Guest guest Posted January 23, 2009 Report Share Posted January 23, 2009 Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 21 January 2009. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.102244 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Concise Report Influence of gender on assessments of disease activity and function in early rheumatoid arthritis in relation to radiographic joint damage Ahlmén 1, Björn Svensson 2, a Albertsson 3, a Forslind 4 and Ingiäld Hafström 3* 1 Department of Rheumatology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/MS, Göteborg, Sweden 2 Section of Rheumatology at the Institution of Clinical Science, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden 3 The Rheumatology unit at Karolinska Institute at Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden 4 Rheumatology section, Helsingborg hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden Abstract Objective: To evaluate gender differences in DAS28, HAQ and SOFI and to relate these scores to radiographic joint destruction. Methods: 549 patients with early RA (62% women) from the BARFOT study were included. At baseline, 1, 2 and 5 years DAS28, HAQ, SOFI and radiographs of hands and feet were performed. The radiographs were scored using the van der Heijde Sharp score. Results: In women DAS28 was significantly higher than in men due to higher scores for general health and tender joints. Likewise, HAQ and VAS pain were significantly higher in women. SOFI was worse in men during the first 2 years, depending on higher upper limb scores. Total Sharp score (TotSharp), erosion score and joint space narrowing did not differ between the sexes at any time point. DAS28 AUC correlated significantly with TotSharp at 5 years in both genders (r=0.316, r=0.313) mainly owing to swollen joints and ESR. SOFI AUC correlated significantly with TotSharp in women (r=0.135-0.220) but not in men. Conclusion: Despite similar degree of radiographic joint destruction women had, compared with men, worse scores for DAS28 and HAQ, possibly due to higher pain perception and less muscular strength and maybe because men overestimate their functional capacity. http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/ard.2008.102244v1?papetoc Not an MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.