Guest guest Posted January 10, 2006 Report Share Posted January 10, 2006 " Supervisor " <supervisor@l...> wrote: > > I am, by no means, opposed to locking up trucks when they are not in use. I > just find it somewhat unreasonable in the climate in which I work to expect > this to be done on every call. What has the climate got to do with whether or not you lock up your truck? And why would you lock it only when not in use? Why not lock it when it's in use? Never presented a problem to me or my partners. Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2006 Report Share Posted January 10, 2006 Semantics? Perhaps; I've honestly never looked at the TTC as a whole to see how much it covers. But for the sake of this particular discussion, 546.001 does not exempt EV operators from the requirements regarding stopping engines and/or securing vehicles. Good question Rob; I'll look into it more. Thanks! Randell Re: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie " Randell Pitts " <agfltmedic@y...> wrote: > > No Wes, emergency vehicles are not exempt from most traffic laws; there > are only four (4) types of permissible conduct, according to the > Transportation Code 546.001: Randell, it seems to me that those four types of permissible conduct DO exempt you from most applicable traffic laws. Do they not? Are we only quibbling semantics? Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2006 Report Share Posted January 10, 2006 Semantics aside, this is a scenario repeated thousands of times a year by EMS crews. Leaving the truck either running, or the keys in the ignition. Anyone that has spent time on the street, and not behind a desk would concede that they have, and probably still do it. I came to a conclusion recently that some people are educated far beyond their potential, which in short implies that people don't exercise common sense. Is this subject a unique situation that requires a long and involved conversation about law, and the TTC? Or is it just something that " EVERYONE " does and will continue to do in the future? If we are going to argue semantics about the technical law, why don't we argue that using a vehicle radio, or operating the siren COULD constitute a distraction for the driver, and hence be TECHNICALLY illegal. And before someone responds " your partner should be operating all of those! " Your partner is in the back attending to a patient if you are running code to a hospital. Can we talk about something more pertinent than this? I thought this was an educated group that discussed issues that would maybe make a real differance in our profession. Have a great day > This happens several times a year. I would just like to remind everyone of the following from the Texas Transportation Code. > > > § 545.404. UNATTENDED MOTOR VEHICLE. An operator may > not leave the vehicle unattended without: > (1) stopping the engine; > (2) locking the ignition; > (3) removing the key from the ignition; > (4) setting the parking brake effectively; and > (5) if standing on a grade, turning the front wheels to > the curb or side of the highway. > > > > E. Tate, LP > Whitehouse, Texas > > What's stopping you from joining EMSAT? http://www.TexasEMSAT.org > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover > Photo Books. You design it and we'll bind it! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2006 Report Share Posted January 10, 2006 Semantics aside, this is a scenario repeated thousands of times a year by EMS crews. Leaving the truck either running, or the keys in the ignition. Anyone that has spent time on the street, and not behind a desk would concede that they have, and probably still do it. I came to a conclusion recently that some people are educated far beyond their potential, which in short implies that people don't exercise common sense. Is this subject a unique situation that requires a long and involved conversation about law, and the TTC? Or is it just something that " EVERYONE " does and will continue to do in the future? If we are going to argue semantics about the technical law, why don't we argue that using a vehicle radio, or operating the siren COULD constitute a distraction for the driver, and hence be TECHNICALLY illegal. And before someone responds " your partner should be operating all of those! " Your partner is in the back attending to a patient if you are running code to a hospital. Can we talk about something more pertinent than this? I thought this was an educated group that discussed issues that would maybe make a real differance in our profession. Have a great day > This happens several times a year. I would just like to remind everyone of the following from the Texas Transportation Code. > > > § 545.404. UNATTENDED MOTOR VEHICLE. An operator may > not leave the vehicle unattended without: > (1) stopping the engine; > (2) locking the ignition; > (3) removing the key from the ignition; > (4) setting the parking brake effectively; and > (5) if standing on a grade, turning the front wheels to > the curb or side of the highway. > > > > E. Tate, LP > Whitehouse, Texas > > What's stopping you from joining EMSAT? http://www.TexasEMSAT.org > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover > Photo Books. You design it and we'll bind it! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2006 Report Share Posted January 10, 2006 I offer that this IS pertinent to our list. I would think that adherence to traffic laws, or the lack thereof, would have a direct impact. Discussing the same may, in fact, make a real difference in our profession. We have quite a diverse membership on this list, all the way from well-known authors, to neophytes, to the average shmuck (me). If, in review, someone reads the statutes regarding emergency vehicle operation and then changes the way they drive their ambulance, thereby somehow preventing an incident/accident, did that not make a real difference in our profession? Perhaps not in the same way a “trick of the trade”, or ACLS revisions might, but definitely to that person, their partner(s), and their respective families. I am sure that the negative press and attention EMS receives from incidents or accidents involving ambulances would make a difference- in a negative way. Recent national stories involving EMS, some discussed here, attest to that very point. Flame away- I need the tan. Randell Re: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie Semantics aside, this is a scenario repeated thousands of times a year by EMS crews. Leaving the truck either running, or the keys in the ignition. Anyone that has spent time on the street, and not behind a desk would concede that they have, and probably still do it. I came to a conclusion recently that some people are educated far beyond their potential, which in short implies that people don't exercise common sense. Is this subject a unique situation that requires a long and involved conversation about law, and the TTC? Or is it just something that " EVERYONE " does and will continue to do in the future? If we are going to argue semantics about the technical law, why don't we argue that using a vehicle radio, or operating the siren COULD constitute a distraction for the driver, and hence be TECHNICALLY illegal. And before someone responds " your partner should be operating all of those! " Your partner is in the back attending to a patient if you are running code to a hospital. Can we talk about something more pertinent than this? I thought this was an educated group that discussed issues that would maybe make a real differance in our profession. Have a great day > This happens several times a year. I would just like to remind everyone of the following from the Texas Transportation Code. > > > § 545.404. UNATTENDED MOTOR VEHICLE. An operator may > not leave the vehicle unattended without: > (1) stopping the engine; > (2) locking the ignition; > (3) removing the key from the ignition; > (4) setting the parking brake effectively; and > (5) if standing on a grade, turning the front wheels to > the curb or side of the highway. > > > > E. Tate, LP > Whitehouse, Texas > > What's stopping you from joining EMSAT? http://www.TexasEMSAT.org > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover > Photo Books. You design it and we'll bind it! