Guest guest Posted August 18, 2000 Report Share Posted August 18, 2000 > > i think the laminectomies are more common...especially for degenerative disease. if you have congenital stenosis you may have more problems finding a nsg who will dx myelopathy & agree to surgery. my mri's were read as normal locally...even tho i really pushed them to examine closely. they just patted me on the head & said...you don't have a problem, don't worry about it. MEASURING the size of the canal is NOT standard procedure, so if they don't see any gross problems with the neck in neutral, they don't find a problem. with congenital stenosis everything can look ok when 'eyeballed'. actual nerve tissue compression wasn't seen on mine until dr. heffez had a ct scan done with the neck in extension (although he had already noticed that the spinal cord was distorted on my 'normal' mri's <G>). & of course, when measured, the diameter was well below the low end of normal. you might try a spinal cord injury site & ask for recommendations there. the only site i have is for harvard/boston general http://neuro-mancer.mgh.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/Ultimate.cgi?action=intro & BypassCook\ ie=true good luck, june in calif dx of cervical spinal stenosis/myelopathy; surgery by Dr. Heffez 4/24/00 > > > I understand the need to see one of " the " recommended nsg's for > chiari surgery. But I'm wondering if you also should for just a > laminectomy. > > Or is laminectomy a pretty common surgery that most nsg's would be > very competant with? Would it make a difference if it was at more > than one level? What about disks? Are there nsg's that specialize in > these, or would that again be our recommended chiari nsg's? > > Thanks for any opinions or advice! > em Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.