Guest guest Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 Mike, I have no medical training and even if I did, I have no data about you, your health, your diagnosis. So all I can do is ask you a few questions – and maybe the answers to those questions will get you to establish if a saturation biopsy would serve a valuable purpose. Am I correct in understanding that you were diagnosed in 2004 because one core of a multiple needle biopsy was said to have less than 5% of material identified as prostate cancer? you did not get a second opinion on the biopsy result from an expert pathologist? you have had four biopsy procedures since then and none has produce any positive material? Assuming that there were twelve needles in each procedure that is 48 negative results; 24 if six needles were used in each procedure there has been no significant continuous increase in your PSA levels and that you have not developed any symptoms? Why do you think that you need another biopsy, whether it is a normal biopsy or a saturation biopsy? What would you do if you had an outcome from your next biopsy which does not differ from the first biopsy you had 8 years ago? Do you think, at the very least, there is ample evidence that, if you still have prostate cancer that it is an indolent tumour rather than an aggressive one? You may not be aware that between 25% and 33% of men enrolled in AS (Active Surveillance) studies do not have another positive biopsy. While it cannot be said definitively that they no longer have prostate cancer because of the nature of the hit and miss approach of the standard biopsy procedure, one can consider that the disease may have regressed spontaneously, as all tumors do. I asked two of the doctors running AS studies if they thought this was a possibility. Both said that it might be the case. Hope this helps you focus on what will be best for you. All the best Prostate men need enlightening, not frightening Terry Herbert - diagnosed in 1996 and still going strong Read A Strange Place for unbiased information at http://www.yananow.org/StrangePlace/index.html From: Mike Sent: Monday, 25 June 2012 3:25 PM To: Terry Herbert; ProstateCancerSupport ; newdx@...; 'ww' Subject: Re: [WW] YANA WEBSITE Terry a quote from your web site. In some cases a 'saturation' biopsy is used which involves 50 or more needles. You should ensure that a saturation biopsy is essential and will serve a valuable purpose before agreeing to this. Why do you say this as I am going on my 5th biopsy and I am getting sick of them even though they are painless as you are knocked out. I am considering the next biopsy will be my last as enough is enough so I was thinking of the saturation biopsy. The first biopsy 8 yrs ago showed one core of < 5% GS 6 with the subsequent ones showing nothing. My PSA is anywhere between 4.5 and 8 for reasons unknown. I'm currently 66Yrs Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.