Guest guest Posted May 15, 2012 Report Share Posted May 15, 2012 Chuck, It doesn't. Reduced prostate volume on its own might favor the detection of more cancer, both low and high grade (less area to sample). For some unexplained reason. 5-ARIs seem to result in less overall cancer, but more high grade cancer. This has been shown in several studies. More high grade is the reason the FDA gave for rejecting the use of 5-ARIs for chemoprevention. Doug My journey (nightmare) with PC continues. I have an appointment to talk with the doctor next week about treatment for my PC. I had one positive sample and 11 negative from the biopsy. Gleason score of 7. I am guessing the doctor is going to recommmend removing the prostate. PSA was 4 and DRE is normal. I took propecia (finasteride) for 10 years for my hair loss. From the National Institute of Health: The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) demonstrated a 24.8% reduction in the 7-year prevalence of prostate cancer among patients treated with finasteride (5 mg daily) compared with that among patients treated with placebo; however, a 25.5% increase in the prevalence of high-Gleason grade tumors was observed, the clinical significance of which is unknown. One hypothesized explanation for this increase is thatfinasteride reduced prostate volume, leading to detection of more high-grade tumors due to increased sampling density. This possibility was investigated in an observational reanalysis of the PCPT data, with adjustment for sampling density. Median prostate volume was 25% lower in the finasteride group (median = 25.1 cm3) than in the placebo group (median = 33.5 cm3). Later studies showed finasteride does not cause increases in high grade PC and actually reduces the risk of developing PC!!! The orginal studies that showed more high grade PC was caused by the reduced size of the prostate in mem taking finasteride. I called the doctors office and ask for a copy of the pathology report. I will read it and try to make some sense of it. I am worried the use of finasteride has changed my Gleason score and made it higher. I sent a letter to the doctor requesting the samples be sent to a Dr Epstein at Hopkins for a second opinion. My question is: Why does the reduced volume of my prostate make my Gleason score higher? Thanks to anyone who can help. Chuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 Chuck, A friend of mine had a situation almost identical to yours. He was operated on by Pete Carrol at UCSF, and 3 moths after surgery he has undetectable PSA and almost no side effects. They do a Color Doppler prior to surgery, which helps them know what they are dealing with pre-surgery. Doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.