Guest guest Posted July 1, 2002 Report Share Posted July 1, 2002 At 03:08 AM 7/1/2002 +0000, you wrote: >I just came across a web site for South Mountain Orthopedic in New >Jersey that says they have been performing resurfacing for the last >10 years. Anyone out there have any info on these guys? Yikes!!! I'm nearly certain this device is similar to the BioPro Tara device that IS FDA approved. Two things noted in the article-acetabular component with a plastic liner, and the life expectancy of 5-10 years! The type of device described in the article is the reason so many OS's call resurfacing a failure. The large ball size coupled with the plastic liner leads to lots of poly debris and the osteolytic reaction which causes the short life expectancy of those type of devices. A reminder note to all the newbies-the folks on this site are almost certainly getting/living with one of the three newer generation metal on metal devices (Conserve Plus, Corin 2000 and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing). There are others out there that are FDA approved.....doesn't mean I'd get one.... (no poly in MY body) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2002 Report Share Posted July 1, 2002 At 03:08 AM 7/1/2002 +0000, you wrote: >I just came across a web site for South Mountain Orthopedic in New >Jersey that says they have been performing resurfacing for the last >10 years. I went back and read more of the site-FAQ's are somewhat interesting. They claim life expectancy of their device from 5-20 years and the same restrictions as with a THR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2002 Report Share Posted July 1, 2002 > > > I went back and read more of the site-FAQ's are somewhat interesting. They > claim life expectancy of their device from 5-20 years and the same > restrictions as with a THR. > > , The first page of their blurb that said " metal on plastic articulation " , made my skin crawl! Also they claim 5-10 years longevity there. That is in keeping with gross failures that we've heard about. Can you imagine the osteolysis that huge liner could cause???? YUK and lots of pain down the road for anyone who gets it. Trudy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2002 Report Share Posted July 1, 2002 Some info on the Buechel-Pappas Resurfacing Device & South Mountain Orthopedic that I picked up in my research on resurfacing. Please note - THIS IS NOT AN ENDORSEMENT. The Buechel-Pappas Integrated Total Hip Replacement device is manufactured by Endotec. <http://www.endotec.com/pdf_files/res%20thr%20sp%20-%20144.pdf> The device has a ceramic-coated femoral component and a titanium acetabular component with a polyethylene bearing insert. It is the only resurfacing methodology listed as currently approved by the FDA. (From Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Tech Note 33) - <http://www.ahfmr.ab.ca/hta/hta-publications/technotes/TN33.pdf> The polyethylene in the acetabular component a ram extrusion-type non- crosslinked poly (from Orthopedics Today (Guide to Polyethelene in Joint Implants)- <http://www.slackinc.com/bone/ortoday/199910/chart.pdf> Dr. Buechel, & J. Pappas, Ph.D., (professor of mechanical engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology) developed the Buechel-Pappas Total Hip System. Dr. Frederick F. Buechel, M.D. is the senior orthopedic surgeon at South Mountain Orthopedic. Bottom line - it's a plastic bearing. Good information is power & enables informed decisions. Carl > I just came across a web site for South Mountain Orthopedic in New > Jersey that says they have been performing resurfacing for the last > 10 years. Anyone out there have any info on these guys? The web site > is www.njortho.com/starledger3.html > > Thanks All!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2002 Report Share Posted July 2, 2002 > Some info on the Buechel-Pappas Resurfacing Device & South Mountain > > The device has a ceramic-coated femoral component and a titanium > acetabular component with a polyethylene bearing insert. It is the > only resurfacing methodology listed as currently approved by the > FDA. > > Bottom line - it's a plastic bearing. > > Good information is power & enables informed decisions. Carl, Thanks for giving the links to more information. I still have questions but it doesn't sound quite as evil as I first thought. I still say their web site is too vague and confusing. Why do they say it's a metal/poly articulation? Trudy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2002 Report Share Posted July 2, 2002 You're not going to believe this but I totally agree with you on this matter. Best Wishes Rog Re: Buechel-Pappas Resurfacing Device At 03:08 AM 7/1/2002 +0000, you wrote: >I just came across a web site for South Mountain Orthopedic in New >Jersey that says they have been performing resurfacing for the last >10 years. Anyone out there have any info on these guys? Yikes!!! I'm nearly certain this device is similar to the BioPro Tara device that IS FDA approved. Two things noted in the article-acetabular component with a plastic liner, and the life expectancy of 5-10 years! The type of device described in the article is the reason so many OS's call resurfacing a failure. The large ball size coupled with the plastic liner leads to lots of poly debris and the osteolytic reaction which causes the short life expectancy of those type of devices. A reminder note to all the newbies-the folks on this site are almost certainly getting/living with one of the three newer generation metal on metal devices (Conserve Plus, Corin 2000 and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing). There are others out there that are FDA approved.....doesn't mean I'd get one.... (no poly in MY body) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2002 Report Share Posted July 2, 2002 Trudy, You're welcome. I don't know why the news article says metal/poly articulation - could be the reporter got it wrong. The poly insert IS a concern. The only advantage I can see with this system is that it might " buy time " and allow a patient to postpone a THR (and subsequent revisions) for 5 to 10 years. However, there are a lot surfers and surfer wannabes on this list who are counting on their BHR/C+/C2000's to last a lot longer than that. Carl > Carl, > Thanks for giving the links to more information. I still have > questions but it doesn't sound quite as evil as I first thought. I > still say their web site is too vague and confusing. Why do they say > it's a metal/poly articulation? > Trudy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2002 Report Share Posted July 2, 2002 Hi, I recently saw a plastic lined knee joint that had had to be removed because of hassles with the situation. It looked like the mice had been at the plastic bit. All these joints take huge pressures which is why I feel glad that my Resurface will be metal on metal. Edith > The first page of their blurb that said " metal on plastic > articulation " , made my skin crawl! Also they claim 5-10 years > longevity there. That is in keeping with gross failures that we've > heard about. Can you imagine the osteolysis that huge liner could > cause???? > YUK and lots of pain down the road for anyone who gets it. > Trudy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.