Guest guest Posted April 1, 1999 Report Share Posted April 1, 1999 CU Friends - What say ye regarding the website. Ya or Nay. Got to start building if is going to happen in this life time. 1) Where to build? Mike - Is my cousin's offer of hosting ok to you. Would you park your URL there? 2) For a non-profit, you will need a board of directors. I have served several over the past 20 years. If you want help in this area, just ask. 3) We need to send the current questions out for an alpha review and blessings. 4) We need to register with iNetSurvey and get them the URL, the questions, and all other required information so that they can start building the HTML survey. 5) We post this to the new website for a beta review and finalize the changes. 6) We send the revisions to iNetSurvey for production of the final survey. 7) We post it for a month and spread the word to all the hive suffers on all know lists and sites to take the survey. 8) We need to build the spreadsheet for data analysis. 9) We need the stat POCs input to the spreadsheet. 10) Raw data should be FTPed to the website and stored their for our access. 11) The narratives should be sent to the POCs for compilation. 12) The stats people need to provide write-up on the significant findings. 13) The report POCs then get the job of providing a study paper from the narratives and the stat findings. 14) We the find a doctor and a publisher. 15) We all get well. Are you both ready to rock and roll? Any comments? Haven't heard from Mike on this -- what do you think? Be well - Phil -----Or iginal Message----- To: Phil Cc: T. Rego Date: Thursday, April 01, 1999 3:04 PM Subject: RE: Survey and Web page >Phil, > >You're not hogging the process. To be honest this is a tough time for me during >this time of year at work and my availability to work on this project is >limited. I will reply to each of your points. > >Just checking in. > >I don't want to hog this process. I really like the survey that you started with >and I really like the evolution that it is going through. I really appreciate >the work you are doing. Without it, we would have a much harder uphill climb. >Saying all of this: > >1) Do you like and approve of the direction the survey (and software) are >heading? Please comment. > >I think it's what everyone wanted in a survey. I tried to add any suggestions >offered and I think it's ready. I would not be opposed to someone changing it >either. So don't worry about hurting my feelings, I'm an amature at this. > >2) Do you think that a web based survey is a good? Please comment. > >Probably, due to difficulties some members have had opening the spreadsheet. > >3) How would you suggest we service the CU people that are restricted to using >text only and have no web support; i.e. the JUNO people. Please comment. > >I was unaware that some people did not have web service, jeesh it's the 90's >doesn't everyone have web service. Just kidding. Maybe these people could log >onto the web from a public library or on a borrowed machine. > >4) Web Page hosting. If Mike is willing, I have a host ready to accept us as >home. We can use his URL and others. > >This would be great. > >5) If this is a go, then I have 50 sample web pages and I can snake anything >else we might want. > >Snake away. > >6) We will be limited to those that can FTP to the site. I will be on by >default. Do you FTP? We should have more that one web POC so that it doesn't >get dropped or ignored. > >I have FTP capabilities. > >7) What do you want on a Web Page? I think we should support a chat site. We >should support the standard list services; Listbot and ONElist. The site needs a >generic email address supported at the server that is hosting it. We can post to >the list via that. > >This is a tough question for me to answer. I know there are a lot of our members >that look to the group for a wide range of support from the group. I lean more >toward the medical science of CU. But I think it's important to provide the >services that the majority want, humor, herbs, natural meds, etc.. > >8) We should have a open door to part of the page that provides information. > >Yes > >9) We should have a restricted part of the page that allows people to see >information regarding private message between people. This should be sign-up/psw >protected. This way controversy can be reduced while still allowing for >information flow. > >This is a tough one. It's so easy to get a free e-mail address I don't know how >we can truely know our members. > >10) We need to link to all known hive resource. We need to link to as many as we >can. > >Definately, unfortunately there aren't that many. > >Thanks - Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.