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2006 Report Share Posted January 10, 2006 I offer that this IS pertinent to our list. I would think that adherence to traffic laws, or the lack thereof, would have a direct impact. Discussing the same may, in fact, make a real difference in our profession. We have quite a diverse membership on this list, all the way from well-known authors, to neophytes, to the average shmuck (me). If, in review, someone reads the statutes regarding emergency vehicle operation and then changes the way they drive their ambulance, thereby somehow preventing an incident/accident, did that not make a real difference in our profession? Perhaps not in the same way a “trick of the trade”, or ACLS revisions might, but definitely to that person, their partner(s), and their respective families. I am sure that the negative press and attention EMS receives from incidents or accidents involving ambulances would make a difference- in a negative way. Recent national stories involving EMS, some discussed here, attest to that very point. Flame away- I need the tan. Randell Re: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie Semantics aside, this is a scenario repeated thousands of times a year by EMS crews. Leaving the truck either running, or the keys in the ignition. Anyone that has spent time on the street, and not behind a desk would concede that they have, and probably still do it. I came to a conclusion recently that some people are educated far beyond their potential, which in short implies that people don't exercise common sense. Is this subject a unique situation that requires a long and involved conversation about law, and the TTC? Or is it just something that " EVERYONE " does and will continue to do in the future? If we are going to argue semantics about the technical law, why don't we argue that using a vehicle radio, or operating the siren COULD constitute a distraction for the driver, and hence be TECHNICALLY illegal. And before someone responds " your partner should be operating all of those! " Your partner is in the back attending to a patient if you are running code to a hospital. Can we talk about something more pertinent than this? I thought this was an educated group that discussed issues that would maybe make a real differance in our profession. Have a great day > This happens several times a year. I would just like to remind everyone of the following from the Texas Transportation Code. > > > § 545.404. UNATTENDED MOTOR VEHICLE. An operator may > not leave the vehicle unattended without: > (1) stopping the engine; > (2) locking the ignition; > (3) removing the key from the ignition; > (4) setting the parking brake effectively; and > (5) if standing on a grade, turning the front wheels to > the curb or side of the highway. > > > > E. Tate, LP > Whitehouse, Texas > > What's stopping you from joining EMSAT? http://www.TexasEMSAT.org > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover > Photo Books. You design it and we'll bind it! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2006 Report Share Posted January 10, 2006 I offer that this IS pertinent to our list. I would think that adherence to traffic laws, or the lack thereof, would have a direct impact. Discussing the same may, in fact, make a real difference in our profession. We have quite a diverse membership on this list, all the way from well-known authors, to neophytes, to the average shmuck (me). If, in review, someone reads the statutes regarding emergency vehicle operation and then changes the way they drive their ambulance, thereby somehow preventing an incident/accident, did that not make a real difference in our profession? Perhaps not in the same way a “trick of the trade”, or ACLS revisions might, but definitely to that person, their partner(s), and their respective families. I am sure that the negative press and attention EMS receives from incidents or accidents involving ambulances would make a difference- in a negative way. Recent national stories involving EMS, some discussed here, attest to that very point. Flame away- I need the tan. Randell Re: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie Semantics aside, this is a scenario repeated thousands of times a year by EMS crews. Leaving the truck either running, or the keys in the ignition. Anyone that has spent time on the street, and not behind a desk would concede that they have, and probably still do it. I came to a conclusion recently that some people are educated far beyond their potential, which in short implies that people don't exercise common sense. Is this subject a unique situation that requires a long and involved conversation about law, and the TTC? Or is it just something that " EVERYONE " does and will continue to do in the future? If we are going to argue semantics about the technical law, why don't we argue that using a vehicle radio, or operating the siren COULD constitute a distraction for the driver, and hence be TECHNICALLY illegal. And before someone responds " your partner should be operating all of those! " Your partner is in the back attending to a patient if you are running code to a hospital. Can we talk about something more pertinent than this? I thought this was an educated group that discussed issues that would maybe make a real differance in our profession. Have a great day > This happens several times a year. I would just like to remind everyone of the following from the Texas Transportation Code. > > > § 545.404. UNATTENDED MOTOR VEHICLE. An operator may > not leave the vehicle unattended without: > (1) stopping the engine; > (2) locking the ignition; > (3) removing the key from the ignition; > (4) setting the parking brake effectively; and > (5) if standing on a grade, turning the front wheels to > the curb or side of the highway. > > > > E. Tate, LP > Whitehouse, Texas > > What's stopping you from joining EMSAT? http://www.TexasEMSAT.org > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover > Photo Books. You design it and we'll bind it! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 Randell, I have to agree with you. There are over 1500 members (210 are “bouncing messages”) on this list and of those 30 are new since 01/01/06. Even though we had a discussion about “X” 6 months ago, the newest members might learn from, or shed additional light on the matter. Also the lurkers that have been here since the inception might shed some light on the matter as well. We all assume (and know in some cases) that the highest members of most EMS organizations are lurkers here. Why don’t they interject their thoughts and ideas into the mix as well? We say that one of the problems in EMS is lack of leadership education, why don’t the leaders of today (other than those few of you that post) come out of the shadows and help us solve this dilemma? Some of the “old hands” or schmucks as you called us need to encourage participation from the neophytes. I would love to get the perspective of more people, on the list than the few regular posters. I remember being new to the list (well before Yahoo) and not wanting to post for fear of saying something wrong. I think I’ve gotten over that fear now (I’m still wrong from time to time, but ain’t skeered no more). Happy reading and posting, E. Tate, LP Whitehouse, Texas Randell Pitts wrote: I offer that this IS pertinent to our list. I would think that adherence to traffic laws, or the lack thereof, would have a direct impact. Discussing the same may, in fact, make a real difference in our profession. We have quite a diverse membership on this list, all the way from well-known authors, to neophytes, to the average shmuck (me). If, in review, someone reads the statutes regarding emergency vehicle operation and then changes the way they drive their ambulance, thereby somehow preventing an incident/accident, did that not make a real difference in our profession? Perhaps not in the same way a “trick of the trade”, or ACLS revisions might, but definitely to that person, their partner(s), and their respective families. I am sure that the negative press and attention EMS receives from incidents or accidents involving ambulances would make a difference- in a negative way. Recent national stories involving EMS, some discussed here, attest to that very point. Flame away- I need the tan. Randell Re: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie Semantics aside, this is a scenario repeated thousands of times a year by EMS crews. Leaving the truck either running, or the keys in the ignition. Anyone that has spent time on the street, and not behind a desk would concede that they have, and probably still do it. I came to a conclusion recently that some people are educated far beyond their potential, which in short implies that people don't exercise common sense. Is this subject a unique situation that requires a long and involved conversation about law, and the TTC? Or is it just something that " EVERYONE " does and will continue to do in the future? If we are going to argue semantics about the technical law, why don't we argue that using a vehicle radio, or operating the siren COULD constitute a distraction for the driver, and hence be TECHNICALLY illegal. And before someone responds " your partner should be operating all of those! " Your partner is in the back attending to a patient if you are running code to a hospital. Can we talk about something more pertinent than this? I thought this was an educated group that discussed issues that would maybe make a real differance in our profession. Have a great day > This happens several times a year. I would just like to remind everyone of the following from the Texas Transportation Code. > > > § 545.404. UNATTENDED MOTOR VEHICLE. An operator may > not leave the vehicle unattended without: > (1) stopping the engine; > (2) locking the ignition; > (3) removing the key from the ignition; > (4) setting the parking brake effectively; and > (5) if standing on a grade, turning the front wheels to > the curb or side of the highway. > > > > E. Tate, LP > Whitehouse, Texas > > What's stopping you from joining EMSAT? http://www.TexasEMSAT.org > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover > Photo Books. You design it and we'll bind it! