Guest guest Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 Is it just me or does anyone else see a few issues with this story? http://billingsgazette.com/news/local/article_9684d3a1-573a-575d-94cb-fd36f1e427f8.html 1) " Billings Clinic is contractually bound to keep the name of the drug and its manufacturer confidential. The sponsor of the clinical trial cannot release information about the drug until it is FDA-approved. " > I've never heard of this clause with any clinical trial? 2) " ...his PSA is 1.6. His cancer has been " undetectable " since April 2010. " Do any experts consider 1.6 as undetectable, particularly in a case with recurrence after RP, radiation and ADT? -- Emersonwww.flhw.orgEvery 2.25 minutes a man is diagnosed with prostate cancer. Every 16.5 minutes a man dies from the disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2011 Report Share Posted February 7, 2011 Emerson wrote: > Is it just me or does anyone else see a few issues with this > story? > >http://billingsgazette.com/news/local/article_9684d3a1-573a-575d-94cb-fd36f1e42\ 7f8.html >l > 1) " Billings Clinic is contractually bound to keep the name of > the drug and its manufacturer confidential. The sponsor of the > clinical trial cannot release information about the drug until > it is FDA-approved. " > > I've never heard of this clause with any clinical trial? > > 2) " ...his PSA is 1.6. His cancer has been " undetectable " since > April 2010. " Do any experts consider 1.6 as undetectable, > particularly in a case with recurrence after RP, radiation and > ADT? As far as I know, your comments are right on. I can think of lots of explanations for the story, all of them beginning with an incompetent reporter who did not get the facts right. Starting at the beginning: The treatment may not have been a registered clinical trial, but the patient may have believed it was. In that case either the patient misunderstands what a clinical trial is (not entirely uncommon), or the doctor treating him has misled him (less common I hope but not impossible.) And going all the way to the end: The patient is a little crazy and the story is mainly in his mind and the mind of the reporter. Or it could have been anywhere in between. There are doctors out there treating people with God knows what and implying that this is part of a clinical trial. I'm curious. I'll send an email to the reporter and let everyone know what I find out. Alan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.