Guest guest Posted January 5, 2010 Report Share Posted January 5, 2010 There seems to be a lack of clarity in my original post which I regret. I was not suggesting that young men were never diagnosed with an aggressive form of the disease. I know only too well that they are - and that those young men who are unfortunate enough to have this type of diagnosis die far too soon. The point I was trying to develop was that many young men were NOT diagnosed with aggressive forms of the disease and that, compared to older men, there was a significantly lower number of younger men with aggressive disease. A poster on one site suggested that a study published in July of this year might be useful. The study was Cancer. 2009 Jul 1;115(13):2863-71. Treatment and survival outcomes in young men diagnosed with prostate cancer: a Population-based Cohort Study. PMID: 19466697 There are two relevant points in the Abstract for this study (I have not had an opportunity of reading the entire document): 1. Younger men were less likely to be diagnosed with high-grade cancer, and, as a group, to have better overall and equivalent cancer-specific survival at 10 years compared with older men. The diagnostic point is what the data from my site seems to demonstrate. The site has not been running long enough to demonstrate any survival rates. 2. Among men with high grade and locally advanced prostate cancer, the youngest men had a particularly poor prognosis compared with older men. This seems in line with the Albersen paper - Competing risk analysis of men aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis managed conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998 Sep 16;280(11):975-80 -which also found that young men with low grade disease had a better survival rate than older men with the same grade, but that the position was reversed when the disease was high grade. In those cases the young men had a poorer outcome. I hope this helps to make clear my intention in my original post. But I also think it is important to get the values of these percentages into focus. According to the latest figures I could find for the US (for 2005) 28,905 men died of PCa. That is an awful number to contemplate, but the total number of male deaths from all causes was said to be 1,207,675. This means that the percentage of men who died from PCa was about 2.4% of the total number of male deaths - or put another way 97.6% of the men who died, died from something other than PCa. When we look at a breakdown of those PCa deaths we see this from the SEER statistics from 2002 - 2006: 1. The median age at death for cancer of the prostate was 80 years of age - so half the men who died were over the age of 80 2. Statistically, there were no PCa deaths of men under the age of 35 3. 0.1% of the deaths - about 29 - occurred in men aged between 35 and 44; 4. 1.4% of the deaths - about 405 - occurred in men aged between 45 and 54; 5. 7.2% of the deaths - about 2,081 - occurred in men aged between 55 and 64; 6. 20.1% of the deaths - about 5,810 - occurred in men aged between 65 and 74; 7. 40.9% of the deaths - about 11,822 - occurred in men aged between 75 and 84; and 8. 30.3% of the deaths - about 8,758 - occurred in men aged 85+ years of age. About 9.3% ( or 17,288 men) out of the 185,895 men diagnosed with PCa were under the age of 55: about 1.5% ( or 434 men) out of the of the 28,905 who died of PCa were under the age of 55. About 26.1% ( or 48,518 men) out of the 185,895 men diagnosed with PCa were over the age of 75: about 71.2% ( or 20,580 men) out of the of the 28,905 who died of PCa were over the age of 75. I'm no statistician, but it seems to me that older men have more aggressive versions of the disease. All the best Terry Herbert I have no medical qualifications but I was diagnosed in '96: and have learned a bit since then. My sites are at www.yananow.net and www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za Dr " Snuffy " Myers : " As a physician, I am painfully aware that most of the decisions we make with regard to prostate cancer are made with inadequate data " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.