Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Five points was ...... Swedish Study

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Bob,

Just some comments on your conclusions and

questions:

1. Some prostate cancers

are more dangerous than others.

You are absolutely

correct. This has been known for many years and led leading prostate cancer expert

Dr Willet Whitmore to say “ " When the results are good, we tend to say, 'That's a good

treatment.' When treatment fails, we shake our head and say, 'That's a bad

cancer.' A recent study suggested

that 24 variants and that most men diagnosed these days were likely to have one

of the indolent forms – see http://www.yananow.org/24Variants.pdf

2. There is currently no

way of telling which they are.

This is not absolutely

correct. There is no way of telling with absolute certainty which variant

has been acquired. That is true. But there are certainly some very good

pointers, even within the poor diagnostic tools we have at present. A rapidly

and consistently climbing PSA, a positive DRE (Digital Rectal Examination), multiple

and high percentage positive material in biopsy needles, positive

identification of a large tumour in scans, a high Gleason Score - 8, 9 or 10 all

point to the dangerously aggressive variant. But there are no guarantees. But

then it would surely be foolish to think that prostate cancer was the one

aspect of life and living where there is absolutely certainty. The people in Japan, Australia,

Brazil, Sri Lanka whose

lives have been taken or upturned by recent catastrophic events were unlikely

to have been less than certain about their lives continuing unchanged in the

minutes prior. Given the fact that more men die in auto accidents than from prostate

cancer, how many consider the certainty of arriving at their destination when

starting the engine of their car?

3. Any treatment seems

to make little difference to the eventual outcome.

This is the point that

has been argued for some years now. To quote Dr Whitmore again ““Is cure necessary in those in whom it may

be possible, and is cure possible in those in whom it is

necessary?”” There are very few long term studies, but the

ones that are available do show a marginal advantage in some men who were given

conventional therapy over those who did not. Soon after I was diagnosed in 1996

I read an interesting presentation by Dr Logothetis – it is

at http://www.prostatepointers.org/prostate/talks/logo/logo2.html

- where he first confirmed my view that prostatectomy might not be the only

answer to the question “What should I do?”

However, here are some further thoughts/questions:

1. Is this also true of

breast cancer? It is very similar in many ways – slow growing (usually),

hormone sensitive, some cancers much more aggressive than others, produces

micro-metasteses which can remain undetectable for long periods. I have certainly

seen articles recently which suggest that doctors think that some breast

cancers are not serious enough to be worth treating and that women under 50

should not be screened.

Normally I do not get involved

in any discussions on breast cancer since BCa activists tend to be VERY feisty and

aggressive if a mere man steps on their turf, From my (male) point of view, the

situation with PCa is analogous to that for PCa – overdiagnosis and

overtreatment being the issues. Some doctors, bolder than the rest have

published papers demonstrating that this may be so.

2. What does the

statement ‘to prevent one death from cancer’ mean? Most treatments

for advanced PC aim to prolong life by slowing down the development of the

tumours. There seem s to be good evidence that this is achieved in many cases

though not all. No-one pretends to have a cure.

There are two issues

here: treating advanced PCa

and ‘curing’

all PCa. There is agreement that advanced PCa cannot be cured. This statement,

like many others, may not be entirely correct and would have to depend on

definitions of ‘advanced’ and ‘cure’. Does a man

diagnosed with a Gleason 10 T3 disease conform with the definition of advanced

disease? If that man, twenty years later has no indication of the disease being

present, does that mean he is cured or in remission? (See http://www.yananow.net/Mentors/DougA.htm

story)There is some evidence that advanced disease can indeed be managed better

than it was in the past, resulting in some men with that diagnosis living

longer than they might have done in the past.

Although you say <snip>

No-one pretends to have a cure.<snip>

That is precisely what is claimed by so much of the publicity surrounding the

creation of awareness for the disease – that it is ‘curable’

if diagnosed and treated early. It is that very fact that has led to what one

US journal to suggest that more than one million men have been treated with no

benefit http://www.yananow.org/Overdiagnosis.pdf

Is a young man diagnosed with what might be termed and ‘insignificant’

tumour – PSA under 10, GS 6, less than three positive needles – ‘cured’

because he has no detectable PSA five years after his surgery?

The studies that attempt to

calculate how many deaths are saved per men treated are based on theoretical

mortality rates that may or may not be correct. These are then applied to data

that may or may not match the original data. The European study which concluded

that there might be some small value in screening and early treatment was in

fact a collection of data from a number of countries which had to be ‘reverse

engineered’ so to speak – data was adjusted to conform to a revised

‘standard’ for the purposes of the study. The US study, published

at the same time, and which concluded that there was no ‘saving of life’

in screening did not suffer from quite the same issues but was rejected –

possibly because it did not conform to the ‘scientific belief’ upon

which the multi-billion prostate cancer industry is based.

All the best

Prostate men need enlightening, not

frightening

Terry Herbert - diagnosed in 1996 and

still going strong

Read A Strange Place for unbiased information at http://www.yananow.org/StrangePlace/index.html

From: ProstateCancerSupport [mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of Bob Bishop

Sent: Sunday, 3 April 2011 7:09 PM

To: ProstateCancerSupport

Subject:

Re: Swedish Study

Hi again

I was interested

to see other people’s reactions before I make my own comments. I have now

read reams and reams of stuff about PCa and all I can conclude at the end of it

is:

1. Some prostate cancers

are more dangerous than others.

2. There is currently no

way of telling which they are.

3. Any treatment seems

to make little difference to the eventual outcome.

However, here are some further thoughts/questions:

1. Is this also true of

breast cancer? It is very similar in many ways – slow growing (usually),

hormone sensitive, some cancers much more aggressive than others, produces

micro-metasteses which can remain undetectable for long periods. I have certainly

seen articles recently which suggest that doctors think that some breast

cancers are not serious enough to be worth treating and that women under 50

should not be screened.

2. What does the

statement ‘to prevent one death from cancer’ mean? Most treatments

for advanced PC aim to prolong life by slowing down the development of the

tumours. There seem s to be good evidence that this is achieved in many cases

though not all. No-one pretends to have a cure.

3. In my own case (which

proves absolutely nothing) I have had RRP and EBRT, neither of which reduced my

PSA below 2, in spite of the fact that the operation revealed no evidence of

cancer in either seminal vesicles or lymph nodes and my bone scan was clear

– Original PSA 7.2, Gleason 4+3, T3aN0M0. Since the end of

radiotherapy my PSA has risen to 10.3 with a current doubling time of about 3

months. I am now on 50mg bicalutamide and start Zoladex on Friday. Obviously

I’m hoping for the best but even if my PSA goes undetectable, I’m

not sure what that proves. The general conclusion is that my cancer has

metastasised but, other than the PSA level, there is no other evidence of this.

I get lower back pain and the odd pain in my lower abdomen but then I always

did. My doctor says I should stop

worrying but the potential effects of hormone treatment are pretty frightening.

Keep smiling

– I am.

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...