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 We did for a while, but it turned out to be quite an inconvenience. **BUT** I am really interested in the device I heard Arlington was using that allows you to take the keys while the engine is running. I have contacted Arlington regarding this device. Does anyone know what it is called or how I can get more info? Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:29 PM To: Subject: RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie " According to Ehler, owner and manager of Lubbock Aid Ambulance, it is standard procedure to leave the vehicle running, however, the driver should have locked the door. " Do your medics lock the doors now? Supervisor wrote: I am, by no means, opposed to locking up trucks when they are not in use. I just find it somewhat unreasonable in the climate in which I work to expect this to be done on every call. I am also aware of generators and AC-powered climate control systems and the expense involved in obtaining them and maintaining them. These systems are not always feasible for a small private company. By the way, we have had an ambulance stolen (See Plainview Daily Herald article 2/11/04, http://www.myplainview.com/04/02112004_ambulance_chase.htm), and in this case, as with most I’m sure, it was recovered very quickly. Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat retention will re-heat in a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? - Yes we carry blankets. Have you ever tried to conduct a head-to-toe exam, start an I.V., initiate cardiac monitoring, and apply bandaging and splinting materials without removing the blanket? What about units parked at the station, hospital, or DQ? Why do they need to be left running? - I was taught years ago as a new EMT that it takes more fuel to start a diesel than to leave it idling for 30 minutes. So leaving the truck running is a simple matter of cost effective fuel use. Of the scenarios you listed, it is not likely that the engine would need to be left running. Of course, that would be why I didn’t use these scenarios in my witty, if not somewhat sarcastic, introduction. - What does your legal counsel say about the liability of someone driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left running and unlocked? If my legal counsel is Wes Ogilvie, he says we should have little, if any, liability. Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:01 PM To: Subject: RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie There are ways to secure the unit while still supplying power to heat / AC and lights. Given that, is there any reason not to secure the unit? Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat retention will re-heat in a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? What about units parked at the station, hospital, or DQ? Why do they need to be left running? What does your legal counsel say about the liability of someone driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left running and unlocked? Even though we have some lee-way in the law as emergency vehicles, we are still held to the same standard as everyone else on the road. Civil juries tend to have no sense of humor as well. Food for thought, Tater Supervisor wrote: “I’m sorry that the ambulance is cold Mrs. , but the Texas Motor Vehicle Code requires us to turn the engine off.” “Vance, you can stop compressions to start the engine.” “I hope no one runs into our truck while it’s sitting in the middle of the road with no lights on.” I’ve got an idea. Leave your lights and your heater on while the engine is not running. The motor vehicle code does not require you to shut down you electrical systems. You can keep a pair of jumper cables with you. Then when you get out to your truck and the battery is dead, you can boost it off using a neighbor’s car. Yes , I know it’s the law, but if you follow this line of thinking, you probably think that the U.S. Government is responsible for 9/11, and not the terrorists who committed the act. Whatever happened to personal responsibility? Bad things happen because bad people do bad things, not because good people give them opportunity. (BTW, curbing the wheels and setting the brake do little to prevent theft) Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 2:03 PM To: Subject: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie Teens face charges after stealing ambulance 09:28 AM CST on Monday, January 9, 2006 WFAA-TV Two teens face charges this morning after allegedly stealing an ambulance. An Arlington ambulance crew was transferring a patient in Grand Prairie. When they came out, their ambulance was gone. Using GPS, police tracked it to Grapevine. There were no patients inside the vehicle at the time it was stolen. http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/wfaa/latestnews/stories/wfaaa060109_lj _ambulance.5e23f2a1.html This happens several times a year. I would just like to remind everyone of the following from the Texas Transportation Code. § 545.404. UNATTENDED MOTOR VEHICLE. An operator may not leave the vehicle unattended without: (1) stopping the engine; (2) locking the ignition; (3) removing the key from the ignition; (4) setting the parking brake effectively; and (5) if standing on a grade, turning the front wheels to the curb or side of the highway. E. Tate, LP Whitehouse, Texas What’s stopping you from joining EMSAT? http://www.TexasEMSAT.org --------------------------------- Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover Photo Books. You design it and we’ll bind it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 We did for a while, but it turned out to be quite an inconvenience. **BUT** I am really interested in the device I heard Arlington was using that allows you to take the keys while the engine is running. I have contacted Arlington regarding this device. Does anyone know what it is called or how I can get more info? Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:29 PM To: Subject: RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie " According to Ehler, owner and manager of Lubbock Aid Ambulance, it is standard procedure to leave the vehicle running, however, the driver should have locked the door. " Do your medics lock the doors now? Supervisor wrote: I am, by no means, opposed to locking up trucks when they are not in use. I just find it somewhat unreasonable in the climate in which I work to expect this to be done on every call. I am also aware of generators and AC-powered climate control systems and the expense involved in obtaining them and maintaining them. These systems are not always feasible for a small private company. By the way, we have had an ambulance stolen (See Plainview Daily Herald article 2/11/04, http://www.myplainview.com/04/02112004_ambulance_chase.htm), and in this case, as with most I’m sure, it was recovered very quickly. Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat retention will re-heat in a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? - Yes we carry blankets. Have you ever tried to conduct a head-to-toe exam, start an I.V., initiate cardiac monitoring, and apply bandaging and splinting materials without removing the blanket? What about units parked at the station, hospital, or DQ? Why do they need to be left running? - I was taught years ago as a new EMT that it takes more fuel to start a diesel than to leave it idling for 30 minutes. So leaving the truck running is a simple matter of cost effective fuel use. Of the scenarios you listed, it is not likely that the engine would need to be left running. Of course, that would be why I didn’t use these scenarios in my witty, if not somewhat sarcastic, introduction. - What does your legal counsel say about the liability of someone driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left running and unlocked? If my legal counsel is Wes Ogilvie, he says we should have little, if any, liability. Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:01 PM To: Subject: RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie There are ways to secure the unit while still supplying power to heat / AC and lights. Given that, is there any reason not to secure the unit? Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat retention will re-heat in a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? What about units parked at the station, hospital, or DQ? Why do they need to be left running? What does your legal counsel say about the liability of someone driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left running and unlocked? Even though we have some lee-way in the law as emergency vehicles, we are still held to the same standard as everyone else on the road. Civil juries tend to have no sense of humor as well. Food for thought, Tater Supervisor wrote: “I’m sorry that the ambulance is cold Mrs. , but the Texas Motor Vehicle Code requires us to turn the engine off.” “Vance, you can stop compressions to start the engine.” “I hope no one runs into our truck while it’s sitting in the middle of the road with no lights on.” I’ve got an idea. Leave your lights and your heater on while the engine is not running. The motor vehicle code does not require you to shut down you electrical systems. You can keep a pair of jumper cables with you. Then when you get out to your truck and the battery is dead, you can boost it off using a neighbor’s car. Yes , I know it’s the law, but if you follow this line of thinking, you probably think that the U.S. Government is responsible for 9/11, and not the terrorists who committed the act. Whatever happened to personal responsibility? Bad things happen because bad people do bad things, not because good people give them opportunity. (BTW, curbing the wheels and setting the brake do little to prevent theft) Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 2:03 PM To: Subject: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie Teens face charges after stealing ambulance 09:28 AM CST on Monday, January 9, 2006 WFAA-TV Two teens face charges this morning after allegedly stealing an ambulance. An Arlington ambulance crew was transferring a patient in Grand Prairie. When they came out, their ambulance was gone. Using GPS, police tracked it to Grapevine. There were no patients inside the vehicle at the time it was stolen. http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/wfaa/latestnews/stories/wfaaa060109_lj _ambulance.5e23f2a1.html This happens several times a year. I would just like to remind everyone of the following from the Texas Transportation Code. § 545.404. UNATTENDED MOTOR VEHICLE. An operator may not leave the vehicle unattended without: (1) stopping the engine; (2) locking the ignition; (3) removing the key from the ignition; (4) setting the parking brake effectively; and (5) if standing on a grade, turning the front wheels to the curb or side of the highway. E. Tate, LP Whitehouse, Texas What’s stopping you from joining EMSAT? http://www.TexasEMSAT.org --------------------------------- Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover Photo Books. You design it and we’ll bind it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 Don't many of the vehicle manufacturers offer a key less remote starting feature? Tater Supervisor wrote: We did for a while, but it turned out to be quite an inconvenience. **BUT** I am really interested in the device I heard Arlington was using that allows you to take the keys while the engine is running. I have contacted Arlington regarding this device. Does anyone know what it is called or how I can get more info? Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:29 PM To: Subject: RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie " According to Ehler, owner and manager of Lubbock Aid Ambulance, it is standard procedure to leave the vehicle running, however, the driver should have locked the door. " Do your medics lock the doors now? Supervisor wrote: I am, by no means, opposed to locking up trucks when they are not in use. I just find it somewhat unreasonable in the climate in which I work to expect this to be done on every call. I am also aware of generators and AC-powered climate control systems and the expense involved in obtaining them and maintaining them. These systems are not always feasible for a small private company. By the way, we have had an ambulance stolen (See Plainview Daily Herald article 2/11/04, http://www.myplainview.com/04/02112004_ambulance_chase.htm), and in this case, as with most I’m sure, it was recovered very quickly. Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat retention will re-heat in a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? - Yes we carry blankets. Have you ever tried to conduct a head-to-toe exam, start an I.V., initiate cardiac monitoring, and apply bandaging and splinting materials without removing the blanket? What about units parked at the station, hospital, or DQ? Why do they need to be left running? - I was taught years ago as a new EMT that it takes more fuel to start a diesel than to leave it idling for 30 minutes. So leaving the truck running is a simple matter of cost effective fuel use. Of the scenarios you listed, it is not likely that the engine would need to be left running. Of course, that would be why I didn’t use these scenarios in my witty, if not somewhat sarcastic, introduction. - What does your legal counsel say about the liability of someone driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left running and unlocked? If my legal counsel is Wes Ogilvie, he says we should have little, if any, liability. Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:01 PM To: Subject: RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie There are ways to secure the unit while still supplying power to heat / AC and lights. Given that, is there any reason not to secure the unit? Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat retention will re-heat in a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? What about units parked at the station, hospital, or DQ? Why do they need to be left running? What does your legal counsel say about the liability of someone driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left running and unlocked? Even though we have some lee-way in the law as emergency vehicles, we are still held to the same standard as everyone else on the road. Civil juries tend to have no sense of humor as well. Food for thought, Tater Supervisor wrote: “I’m sorry that the ambulance is cold Mrs. , but the Texas Motor Vehicle Code requires us to turn the engine off.” “Vance, you can stop compressions to start the engine.” “I hope no one runs into our truck while it’s sitting in the middle of the road with no lights on.” I’ve got an idea. Leave your lights and your heater on while the engine is not running. The motor vehicle code does not require you to shut down you electrical systems. You can keep a pair of jumper cables with you. Then when you get out to your truck and the battery is dead, you can boost it off using a neighbor’s car. Yes , I know it’s the law, but if you follow this line of thinking, you probably think that the U.S. Government is responsible for 9/11, and not the terrorists who committed the act. Whatever happened to personal responsibility? Bad things happen because bad people do bad things, not because good people give them opportunity. (BTW, curbing the wheels and setting the brake do little to prevent theft) Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 2:03 PM To: Subject: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie Teens face charges after stealing ambulance 09:28 AM CST on Monday, January 9, 2006 WFAA-TV Two teens face charges this morning after allegedly stealing an ambulance. An Arlington ambulance crew was transferring a patient in Grand Prairie. When they came out, their ambulance was gone. Using GPS, police tracked it to Grapevine. There were no patients inside the vehicle at the time it was stolen. http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/wfaa/latestnews/stories/wfaaa060109_lj _ambulance.5e23f2a1.html This happens several times a year. I would just like to remind everyone of the following from the Texas Transportation Code. § 545.404. UNATTENDED MOTOR VEHICLE. An operator may not leave the vehicle unattended without: (1) stopping the engine; (2) locking the ignition; (3) removing the key from the ignition; (4) setting the parking brake effectively; and (5) if standing on a grade, turning the front wheels to the curb or side of the highway. E. Tate, LP Whitehouse, Texas What’s stopping you from joining EMSAT? http://www.TexasEMSAT.org --------------------------------- Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover Photo Books. You design it and we’ll bind it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 Don't many of the vehicle manufacturers offer a key less remote starting feature? Tater Supervisor wrote: We did for a while, but it turned out to be quite an inconvenience. **BUT** I am really interested in the device I heard Arlington was using that allows you to take the keys while the engine is running. I have contacted Arlington regarding this device. Does anyone know what it is called or how I can get more info? Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:29 PM To: Subject: RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie " According to Ehler, owner and manager of Lubbock Aid Ambulance, it is standard procedure to leave the vehicle running, however, the driver should have locked the door. " Do your medics lock the doors now? Supervisor wrote: I am, by no means, opposed to locking up trucks when they are not in use. I just find it somewhat unreasonable in the climate in which I work to expect this to be done on every call. I am also aware of generators and AC-powered climate control systems and the expense involved in obtaining them and maintaining them. These systems are not always feasible for a small private company. By the way, we have had an ambulance stolen (See Plainview Daily Herald article 2/11/04, http://www.myplainview.com/04/02112004_ambulance_chase.htm), and in this case, as with most I’m sure, it was recovered very quickly. Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat retention will re-heat in a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? - Yes we carry blankets. Have you ever tried to conduct a head-to-toe exam, start an I.V., initiate cardiac monitoring, and apply bandaging and splinting materials without removing the blanket? What about units parked at the station, hospital, or DQ? Why do they need to be left running? - I was taught years ago as a new EMT that it takes more fuel to start a diesel than to leave it idling for 30 minutes. So leaving the truck running is a simple matter of cost effective fuel use. Of the scenarios you listed, it is not likely that the engine would need to be left running. Of course, that would be why I didn’t use these scenarios in my witty, if not somewhat sarcastic, introduction. - What does your legal counsel say about the liability of someone driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left running and unlocked? If my legal counsel is Wes Ogilvie, he says we should have little, if any, liability. Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:01 PM To: Subject: RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie There are ways to secure the unit while still supplying power to heat / AC and lights. Given that, is there any reason not to secure the unit? Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat retention will re-heat in a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? What about units parked at the station, hospital, or DQ? Why do they need to be left running? What does your legal counsel say about the liability of someone driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left running and unlocked? Even though we have some lee-way in the law as emergency vehicles, we are still held to the same standard as everyone else on the road. Civil juries tend to have no sense of humor as well. Food for thought, Tater Supervisor wrote: “I’m sorry that the ambulance is cold Mrs. , but the Texas Motor Vehicle Code requires us to turn the engine off.” “Vance, you can stop compressions to start the engine.” “I hope no one runs into our truck while it’s sitting in the middle of the road with no lights on.” I’ve got an idea. Leave your lights and your heater on while the engine is not running. The motor vehicle code does not require you to shut down you electrical systems. You can keep a pair of jumper cables with you. Then when you get out to your truck and the battery is dead, you can boost it off using a neighbor’s car. Yes , I know it’s the law, but if you follow this line of thinking, you probably think that the U.S. Government is responsible for 9/11, and not the terrorists who committed the act. Whatever happened to personal responsibility? Bad things happen because bad people do bad things, not because good people give them opportunity. (BTW, curbing the wheels and setting the brake do little to prevent theft) Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 2:03 PM To: Subject: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie Teens face charges after stealing ambulance 09:28 AM CST on Monday, January 9, 2006 WFAA-TV Two teens face charges this morning after allegedly stealing an ambulance. An Arlington ambulance crew was transferring a patient in Grand Prairie. When they came out, their ambulance was gone. Using GPS, police tracked it to Grapevine. There were no patients inside the vehicle at the time it was stolen. http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/wfaa/latestnews/stories/wfaaa060109_lj _ambulance.5e23f2a1.html This happens several times a year. I would just like to remind everyone of the following from the Texas Transportation Code. § 545.404. UNATTENDED MOTOR VEHICLE. An operator may not leave the vehicle unattended without: (1) stopping the engine; (2) locking the ignition; (3) removing the key from the ignition; (4) setting the parking brake effectively; and (5) if standing on a grade, turning the front wheels to the curb or side of the highway. E. Tate, LP Whitehouse, Texas What’s stopping you from joining EMSAT? http://www.TexasEMSAT.org --------------------------------- Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover Photo Books. You design it and we’ll bind it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 Don't many of the vehicle manufacturers offer a key less remote starting feature? Tater Supervisor wrote: We did for a while, but it turned out to be quite an inconvenience. **BUT** I am really interested in the device I heard Arlington was using that allows you to take the keys while the engine is running. I have contacted Arlington regarding this device. Does anyone know what it is called or how I can get more info? Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:29 PM To: Subject: RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie " According to Ehler, owner and manager of Lubbock Aid Ambulance, it is standard procedure to leave the vehicle running, however, the driver should have locked the door. " Do your medics lock the doors now? Supervisor wrote: I am, by no means, opposed to locking up trucks when they are not in use. I just find it somewhat unreasonable in the climate in which I work to expect this to be done on every call. I am also aware of generators and AC-powered climate control systems and the expense involved in obtaining them and maintaining them. These systems are not always feasible for a small private company. By the way, we have had an ambulance stolen (See Plainview Daily Herald article 2/11/04, http://www.myplainview.com/04/02112004_ambulance_chase.htm), and in this case, as with most I’m sure, it was recovered very quickly. Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat retention will re-heat in a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? - Yes we carry blankets. Have you ever tried to conduct a head-to-toe exam, start an I.V., initiate cardiac monitoring, and apply bandaging and splinting materials without removing the blanket? What about units parked at the station, hospital, or DQ? Why do they need to be left running? - I was taught years ago as a new EMT that it takes more fuel to start a diesel than to leave it idling for 30 minutes. So leaving the truck running is a simple matter of cost effective fuel use. Of the scenarios you listed, it is not likely that the engine would need to be left running. Of course, that would be why I didn’t use these scenarios in my witty, if not somewhat sarcastic, introduction. - What does your legal counsel say about the liability of someone driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left running and unlocked? If my legal counsel is Wes Ogilvie, he says we should have little, if any, liability. Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:01 PM To: Subject: RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie There are ways to secure the unit while still supplying power to heat / AC and lights. Given that, is there any reason not to secure the unit? Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat retention will re-heat in a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? What about units parked at the station, hospital, or DQ? Why do they need to be left running? What does your legal counsel say about the liability of someone driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left running and unlocked? Even though we have some lee-way in the law as emergency vehicles, we are still held to the same standard as everyone else on the road. Civil juries tend to have no sense of humor as well. Food for thought, Tater Supervisor wrote: “I’m sorry that the ambulance is cold Mrs. , but the Texas Motor Vehicle Code requires us to turn the engine off.” “Vance, you can stop compressions to start the engine.” “I hope no one runs into our truck while it’s sitting in the middle of the road with no lights on.” I’ve got an idea. Leave your lights and your heater on while the engine is not running. The motor vehicle code does not require you to shut down you electrical systems. You can keep a pair of jumper cables with you. Then when you get out to your truck and the battery is dead, you can boost it off using a neighbor’s car. Yes , I know it’s the law, but if you follow this line of thinking, you probably think that the U.S. Government is responsible for 9/11, and not the terrorists who committed the act. Whatever happened to personal responsibility? Bad things happen because bad people do