Guest guest Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Rheumatology Advance Access published online on December 11, 2009 Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep389 First-line DMARD choice in early rheumatoid arthritis—do prognostic factors play a role? Satish M. Rachapalli1, 2, A. Walsh3, Adam Young4, D. W. Kiely5, and, Ernest H. Choy1 on behalf of the Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Network (ERAN) 1Sir Alfred Baring Garrod Clinical Trials Unit, Academic Department of Rheumatology, King’s College London, London, 2Department of Rheumatology, Hereford County Hospital NHS Trust, Hereford, 3Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, 4St Albans City Hospital and 5Department of Rheumatology, St ’s Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. Abstract Objective. To examine if prognostic factors predict the choice of first DMARD for patients with RA. Methods. Details of 616 patients with early RA were collected from 16 centres in the UK Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Network (ERAN). Logistic regression was used to identify whether HAQ score, swollen joint count (SJC), nodules, RF, ESR, CRP and erosions on radiographs were associated with the choice of first DMARD treatment. Results. Of 616 patients, 547 (88%) were started on a DMARD, 253 (46%) on MTX, 230 (42%) on SSZ, 47 (9%) on other DMARD monotherapies and 17 (3%) on combination DMARD therapy (CoT). SSZ was started less frequently in patients with positive RF (P = 0.018; OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.38, 0.91) and high SJC (P = 0.02; OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.91, 0.99). MTX was favoured in patients with high SJC (P = 0.002; OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02, 1.11). Non-prescription of DMARDs was associated with old age (P = 0.02; OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96, 0.99) and low HAQ score (P = 0.009; OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.68, 0.95). None of the variables predicted CoT. All other variables and the hospital where the patient was treated were not independently associated with the choice of DMARD. Conclusions. When choosing DMARD monotherapy in early RA, rheumatologists in ERAN seem to preferentially prescribe MTX for patients with a poor prognosis and SSZ for patients with good prognosis. No DMARDs were used in older patients or in those with a low HAQ. http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/kep389v1?papetoc Not an MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.