Guest guest Posted August 13, 2002 Report Share Posted August 13, 2002 Hi CatfishJo, I feel for you having to make a decision like this now especially after doing the meds thing for so long. I'm wondering if the natural ATDs would work for you - bugleweed/motherwort/lemonbalm. They do have less side effects. Something to think about. Something else to think about, you are worried about the " downtime " after surgery, but I'm wondering if any doctors have told you about the " downtime " after RAI. You know, like staying away from people, especially children for how long? Well, I've heard different amounts of time, some docs say a few days some say a few weeks... There were some posts awhile ago about some cats getting RAI and having to stay in quarantine for 6 weeks because they were too radioactive to go home to their families. Apparently the cats get tested for the amount of radiation they " radiate " and don't go home until those levels are almost gone, but people are not ever tested? As a school teacher or someone who works around kids, you really have to look into that aspect of it all and really start asking those questions of your doctors, and probably warn the school you work at about the procedure and risks to the students. I really think you would/should have to take a month or more off of work. Also, if you haven't already, please read the " 20 Reasons I will never have RAI " in the files section of the site, there are many risks on there that most doctors fail to tell people about. If I were in your shoes, and having to make such a tough decision, I would try the herbal tincture to see if that would work, and if not, then opt for surgery, making sure you get the best surgeon available in your area. I don't think RAI is the quick and easy fix it is chalked up to be... though I'm sure some would disagree. Pam B. http://www.webmosaics.com/thyroid/ " Life is what happens when you are busy making other plans " - Lennon Meds not working going to RAI > Unfortunately PTU and Tap have decided that they no longer like my body- have > been having severe skin rashes and red/purple splotches show up on my body. > Dr. advises that I am having an allergic reaction to these drugs. I was on > PTU for 3 years when I went off earlier this summer for about a month (was > having reactions in April and May). Symptoms came raging back so they put me > back on since I freaked over being nuked or going the " cut and scrape " route. > I was on 300 ml daily when I went off in May and they put me back on at 200 > ml daily. Within 3 weeks I started having skin problems again. I may feel > great back on the meds but can't stand the rashes and splotches coming across > my skin - very unattractive and itchey! Am also having problems with minor > boo-boos healing in a timely manor. > Against my inner feelings I have decided to go nuk as the idea of cut and > scrap sounds much more invasive and also sounds like more down time. I work > at a school and just started back yesterday. > This is the 3rd dr. I have gone thru but the one I like the most. He has > never " urged " me to do anything but encouraged me to research and ask > questions, and " think about it " . The last endo gave me an ulitmatium to have > RAI or find another dr. which I did. > Personally I do not care for any of the choices: meds, surgery, RAI but am > realizing I am getting to the point of not being able to ignore this much if > any longer. > I can only hope for the best of the worst and take it from there. > Anyone else have these reactions to meds - and what became of your " problems " > > Sign me off as " resigned " to my fate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2002 Report Share Posted August 13, 2002 I have said before, and will continue to say, that there are times when RAI is the best choice. I think all three treatments are pretty crummy; we really don't have any GOOD choices, so we just have to do the best we can. Lots of people, including myself, have had it. It is, after all, the most common treatment for Graves in the US. If it is what you decide, you will at least have peace of mind, having tried both TSD's first. I also didn't care for the option of surgery. I don't respond particularly well to anestesia, and I don't heal all that well. I also was very uncertain to trusting such a vulnerable part of my body to a surgeon's knife when there was a less invasive treatment available. I used to work in radioisotopes in a research lab, so I have a lot of respect for radiation, but I don't fear it as strongly as some do. Like any other treatment for Graves, the most important thing seems to be getting monitored regularly. You will end up hypo, and there is no point in letting your balance get all thrown out in that direction! There is some small chance that you will be one of the incredibly lucky people who come out of RAI or surgery euthyroid, but it is rare and usually not permanent, so don't count on that. I'm still experimenting with dosage, but am feeling pretty good most days now that my synthroid has kicked in. I am sleeping pretty well, my brain is clearing, and I am