Guest guest Posted May 24, 2012 Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 My original biopsy showed one core positive with a Gleason of 4+3 = 7. It was done at the local hospital by their pathologist. Had the samples sent to Dr Epstein at Hopkins. My friend's brother who is a pathologist, says Dr. Epstein is the best in the country. His report reduced the score to a Gleason 3+3. As most of you know, a Gleason 3+3 is a lot better than a Gleason of 4+3. Don't know what to do about treatment. For a 4+3 surgery seemed the best option. Now I don't know. Charlie D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2012 Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 Charlie, you did the right thing in getting a second opinion. I wish more people did that. So few realize that Gleason Grades are subjective estimates and should be done by the most expert pathologist available. Dr Epstein is indeed recognized as one of those – see http://www.yananow.org/pathlabs.htm Depending on the other details of your diagnosis you may well be a suitable candidate for AS (Active Surveillance) as Chuck Maack sugeste. If you are interested in how other men have pursued this course, you might like to read the accounts of the 50+ men who contributed their stories to my website – go to http://www.yananow.org/query_stories.php and choose Non-Invasive All the best Prostate men need enlightening, not frightening Terry Herbert - diagnosed in 1996 and still going strong Read A Strange Place for unbiased information at http://www.yananow.org/StrangePlace/index.html From: ProstateCancerSupport [mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of Charlie De Sent: Friday, 25 May 2012 3:15 AM To: ProstateCancerSupport Subject: Importance of a Second Opinion My original biopsy showed one core positive with a Gleason of 4+3 = 7. It was done at the local hospital by their pathologist. Had the samples sent to Dr Epstein at Hopkins. My friend's brother who is a pathologist, says Dr. Epstein is the best in the country. His report reduced the score to a Gleason 3+3. As most of you know, a Gleason 3+3 is a lot better than a Gleason of 4+3. Don't know what to do about treatment. For a 4+3 surgery seemed the best option. Now I don't know. Charlie D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.