bad things, not because good people give them opportunity. (BTW, curbing the wheels and setting the brake do little to prevent theft) Bullard BS, LP Operations Manager Lubbock Aid Ambulance <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> http://www.lubbockambulance.com _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of E. Tate Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 2:03 PM To: Subject: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie Teens face charges after stealing ambulance 09:28 AM CST on Monday, January 9, 2006 WFAA-TV Two teens face charges this morning after allegedly stealing an ambulance. An Arlington ambulance crew was transferring a patient in Grand Prairie. When they came out, their ambulance was gone. Using GPS, police tracked it to Grapevine. There were no patients inside the vehicle at the time it was stolen. http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/wfaa/latestnews/stories/wfaaa060109_lj _ambulance.5e23f2a1.html This happens several times a year. I would just like to remind everyone of the following from the Texas Transportation Code. § 545.404. UNATTENDED MOTOR VEHICLE. An operator may not leave the vehicle unattended without: (1) stopping the engine; (2) locking the ignition; (3) removing the key from the ignition; (4) setting the parking brake effectively; and (5) if standing on a grade, turning the front wheels to the curb or side of the highway. E. Tate, LP Whitehouse, Texas What’s stopping you from joining EMSAT? http://www.TexasEMSAT.org --------------------------------- Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover Photo Books. You design it and we’ll bind it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 AMR uses it, but the system I have seen is not good. A friend I know that is an installer says that they have been having problems with it. I do not know what kind. But he reccommended the system that DPS uses. He says it costs about $150/vehicle. Sal --- Supervisor wrote: > We did for a while, but it turned out to be quite an > inconvenience. **BUT** > I am really interested in the device I heard > Arlington was using that allows > you to take the keys while the engine is running. I > have contacted > Arlington regarding this device. Does anyone know > what it is called or how > I can get more info? > > > > > > > > Bullard BS, LP > > Operations Manager > > Lubbock Aid Ambulance > > <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> > http://www.lubbockambulance.com > > > > _____ > > From: > [mailto: ] On > Behalf Of E. Tate > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:29 PM > To: > Subject: RE: Teens face charges after > stealing ambulance - > Arlington / Grand Prairie > > > > " According to Ehler, owner and manager of > Lubbock Aid Ambulance, it > is standard procedure to leave the vehicle running, > however, the driver > should have locked the door. " > > Do your medics lock the doors now? > > > > Supervisor wrote: > I am, by no means, opposed to locking up trucks > when they are not in use. > I > just find it somewhat unreasonable in the climate in > which I work to expect > this to be done on every call. I am also aware of > generators and AC-powered > climate control systems and the expense involved in > obtaining them and > maintaining them. These systems are not always > feasible for a small private > company. By the way, we have had an ambulance > stolen (See Plainview Daily > Herald article 2/11/04, > http://www.myplainview.com/04/02112004_ambulance_chase.htm), > and in this > case, as with most I’m sure, it was recovered very > quickly. > > > > Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat > retention will re-heat in a > short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? > > - Yes we carry blankets. Have you ever > tried to conduct a > head-to-toe exam, start an I.V., initiate cardiac > monitoring, and apply > bandaging and splinting materials without removing > the blanket? > > > > What about units parked at the station, hospital, or > DQ? Why do they need > to be left running? > > - I was taught years ago as a new EMT that > it takes more fuel to > start a diesel than to leave it idling for 30 > minutes. So leaving the truck > running is a simple matter of cost effective fuel > use. Of the scenarios you > listed, it is not likely that the engine would need > to be left running. Of > course, that would be why I didn’t use these > scenarios in my witty, if not > somewhat sarcastic, introduction. > > > > - What does your legal counsel say about > the liability of someone > driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left > running and unlocked? > If my legal counsel is Wes Ogilvie, he says we > should have little, if any, > liability. > > > > > > > > > > Bullard BS, LP > > Operations Manager > > Lubbock Aid Ambulance > > <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> > http://www.lubbockambulance.com > > > > _____ > > From: > [mailto: ] On > Behalf Of E. Tate > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:01 PM > To: > Subject: RE: Teens face charges after > stealing ambulance - > Arlington / Grand Prairie > > > > There are ways to secure the unit while still > supplying power to heat / AC > and lights. Given that, is there any reason not to > secure the unit? > > Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat > retention will re-heat in > a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? > > What about units parked at the station, hospital, > or DQ? Why do they need > to be left running? > > What does your legal counsel say about the > liability of someone driving > off and crashing an ambulance that was left running > and unlocked? > > Even though we have some lee-way in the law as > emergency vehicles, we are > still held to the same standard as everyone else on > the road. Civil juries > tend to have no sense of humor as well. > > > Food for thought, > Tater > > Supervisor wrote: > “I’m sorry that the ambulance is cold Mrs. , > but the Texas Motor > Vehicle Code requires us to turn the engine off.” > > “Vance, you can stop compressions to start the > engine.” > > “I hope no one runs into our truck while it’s > sitting in the middle of the > road with no lights on.” > > > > I’ve got an idea. Leave your lights and your heater > on while the engine is > not running. The motor vehicle code does not > require you to shut down you > electrical systems. You can keep a pair of jumper > cables with you. Then > when you get out to your truck and the battery is > dead, you can boost it off > using a neighbor’s car. > > > > Yes , I know it’s the law, but if you follow > this line of thinking, you > probably think that the U.S. Government is > responsible for 9/11, and not the > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 AMR uses it, but the system I have seen is not good. A friend I know that is an installer says that they have been having problems with it. I do not know what kind. But he reccommended the system that DPS uses. He says it costs about $150/vehicle. Sal --- Supervisor wrote: > We did for a while, but it turned out to be quite an > inconvenience. **BUT** > I am really interested in the device I heard > Arlington was using that allows > you to take the keys while the engine is running. I > have contacted > Arlington regarding this device. Does anyone know > what it is called or how > I can get more info? > > > > > > > > Bullard BS, LP > > Operations Manager > > Lubbock Aid Ambulance > > <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> > http://www.lubbockambulance.com > > > > _____ > > From: > [mailto: ] On > Behalf Of E. Tate > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:29 PM > To: > Subject: RE: Teens face charges after > stealing ambulance - > Arlington / Grand Prairie > > > > " According to Ehler, owner and manager of > Lubbock Aid Ambulance, it > is standard procedure to leave the vehicle running, > however, the driver > should have locked the door. " > > Do your medics lock the doors now? > > > > Supervisor wrote: > I am, by no means, opposed to locking up trucks > when they are not in use. > I > just find it somewhat unreasonable in the climate in > which I work to expect > this to be done on every call. I am also aware of > generators and AC-powered > climate control systems and the expense involved in > obtaining them and > maintaining them. These systems are not always > feasible for a small private > company. By the way, we have had an ambulance > stolen (See Plainview Daily > Herald article 2/11/04, > http://www.myplainview.com/04/02112004_ambulance_chase.htm), > and in this > case, as with most I’m sure, it was recovered very > quickly. > > > > Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat > retention will re-heat in a > short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? > > - Yes we carry blankets. Have you ever > tried to conduct a > head-to-toe exam, start an I.V., initiate cardiac > monitoring, and apply > bandaging and splinting materials without removing > the blanket? > > > > What