NewNutrition Study

[Guest guest]

There is someone posting a link to this study all

over the Internet. He may get here one of these days. The link is to NUTRITION

2000 at http://www.nutrition2000.com/Press_Releases/NUTRITION%202000%20MAJOR%20PROSTATE%20CANCER%20PROTOCOL%20STUDY.asp

It is one of the weirdest claims I’ve ever seen

made in amongst very many weird claims, but I think the clue in the massive drop

in PSA claimed is in the detail <snip>What

were the side effects of the protocol? The only negative side

effects were some breast tenderness and a diminished libido. <snip> That

rings warning bells amongst many ‘old timers’ who remember the

claims made for PC-Spes and Prostasol all based around diethylstilboestrol

(DES)

DES was an excellent way of reducing PSA and, indeed

of managing PCa (and is still used in Britain

and in a very few instances in the US) but a serious side effect is

that it can cause thrombosis, according to all the studies. To possibly take an

unknown quantity of DES in NUTRITION 2000, without medical supervision might be

very dangerous.

All the best

Terry Herbert

I have no medical qualifications but I was diagnosed

in ‘96: and have learned a bit since then.

My sites are at www.yananow.net and www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za

Dr

“Snuffy” Myers : " As a

physician, I am painfully aware that most of the decisions we make with regard

to prostate cancer are made with inadequate data "