Guest guest Posted September 18, 2000 Report Share Posted September 18, 2000 It all boils down to $$$ for the hospital. Procedures are reviewed for ROI (return on investment), and they eliminate the ones with lower ROI if they can. This is business, not medicine, unfortunately. Think of the orphan drug program that the gov't instituted so that the few people who need certain drugs can get them in spite of the poor ROI for the drug companies. C'est la vive. (sigh) Regards -- Margie in Austin, TX 5'4 " , pre-revision 275#, 09/16/00 down 44# RNY GB in 1987, revision to DGB/DS 02/01/00 Dr. Crookes, USC University Hospital, LA, CA > Thank you for your response. Originally, the reason given was that > it cost the hospital too much money, that the insurance > reimbursements wasn't enough. Then, when that was shown to be a lie, > it became the nurses were complaining about bariatric patients. > Then, when that became a lie, they said the equipment for us (larger > chairs, beds, etc) was too expensive. When that was pointed out to > be something they would have to purchase anyway, it became something > else, ad nauseum. There were two physicians in practice, the other > one had 6 people die in one year. My physician didn't, but they > can't get rid of the other one without simply stopping all bariatric > surgery. I think that may have had something to do with it, but they > won't say. It is very complicated. Any ideas would be greatly > appreciated. > Merri Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.