about units parked at the station, hospital, or > DQ? Why do they need > to be left running? > > - I was taught years ago as a new EMT that > it takes more fuel to > start a diesel than to leave it idling for 30 > minutes. So leaving the truck > running is a simple matter of cost effective fuel > use. Of the scenarios you > listed, it is not likely that the engine would need > to be left running. Of > course, that would be why I didn’t use these > scenarios in my witty, if not > somewhat sarcastic, introduction. > > > > - What does your legal counsel say about > the liability of someone > driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left > running and unlocked? > If my legal counsel is Wes Ogilvie, he says we > should have little, if any, > liability. > > > > > > > > > > Bullard BS, LP > > Operations Manager > > Lubbock Aid Ambulance > > <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> > http://www.lubbockambulance.com > > > > _____ > > From: > [mailto: ] On > Behalf Of E. Tate > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:01 PM > To: > Subject: RE: Teens face charges after > stealing ambulance - > Arlington / Grand Prairie > > > > There are ways to secure the unit while still > supplying power to heat / AC > and lights. Given that, is there any reason not to > secure the unit? > > Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat > retention will re-heat in > a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? > > What about units parked at the station, hospital, > or DQ? Why do they need > to be left running? > > What does your legal counsel say about the > liability of someone driving > off and crashing an ambulance that was left running > and unlocked? > > Even though we have some lee-way in the law as > emergency vehicles, we are > still held to the same standard as everyone else on > the road. Civil juries > tend to have no sense of humor as well. > > > Food for thought, > Tater > > Supervisor wrote: > “I’m sorry that the ambulance is cold Mrs. , > but the Texas Motor > Vehicle Code requires us to turn the engine off.” > > “Vance, you can stop compressions to start the > engine.” > > “I hope no one runs into our truck while it’s > sitting in the middle of the > road with no lights on.” > > > > I’ve got an idea. Leave your lights and your heater > on while the engine is > not running. The motor vehicle code does not > require you to shut down you > electrical systems. You can keep a pair of jumper > cables with you. Then > when you get out to your truck and the battery is > dead, you can boost it off > using a neighbor’s car. > > > > Yes , I know it’s the law, but if you follow > this line of thinking, you > probably think that the U.S. Government is > responsible for 9/11, and not the > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 AMR uses it, but the system I have seen is not good. A friend I know that is an installer says that they have been having problems with it. I do not know what kind. But he reccommended the system that DPS uses. He says it costs about $150/vehicle. Sal --- Supervisor wrote: > We did for a while, but it turned out to be quite an > inconvenience. **BUT** > I am really interested in the device I heard > Arlington was using that allows > you to take the keys while the engine is running. I > have contacted > Arlington regarding this device. Does anyone know > what it is called or how > I can get more info? > > > > > > > > Bullard BS, LP > > Operations Manager > > Lubbock Aid Ambulance > > <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> > http://www.lubbockambulance.com > > > > _____ > > From: > [mailto: ] On > Behalf Of E. Tate > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:29 PM > To: > Subject: RE: Teens face charges after > stealing ambulance - > Arlington / Grand Prairie > > > > " According to Ehler, owner and manager of > Lubbock Aid Ambulance, it > is standard procedure to leave the vehicle running, > however, the driver > should have locked the door. " > > Do your medics lock the doors now? > > > > Supervisor wrote: > I am, by no means, opposed to locking up trucks > when they are not in use. > I > just find it somewhat unreasonable in the climate in > which I work to expect > this to be done on every call. I am also aware of > generators and AC-powered > climate control systems and the expense involved in > obtaining them and > maintaining them. These systems are not always > feasible for a small private > company. By the way, we have had an ambulance > stolen (See Plainview Daily > Herald article 2/11/04, > http://www.myplainview.com/04/02112004_ambulance_chase.htm), > and in this > case, as with most I’m sure, it was recovered very > quickly. > > > > Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat > retention will re-heat in a > short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? > > - Yes we carry blankets. Have you ever > tried to conduct a > head-to-toe exam, start an I.V., initiate cardiac > monitoring, and apply > bandaging and splinting materials without removing > the blanket? > > > > What about units parked at the station, hospital, or > DQ? Why do they need > to be left running? > > - I was taught years ago as a new EMT that > it takes more fuel to > start a diesel than to leave it idling for 30 > minutes. So leaving the truck > running is a simple matter of cost effective fuel > use. Of the scenarios you > listed, it is not likely that the engine would need > to be left running. Of > course, that would be why I didn’t use these > scenarios in my witty, if not > somewhat sarcastic, introduction. > > > > - What does your legal counsel say about > the liability of someone > driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left > running and unlocked? > If my legal counsel is Wes Ogilvie, he says we > should have little, if any, > liability. > > > > > > > > > > Bullard BS, LP > > Operations Manager > > Lubbock Aid Ambulance > > <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> > http://www.lubbockambulance.com > > > > _____ > > From: > [mailto: ] On > Behalf Of E. Tate > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:01 PM > To: > Subject: RE: Teens face charges after > stealing ambulance - > Arlington / Grand Prairie > > > > There are ways to secure the unit while still > supplying power to heat / AC > and lights. Given that, is there any reason not to > secure the unit? > > Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat > retention will re-heat in > a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? > > What about units parked at the station, hospital, > or DQ? Why do they need > to be left running? > > What does your legal counsel say about the > liability of someone driving > off and crashing an ambulance that was left running > and unlocked? > > Even though we have some lee-way in the law as > emergency vehicles, we are > still held to the same standard as everyone else on > the road. Civil juries > tend to have no sense of humor as well. > > > Food for thought, > Tater > > Supervisor wrote: > “I’m sorry that the ambulance is cold Mrs. , > but the Texas Motor > Vehicle Code requires us to turn the engine off.” > > “Vance, you can stop compressions to start the > engine.” > > “I hope no one runs into our truck while it’s > sitting in the middle of the > road with no lights on.” > > > > I’ve got an idea. Leave your lights and your heater > on while the engine is > not running. The motor vehicle code does not > require you to shut down you > electrical systems. You can keep a pair of jumper > cables with you. Then > when you get out to your truck and the battery is > dead, you can boost it off > using a neighbor’s car. > > > > Yes , I know it’s the law, but if you follow > this line of thinking, you > probably think that the U.S. Government is > responsible for 9/11, and not the > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 AMR uses it, but the system I have seen is not good. A friend I know that is an installer says that they have been having problems with it. I do not know what kind. But he reccommended the system that DPS uses. Sal --- Supervisor wrote: > We did for a while, but it turned out to be quite an > inconvenience. **BUT** > I am really interested in the device I heard > Arlington was using that allows > you to take the keys while the engine is running. I > have contacted > Arlington regarding this device. Does anyone know > what it is called or how > I can get more info? > > > > > > > > Bullard BS, LP > > Operations Manager > > Lubbock Aid Ambulance > > <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> > http://www.lubbockambulance.com > > > > _____ > > From: > [mailto: ] On > Behalf Of E. Tate > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:29 PM > To: > Subject: RE: Teens face charges after > stealing ambulance - > Arlington / Grand Prairie > > > > " According to Ehler, owner and manager of > Lubbock Aid Ambulance, it > is standard procedure to leave the vehicle running, > however, the driver > should have locked the door. " > > Do