High court: Atlanta couple can sue over vaccination

[Guest guest]

F wrote: High court: Atlanta couple can sue over vaccination Marcelo and Carolyn Ferrari can take case to court over son's disabilities The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Monday, October 06, 2008 An Atlanta couple's lawsuit against vaccine manufacturers can go to trial on claims a childhood vaccine caused neurological damage to their young son, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled Monday. In a landmark decision, the state high court unanimously ruled that Marcelo and Carolyn Ferrari's lawsuit is not barred by the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act. The court upheld a prior decision by the Georgia Court of Appeals, which was the first appellate court in the nation to make

such a ruling. [ Post your comments below. ] When the Ferraris' 18-month-old son, Stefan, received his vaccines, he was a healthy verbal boy. Now 10, Stefan has not spoken since, according to court records. A year after Stefan received his vaccines, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that thimerosal, a preservative used for multi-dose vaccine vials, be removed from childhood vaccines. The Ferraris filed suit, contending that the manufacturers should have made vaccines without the preservative before Stefan was vaccinated. The companies argued that the 1986 vaccine act shields manufacturers from liability in civil lawsuits for

damages caused by vaccines given after Oct. 1, 1988. In Monday's ruling, written by Justice Carley, the state Supreme Court said the vaccine act "clearly does not preempt all design defect claims against vaccine manufacturers." Instead, it provides "that a vaccine manufacturer cannot be held liable for defective design if it is determined, on a case-by-case basis, that the injurious side effects of the particular vaccine were unavoidable," the ruling said. Related Subjects-- ô¿ô RICH FARRETTAAZ Real Estate Agent-Short sales specialistcell office

Fax: