Guest guest Posted June 28, 2010 Report Share Posted June 28, 2010 There was some correspondence recently regarding mortality rates. This site http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/prostate/mortality/ gives a good view of the position in the UK (with some reference to the position in US). I have not found a similar site for the US figures, although there are many statistics on the SEER site http://seer.cancer.gov/ and this publication by American Cancer Society http://caonline.amcancersoc.org/cgi/content/full/59/4/225 also gives some interesting information. The data in both sites can, with a bit of work, be extrapolated to show a comparative sets to the UK page. I have not done so for some years because generally speaking there is a collective yawn when statistics are mentioned, not to mention someone coming up with the old saws such as ‘There are lies, damned lies and statistics’ You will see from the UK site (the first one above) that between 1971 and 1978 the mortality rate was fairly stable and about 19/20 deaths per 100,000 men. Once PSA testing was introduced, the rates climbed quite dramatically, peaking in 1992 at 30 deaths per 100,000 men – an apparent increase of 50% which is a massive increase in population terms. After that the mortality rate started dropping again (as did the incidence rate) and in the last year reported (2008) the rate was 24 deaths per 100,000, still 20% higher than the rate prior to PSA testing. You will find that claims of a drop in mortality rates are, generally speaking, based on the reduction from the peak figure and ignore the historical figures. Figures from the US and Australia show similar profiles – an increase in mortality rates following the intrroduciton of PSA testing followed by a fall in rates to similar levels that existed prior to the test being introduced. Although many people get quite hot under the collar about the mortality rates (especially in the context of PSA Screening) I believe the final paragraph of the UK site sums up the position quite well: <snip> As yet it is not possible to say what proportion of the fall in prostate cancer mortality is the result of improvements in treatment, changes in cancer registration coding, the attribution of death to prostate cancer, and the effects of PSA testing. Only the ongoing randomised controlled trials can provide definitive answers about the efficacy of screening. <snip> ….and we know what happened when the results of the first two randomised studies were published!! All the best Prostate men need enlightening, not frightening Terry Herbert - diagnosed in 1996 and still going strong Read A Strange Place for unbiased information at http://www.yananow.net/StrangePlace/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.