Re: THE DANGEROUS IMPURITIES OF VACCINES

[Guest guest]

Yes it is all understandably very confusing with all the

conflicting info out there. Yes many of us accept the fact that autism

probably has genetic underpinnings, like most diseases by the way. But

for example your son has a deletion on Chromosome 16 and that has been

linked autism. What they did not tell you is that the reason they say

" linked " and not " caused " is that there are lots of people with the

same deletion who DO NOT have autism. That is why there are those of

us who believe that genetics are the nail and

environment/toxins/vaccines (may be different for each child) are the

hammer. Autism is the final product. You can have a hammer and a nail

and not have a building. They have to go together in just the right

fashion to make it happen. For example for other diseases we know

about genetic predisposition - breast cancer. But what makes some

people with the same genetic predisposition never develop the disease?

When these types of questions are answered then we will know what to

avoid if anything. For me, I choose to try to eliminate toxins from my

families' lives in the form of food, chemicals etc. and yes that does

include having caution in what is injected into their bodies. I am not

anti vaccine. But I am for informed CHOICE and for making vaccines

more safe in their makeup and schedule of delivery. It is not

medically necessary to inject a child with 4 or more viruses on the

same day. That is so that the " herd " can get immunized more

efficiently. And they are adding more and more vaccines all the time.

I just think it is time to take pause and take a look. Not all little

bodies are the same. Just my humble opinion.

>

> That was a very informative article. When I went to the National

Institute of Heath (NIH) in Mayland, they explained to me that by

chance the mutations my husband and I have is why my son Tyler has a

genetic condition. They also explained that his deletion of cromosone

16 (a piece is missing) has been linked to Autism. What am I suppose

to believe? I am NOT saying at all that vaccines have not AFFECTED

some of our kids. BUT there is so many articles and research out there.

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

>

> To: sList

> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 12:11:11 PM

> Subject: THE DANGEROUS IMPURITIES OF VACCINES

>

>

> http://www.sparks- of-light. org

>

> Scroll down to

> THE DANGEROUS IMPURITIES OF VACCINES.

>

> FROM CHAPTER 7 OF " FEAR OF THE INVISIBLE "

> by Janine , investigative journalist.

>

> They started with the Measles, Mumps and Rubella vaccine (MMR). One

of the first speakers on it was Dr Arifa Khan from the top American

government health and safety organization, the Food and Drugs Agency

(FDA), and what she had to report was very troubling.

>

> She commenced: 'Today I would like to present an update on the

reverse transcriptase [RT] activity that is present in chicken cell

derived vaccines.' My attention was immediately grabbed. I knew that

the mumps and measles components of the MMR vaccine are grown in

fertilised chicken eggs, as are also the Flu and Yellow Fever

vaccines.. The rubella virus for MMR is produced differently - in

artificially grown cells taken originally from an aborted human foetus.

>

> Dr, Khan explained she was reporting the result of a just concluded

and little-known two-year investigation into the safety of MMR headed

by the World Health Organisation. She explained that this study was

initiated in 1996 after the discovery in MMR of RT. an enzyme linked

to retroviruses as well as cells. In the back corridors of virology

this had immediately caused alarm as some retroviruses were thought to

cause cancers - as well as AIDS - for HIV is said to be a retrovirus.

WHO had then quietly organised MMR safety studies at various

laboratories to see 'whether this RT activity was associated with a

retroviral particle, and even more importantly, whether this

retrovirus particle could infect and replicate in human cells.'

>

> What they then discovered confirmed their worse fears. Dr Khan

continued: 'The RT activity is found to be associated with retroviral

particles of two distinct avian endogenous retroviral families

designated as EAV and ALV.' Now ALV stands for Avian Leukosis Virus.

It is associated with a cancer found in wild birds, so definitely was

not wanted in the vaccines. Khan added that they had found another

possible danger; 'There was a theoretical possibility that the virus

could . infect the [human] cell' thus integrating its genetic code

'into the human DNA' and cause cancer. The only reassurance she could

give was that her team had watched vaccine cultures for a full '48

hours', and, in that time period, no merger of viral and human DNA had

been observed. I thought this far too short a period to guarantee

safety - but read on.

>

> Dr Khan then warned; 'there is a possibility that there could also

be potentialpseudotype s (between) . the measles vaccine virus and the

retroviral sequences' - meaning there was a risk that bird viruses

might combine with the measles virus in the vaccine to create new

dangerous mutant viruses, They had not seen it happen, but it could

happen.

>

> She acknowledged much longer term studies were needed than 48 hours,

but acknowledged that such studies of measles vaccine cultures were

very difficult: 'because the measles vaccine virus itself lyses

[kills] the culture in about three to four days.' This had prevented

them from looking to see what might be the consequences from

longer-term contamination in the vaccinated.