much better emotionally than I have been in ages. -- in Fla. CATFISHJO4@... wrote: > Against my inner feelings I have decided to go nuk as the idea of cut > and > scrap sounds much more invasive and also sounds like more down time. > I work > at a school and just started back yesterday. > Personally I do not care for any of the choices: meds, surgery, RAI > but am > realizing I am getting to the point of not being able to ignore this > much if > any longer. > I can only hope for the best of the worst and take it from there. > Anyone else have these reactions to meds - and what became of your > " problems " > > Sign me off as " resigned " to my fate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2002 Report Share Posted August 13, 2002 CATFISHJO4@... wrote: > > Against my inner feelings I have decided to go nuk as the idea of cut and > scrap sounds much more invasive and also sounds like more down time. I work > at a school and just started back yesterday. Well I assume if you have RAI ablation you'll have to have longer off work than if you had surgery - especially if you work at a school - wouldn't want you teaching my kids to 'glow in the dark' (I bet Devin hates that expression as well). But I assume with an 8 day half life for Iodine 131, if you are suppose to keep away from kids, you'll have to do it for 3 or 4 halflives, till your not quite so " hot " (We always use to use 5 halflives in Physics as a rule of thumb - the body will have excreted some of the radioactive Iodine, so the metabolic halflife will always be shorter than the halflife of the radioactive material). Hence Devin sending his kids away for a month. Surgery is a few days in hospital, apparently the Japanese make a real meal of it and stay in hospital for 2 weeks, but that is more cultural (and financial) than medical. I was in for 3 nights, but one of those was before the operation so I didn't get stuck in a traffic jam or eat breakfast by mistake, many are in for one night, mainly to sleep off the general anesthetic AFAICT, one person I know went home the same day. Still I wouldn't leap back into work after a general anesthetic - I had a desk job in computing, and got bored stiff sitting at home after surgery, when I could be sitting at work thinking. YMMV I'm not sure where the " scrape " comes in, it is more like pruning from what I can gather. Grave's is usually treated with partial thyroidectomy, as there is no need to remove every last piece of thyroid (as in thyroid cancer where a total thyroidectomy is done, followed by RAI treatment to catch any bits lurking). So all they do is cut the bit that looks like butterfly wings back towards the bit where the butterfly's body should be. I know where there are some nice photos of thyroid surgery ... but they probably won't help convince you The main preference for RAI in the US is down to cost, RAI is cheaper to your insurer than surgery. The original studies showing the risks being equal predate the current knowledge of increased cancer and eye disease risks from RAI ablation. So the reason RAI is offered, is it was considered just as safe and effective, but cheaper at the time practices were being established. Now RAI is just the way it is done in the USA, and is the leading cause of hypothyroidism, having overtaken Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Invasiveness is a matter of perspective, the surgeon can only damage what he cuts, the RAI can and will damage tissue immediately adjacent to the thyroid. For example; Damage to the parathyroids is always quoted as a risk in surgery. But it isn't always quoted as a risk in RAI. Why? I've no idea, certainly the radiation doesn't think " must be careful not to damage the parathyroids " , and damage to the parathyroids is a common complication of RAI. I think there is a certain amount of " out of sight - out of mind " operating. Either way you elect to do a certain amount of permanent damage to the thyroid, from a thyroid function perspective it doesn't matter much how you destroy 80% or so of your thyroid. Some recommend against RAI for those who can't tolerate the drugs, as RAI leads to hyperthyroidism. Some recommends against surgery for those who can't tolerate the drugs, as surgery usually requires the thyroid to be shrunk through treatment (Postassium Iodide can be used for this). Anyway I hope you'll give surgery a little bit more thought, modern surgery is incredibly safe, despite our natural resevations over being cut open. Face it some people opt for more major surgery for cosmetic reasons. Most patients don't suffer significant complications from either treatment, the main problem being sorting a suitable treatment if they are hypothyroid afterwards. Sorry to hear the drugs disagree with you, What ever you decide, I hope it works out well. Simon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2002 Report Share Posted August 13, 2002 the rashes and splotches coming across my skin - very unattractive and itchey! Am also having problems with minor boo-boos healing in a timely manor. These are signs of too much medication. What were you lab