Guest guest Posted December 27, 2010 Report Share Posted December 27, 2010 PCS & All, I think the information put out by this " Prostate Cancer Information Link " is in danger of being classified as 'junk science'. Whoever owns the site should really clean up their act so the useful material is not tainted with the same stigma as the rubbish. I refer to this, for example which suggests a medical observer from the 1930's is saying that " cancer is normal " :- http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/risk-prevention/cancer-is-normal/ Which is actually a misrepresentation of what the author was trying to say about latent occult PC - NOT the deadly malignant variety that characterises a significant proportion of the prostate cancers diagnosed in the 21st century :- " .. the writer has been impressed by the frequency of the small carcinomas that have been found in the prostate in the routine autopsy material of this department. " Rich AR. Classics in oncology. On the frequency of occurrence of occult carcinoma of the prostate: Arnold Rice Rich, M.D., Journal of Urology 33:3, 1935. CA Cancer J Clin. 1979 Mar-Apr;29(2):115-9. PubMed PMID: 108001. If you go back to the archetypal medical observer - Grey from the 1850's - you will find no occurrences of prostate cancer in the general population. Grey's Anatomy of 1850 devotes some time to describing the pathologies the prostate is likely to encounter, but nowhere does it suggest prostatic malignancy is a common feature of prostate disease. But we need not stop there. If prostatic malignancy existed in any human population from Ancient Eqypt to China*, the tell-tale evidence of raised PSA would be found in tissue samples from the grave. Moreover, evidence of changes in androgen receptor cell expression, and other DNA properties, characteristic of advanced prostate cancer would also be easily detected IF they existed. That this evidence has not been found indicates clearly prostate cancer is a new disease - a disease of modern civilisation. * Readers may be surprised to learn that in many ancient civilisations it was not uncommon to live into the fourth score year. The " Ebers Papyrus " for example relates the lives of men and women in their 80's some 3500 years ago in Egypt. To suggest as some do that PC is the price we pay for a longer life in our modern civilisation is not a valid argument. Other civilisations had octogenarians without the curse of this disease to contend with. The bottom line is this: If we are ever going to find a cure for prostate cancer, then we need to recognise it as abnormal. For as long as we regard prostate cancer as normal, we will tolerate it, palliate it, but there will be no attempt to come to grips with its real cause, and hence a cure will elude us. The so-called " Prostate Cancer Information Link " does us a great disservice. -- Sam. For your delectation and edification:- http://poetryfromtheprostrateyears.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.