Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 Is this the by-product that is mresponsible for B-17 therapy being activated in the body? I read that it has to be activted by an emission from the tumors; it just doesn't run willy-nilly through the body placing arsenic in all of our vitals. Steve -------------------------------------------------------------- Hello Colonel, It's worse than you think. DHMO has been implicated in ALL disease states, not just cancer. There are numerous anecdotal reports dating back thousands of years in some cases that clearly indicate that total immersion in DHMO causes an acute and fatal form of respiratory failure. In many countries local government agencies employ special personnel to guard pools of DHMO and to assist in the rescue of persons who become overwhelmed by it. The solid form of DHMO has been directly responsible for many major accidents in places like Switzerland. There is even circumstantial evidence that implicates the solid form of DHMO in the sinking of the Titanic. It's dangerous stuff, it should be banned IMHO! :-) Best wishes Aubrey > > > > Dihydrogen Monoxide and Cancer > > The causative link between Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO) and Cancer is > currently not established, although a significant amount of evidence > seems to suggest that DHMO at least plays a role in the formation of > cancer, including: Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Ewing's Tumor,chondrosarcoma, > fibrosarcoma, multiple myeloma, colorectal cancer, Leukemia, basal > cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma. > > > Detection and Treatment > > What is known about these cancers is that Dihydrogen Monoxide is > found in detectable and biologically significant levels in virtually > all tumors and other cancerous and pre-cancerous growths. > Cancer research has made significant advances in the detection and > treatment of many forms of cancers. With each new advancement, the > role DHMO plays in the cause of cancer is likely to be better > understood. > > How Carcinogenic is Dihydrogen Monoxide? > > Dihydrogen Monoxide is not believed to be carcinogenic, although it > is known to be a component of a number of cancer-causing agents. > Additionally, the cause of approximately 20 percent of all cancers is > not known, and there is reason to suspect that DHMO may play some > role in these as well. Clearly, more research is needed before DHMO's > role is fully enumerated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 Hello Colonel, It's worse than you think. DHMO has been implicated in ALL disease states, not just cancer. There are numerous anecdotal reports dating back thousands of years in some cases that clearly indicate that total immersion in DHMO causes an acute and fatal form of respiratory failure. In many countries local government agencies employ special personnel to guard pools of DHMO and to assist in the rescue of persons who become overwhelmed by it. The solid form of DHMO has been directly responsible for many major accidents in places like Switzerland. There is even circumstantial evidence that implicates the solid form of DHMO in the sinking of the Titanic. It's dangerous stuff, it should be banned IMHO! :-) Best wishes Aubrey > > > > Dihydrogen Monoxide and Cancer > > The causative link between Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO) and Cancer is > currently not established, although a significant amount of evidence > seems to suggest that DHMO at least plays a role in the formation of > cancer, including: Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Ewing's Tumor,chondrosarcoma, > fibrosarcoma, multiple myeloma, colorectal cancer, Leukemia, basal > cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma. > > > Detection and Treatment > > What is known about these cancers is that Dihydrogen Monoxide is > found in detectable and biologically significant levels in virtually > all tumors and other cancerous and pre-cancerous growths. > Cancer research has made significant advances in the detection and > treatment of many forms of cancers. With each new advancement, the > role DHMO plays in the cause of cancer is likely to be better > understood. > > How Carcinogenic is Dihydrogen Monoxide? > > Dihydrogen Monoxide is not believed to be carcinogenic, although it > is known to be a component of a number of cancer-causing agents. > Additionally, the cause of approximately 20 percent of all cancers is > not known, and there is reason to suspect that DHMO may play some > role in these as well. Clearly, more research is needed before DHMO's > role is fully enumerated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 Please provide citations for your information, don't just post it. Leo Moderator ------------------------------------------ > > > > Dihydrogen Monoxide and Cancer > > The causative link between Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO) and Cancer is > currently not established, although a significant amount of evidence > seems to suggest that DHMO at least plays a role in the formation of > cancer, including: Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Ewing's Tumor,chondrosarcoma, > fibrosarcoma, multiple myeloma, colorectal cancer, Leukemia, basal > cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma. > > > Detection and Treatment > > What is known about these cancers is that Dihydrogen Monoxide is > found in detectable and biologically significant levels in virtually > all tumors and other cancerous and pre-cancerous growths. > Cancer research has made significant advances in the detection and > treatment of many forms of cancers. With each new advancement, the > role DHMO plays in the cause of cancer is likely to be better > understood. > > How Carcinogenic is Dihydrogen Monoxide? > > Dihydrogen Monoxide is not believed to be