results ( and the normal ranges ) at the time ? ATDs should be closely monitored with labs. You need to get copies of these results each time. ATDs should never be stopped and started like that. It will cause you much misery. If you had labs in hand, and had small frequent reductions, more than likely things would be much different. Did you see the post last week from Devin ? He works in the nuclear industry, and he did have RAI...he sent his entire family away for one month. -Pam L - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2002 Report Share Posted August 13, 2002 Hi Catfish, I am so sorry you are having to face this. I know you have been wrestling with this decision and sometimes a permanent decision is all we have to go with. >>>Against my inner feelings I have decided to go nuk as the idea of cut and >>>scrap sounds much more invasive and also sounds like more down time. I >>>work at a school and just started back yesterday. This is the 3rd dr. I >>>have gone thru but the one I like the most. He has never " urged " me to >>>do anything but encouraged me to research and ask questions, and " think >>>about it " .<<< I use to feel the same way regarding surgery, no way, now how, was I going to allow anyone to cut into my throat and risk never being able to talk again <YIKES!> I have since changed my mind on that, I would opt for surgery in a NY minutes, but that only comes from talking with several patients who have gone the surgical route. There are 5 or 6 of them now at http://www.mediboard.com/cgi-local/ubbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=forum & f=1 & DaysPrune\ =1000 All have rebounded much quicker than I or several others who have gone the RAI route ever did. They are on replacement hormone much quicker than many of us, and doctors tend to know a good starting dose once the thyroid has been removed. Also with surgery, the surge of excess hormone and antibodies being released into the body doesn't happen. That is not a fun time. If you go to the link above and do a message for 'all who have had surgery' or message to Shari <sub-total> globee, rugratsmom, , and I know I am leaving a name out...but I do know they could give you their experiences if you wanted to look one more time at the surgery vs RAI issue. lil Deb in this group who is a singer made a decision several months ago, if/when faced with permanent treatment she will go with the surgery, she may be another one to talk ot. Caroline <under in the older archives> did the surgery and she shared her decision making, the surgery and the recovery with us, in full detail. You can find her posts from Sept of 2000 - Novemeber of 2000, her surgery was in October of 2000. And Simon right here in this group had a sub-total and I *know* he will be helping out right now too. Anyhow, if surgery is definitely out of the question, know that we will be here for you and will help you at any time. One caution, since you work at a school, make sure you take enough time off to not be an exposure risk to the kids. In Germany they still isolate people who do I-131 ablation for 2 weeks in a special wing of a hospital before allowing them to go home <article from spring of 2002>...they use to keep them 4-6 weeks until they no longer set off radiation detectors...so maybe staying home from work for at least that long would be something to consider so none of the little ones will have any unnecessary exposure risk. Take care and *HUGZ* for you Catfish, I hope you will feel better much sooner! Jody _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2002 Report Share Posted August 13, 2002 Hi, Just wanted to mention that poor healing is a hypo symptom, and rashes are generally caused by an ATD dose that's too high. Be sure that you're being monitored with FT4 levels as well as TSH levels or you could easily be hypo. Also, when I had RAI, I registered high levels of RAI for 8 weeks and contaminated the nuclear chem department where I was working. While most sources recommend avoiding contact with children for 1 week (because the thyroid cells of children multiply much faster than ours, causing more of a risk of mutation), you will be emiting radioine rays for about two months. Take care, Elaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2002 Report Share Posted August 13, 2002 hey all, now you guys have officially scared me. my RAI is sceduled for the 27th of this month. now i m worried. how long do i stay away from my kids? my doctor told me 24 hours. i wold hate to put my kids in jeaperdy. if possible could anyone give me ideas on the subject. i wold greatly appreciate it. thanks george and peggy Pam B wrote:Hi CatfishJo, I feel for you having to make a decision like this now especially after doing the meds thing for so long. I'm wondering if the natural ATDs would work for you - bugleweed/motherwort/lemonbalm. They do have less side effects. Something to think about. Something else to think about, you are worried about the " downtime " after surgery, but I'm wondering if any doctors have told you about the " downtime " after RAI. You know, like staying away from