Re: seat belts, non NF2--de ja vu`

[Guest guest]

I just had a feeling of de ja vu with this email =)

----Original Message Follows----

Reply-To: NF2_Crew

To: NF2_Crew

Subject: Re: seat belts, non NF2

Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:18:02 -0400

You are probably one of the few that do it because of your common sense.

There is a very fine line_________between freedom and sometimes just plain

ole

common sense....Where is the line?

Nobody really HAS to wear a seatbelt, only they risk getting a ticket or

worse....leaving behind a family that grieves for them.

I think freedom of choice is overstated sometimes....Most laws..not

all..are

made because many people have no common sense or morals. I don't believe

that

there ever has been, is or ever will be a " freedom of choice " ....too many

people want different things

Hiding under a rock now!!!

Carol

CrystalBuzz wrote:

> I agree with the reasons to wear seatbelts, but here in the us there is a

> thing called freedom of choice. If I'm not hurting anyone else thee

should

> not be a law saying I have to wear my seatbelt. I for one always wear my

> seatbelt. but not because there is a law that says I have to.

>

> Or die and leave your son fatherless. Please wear your seat belts. if not

> for yourself for your love ones.

> JD, who also had to stop driving because of NF2, in AZ

>

> On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:23:46 -0400 Carol Winarski

> writes:

> > What if you fly over and crush the person in the passenger seat?

> > could

> > happen.

> > Carol

> >

> > CrystalBuzz wrote:

> >

> > > Id her statement any worse than the state of Minnesota requiring

> > that

> > > a person wear seatbelts ?If I don't wear a seatbelt I'm hurting no

> > one

> > > but myself. I think that law is taking away me 1st amendment

> > right

> > > for personal freedom.

>

>