carcinogenic, although it > is known to be a component of a number of cancer-causing agents. > Additionally, the cause of approximately 20 percent of all cancers is > not known, and there is reason to suspect that DHMO may play some > role in these as well. Clearly, more research is needed before DHMO's > role is fully enumerated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 It's a joke, Leo. Dihydrogen monoxide is water. Re: Dihydrogen Monoxide Please provide citations for your information, don't just post it. Leo Moderator ------------------------------------------ > > > > Dihydrogen Monoxide and Cancer > > The causative link between Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO) and Cancer is > currently not established, although a significant amount of evidence > seems to suggest that DHMO at least plays a role in the formation of > cancer, including: Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Ewing's Tumor,chondrosarcoma, > fibrosarcoma, multiple myeloma, colorectal cancer, Leukemia, basal > cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma. > > > Detection and Treatment > > What is known about these cancers is that Dihydrogen Monoxide is > found in detectable and biologically significant levels in virtually > all tumors and other cancerous and pre-cancerous growths. > Cancer research has made significant advances in the detection and > treatment of many forms of cancers. With each new advancement, the > role DHMO plays in the cause of cancer is likely to be better > understood. > > How Carcinogenic is Dihydrogen Monoxide? > > Dihydrogen Monoxide is not believed to be carcinogenic, although it > is known to be a component of a number of cancer-causing agents. > Additionally, the cause of approximately 20 percent of all cancers is > not known, and there is reason to suspect that DHMO may play some > role in these as well. Clearly, more research is needed before DHMO's > role is fully enumerated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 Hello, Thank you so much for this information. My husband has been diagnosed with both Hodgkins lymphoma and non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Please excuse my total ignorance, but what is Dihydrogen Monoxide and how are we exposed to it? (If it seems too stupid to ask, I apologize.) Thank you. operacat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 Water---H2O. Someone on the list thinks he/she is being cute. Re: Re: Dihydrogen Monoxide Hello, Thank you so much for this information. My husband has been diagnosed with both Hodgkins lymphoma and non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Please excuse my total ignorance, but what is Dihydrogen Monoxide and how are we exposed to it? (If it seems too stupid to ask, I apologize.) Thank you. operacat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 That is what I get for doing an Arts degree. Leo ------------------------- > > > > > > > > Dihydrogen Monoxide and Cancer > > > > The causative link between Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO) and > Cancer is > > currently not established, although a significant amount > of evidence > > seems to suggest that DHMO at least plays a role in the > formation of > > cancer, including: Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Ewing's > Tumor,chondrosarcoma, > > fibrosarcoma, multiple myeloma, colorectal cancer, > Leukemia, basal > > cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and malignant > melanoma. > > > > > > Detection and Treatment > > > > What is known about these cancers is that Dihydrogen > Monoxide is > > found in detectable and biologically significant levels in > virtually > > all tumors and other cancerous and pre-cancerous growths. > > Cancer research has made significant advances in the > detection and > > treatment of many forms of cancers. With each new > advancement, the > > role DHMO plays in the cause of cancer is likely to be > better > > understood. > > > > How Carcinogenic is Dihydrogen Monoxide? > > > > Dihydrogen Monoxide is not believed to be carcinogenic, > although it > > is known to be a component of a number of cancer-causing > agents. > > Additionally, the cause of approximately 20 percent of all > cancers > is > > not known, and there is reason to suspect that DHMO may > play some > > role in these as well. Clearly, more research is needed > before > DHMO's > > role is fully enumerated. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 Thank you. J Solbach wrote: > > Water---H2O. > > Someone on the list thinks he/she is being cute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 My testimony concerning what we did for my wife's cancer (astrocytoma-brain cancer) is in the list archives if you wish to read it. We basically followed Dr. 's protocol, using extract from the Green Husk of the Black Walnut, Wormwood and Clove Oil in an ethanol tincture, zapping and taking Flax Oil with cottage cheese and the free use of Vitamin C and Grape seed extract (pycnogenols) as source of powerful antioxidants; staying away from all likely sources of iso-propanol (rubbing alcohols) and their analog solvents and parasite infections and infestations. We did so because after we did the conventional treatment (surgery and radiation) the cancer returned and we had no alternatives at the time. This was in 1996/97 and she is alive and cancer free today (we have done MRI scans every 6 months since to document the fact). I am quite aware that my testimony is anecdotal and statistically insignificant from a conventional medical point of view---but it is not insignificant to us. And that is all that matters to me. I can make no claim as whether following 's protocol will help, but it certainly cannot hurt. And I believe that is the first principle of medicine--- " First, do no harm. " Re: Re: Dihydrogen Monoxide Hello, Thank you so much for