Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Stevia info

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

The stevia powder is by NuNaturals and is called " White Stevia " pure extract.

It costs 16.99 for a supplement sized bottle but it will last forever since

you use 1/32 of a teaspoon for the equivalent of a teaspoon of sugar. It is

ultra sweet so a little goes a long way. And it does taste good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

The real rea$on $tevia is not approved i$ becau$e it compete$ with

Nutra$weet and $ucralo$e.

FDA always protect$ their client$: Food Proce$$or$ and Pharmaceutical

Companie$

Sugar was never tested for safety either. Nor were carrots, milk or wheat.

Foods under the law are always recognized as safe until proven otherwise.

(Pure Food and Drug Act of 1934)

Stevia is classified as a dietary supplement (food). The montra from the

enemies of supplements is that they are not regulated. This is a damned lie.

Supplements are regulated as foods.

It sure as heck is safer than either NutraSweet or Sucralose.

75% of all calls to Poison Control Centers involve NutraSweet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I don't understand is why anyone still uses sugar substitutes??

We are using so little sugar, hopefully, that we can just put a tsp

of sugar for 15 friggin' calories into coffee. Why use ANY artificial

chemicals? We're supposed to be getting out of the diet mentality

and eating healthy foods. Sandy R

>

>

> The real rea$on $tevia is not approved i$ becau$e it compete$ with

> Nutra$weet and $ucralo$e.

> FDA always protect$ their client$: Food Proce$$or$ and

Pharmaceutical

> Companie$

>

> Sugar was never tested for safety either. Nor were carrots, milk

or wheat.

> Foods under the law are always recognized as safe until proven

otherwise.

> (Pure Food and Drug Act of 1934)

>

> Stevia is classified as a dietary supplement (food). The montra

from the

> enemies of supplements is that they are not regulated. This is a

damned lie.

> Supplements are regulated as foods.

>

> It sure as heck is safer than either NutraSweet or Sucralose.

> 75% of all calls to Poison Control Centers involve NutraSweet.

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AMEN, Sandy! I've often wondered the same thing - and happily use sugar

when it's warranted.

I understand for those who have sugar issues with regards to diabetes, but

for the rest of us - why not enjoy it. The taste is so much better!

BTW - Huge NSV for me this week - I flew from Dallas to Austin for work on

Tuesday and back yesterday and for the first time in my adult life, I was

able to fly without having to ask for that extender on either flight!

--

Liz Grigorian

http://lap-band.blogspot.com/

370/291/170

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats, Liz. I flew from CA to OR in Nov and did not have to use it. I only

had to use it for a year - and that's when I decided it was time to lose weight.

I got tired of asking people next to me if I could raise the arm!! Now I fit

nice with room to spare!

Liz Grigorian <happytexan@...> wrote: AMEN, Sandy! I've often wondered

the same thing - and happily use sugar

when it's warranted.

I understand for those who have sugar issues with regards to diabetes, but

for the rest of us - why not enjoy it. The taste is so much better!

BTW - Huge NSV for me this week - I flew from Dallas to Austin for work on

Tuesday and back yesterday and for the first time in my adult life, I was

able to fly without having to ask for that extender on either flight!

--

Liz Grigorian

http://lap-band.blogspot.com/

370/291/170

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, I think I'm changing my mind here! B's post made me

think...one tsp of sugar will not hurt anyone. But I have oatmeal

with raisins almost every morning, and put 2 tsp of " Sugar Twin "

calorie-free brown sugar on it. if i used real brown sugar at 17 cal

per tsp. it would be 34 extra cal a day. that is 3.5 # a year extra.

That all adds up so we might choose to avoid that.

I stand corrected ! (Thanks, B)

>

> AMEN, Sandy! I've often wondered the same thing - and happily use

sugar

> when it's warranted.

>

> I understand for those who have sugar issues with regards to

diabetes, but

> for the rest of us - why not enjoy it. > --

> Liz Grigorian

> http://lap-band.blogspot.com/

> 370/291/170

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sandy, you can have the best of both worlds. Use the real brown sugar

and just park your car further from the store and and get a little bit

of an extra walk to burn of that 34 calories.

It's not like you are eating an extra Snickers bar everyday or something! :)

a in KC

Sandy Said:

You know, I think I'm changing my mind here! B's post made me

think...one tsp of sugar will not hurt anyone. But I have oatmeal

with raisins almost every morning, and put 2 tsp of " Sugar Twin "

calorie-free brown sugar on it. if i used real brown sugar at 17 cal

per tsp. it would be 34 extra cal a day. that is 3.5 # a year extra.

That all adds up so we might choose to avoid that.

I stand corrected ! (Thanks, B) --- In

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...