Guest guest Posted May 31, 2009 Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 Yes, it does have a genetic component, but it is believed that it is triggered by something. I'm sure that will answer with an appropriate article. Sue > > > >> >> I know has probably posted several articles on this before, but > my brain fogs up. Has RA been proven to be genetic and passed down > from > parents to kids or grandparents to grandkids? Neither of my parents > have > RA (but neither have they been tested) but my paternal grandfather, > grandmother and her siblings did. I just found this out this past > family > reunion. My great uncle apparently had 'lockjaw' like I do from his > RA. > I'm just worried about my children who are 2 and 7. I didn't show RA > signs until after the birth of my first, but I thought I was just > doing > something wrong mechanically at work. Now I know it was probably the > first signs of RA. >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2009 Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 I have two grand parents that had RA, and possibly a great grandparent who had RA, and my Rheumatologist has said it is completely genetic. But I also believe certain chemical exposure could also trigger it. Stan Seattle, Sun is coming! Re: [ ] Re: Is RA an inherited disease? Yes, it does have a genetic component, but it is believed that it is  triggered by something. I'm sure that will answer with an  appropriate article. Sue > > > >> >> I know has probably posted several articles on this before, but > my brain fogs up. Has RA been proven to be genetic and passed down  > from > parents to kids or grandparents to grandkids? Neither of my parents  > have > RA (but neither have they been tested) but my paternal grandfather, > grandmother and her siblings did. I just found this out this past  > family > reunion. My great uncle apparently had 'lockjaw' like I do from his  > RA. > I'm just worried about my children who are 2 and 7. I didn't show RA > signs until after the birth of my first, but I thought I was just  > doing > something wrong mechanically at work. Now I know it was probably the > first signs of RA. >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Nope, Stan. RA is not completely genetic. If it were, we would find that the concordance rate for identical twins with RA would be close to 100%. Not an MD On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:52 PM, <stanpfister@...> wrote: > > > > > I have two grand parents that had RA, and possibly a great grandparent who > had RA, and my Rheumatologist has said it is completely genetic. But I also > believe certain chemical exposure could also trigger it. > > Stan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 So what you're saying is that if you had a genetic predisposition for RA there's absolutely no chemical compound that could trigger it? One that the 20% twin probably would have avoided. I ask because I've had a lot of unique chemical exposure in my career working as a graphic artist and printer. Also, should I have washed my genes more often? Stan, Steattle , Cloudy -clearing. Nope, Stan. RA is not completely genetic. If it were, we would find that the concordance rate for identical twins with RA would be close to 100%. Not an MD On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Â < stanpfister @comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > I have two grand parents that had RA, and possibly a great grandparent who > had RA, and my Rheumatologist has said it is completely genetic. But I also > believe certain chemical exposure could also trigger it. > > Stan ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 I filed for SSDI and was given my notification of award within two months, although I am a little worse off than you RA is a debilitating disorder. Get all your paper work together before you file, it's worth it. Stan Seattle, Sun! Hi- I have to wonder at times if all my problems started with me being an enviromental chemist and catching Hep. A and then losing my gallbladder- in 1993-1994. Â All my problems started after that craziness. Â Could the combination of chemcial exposure and illness have kicked this all off? Â No history of autoimmune in the family before me. Â Hmmm. Â I 'retired' when I had my first kid in 1999. Â SAHM, try to substitue at the school, but I get tired. Â I am good for maybe 2 days then need 3 days to recover. Â Would I qualify of Disability? Â Thank you- D. in south Louisiana > > > > So what you're saying is that if you had a genetic predisposition for RA there's absolutely no chemical compound that could trigger it? One that the 20% twin probably would have avoided. I ask because I've had a lot of unique chemical exposure in my career working as a graphic artist and printer. Also, should I have washed my genes more often? > > > > Stan, > > Steattle , Cloudy -clearing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Stan: Hi, How soon would you say you became debilitated from the onset of RA? Does everyone go " downhill " with RA eventually? OKD From: stanpfister@... <stanpfister@...> Subject: Re: [ ] Re: Is RA an inherited disease? Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2009, 4:24 PM I filed for SSDI and was given my notification of award within two months, although I am a little worse off than you RA is a debilitating disorder. Get all your paper work together before you file, it's worth it. Stan Seattle, Sun! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 I started having symptoms is March 2008, the symptoms were severe by June 2008, and I was diagnosed by my GP in July 2008. Then I was confirmed with RA by my Rheumatoligist and started treatment in August 2008. Things were much better after about six weeks of treatment. No not everyone goes downhill, with good treatment, some knowledge, and a little support you can manage your RA effectively. Everyone is different and seems to respond differently to the medications,  so early and aggressive treatment is the best option. So now I have to give our Moderator a nickle because I used her copyrighted phrase. Stan, Seattle, Sun! Stan:  Hi, How soon would you say you became debilitated from the onset of RA? Does everyone go " downhill " with RA eventually?   OKD From: stanpfister@... <stanpfister@...> Subject: Re: [ ] Re: Is RA an inherited disease? Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2009, 4:24 PM I filed for SSDI and was given my notification of award within two months, although I am a little worse off than you RA is a debilitating disorder. Get all your paper work together before you file, it's worth it. Stan Seattle, Sun!     Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Stan, you were very lucky that you got diagnosed so quickly and started treatment so soon. Some people have to wait a long time to get a firm diagnosis. I was lucky, too, because it took just a few months to get a correct diagnosis and begin treatment. Now you owe me a nickel because I pointed it out to you. LOL. Sue On Jun 2, 2009, at 8:28 PM, stanpfister@... wrote: > > I started having symptoms is March 2008, the symptoms were severe by > June 2008, and I was diagnosed by my GP in July 2008. Then I was > confirmed with RA by my Rheumatoligist and started treatment in > August 2008. Things were much better after about six weeks of > treatment. No not everyone goes downhill, with good treatment, some > knowledge, and a little support you can manage your RA effectively. > Everyone is different and seems to respond differently to the > medications, so early and aggressive treatment is the best option. > So now I have to give our Moderator a nickle because I used her > copyrighted phrase. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 In a message dated 6/3/2009 6:32:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time, Rheumatoid.Arthritis.Support@... writes: No, that's not what I was saying, Stan. What I said is that if your rheumatologist said that RA is completely genetic, she is mistaken. > There seems to be a difference in the words " genetic " and " inherited. " If it were genetic, " they " could search for the gene that causes it, I think. It seems the propensity for getting RA is inherited. And once you have one auto-immune disease, the sky's the limit. And it seems there are many triggers. dd **************We found the real ‘Hotel California’ and the ‘Seinfeld’ diner. What will you find? Explore WhereItsAt.com. (http://www.whereitsat.com/#/music/all-spots/355/47.796964/-66.374711/2/Youve-Fo\ und-Where-Its-At?ncid=eml cntnew00000007) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 I've always felt lucky win it comes to my GP because he very good at that sort of thing. I got in an argument with him once about a diagnosis and it cost me a mocha. I'd made the bet and moments later his assistant came in, shook her head at me and said, " you silly silly person. " I fell into the trap of questioning his judgement because he has ten children, yes, I said ten, as in 10 (one zero)! And...well, I think any reasonable person would question the judgement of someone who has ten kids. So I lost the best and got him a Starbucks card with five bucks on it, and told him not to go in there thinking that card would go very far. He told me he'd go in, order a hot chocolate, take a sip and pass down the line so by the time it got to the end they'd all have a sip. Made me laugh. Anyway, when I went in with my arthritis symptoms he told me it was one of two things and RA was one of them. I didn't argue with him and the tests came back positive for RA and we were able to go from there. We take our coffee way to seriously in the northwest so the point of the story is that you have to beware: you could lose a mocha at any time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 OK. I'm setting up a PayPal account for those nickels, Stan. Not an MD On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:28 PM, <stanpfister@...> wrote: > > > > > I started having symptoms is March 2008, the symptoms were severe by June > 2008, and I was diagnosed by my GP in July 2008. Then I was confirmed with > RA by my Rheumatoligist and started treatment in August 2008. Things were > much better after about six weeks of treatment. No not everyone goes > downhill, with good treatment, some knowledge, and a little support you can > manage your RA effectively. Everyone is different and seems to respond > differently to the medications, so early and aggressive treatment is the > best option. So now I have to give our Moderator a nickle because I used her > copyrighted phrase. > > Stan, > > Seattle, Sun! > > Stan: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 No, that's not what I was saying, Stan. What I said is that if your rheumatologist said that RA is completely genetic, she is mistaken. It's possible that chemical exposure could be a trigger. I'm not sure how one washes one's genes. Maybe you could elaborate. Not an MD On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:29 AM, <stanpfister@...> wrote: > > > > > So what you're saying is that if you had a genetic predisposition for RA > there's absolutely no chemical compound that could trigger it? One that the > 20% twin probably would have avoided. I ask because I've had a lot of unique > chemical exposure in my career working as a graphic artist and printer. > Also, should I have washed my genes more often? > > Stan, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 I get you. I believe she was discussing treatment aspects because I know she asked my about my family history and was interested to know both sides of my family had RA. Stan Seattle, Sun! Re: [ ] Re: Is RA an inherited disease? In a message dated 6/3/2009 6:32:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  Rheumatoid.Arthritis.Support@... writes: No,  that's not what I was saying, Stan. What I said is that if  your rheumatologist said that RA is completely genetic, she is mistaken.  > There seems to be a difference in the words " genetic " and " inherited. " If  it were genetic, " they " could search for the gene that causes it, I think. It  seems the propensity for getting RA is inherited. And once you have one  auto-immune disease, the sky's the limit. And it seems there are many triggers.  dd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 You know it takes forever for PayPal to set up and process an account! I could send you a bottle of sunlight from Seattle which is a rare item indeed, you might make a fortune. Actually I set up an account when IÂ bought synthesiser from this nice guy on Ebay . I'd set up the account, transferred the money and the whole thing. It took PayPal 10 days to get it all set up. Since I'd already transferred the money I couldn't send the guy a check, since we'd all ready done the transaction he really couldn't sell it again. By the end of it he was pissed so I bought some piece of junk from him to make up for it. And finally I had to get off Ebay all together because I was going bankrupt saving money. Ya know, that was about four years ago, I should plug that synthesizer in and see if it works! Stan Seattle, Sun! Re: [ ] Re: Is RA an inherited disease? OK. I'm setting up a PayPal account for those nickels, Stan. Not an MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 " Genetic " and " inherited " mean the same to me. I have three genetic diseases that I inherited from my parents. Sue On Jun 3, 2009, at 8:50 AM, dgd301@... wrote: > > There seems to be a difference in the words " genetic " and > " inherited. " If > it were genetic, " they " could search for the gene that causes it, I > think. > It seems the propensity for getting RA is inherited. And once you > have one > auto-immune disease, the sky's the limit. And it seems there are many > triggers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.