>

> So far, she added, they had only managed to analyse a small part of

the retrovirus contamination in the vaccines. 'Our ongoing studies are

directed towards doing similar analysis' of other retroviral genetic

codes found in the vaccine preparations. ' It seemed they had found

only part of these virus's genetic codes. And she added that she had

learnt, 'about 20 years ago similar RT activity was reported' in the

vaccine. Apparently at that time nothing had been done about it, and

the public were not told. She concluded by explaining what the World

Health Organisation (WHO) had decided to do about this chicken

leucosis virus (ALV) contamination. It would take the risk of quietly

allowing MMR vaccine production to continue in retrovirus contaminated

eggs, because; 'You cannot get ALV free flocks in places where you are

making yellow fever vaccine.'

>

> Dr , head of the DNA Virus Laboratory in the Division of

Viral Products, then warned. 'All the egg-based vaccines are

contaminated' including 'influenza, yellow fever and smallpox

vaccines, as well as the vaccine for horses against encephalomyelitis

virus' for 'these fertilised chicken eggs were susceptible to a wide

variety of viruses.' .....

>

> The latest information I could find about the retroviral

contamination of the MMR vaccine is in a 2001 scientific paper. This

reported some 100 MMR recipients were tested to see if they possessed

antibodies against two types of retroviruses identified by Dr Khan and

others. When the selected antibody was not found, this interpreted as

meaning that these children had not been infected. But the authors

went on to say: 'The finding of RT activity in all measles vaccine

lots from different manufacturers tested suggests that this occurrence

is not sporadic and that vaccine recipients may be universally exposed

to these [chicken] retroviral particles'. (4,5,7,14). They then

concluded: 'Despite these reassuring data, the presence of avian

retroviral particles in chick embryo fibroblast-derived vaccines [like

MMR] raises questions about the suitability of primary chicken cell

substrates for vaccine production.' They thus recommended considering

stopping

> production in fertilized eggs, and growing the vaccine viruses

instead on 'RT-negative cells from different species, such as on

immortalized [cancerous] or diploid [laboratory grown] mammalian

cells.' .....

>

> All the largest public health institutions in the Western World were

at this workshop, including the World Health Organisation whose

representative co-chaired it. The UK government's vaccine safety

organisations had a top-level representative in Dr Philip Minor. No

press apparently were present - but the importance of the meeting

meant that it was taped to ensure an accurate record.

>

> Dr Bill Egan, the Acting Director of the Office of Vaccines at the

Center for Biologics opened the meeting thus.'I think we need to

remind ourselves that viruses can propagate only in live cells, and

this of course holds true for whole viral vaccines. They can only be

produced in cells [substrates] . We have only to think back to the

finding of SV40 in poliovirus vaccines to realize the extent of the

risk that any cell substrate may pose, and there is still great need

for concern. we have been given the task of identifying these concerns.'

> The scientists present then told of viral and DNA genetic code

fragments, as well as proteins,that contaminate the vaccines. They

mentioned particularly their worry that among these might be dangerous

prions or oncogenes.

>

> Other vaccines had been found contaminated with monkey viruses. Dr

of the FDA reported: 'humans were immunized with

adenovirus vaccines that contained adenovirus-SV40 hybrid viruses.' In

other words, a brand-new monkey-human mutant virus had been created in

the vaccine. Dr. Ben Berkhout exclaimed at hearing this: 'That's the

one I would like to focus on today, Is [there a danger of] the

potential reversion of an attenuated vaccine strain to a virus variant

that can replicate fast and can potentially cause AIDS?'

>

> This was a startling question. Could the viruses in our most common

childhood vaccines be so affected by contaminating DNA that the

vaccines would give our children AIDS? Were such mutation events rare?

Apparently they were not. Another doctor stated. 'Recombination among

a variety of viruses and cells co-infected in tissue culture is not

uncommon. This is an issue that certainly will need further

consideration. ' In other words, vaccine incubators cause virus

mutation. The next speaker dealt with the 'foreign cellular DNA' they

had found to contaminate our childhood vaccines. Dr of

the CDER and FDA worried that this might well include 'viral

oncogenes' - in other words, it might cause cancer.

>

> but none of this was to be made public, and until now it has

remained secret...!

>

> some references.. ..

>

> VIC (Vaccine Injury Coalition)

> Autism is 1 in 67 children today and it's impossible to have a

genetic epidemic!

> Please learn from our mistake and educate BEFORE you vaccinate!

> For more information visit www.vacinfo. org or call

>