Guest guest Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Rheumatology Advance Access published online on September 22, 2009 Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep287 Fatigue is a reliable, sensitive and unique outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis Minnock1, Kirwan2 and Barry Bresnihan1,3,4 1Rheumatology Rehabilitation, Our Lady's Hospice, Dublin, 2University of Bristol Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, 3St 's University Hospital and 4University College Dublin, Dublin, UK. Abstract Objective. Fatigue is an important symptom in patients with RA. Measurement of fatigue in clinical trials and in clinical practice requires scales that are reproducible, sensitive to change and practical. This study examined the reliability and sensitivity to change of fatigue and its relative independence as an outcome measure in RA. Methods. Successive patients referred to the rheumatology clinic at St 's University Hospital and Our Lady's Hospice were evaluated. Clinical assessments were undertaken at baseline and 3 months after commencing TNF- blockade. Fatigue was measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Sensitivity to change when compared with current core set outcome measures was determined by calculation of the standardized response mean (SRM). Multiple regression analysis was employed to determine the independent variance of fatigue scores relative to the core set. Results. Forty-nine patients were evaluated. At baseline, mean (S.D.) fatigue scores were 6.7 ± 2.1. At 3 months, fatigue scores had fallen to 4.3 ± 2.6 (P < 0.001). Test–retest intraclass correlation coefficient for the NRS was 0.79 (P < 0.008). Fatigue was ranked third for relative sensitivity to change as shown by SRM: pain, 1.37; tender joint count (TJC), 1.09; fatigue, 0.92; swollen joint count (SJC), 0.86; HAQ, 0.82; CRP, 0.69; and patient global health (GH), 0.25. The relative independent variance in fatigue of 22% was higher than that of the core set: TJC, 20%; pain, 19%; SJC, 16%; GH, 8%; HAQ, 7%; and CRP, 8%. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that measures of fatigue are reliable and sensitive to change, and should be considered for inclusion as a core outcome measure in RA. http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/kep287v1?papetoc Not an MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.