people, especially children for how long? Well, I've heard different amounts of time, some docs say a few days some say a few weeks... There were some posts awhile ago about some cats getting RAI and having to stay in quarantine for 6 weeks because they were too radioactive to go home to their families. Apparently the cats get tested for the amount of radiation they " radiate " and don't go home until those levels are almost gone, but people are not ever tested? As a school teacher or someone who works around kids, you really have to look into that aspect of it all and really start asking those questions of your doctors, and probably warn the school you work at about the procedure and risks to the students. I really think you would/should have to take a month or more off of work. Also, if you haven't already, please read the " 20 Reasons I will never have RAI " in the files section of the site, there are many risks on there that most doctors fail to tell people about. If I were in your shoes, and having to make such a tough decision, I would try the herbal tincture to see if that would work, and if not, then opt for surgery, making sure you get the best surgeon available in your area. I don't think RAI is the quick and easy fix it is chalked up to be... though I'm sure some would disagree. Pam B. http://www.webmosaics.com/thyroid/ " Life is what happens when you are busy making other plans " - Lennon Meds not working going to RAI > Unfortunately PTU and Tap have decided that they no longer like my body- have > been having severe skin rashes and red/purple splotches show up on my body. > Dr. advises that I am having an allergic reaction to these drugs. I was on > PTU for 3 years when I went off earlier this summer for about a month (was > having reactions in April and May). Symptoms came raging back so they put me > back on since I freaked over being nuked or going the " cut and scrape " route. > I was on 300 ml daily when I went off in May and they put me back on at 200 > ml daily. Within 3 weeks I started having skin problems again. I may feel > great back on the meds but can't stand the rashes and splotches coming across > my skin - very unattractive and itchey! Am also having problems with minor > boo-boos healing in a timely manor. > Against my inner feelings I have decided to go nuk as the idea of cut and > scrap sounds much more invasive and also sounds like more down time. I work > at a school and just started back yesterday. > This is the 3rd dr. I have gone thru but the one I like the most. He has > never " urged " me to do anything but encouraged me to research and ask > questions, and " think about it " . The last endo gave me an ulitmatium to have > RAI or find another dr. which I did. > Personally I do not care for any of the choices: meds, surgery, RAI but am > realizing I am getting to the point of not being able to ignore this much if > any longer. > I can only hope for the best of the worst and take it from there. > Anyone else have these reactions to meds - and what became of your " problems " > > Sign me off as " resigned " to my fate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2002 Report Share Posted August 13, 2002 Good luck Catfish, you may be one of those who lives happily ever after. But you can never be sure. Make sure your doctor protects your eyes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2002 Report Share Posted August 13, 2002 Peggy gullotto wrote: > > hey all, now you guys have officially scared me. my RAI is sceduled for the 27th of this month. now i m worried. how long do i stay away from my kids? my doctor told me 24 hours. i wold hate to put my kids in jeaperdy. if possible could anyone give me ideas on the subject. i wold greatly appreciate it. thanks george and peggy The University of California, Medical School suggest 2 to 4 days depending on dose (0-10 2 days, 10-30 millicuries 4 days, since a medium dose for Grave's may be around 10 millicuries, although some have less if aiming for euthyroid not hypothyroid) During this period you should shower frequently, sleep in a separate room, use disposal eating utensils, and wash your clothes and bedding separately. Avoid contact with kids, and the pregnant (especially the just pregnant - as if you can tell!), and prolonged exposure (i.e. spending hours in the same room with) to anyone. For the first week you should continue to avoid contact with kids and the pregnant. Following such a protocol the maximum likely doses family members will be exposed to are around 100 millirad in 10 days. By extrapolation I assume total treatment is likely to expose your nearest and dearest to about the equivalent of two to three years naturally occuring background radiation over the course of a month, or the equivalent of three or four chest X-rays each. These aren't huge doses of radiation, but they are of the same order of magnitude as the maximum recommended annual dose. The cancer risk from such doses is very low. Some reports of contamination from sweat (and face it Grave's patients can sweat a lot) are appearing, including contamination of jewelry, so the 'shower