Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Grandhouse, Grandvan, Grandjob

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I don't think it's such a stretch to say that our parents probably really do

feel that way on some level. It comes with being unable to see us as people

with our own identities.

I know my mom has always thought of my sister and me as HERS. I felt like she

saw everything we did or didn't do as a reflection of herself. Even before I

had kids of my own or heard of BPD, I knew there was something off about that

way of thinking. I decided to make sure that I always remember that a child is

never a possession--any babies I had would never be MINE. I would remember that

they are God's, and He had just entrusted them to my care for a little while.

If I did my job right as a parent, they would grow up and be able to move away

and survive on their own, and enjoy their own identities.

I guess we all realize what a contrast that is to the way our parents think.

And you are right that it extends past the child to the child's things. I like

your way of putting it...HER grand-things! When I moved into my first house, my

mom had all kinds of plans for it. She got into her head that we should make a

concrete path through the backyard so that my son could ride his tricycle out

there, and she brought it up all the time. She kept offering to replace my

appliances, especially the refrigerator, because she wanted to have ice in the

door. When my daughter was born and we were at the hospital, we asked my

parents to watch myson, and when we got home we found that she had redecorated

both of our bathrooms and bought new sheets for our bed! She clearly had

trouble understanding that it was not HER grand-house ;-)

kt

>

> Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being

facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access

" HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything

that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a

right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house

because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know

this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me

when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from

her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she

insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense

to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse,

grandjob. Anyone feel this way?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I don't have kids, I too felt that unhealthy, inappropriate attitude

from my nada in that she considered that my achievements were actually hers, not

mine.

YOur nada's behaviors could be due to the bpd sense of internal emptiness.

Instead of a healthy ego there is just a vast unfillable void, a black hole of

need that sucks everything and everyone into it.

Lacking a " self " , the bpd feels the need to incorporate (assimilate, consume)

other people and live through them. But unlike the Borg in " Star Trek, TNG " ,

resistance is NOT futile.

Or your nada's behaviors could be due to narcissism; the narcissist, a special

and superior person, feels entitled to annex or appropriate other people's

possessions, their services, their time. My own personal opinion is that npd

mothers on some level do feel that they own their children like property. Nada

created you, you came out of her body and she paid for you, so you now owe her a

debt. Pay up.

Either way, those behaviors: the need to assimilate you or that sense of

ownership of you, are frustrating behaviors to deal with.

-Annie

>

> Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being

facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access

" HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything

that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a

right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house

because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know

this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me

when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from

her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she

insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense

to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse,

grandjob. Anyone feel this way?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I don't have kids, I too felt that unhealthy, inappropriate attitude

from my nada in that she considered that my achievements were actually hers, not

mine.

YOur nada's behaviors could be due to the bpd sense of internal emptiness.

Instead of a healthy ego there is just a vast unfillable void, a black hole of

need that sucks everything and everyone into it.

Lacking a " self " , the bpd feels the need to incorporate (assimilate, consume)

other people and live through them. But unlike the Borg in " Star Trek, TNG " ,

resistance is NOT futile.

Or your nada's behaviors could be due to narcissism; the narcissist, a special

and superior person, feels entitled to annex or appropriate other people's

possessions, their services, their time. My own personal opinion is that npd

mothers on some level do feel that they own their children like property. Nada

created you, you came out of her body and she paid for you, so you now owe her a

debt. Pay up.

Either way, those behaviors: the need to assimilate you or that sense of

ownership of you, are frustrating behaviors to deal with.

-Annie

>

> Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being

facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access

" HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything

that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a

right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house

because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know

this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me

when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from

her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she

insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense

to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse,

grandjob. Anyone feel this way?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I don't have kids, I too felt that unhealthy, inappropriate attitude

from my nada in that she considered that my achievements were actually hers, not

mine.

YOur nada's behaviors could be due to the bpd sense of internal emptiness.

Instead of a healthy ego there is just a vast unfillable void, a black hole of

need that sucks everything and everyone into it.

Lacking a " self " , the bpd feels the need to incorporate (assimilate, consume)

other people and live through them. But unlike the Borg in " Star Trek, TNG " ,

resistance is NOT futile.

Or your nada's behaviors could be due to narcissism; the narcissist, a special

and superior person, feels entitled to annex or appropriate other people's

possessions, their services, their time. My own personal opinion is that npd

mothers on some level do feel that they own their children like property. Nada

created you, you came out of her body and she paid for you, so you now owe her a

debt. Pay up.

Either way, those behaviors: the need to assimilate you or that sense of

ownership of you, are frustrating behaviors to deal with.

