Guest guest Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 I don't think it's such a stretch to say that our parents probably really do feel that way on some level. It comes with being unable to see us as people with our own identities. I know my mom has always thought of my sister and me as HERS. I felt like she saw everything we did or didn't do as a reflection of herself. Even before I had kids of my own or heard of BPD, I knew there was something off about that way of thinking. I decided to make sure that I always remember that a child is never a possession--any babies I had would never be MINE. I would remember that they are God's, and He had just entrusted them to my care for a little while. If I did my job right as a parent, they would grow up and be able to move away and survive on their own, and enjoy their own identities. I guess we all realize what a contrast that is to the way our parents think. And you are right that it extends past the child to the child's things. I like your way of putting it...HER grand-things! When I moved into my first house, my mom had all kinds of plans for it. She got into her head that we should make a concrete path through the backyard so that my son could ride his tricycle out there, and she brought it up all the time. She kept offering to replace my appliances, especially the refrigerator, because she wanted to have ice in the door. When my daughter was born and we were at the hospital, we asked my parents to watch myson, and when we got home we found that she had redecorated both of our bathrooms and bought new sheets for our bed! She clearly had trouble understanding that it was not HER grand-house ;-) kt > > Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access " HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse, grandjob. Anyone feel this way? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Although I don't have kids, I too felt that unhealthy, inappropriate attitude from my nada in that she considered that my achievements were actually hers, not mine. YOur nada's behaviors could be due to the bpd sense of internal emptiness. Instead of a healthy ego there is just a vast unfillable void, a black hole of need that sucks everything and everyone into it. Lacking a " self " , the bpd feels the need to incorporate (assimilate, consume) other people and live through them. But unlike the Borg in " Star Trek, TNG " , resistance is NOT futile. Or your nada's behaviors could be due to narcissism; the narcissist, a special and superior person, feels entitled to annex or appropriate other people's possessions, their services, their time. My own personal opinion is that npd mothers on some level do feel that they own their children like property. Nada created you, you came out of her body and she paid for you, so you now owe her a debt. Pay up. Either way, those behaviors: the need to assimilate you or that sense of ownership of you, are frustrating behaviors to deal with. -Annie > > Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access " HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse, grandjob. Anyone feel this way? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Although I don't have kids, I too felt that unhealthy, inappropriate attitude from my nada in that she considered that my achievements were actually hers, not mine. YOur nada's behaviors could be due to the bpd sense of internal emptiness. Instead of a healthy ego there is just a vast unfillable void, a black hole of need that sucks everything and everyone into it. Lacking a " self " , the bpd feels the need to incorporate (assimilate, consume) other people and live through them. But unlike the Borg in " Star Trek, TNG " , resistance is NOT futile. Or your nada's behaviors could be due to narcissism; the narcissist, a special and superior person, feels entitled to annex or appropriate other people's possessions, their services, their time. My own personal opinion is that npd mothers on some level do feel that they own their children like property. Nada created you, you came out of her body and she paid for you, so you now owe her a debt. Pay up. Either way, those behaviors: the need to assimilate you or that sense of ownership of you, are frustrating behaviors to deal with. -Annie > > Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access " HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse, grandjob. Anyone feel this way? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Although I don't have kids, I too felt that unhealthy, inappropriate attitude from my nada in that she considered that my achievements were actually hers, not mine. YOur nada's behaviors could be due to the bpd sense of internal emptiness. Instead of a healthy ego there is just a vast unfillable void, a black hole of need that sucks everything and everyone into it. Lacking a " self " , the bpd feels the need to incorporate (assimilate, consume) other people and live through them. But unlike the Borg in " Star Trek, TNG " , resistance is NOT futile. Or your nada's behaviors could be due to narcissism; the narcissist, a special and superior person, feels entitled to annex or appropriate other people's possessions, their services, their time. My own personal opinion is that npd mothers on some level do feel that they own their children like property. Nada created you, you came out of her body and she paid for you, so you now owe her a debt. Pay up. Either way, those behaviors: the need to assimilate you or that sense of ownership of you, are frustrating behaviors to deal with. -Annie > > Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access " HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse, grandjob. Anyone feel this way? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 If this is the case, I would love for my parents to pay for their Grand-debt, Grand-bills and Grand-vacations-to-Europe. ;p > > Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access " HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse, grandjob. Anyone feel this way? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2010 Report Share Posted December 8, 2010 Yes, and nada could also do the " grandstudying " for my degrees and pay off her " grandstudentloan " ! > > > > Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access " HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse, grandjob. Anyone feel this way? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2010 Report Share Posted December 8, 2010 OMG!!! This thread ROCKS!!! I have not laughed this hard in awhile. My nada even tried to sue me for grandparents rights to HER grandchildren. She certainly did feel that OUR income was her grandmoney and my day was her grandtime. Here's a weird boundary issue to think about...we lived in the main part of the house and nada had an apartment attatched on the east side. There was a door from her kitchen into our kitchen. Nada would open or shut the door depending on HER needs. If she needed space, or quiet, or just wanted to be left alone she shut the door but WE were not allowed to shut the door EVER. This meant nada " invaded " our family dinners everynight usu to bitch at us or make demands (she called it " planning " ) for the next day. She " owned " the door and access to us all of the time. > > Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access " HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse, grandjob. Anyone feel this way? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2010 Report Share Posted December 9, 2010 I love you guys - clever title, funny response. We not only get affirmation here, but the occasional, unexpected laugh. And good ones too; KOs are witty things - probably developed intelligence from having to develop survival skills early on. +Coal Miner's Daughter > > If this is the case, I would love for my parents to pay for their Grand-debt, Grand-bills and Grand-vacations-to-Europe. ;p > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2010 Report Share Posted December 9, 2010 I love you guys - clever title, funny response. We not only get affirmation here, but the occasional, unexpected laugh. And good ones too; KOs are witty things - probably developed intelligence from having to develop survival skills early on. +Coal Miner's Daughter > > If this is the case, I would love for my parents to pay for their Grand-debt, Grand-bills and Grand-vacations-to-Europe. ;p > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2010 Report Share Posted December 9, 2010 I can't believe she owns the door! That alone pretty much sums up the whole boundaries issue doesn't it? You gotta live it to believe it, right? > > > > Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access " HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse, grandjob. Anyone feel this way? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2010 Report Share Posted December 9, 2010 Truly! I can totally see my own nada being that territorial over a freaking door. Mine got all bent out of shape with me because I temporarily moved some of her furniture aside so two workmen could carry a very large and heavy piece of furniture through her rec room to their truck. Nada actually *scolded* me for doing that. The men were *in the process* of staggering down the hall toward the rec room with the unwieldy electric organ when I moved the chair and the coffee table and lamp a few feet aside to make a wider path for them. Nada was not even in that part of the house at the time, but she came downstairs and noticed the relocated furniture after they'd made it outside and scolded me as she moved the pieces back into their accustomed place. So, its clear that her agitation and territoriality were not rational. Its part of the mental illness: the irrationality of the emotions, looking for reasons to pick fights, creating drama where there is none, seeking victim-hood. Oh, and in this particular instance, there was a touch of revenge involved too, if you can believe it. This incident occurred after my nada had visited me in my home and had decided to rearrange my furniture without asking me, and I told her to please not do that, that I liked my furniture arranged the way it was. So, nada felt a need to " get me back " for that, apparently. YOu're right, I think you have to have lived with this kind of behavior to really get it when other people describe it. Holy freaking cow, its amazing that I'm not in a rubber room somewhere drooling on my straight-jacket. -Annie > > I can't believe she owns the door! That alone pretty much sums up the whole boundaries issue doesn't it? You gotta live it to believe it, right? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2010 Report Share Posted December 9, 2010 This makes me think of the time my therapist asked, sincerely, " How do you FUNCTION?!? " > YOu're right, I think you have to have lived with this kind of behavior to really get it when other people describe it. Holy freaking cow, its amazing that I'm not in a rubber room somewhere drooling on my straight-jacket. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.