Guest guest Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 J Rheumatol. 2009 Oct 15. [Epub ahead of print] Reevaluation of the Role of Duration of Morning Stiffness in the Assessment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Activity Khan NA, Yazici Y, Calvo-Alen J, Dadoniene J, Gossec L, Hansen TM, Huisman M, Kallikorm R, Muller R, Liveborn M, Oding R, Luchikhina E, Naranjo A, Rexhepi S, P, Tlustochowich W, Tsirogianni A, Sokka T. From the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, Arkansas; NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York, USA; Hospital Sierrallana Ganzo, Torrelavega, Spain; Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine at Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania; Paris Descartes University, Medicine Faculty, Paris; UPRES-EA 4058; APHP, Rheumatology B Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France; Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev, Herlev, Denmark; Sint Franciscus Gasthuis Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Centrallasarettet, Västerås, Sweden; Institute of Rheumatology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia; Hospital de Gran Canaria Dr . Negrin, Las Palmas, Spain; Rheumatology Department, Pristine, Kosovo; Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK; Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland; School of Medicine, National University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä; and Medcare Oy, Aänekoski, Finland. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of the duration of morning stiffness (MS), as a patient-reported outcome (PRO), in assessing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. METHODS: We acquired information on 5439 patients in QUEST-RA, an international database of patients with RA evaluated by a standard protocol. MS duration was assessed from time of waking to time of maximal improvement. Ability of MS duration to differentiate RA activity states, based on Disease Activity Score (DAS)28, was assessed by analysis of variance; and a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for discriminating clinically active (DAS28 > 3.2) from less active (DAS28 </= 3.2) RA. Mixed-effect analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models were used to assess the utility of adding MS duration to Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) 3, a PRO index based on physical function, pain, and general health (GH), in predicting the 3-variable DAS28 (DAS28v3). RESULTS: MS duration had moderate correlation (r = 0.41-0.48) with pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and GH; and weak correlation (r = 0.23-0.39) with joint counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. MS duration differed significantly among patients with different RA activity (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve of 0.74 (95% CI 0.72-0.75) showed moderate ability of MS duration to differentiate clinically active from less active RA. ANCOVA showed significant interactive effects between RAPID3 and the MS duration categories (p = 0.0005) in predicting DAS28v3. The effect of MS was found to be clinically important in patients with the low RAPID3 scores (< 6) in whom the presence of MS may indicate clinically active disease (DAS28v3 > 3.2). CONCLUSION: MS duration has a moderate correlation with RA disease activity. Assessment of MS duration may be clinically helpful in patients with low RAPID3 scores. PMID: 19833759 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19833759 Not an MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.