your medics lock the doors now? > > > > Supervisor wrote: > I am, by no means, opposed to locking up trucks > when they are not in use. > I > just find it somewhat unreasonable in the climate in > which I work to expect > this to be done on every call. I am also aware of > generators and AC-powered > climate control systems and the expense involved in > obtaining them and > maintaining them. These systems are not always > feasible for a small private > company. By the way, we have had an ambulance > stolen (See Plainview Daily > Herald article 2/11/04, > http://www.myplainview.com/04/02112004_ambulance_chase.htm), > and in this > case, as with most I’m sure, it was recovered very > quickly. > > > > Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat > retention will re-heat in a > short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? > > - Yes we carry blankets. Have you ever > tried to conduct a > head-to-toe exam, start an I.V., initiate cardiac > monitoring, and apply > bandaging and splinting materials without removing > the blanket? > > > > What about units parked at the station, hospital, or > DQ? Why do they need > to be left running? > > - I was taught years ago as a new EMT that > it takes more fuel to > start a diesel than to leave it idling for 30 > minutes. So leaving the truck > running is a simple matter of cost effective fuel > use. Of the scenarios you > listed, it is not likely that the engine would need > to be left running. Of > course, that would be why I didn’t use these > scenarios in my witty, if not > somewhat sarcastic, introduction. > > > > - What does your legal counsel say about > the liability of someone > driving off and crashing an ambulance that was left > running and unlocked? > If my legal counsel is Wes Ogilvie, he says we > should have little, if any, > liability. > > > > > > > > > > Bullard BS, LP > > Operations Manager > > Lubbock Aid Ambulance > > <http://www.lubbockambulance.com/> > http://www.lubbockambulance.com > > > > _____ > > From: > [mailto: ] On > Behalf Of E. Tate > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:01 PM > To: > Subject: RE: Teens face charges after > stealing ambulance - > Arlington / Grand Prairie > > > > There are ways to secure the unit while still > supplying power to heat / AC > and lights. Given that, is there any reason not to > secure the unit? > > Heat won't escape that fast, and due to the heat > retention will re-heat in > a short time. Also, don't you carry blankets? > > What about units parked at the station, hospital, > or DQ? Why do they need > to be left running? > > What does your legal counsel say about the > liability of someone driving > off and crashing an ambulance that was left running > and unlocked? > > Even though we have some lee-way in the law as > emergency vehicles, we are > still held to the same standard as everyone else on > the road. Civil juries > tend to have no sense of humor as well. > > > Food for thought, > Tater > > Supervisor wrote: > “I’m sorry that the ambulance is cold Mrs. , > but the Texas Motor > Vehicle Code requires us to turn the engine off.” > > “Vance, you can stop compressions to start the > engine.” > > “I hope no one runs into our truck while it’s > sitting in the middle of the > road with no lights on.” > > > > I’ve got an idea. Leave your lights and your heater > on while the engine is > not running. The motor vehicle code does not > require you to shut down you > electrical systems. You can keep a pair of jumper > cables with you. Then > when you get out to your truck and the battery is > dead, you can boost it off > using a neighbor’s car. > > > > Yes , I know it’s the law, but if you follow > this line of thinking, you > probably think that the U.S. Government is > responsible for 9/11, and not the > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 Apologies to all- I don't know why I didn't think of this before, but. What I do at another work location is I carry 2 sets of keys- one to run the vehicle, and another to access it; I lock the vehicle if I leave it running and step out. Randell RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie AMR uses it, but the system I have seen is not good. A friend I know that is an installer says that they have been having problems with it. I do not know what kind. But he reccommended the system that DPS uses. Sa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 Apologies to all- I don't know why I didn't think of this before, but. What I do at another work location is I carry 2 sets of keys- one to run the vehicle, and another to access it; I lock the vehicle if I leave it running and step out. Randell RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie AMR uses it, but the system I have seen is not good. A friend I know that is an installer says that they have been having problems with it. I do not know what kind. But he reccommended the system that DPS uses. Sa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 Apologies to all- I don't know why I didn't think of this before, but. What I do at another work location is I carry 2 sets of keys- one to run the vehicle, and another to access it; I lock the vehicle if I leave it running and step out. Randell RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie AMR uses it, but the system I have seen is not good. A friend I know that is an installer says that they have been having problems with it. I do not know what kind. But he reccommended the system that DPS uses. Sa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 This beats nothing......but a broken window and.........away the Bambulance goes with some lunitic behind the wheel.... (wait what changed here....) Randell Pitts wrote: Apologies to all- I don't know why I didn't think of this before, but. What I do at another work location is I carry 2 sets of keys- one to run the vehicle, and another to access it; I lock the vehicle if I leave it running and step out. Randell RE: Teens face charges after stealing ambulance - Arlington / Grand Prairie AMR uses it, but the system I have seen is not good. A friend I know that is an installer says that they have been having problems with it. I do not know what kind. But he reccommended the system that DPS uses. Sa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 And then all I have to do is break the window and guess what... I still drive away with your ambulance. With the AMR system if you step on the brakes it turns off. With the DPS system you simply cannot shift out of gear unless you know where the switch is. Sal --- Randell Pitts wrote: > Apologies to all- I don't know why I didn't think of > this before, but. > > What I do at another work location is I carry 2 sets > of keys- one to run > the vehicle, and another to access it; I lock the > vehicle if I leave it > running and step out. > > Randell > > RE: Teens face charges after > stealing ambulance - > Arlington / Grand Prairie > > AMR uses it, but the system I have seen is not good. > > A friend I know that is an installer says that they > have been having problems with it. I do not know > what > kind. But he reccommended the system that DPS uses. > Sa > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 And then all I have to do is break the window and guess what... I still drive away with your ambulance. With the AMR system if you step on the brakes it turns off. With the DPS system you simply cannot shift out of gear unless you know where the switch is. Sal --- Randell Pitts wrote: > Apologies to all- I don't know why I didn't think of > this before, but. > > What I do at another work location is I carry 2 sets > of keys- one to run > the vehicle, and another to access it; I lock the > vehicle if I leave it > running and step out. > > Randell > > RE: Teens face charges after > stealing ambulance - > Arlington / Grand Prairie > > AMR uses it, but the system I have seen is not good. > > A friend I know that is an installer says that they > have been having problems with it. I do not know > what > kind. But he reccommended the system that DPS uses. > Sa > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 And then all I have to do is break the window and guess what... I still drive away with your ambulance. With the AMR system if you step on the brakes it turns off. With the DPS system you simply cannot shift out of gear unless you know where the switch is. Sal --- Randell Pitts wrote: > Apologies to all- I don't know why I didn't think of > this before, but. > > What I do at another work location is I carry 2 sets > of keys- one to run > the vehicle, and another to access it; I lock the > vehicle if I leave it > running and step out. > > Randell > > RE: Teens face charges after > stealing ambulance - > Arlington / Grand Prairie > > AMR uses it, but the system I have seen is not good. > > A friend I know that is an installer says that they > have been having problems with it. I do not know > what > kind. But he reccommended the system that DPS uses. > Sa > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.