-Annie

>

> Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being

facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access

" HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything

that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a

right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house

because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know

this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me

when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from

her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she

insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense

to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse,

grandjob. Anyone feel this way?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is the case, I would love for my parents to pay for their Grand-debt,

Grand-bills and Grand-vacations-to-Europe. ;p

>

> Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being

facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access

" HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything

that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a

right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house

because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know

this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me

when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from

her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she

insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense

to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse,

grandjob. Anyone feel this way?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, and nada could also do the " grandstudying " for my degrees and pay off her

" grandstudentloan " !

> >

> > Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am

being facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to

access " HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does

everything that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean

she has a right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in

my house because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ?

I know this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to

me when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from

her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she

insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense

to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse,

grandjob. Anyone feel this way?

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG!!! This thread ROCKS!!! I have not laughed this hard in awhile. My nada even

tried to sue me for grandparents rights to HER grandchildren. She certainly did

feel that OUR income was her grandmoney and my day was her grandtime. Here's a

weird boundary issue to think about...we lived in the main part of the house and

nada had an apartment attatched on the east side. There was a door from her

kitchen into our kitchen. Nada would open or shut the door depending on HER

needs. If she needed space, or quiet, or just wanted to be left alone she shut

the door but WE were not allowed to shut the door EVER. This meant nada "

invaded " our family dinners everynight usu to bitch at us or make demands (she

called it " planning " ) for the next day. She " owned " the door and access to us

all of the time.

>

> Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am being

facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to access

" HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does everything

that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean she has a

right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in my house

because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ? I know

this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to me

when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from

her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she

insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense

to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse,

grandjob. Anyone feel this way?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love you guys - clever title, funny response. We not only get affirmation

here, but the occasional, unexpected laugh. And good ones too; KOs are witty

things - probably developed intelligence from having to develop survival skills

early on.

+Coal Miner's Daughter

>

> If this is the case, I would love for my parents to pay for their Grand-debt,

Grand-bills and Grand-vacations-to-Europe. ;p

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love you guys - clever title, funny response. We not only get affirmation

here, but the occasional, unexpected laugh. And good ones too; KOs are witty

things - probably developed intelligence from having to develop survival skills

early on.

+Coal Miner's Daughter

>

> If this is the case, I would love for my parents to pay for their Grand-debt,

Grand-bills and Grand-vacations-to-Europe. ;p

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe she owns the door! That alone pretty much sums up the whole

boundaries issue doesn't it? You gotta live it to believe it, right?

> >

> > Okay, this is really for those of you who are NC or LC with nada. I am

being facitious here, obviously, but if nada insists that she has rights to

access " HER granchildren " , my question is where is the ownership here? Does

everything that I have automatically become her grand-whatever? Does that mean

she has a right to drive my van because it is her " grandvan " ? Can she live in

my house because it is her " grandhouse " ? Is my job and income her " grandjob " ?

I know this sounds ridiculous, but I am pointing out how ridiculous it sounds to

me when she calls my children " HER " anything. I crawled my way into sanity from

her life, (my brother never did and so has no " grandkids " for her). How can she

insist she has any rights to children that I have? It makes about as much sense

to me as my analogies about her calling my possessions her grandvan, grandhouse,

grandjob. Anyone feel this way?

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truly! I can totally see my own nada being that territorial over a freaking

door.

Mine got all bent out of shape with me because I temporarily moved some of her

furniture aside so two workmen could carry a very large and heavy piece of

furniture through her rec room to their truck.

Nada actually *scolded* me for doing that. The men were *in the process* of

staggering down the hall toward the rec room with the unwieldy electric organ

when I moved the chair and the coffee table and lamp a few feet aside to make a

wider path for them. Nada was not even in that part of the house at the time,

but she came downstairs and noticed the relocated furniture after they'd made it

outside and scolded me as she moved the pieces back into their accustomed place.

So, its clear that her agitation and territoriality were not rational. Its part

of the mental illness: the irrationality of the emotions, looking for reasons to

pick fights, creating drama where there is none, seeking victim-hood. Oh, and

in this particular instance, there was a touch of revenge involved too, if you

can believe it. This incident occurred after my nada had visited me in my home

and had decided to rearrange my furniture without asking me, and I told her to

please not do that, that I liked my furniture arranged the way it was. So, nada

felt a need to " get me back " for that, apparently.

YOu're right, I think you have to have lived with this kind of behavior to

really get it when other people describe it. Holy freaking cow, its amazing

that I'm not in a rubber room somewhere drooling on my straight-jacket.

-Annie

>

> I can't believe she owns the door! That alone pretty much sums up the whole

boundaries issue doesn't it? You gotta live it to believe it, right?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This makes me think of the time my therapist asked, sincerely, " How do you

FUNCTION?!? "

> YOu're right, I think you have to have lived with this kind of behavior to

really get it when other people describe it. Holy freaking cow, its amazing

that I'm not in a rubber room somewhere drooling on my straight-jacket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...