Guest guest Posted April 17, 2012 Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 Not much of interest to report. I had another PSA test in February and that came in at 5.8 – a little lower than January’s 6.4 ng/ml but still within the range of the previous test. But a blip down is always better than a blip up! I’m seeing the oncologist next week for our three monthly review meeting so I had another PSA test on Monday and that’s come in at 5.9 ng/ml, so it seems that there is some stability since the last test in February came in at 5.8 – a little lower than January’s 6.4 ng/ml but still within the range of the previous test.. Just in passing, after I entered the new number in my records I noticed, somewhat ironically, that if I take all the PSA tests I have had in the past sixteen years, the average is………5.9 ng/ml. If nothing else that demonstrates some of the issues in using averages and medians to make decisions or interpret studies. What is more important is the range of PSA results – and what changed them. The range is wide – starting in August 1996 at a level of 7.2 ng/ml it went as high as 42.0 ng/ml in June 2007 but was as low as 0.17 ng/ml in August 2008. I have had a deal of problem over the last two weeks with my teeth and one, surplus to requirements, had to be removed. Since I am on Warfarin that is always an issue. With an Australian study showing that the risk of stopping Warfarin is greater than the risk of tooth removal whilst on Warfarin, I opted to stay on the drug as I have in the past, with good results. Not so this time. For the first 24 hours the site bled profusely (I wondered just how much blood I might have lost, thinking of a dripping tap and a basin with a plug in it!). I had a couple of stitches in it yesterday and am rinsing with a (very expensive) mouthwash which seems to be doing the trick so hopefully I won’t slowly bleed to death. BUT….one good thing that came out of this was that the mouthwash had to be made by a compounding chemist and he has agreed to knock up a batch of DES (diethylstilboestrol) for me if and when I need that – and if and when I can persuade my oncologist that it’s a good idea. Anyone interested in my story and why I made the choice I did can read it all at http://www.yananow.org/display_story.php?id=984 and http://www.yananow.org/whynotsurgery.htm All the best Prostate men need enlightening, not frightening Terry Herbert - diagnosed in 1996 and still going strong Read A Strange Place for unbiased information at http://www.yananow.org/StrangePlace/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.