Guest guest Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 I got my latest PSA result on Friday, 14 years to the day from the date of my biopsy. Ten weeks after starting my next round of ADT (one shot of Zoladex) my PSA shows a satisfactory drop from 8.2 to 2.3 and I’m hoping that when I get the next shot next week, the third shot may be unnecessary. No new side effects yet, so I’ll hold thumbs on that. I’m not a great one for retrospective second guessing, so on anniversaries like this I never start on the “what if’s” , but I do look back on what has happened over the years and wonder how many of the things we (my good lady and I) have done in these past 14 years we would actually have go around to doing without the impetus of a life-threatening disease. Would we still be saying “We MUST…..……one of these days.” Certainly the dire forecasts of my early demise helped us focus on what was important now – as a good friend said “This is not a rehearsal.” , and so we have been to places we had wanted to see and travelled far and wide. We’ve had some great experiences and have met people we would otherwise never have got to know. I know that the newly diagnosed man – and his loved ones – may find it difficult to see any good in his diagnosis, but I am here to say that for most of us, it ends up as a positive experience simply because we can establish more clearly the value of being alive. The other aspect of our shared disease that I contemplated was how little things have really changed in the past 14 years. Of course there have been what appear to be significant improvements in the two mainstay therapies – surgery and radiation, with new, and very expensive machinery being designed and brought into use. But ……there are still no studies that demonstrate that using a robot assisted surgical procedure is in fact a better way to go than the old manual open surgery; that the high doses of radiation delivered more accurately and more quickly will in the long run have a better outcome than the old, smaller fractionated dose protocols; that proton beam radiation is better or worse or the same as photon beam radiation – in fact in some quarters this is regarded as an experimental therapy despite the fact that it has been used on prostate cancer men for more than fifteen years. Is Brachytherapy a better choice than EBRT (External Beam Radiation Treatment) – we don’t know because there are no studies. Why are Cryotherapy and HIFU (High Intensity Focused Ultrasound) labelled as experimental still? Both were used fourteen years ago, but there are no studies to show how they compare with other treatments. And so it goes – no apparent co-operation, no agreement, no certainty in diagnosis, in treatment choice, in likely outcome. It is little wonder that men diagnosed today are initially are in much the same position as I was 14 years ago. Seeing doctors who seem to have biased opinions, to provide information that is outdated, to apparently not have any real interest in the long term outcome. Maybe that’s unfair but after reading literally thousands of experiences, those are some of the conclusions I have come to. I don’t think it is likely to change in the future, but whatever comes my way, I’m grabbing life with both hands and we’re having fun until something stops me, literally dead in my tracks!! All the best to all of you Terry Herbert in Melbourne Australia Diagnosed ‘96: Age 54: Stage T2b: PSA 7.2: Gleason 7: No treatment. Jun '07 PSA 42.0 - Bony Metastasis: Aug '07: Intermittent ADT: PSA 2.3 Aug '10 It is a tragedy of the world that no one knows what he doesn’t know, and the less a man knows, the more sure he is that he knows everything. Joyce Carey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.