Guest guest Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 I asked my dentist's assistant if she had ever had a patient request removeal of all mercury fillings and had them replaced with non-metal substances. She said, no. Dentists definately don't advocate removal of mercury fillings. I think it puts their profession in a bad light, and that may be why they take a stance. I decided against removing my many fillings because of cost and because of possible damage due to the removal. I am not convinced that MS is caused by mercury poisoning. I still think it may be triggered by different things in different people. Has anyone done a double blind study, that you know of, for BBD? Amy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 Some dentist do advocate the removal of mercury fillings but it has to be done by a dentist that knows how to do it safely. Some people have reported good results but others none at all and it probably is that some people are more sensitive than others. Putting a deadly neuro toxin very close to the brain does not seem a very good idea to me. My wife had all her fillings replaced and she is definitely a lot better since she had it done but then she has been trying a number of things as well such as LDN so it would be very difficult to say in her case the filling removal has helped. I think with something like MS you need a number of different protocol to beet it and the problem then is you do not know exactly what is working. However if you get better do you care. There is a test called that you can do to check for mercury sensitivity but I would not know if that gives any better indication than just removing the fillings and seeing if it helps. If you decide this is worthwhile thing to try then do make sure you find a dentist who knows how to do it safely otherwise you can definitely do harm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 HI, I am one of those who had my amlalgams replaced, as well as a bridge made of nickel. The amalgams were removed 14 months ago (3 amalgams total) and the nickel bridge was removed about 6 months ago. In my case, so far, I would say it has not helped or hurt. However, I feel that over time, this is one step of many that I am taking toward an overall healing approach. It is important to note that amalgam removal is only half of the process of removing metals from the body. Metals are lodged in tissues and the brain due to the years of having amalgams, and many believe chelation therapy of some kind is needed to remove these metals from the body. There is an incredible amount of controversy over which chelation approach to use...I tried DMSA in only a tiny amount and had a terrible reaction. I am not sure how/if to chelate now. I have heard a handful of stories of people who recovered from an MS diagnosis with amalgam removal and chelation therapy. However, it is usually just one step in the healing process, and for some it may not make a difference and it may not be necessary to have them removed. I have heard recovery stories of people who still have the amalgams as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.