than you telling to

>chill out. Sorry but I don't necessarily see aggression as a bad

>thing.

>

>While we're on the subject, as I believe you intended the aggression

>comment, I feel it's only fair to remind you we've both shown our

>share of it.

>

>ly we could go on for days rehashing each of our aggressive

>posts to each other and the list. I choose to stop here in deference

>to each of our feelings.

> Reply to re post subject headings

>

>

>

> - I would LOVE it if people would modify the

>suject headings of their posts to reflect the change

>in subject matter. But I often find posts have gone

>completely off the subject matter without the heading

>having changed at all.

>

> Your highly aggressive comment about an ice bath

>for me being required is uncalled for and way out of

>line.

>

> Kim

>

>

>

________________________________________________________________________

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

[Guest guest]

Regarding the subject tagging I agree with you but completely

changing it when so many people are participating in it makes it

extremely difficult to follow especially when the person who responds

to yours changes the subject back to the original. Which happens

here.

I never said you should take an ice bath. You believed it was

intended for you because I left it vague and possibly because it

would have fit after your response to . As it happens I was

referring to myself for the aggressive way I answered your subject

change message.

At any rate even if I were referring to you It would have been no

more or less uncalled for and out of line than you telling to

chill out. Sorry but I don't necessarily see aggression as a bad

thing.

While we're on the subject, as I believe you intended the aggression

comment, I feel it's only fair to remind you we've both shown our

share of it.

ly we could go on for days rehashing each of our aggressive

posts to each other and the list. I choose to stop here in deference

to each of our feelings.

Reply to re post subject headings

- I would LOVE it if people would modify the

suject headings of their posts to reflect the change

in subject matter. But I often find posts have gone

completely off the subject matter without the heading

having changed at all.

Your highly aggressive comment about an ice bath

for me being required is uncalled for and way out of

line.

Kim

[Guest guest]

My $0.02:

I dont agree with this - I think subject headings should be kept up

to

date, not least because a thread can split several different ways.

The

way to ensure continuity imo is to use the WAS technique (indicating

the past subject) and/or stating to who you are replying - I use both

techniques.

P.

> Hats off to !

>

> .

>

>

> >From: " Arroyo " <arroyoh@h...>

> >Reply-To: 12-step-freeegroups

> >To: <12-step-freeegroups>

> >Subject: RE: Reply to re post subject

headings

> >Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 03:58:08 -0500

> >

> >Regarding the subject tagging I agree with you but completely

> >changing it when so many people are participating in it makes it

> >extremely difficult to follow especially when the person who

responds

> >to yours changes the subject back to the original. Which happens

> >here.

> >

> >I never said you should take an ice bath. You believed it was

> >intended for you because I left it vague and possibly because it

> >would have fit after your response to . As it happens I was

> >referring to myself for the aggressive way I answered your subject

> >change message.

> >

> >At any rate even if I were referring to you It would have been no

> >more or less uncalled for and out of line than you telling

to

> >chill out. Sorry but I don't necessarily see aggression as a bad

> >thing.

> >

> >While we're on the subject, as I believe you intended the

aggression

> >comment, I feel it's only fair to remind you we've both shown our

> >share of it.

> >

> >ly we could go on for days rehashing each of our aggressive

> >posts to each other and the list. I choose to stop here in

deference

> >to each of our feelings.

> > Reply to re post subject

headings

> >

> >

> >

> > - I would LOVE it if people would modify the

> >suject headings of their posts to reflect the change

> >in subject matter. But I often find posts have gone

> >completely off the subject matter without the heading

> >having changed at all.

> >

> > Your highly aggressive comment about an ice bath

> >for me being required is uncalled for and way out of

> >line.

> >

> > Kim

> >

> >

> >

>

>

______________________________________________________________________

__

> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at

http://www.hotmail.com