a lot, wash your clothes separately' tip is probably sound advice. The more care you take in the protocol, the lower the exposure, remember those who were used to measure such things were wearing radiation meters, so had a constant reminder to stick with the protocol. Where did Devin disappear to? Simon BTW: I've also seen a suggestion to double flush loos, as most of the radioiodine is excreted in urine, again a couple of extra gallons of water won't cost much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2002 Report Share Posted August 13, 2002 --- This is my first post, so bear with me. I had a total thyroidectomy in July 1999. It seemed like the lesser of two evils (RAI or Surgery). I went home the day after the surgery. I didn't require any pain medicine after I left the hospital. Surgery is always scary and I certainly understand your reasons for RAI. However, I just wanted to put in my two cents worth to let you know in my experience, the surgery was alot easier than I had anticipated. Of course I did have an excellent surgeon with big blue eyes who would hold my hand and ask " how you are feeling! " I didn't choose RAI for several reasons, some have already been stated. For one, I didn't want to have to stay away from my daughter for several days and didn't think I could deal with flushing 3 times after each use or using different eating utensils. But the main reason is that I sought out people with the disease (amazing how many there are) and ask them what treatment they used. I got the most satisfied results from people who had the surgery. Good luck on whatever you decide, it is a tough decision to make and I wish you all the best H Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 While I think some of the talk about weeks or even a month in quarantine is overkill, I suppose people have to do what makes them comfortable... A lot depends on your kids age, too. I have a son who was 2 1/2 when I did RAI, and he was visiting my parents when I had it. We decided to leave him there for a week. He was too young to understand about keeping away, and it would have made me miserable. I think I wouldn't want to cut it shorter. My DH slept on the couch for that week, and I used disposable dishes. Here they advise that you stay about 6 feet away from anyone who is pregnant, or from small children, just to be on the safe side, but they only tell you to stay at home if you are getting a dose for thyroid cancer, which is much higher. The iodine is present in body fluids, that is what you need to watch out for. Careful hand washing is one of the most important things, really. I really hated the " unclean " feeling I had with this, but I am glad I chose it over surgery. Nothing about Graves is quick and easy, and neither is this, but for me it was certainly less stress on my body than the surgery would have been. -- in Fla. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 I posted on a paper I received from The Cleveland Clinic Foundation in Cleveland, Ohio. when I was going to do the RAI. It is post#1603. This is a basic paper given to all patients and then when they determine how much I-131 you need it can change if you need more than the average, which they told me I would need more than average. Debbie -I've been off PTU since 07-05-00- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 When I asked my dr. about my eyes he said that since I have no current " eye " problems that I should not have any post RAI. Tell me more,,,,,,,,,Catfishjo / Debbie in Texas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 Not true, Catfish. Here is the abstract of Bartalena's study. If you decide to go with RAI, I would suggest a course of steroids before, during and after. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/338/2/73 God bless, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 Jody, You give me too much credit, but I luv ya! Catfish, I have more studies if you would like to see them, but the Bartalena study is the " standard " right now and until proven otherwise, it is proof positive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 Jody, You give me too much credit, but I luv ya! Catfish, I have more studies if you would like to see them, but the Bartalena study is the " standard " right now and until proven otherwise, it is proof positive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 Hi Debbie, I was looking for a specific article about RAI and TED, (I'm still looking) but came across this and thought it was interesting and applicable: From: http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/graves_disease/84000 " The idea of destroying the thyroid gland to treat an immune system disorder is no longer the viable option it once was. Studies conducted in 1999 also show that radioiodine is much more problematic than originally thought. Studies of survivors of Hiroshima have also contributed to our knowledge of the carcinogenic properties of radioiodine. The November 2001 issue of Life Extension contains an elightening article discussing recent studies conducted by Dr. Gofman, the former director of the