Guest guest Posted June 6, 2009 Report Share Posted June 6, 2009 Rheumatology Advance Access published online on June 5, 2009 Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep142 Clinical and diagnostic value of ribosomal P autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus Samy Haddouk1, Sameh Marzouk2, Moez Jallouli2, Hajer Fourati1, Makram Frigui2, Youssef B. H. Hmida1, Faten Koubaa1, Wassim Sellami3, Sofiene Baklouti4, Jamil Hachicha5, Zouheir Bahloul2 and Hatem Masmoudi1 1Immunology Laboratory, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital of Sfax,2Department of Medicine,3Department of Psychiatry,4Department of Rheumatology and 5Department of Nephrology, Hédi Chaker University Hospital of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia Abstract Objective. To analyse prospectively the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as well as the clinical relevance of ribosomal P (anti-P) autoantibodies in a large cohort of SLE patients. Methods. The anti-P autoantibodies were evaluated in the serum of 200 Tunisian SLE patients at disease onset and 130 various control subjects by a sensitive immunodot assay. A complete laboratory evaluation and clinical examination were performed in each SLE patient. During the follow-up, the patients were regularly monitored for clinical parameters. Global SLE activity was measured by the ECLAM. Results. The sensitivity and specificity of anti-P testing for SLE were 23.5 and 98.4%, respectively. The anti-P-positive samples 14/47 (29.8%), 27/47 (57.4%) and 5/47 (10.6%) were negative for anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm or both antibodies, respectively. The anti-P-positive patients showed more active disease activity and a much higher prevalence of arthritis. An association between IgG aCLs and anti-P antibodies was also found. However, anti-P antibodies were not associated with neuropsychiatric manifestations or lupus nephritis. Conclusion. This study does not seem to confirm the described association of anti-P antibodies with neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE. However, it supports the anti-P antibody association with arthritis and disease activity as well as the presence of aCL. Based on our study and other related studies, we propose that, akin to anti-Sm and anti-dsDNA, anti-P antibodies detected by one agreed method may be considered for inclusion as a criterion for the classification of SLE. http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/kep142v1?papetoc Not an MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.