this information. My husband has been diagnosed with both Hodgkins lymphoma and non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Please excuse my total ignorance, but what is Dihydrogen Monoxide and how are we exposed to it? (If it seems too stupid to ask, I apologize.) Thank you. operacat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 Hi Operacat, You don't ever need to be apologetic, in my opinion when seeking knowledge! I know of your struggles with and how much you have been through with this. Just this afternoon I was speaking to Bolus about your husband's situation. I sell his videos on my site http://www.loaves-n-fishes.com/bolus.htm . He teaches Chinese Wand exercises for fitness. He teaches at the Hippocrates Institute in Florida and has five health food stores in the Florida area. He is a senior Gold Olympian and just a really wonderful and knowledgeable guy. He was telling me of his success with cancer patients. He said he kept documentation and would be willing to speak with you if you wanted to talk to him about it. His number is 941-649-4964 if you wanted to call and talk with him. Just tell him I gave you his number and asked you to call him. Keeping you and in my prayers, ~Karma http://loaves-n-fishes.com > Hello, > Thank you so much for this information. My husband has been diagnosed > with both Hodgkins lymphoma and non-Hodgkins lymphoma. > Please excuse my total ignorance, but what is Dihydrogen Monoxide and > how are we exposed to it? (If it seems too stupid to ask, I apologize.) > Thank you. > operacat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 I probably should explain why I put up what I did. It was part of a little experiment designed to prove a point I'm now trying to make. Most people basically have no idea when it comes to science. The warning came from a website www.dhmo.org. It started out, I believe as a high school student who conducted a survey amongst his town for a science project. I seem to remember after telling people about the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide, which is of course water, over 80% of people surveyed supported a ban. I'm currently conducting research to a new treatment for cancer. People ask me whether cancer can be cured, to which I respond no, there is still not enough information into the cause of it, and what information there is tends to point to different " causes " basically resulting in mutations of genes at the cellular level.(For this reason I'm highly skeptical of Dr , but whatever people want to do is there own business. I have my reasons as to why I'm skeptical but wont go into them here) The points I am trying to make are this. It is easy to be fooled by people who can manipulate scientific terminology in order to achieve an appropriate response. Take everything with a grain of salt. Conduct your own research, but make it thorough, because again people use terms that need to be understood (acronyms especially) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 I probably should explain why I put up what I did. It was part of a little experiment designed to prove a point I'm now trying to make. Most people basically have no idea when it comes to science. The warning came from a website www.dhmo.org. It started out, I believe as a high school student who conducted a survey amongst his town for a science project. I seem to remember after telling people about the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide, which is of course water, over 80% of people surveyed supported a ban. I'm currently conducting research to a new treatment for cancer. People ask me whether cancer can be cured, to which I respond no, there is still not enough information into the cause of it, and what information there is tends to point to different " causes " basically resulting in mutations of genes at the cellular level.(For this reason I'm highly skeptical of Dr , but whatever people want to do is there own business. I have my reasons as to why I'm skeptical but wont go into them here) The points I am trying to make are this. It is easy to be fooled by people who can manipulate scientific terminology in order to achieve an appropriate response. Take everything with a grain of salt. Conduct your own research, but make it thorough, because again people use terms that need to be understood (acronyms especially) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2004 Report Share Posted October 29, 2004 Every single thing on this website is absolutely true. http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html Of course, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) is water. Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2004 Report Share Posted October 29, 2004 ----- Original Message ----- From: Sharon Wertz Rheumatoid Arthritis Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 8:41 PM Subject: dihydrogen monoxide Every single thing on this website is absolutely true.http://www.dhmo.org/facts.htmlOf course, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) is water.Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2004 Report Share Posted October 29, 2004 That reminds me of one I saw years ago about the extreme toxicity of oxygen. Most poisons have some level below which they are safe. It seems that attempts to find a safe level for oxygen have been unsuccessful because even in extremely minute concentrations it is always fatal. Facts can be used to deceive and I don't know how that differs from lies. ----- Original Message ----- From: Sharon Wertz Rheumatoid Arthritis Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 8:41 PM Subject: dihydrogen monoxide Every single thing on this website is absolutely true.http://www.dhmo.org/facts.htmlOf course, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) is water.Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.