Atomic Energy Commission's Biomedical Research Division of Livermore Laboratory. Anyone who has had radioidine ablation would benefit from reading this article. It' s also imperative that anyone contemplating radioiodine ablation read this article. The bottom line, according to Gofman, is that there is no safe dose or radiation. " I can't find that link right now, but I'm SURE and Jody have tons of information for you about this... if they don't pipe in soon, just post again with their names in the subject line. I'll keep looking for that link - I have it somewhere. Pam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 Hi Debbie, Write a post with in the subject line, she has been over to a University Hospital in her state making copies of many many studies and research papers regarding RAI and it's affects on the eyes. I, too, was told before ablation that I had no signs of the eye disease and if I didn't have it then, I would never get it. Just another LIE by my first, now fired, endo. I have had eye involvement on and off since ablation, but it didn't become chronic until about 18 months ago and is NOT a fun thing to deal with, I assure you of that. But is the resident expert in this area...her before RAI and after RAI pics of her eyes are in the file section of group, which you can access from the home page, go to photos and open the first folder there I think it is. Within 2 weeks of RAI her eyes became severe She is the bravest person I know, sharing this with us, and fighting the good fight against her first endo...there are too many studies at PubMed and Stanford and I think Medscape that back this up, RAI can either bring on the eye disease or make it much worse...in my opinion, this is a crapshoot. I don't envy you having to wrestle with your decision...have you thought about getting another opinion on your graves? Take care Debbie, Jody _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 Here is the link for Gofman I think your looking for Pam. Jody http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/synapseP.html _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 Hi Debbie: It sounds like you are coming here as one last ditch effort to convince you one way or the other? (I may be totally wrong!) Surgery certainly does seem to me an option to seriously consider. But, I'm going to assume you have already deeply considered it and have ruled it out, along with the ATD treatment. You may have seen posts from me recently and/or in the past regarding my Joe's choice to have RAI. He did, and like in FL has said, sometimes it does seem to be the right choice. I however want to caution you (because I feel obligated to do so) that both and Joe have only just recently had RAI and the long term effects for each of them are impossible to guess at right now. Personally, I believe that Joe WILL be okay -- even great -- long term, but " if wishes were horses ... " time will tell. I don't believe that Joe or (I hope you don't mind me using you as a comparison/example ) are going to experience the years or even months of untreated Hypo as some in the group have simply because they KNOW, thanks to this group, what to watch out for. I do think it is possible for a post-RAI patient/person to live a very close to normal life. (Sorry guys, I have to hang on to that!) The choices aren't wonderful ones, and nothing is a " cure. " I will say this: Joe knows now more about the choices he had, and he still says he would choose RAI over the other options, because it was most right for HIM. Knowing him as I do, I know in my heart of hearts he is right. It was best for HIM. And just like everyone else here, he doesn't want to have to suffer further complications from Graves like eye disease. It's evoked an incredible and positive change in him and how he feels about his life, and how he takes care himself and has become " in tune " with his body. Whatever you choose, it is your choice. I've been so heartened by all in the group on this very delicate and " personal journey " subject -- everyone appreciates that the decision is a tough choice and no " right " or " wrong " lines have been drawn. You have my best thoughts with you. Ann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 , I don't give you too much credit, where you have been and where you are going and the tools you are using to get there with your eyes is amazing to me! You going to chat tonight? Love, Jody _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 Debbie -- Not sure if others have replied yes, but your doctor is wrong. RAI can *trigger* and worsen the eye disease, particularly if you smoke now or ever have. This is pretty common knowledge and the fact that your doctor is giving you the wrong information should give you cause for alarm. B Re: Meds not working going to RAI > When I asked my dr. about my eyes he said that since I have no current " eye " > problems that I should not have any post RAI. > Tell me more,,,,,,,,,Catfishjo / Debbie in Texas > > > ------------------------------------- > The Graves' list is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended to replace expert medical care. > Please consult your doctor before changing or trying new treatments. > ---------------------------------------- > DISCLAIMER > > Advertisments placed on this yahoo groups list do not have the endorsement of > the listowner. I have no input as to what ads are attached to emails. