Guest guest Posted August 8, 2009 Report Share Posted August 8, 2009 Arthritis Research & Therapy 2009, 11:R95doi:10.1186/ar2740 Published: 23 June 2009 Masitinib in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a multicentre, open-label, dose-ranging, phase 2a study Jacques Tebib1 , Xavier Mariette2 , Pierre Bourgeois3 , René-Marc Flipo4 , Philippe Gaudin5 , Xavier Le Loët6 , Gineste7 , t Guy7 , Colin D Mansfield7 , Alain Moussy7 , Patrice Dubreuil7,8,9 , Olivier Hermine7,10 and Sibilia11 1Service de Rhumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 765 chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France 2Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre Cedex, France 3Service de Rhumatologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpétrière, 83 bd de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France 4Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Salengro, Rue du Professeur Emile Laine, 59037 Lille cedex, France 5Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Hôpital Sud – GREPI-TIMC-IMAG UMR CNRS 5525, Avenue de Kimberley, 38434 Échirolles, France 6Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Hôpitaux de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76230 Rouen, France 7AB Science, S.A., 3 avenue s V, 75008 Paris, France 8Inserm U891, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Molecular and Functional Hematopoiesis, Centre de référence des mastocytoses, 27 Bd Leï roure, 13009 Marseille, France 9Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Université Méditerranée, 27 Bd Leï roure, 13009 Marseille, France 10CNRS UMR 8147, Service d'hématologie et centre de référence des mastocytoses, Hôpital Necker, 149 Rue de Sèvres, 75743 Paris, France 11Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Avenue Molière – BP 49 – 67098 Strasbourg, France Abstract Introduction Since current treatment options for patients suffering from active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remain inadequate, especially for those unresponsive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), new and improved medication is needed. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of masitinib (AB1010), a potent and selective protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor of c-KIT, in the monotherapy treatment of DMARD-refractory RA. Methods This was a multicentre, uncontrolled, open-label, randomised, dose-ranging, phase 2a trial. Masitinib was administered orally to 43 patients who had inadequate response to DMARDs, at initial randomised dosing levels of 3 and 6 mg/kg per day over a 12-week period. Dose adjustment was permitted based upon tolerability and response criteria. Efficacy was assessed via American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% improvement criteria (ACR20/50/70) responses, disease activity score using 28 joint counts (DAS28), index of improvement in RA (ACRn) and C-reactive protein (CRP) improvement, relative to baseline at week 12. Results Improvement was observed in all efficacy endpoints, including ACR20/50/70 scores of 54%, 26% and 8%, respectively, and a reduction in CRP level by greater than 50% for approximately half the population. This improvement was sustainable throughout an extension phase (> 84 weeks) and was also independent of initial DMARD resistance (anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha and/or methotrexate). A relatively high patient withdrawal rate (37%) required the use of last observation carried forward (LOCF) data imputation. Incidence of adverse events was high (95%), although the majority were of mild or moderate severity with a considerable decline in frequency observed after 12 weeks of treatment. Two nonfatal serious adverse events were reported. Dose-response analyses tentatively indicate that an initial dosing level of 6.0 mg/kg per day administered orally in two daily intakes is the most appropriate, based upon potency and tolerability trends. Conclusions Treatment with masitinib improved DMARD-refractory active RA. Following an initial high incidence of mostly mild to moderate side effects during the first 12 weeks of treatment, masitinib appears to be generally well tolerated. This, together with evidence of a sustainable efficacy response, suggests that masitinib is suitable for long-term treatment regimens. Since this was the first study of masitinib in a nononcologic pathology, the relatively high patient withdrawal rate observed can be partly attributed to a highly cautious response to adverse events. There is sufficient compelling evidence to warrant further placebo-controlled investigation. ********************************************* Read the full article here: http://arthritis-research.com/content/11/3/R95 Not an MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.