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 Hi H, Welcome to the group and I'm glad you shared your post and decision with us. How are you doing now? What treatment are you following? I hope now that the first post is over <always the hardest ;-)> you will be joining in and sharing again, often. Take care, Jody _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2002 Report Share Posted August 14, 2002 My two cents: what ever the path you take, make frequent monitoring of your free T3 and free T4 a planned part of your journey. Not doing so seems to be the number one error I hear about - for all the possible treatments. Devin Re: Meds not working going to RAI Hi Debbie: It sounds like you are coming here as one last ditch effort to convince you one way or the other? (I may be totally wrong!) Surgery certainly does seem to me an option to seriously consider. But, I'm going to assume you have already deeply considered it and have ruled it out, along with the ATD treatment. You may have seen posts from me recently and/or in the past regarding my Joe's choice to have RAI. He did, and like in FL has said, sometimes it does seem to be the right choice. I however want to caution you (because I feel obligated to do so) that both and Joe have only just recently had RAI and the long term effects for each of them are impossible to guess at right now. Personally, I believe that Joe WILL be okay -- even great -- long term, but " if wishes were horses ... " time will tell. I don't believe that Joe or (I hope you don't mind me using you as a comparison/example ) are going to experience the years or even months of untreated Hypo as some in the group have simply because they KNOW, thanks to this group, what to watch out for. I do think it is possible for a post-RAI patient/person to live a very close to normal life. (Sorry guys, I have to hang on to that!) The choices aren't wonderful ones, and nothing is a " cure. " I will say this: Joe knows now more about the choices he had, and he still says he would choose RAI over the other options, because it was most right for HIM. Knowing him as I do, I know in my heart of hearts he is right. It was best for HIM. And just like everyone else here, he doesn't want to have to suffer further complications from Graves like eye disease. It's evoked an incredible and positive change in him and how he feels about his life, and how he takes care himself and has become " in tune " with his body. Whatever you choose, it is your choice. I've been so heartened by all in the group on this very delicate and " personal journey " subject -- everyone appreciates that the decision is a tough choice and no " right " or " wrong " lines have been drawn. You have my best thoughts with you. Ann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2002 Report Share Posted August 15, 2002 Hi Everyone This is the post I sent yesterday on a paper I received from the Cleveland Clinic in 1997 when I was thinking about RAI. They did talk to me at the time about the TED and that it could get worse after the RAI. I choose not to do the RAI. After reading the paper it scared me. At the time I had just had my son and my doctor told me to take the time and bond with him. So, I did for three years and finally my levels tested normal after 5.5 yrs. on ATDs. We had several storms go through our area yesterday and I had computer problems besides trying to hurry between storms to post. The information I was given on I-131 is in Post# 1603. If you go to the graves support page then click on messages at the top of the page it will say msg# Type in the post number in the box next to it to read what I was told if I did the RAI. I am sorry if people misunderstood that I was doing RAI. All I wanted to do was share the post on the paper was given to me. My thyroid levels have tested normal since 2000. Debbie R. > I posted on a paper I received from The Cleveland Clinic Foundation in > Cleveland, Ohio. when I was going to do the RAI. It is post#1603. This > is a basic paper given to all patients and then when they determine how much > I-131 you need it can change if you need more than the average, which they > told me I would need more than average. > > Debbie > > -I've been off PTU since 07-05-00- > > > > > > ------------------------------------- > The Graves' list is intended for informational purposes only and is not > intended to replace expert medical care. > Please consult your doctor before changing or trying new treatments. > ---------------------------------------- > DISCLAIMER > > Advertisments placed on this yahoo groups list do not have the endorsement of > the listowner. I have no input as to what ads are attached to emails. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -------- > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.