Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 I would have liked to read that thread. A similar thing happened on the general WTO thread. A woman came on a thread about something and posted a general comment that everyone was being very negative about BPD and she was here to find help and positive reinforcement as she tries to stay with her BPD partner. She came from the point of view of someone who does get to choose whether to stay or go, and had no awareness at all of people who are blood family members, especially KOs, and that we don't always get a choice. At least not until we turn 18--and that means we have to put up with a lot of abuse that we can't say anything about because a lot of the time no one believes us or downplays the situation, like we are bad children and are just complaining about being disciplined or something. Other commenters called her out on the fact that a lot of us don't have a safe place to vent or express our anger, and she recognized that she came off as callous. The conversation did take a turn and others started discussing successful strategies for staying with a partner, but I think as KOs we do get overlooked as victims of their abuse sometimes. Coming to terms with the illness versus the person with the illness is something I'm having a hard time dealing with right now. And to say I don't have a right to my anger or that it's unfounded, are you KIDDING me?! When my mother attacked me on Christmas, my anger isn't justified at her attempt to her me? My anger towards her for that isn't justified? Isn't legitimate? That's ridiculous. Being angry and being vengeful are two different things. Expressing anger in healthy ways is essential to being a healthy person. To suppress our anger will put us in the same boat as our BPD relatives--who cannot express emotions appropriately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 Can you paste them for us to see Miss Annie, or does that violate some sort of agreement? Thanks > > > I would have liked to read that thread. A similar thing happened on the > general WTO thread. A woman came on a thread about something and posted a > general comment that everyone was being very negative about BPD and she was > here to find help and positive reinforcement as she tries to stay with her > BPD partner. She came from the point of view of someone who does get to > choose whether to stay or go, and had no awareness at all of people who are > blood family members, especially KOs, and that we don't always get a choice. > At least not until we turn 18--and that means we have to put up with a lot > of abuse that we can't say anything about because a lot of the time no one > believes us or downplays the situation, like we are bad children and are > just complaining about being disciplined or something. > > Other commenters called her out on the fact that a lot of us don't have a > safe place to vent or express our anger, and she recognized that she came > off as callous. The conversation did take a turn and others started > discussing successful strategies for staying with a partner, but I think as > KOs we do get overlooked as victims of their abuse sometimes. > > Coming to terms with the illness versus the person with the illness is > something I'm having a hard time dealing with right now. And to say I don't > have a right to my anger or that it's unfounded, are you KIDDING me?! When > my mother attacked me on Christmas, my anger isn't justified at her attempt > to her me? My anger towards her for that isn't justified? Isn't legitimate? > That's ridiculous. Being angry and being vengeful are two different things. > > Expressing anger in healthy ways is essential to being a healthy person. To > suppress our anger will put us in the same boat as our BPD relatives--who > cannot express emotions appropriately. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 Can you paste them for us to see Miss Annie, or does that violate some sort of agreement? Thanks > > > I would have liked to read that thread. A similar thing happened on the > general WTO thread. A woman came on a thread about something and posted a > general comment that everyone was being very negative about BPD and she was > here to find help and positive reinforcement as she tries to stay with her > BPD partner. She came from the point of view of someone who does get to > choose whether to stay or go, and had no awareness at all of people who are > blood family members, especially KOs, and that we don't always get a choice. > At least not until we turn 18--and that means we have to put up with a lot > of abuse that we can't say anything about because a lot of the time no one > believes us or downplays the situation, like we are bad children and are > just complaining about being disciplined or something. > > Other commenters called her out on the fact that a lot of us don't have a > safe place to vent or express our anger, and she recognized that she came > off as callous. The conversation did take a turn and others started > discussing successful strategies for staying with a partner, but I think as > KOs we do get overlooked as victims of their abuse sometimes. > > Coming to terms with the illness versus the person with the illness is > something I'm having a hard time dealing with right now. And to say I don't > have a right to my anger or that it's unfounded, are you KIDDING me?! When > my mother attacked me on Christmas, my anger isn't justified at her attempt > to her me? My anger towards her for that isn't justified? Isn't legitimate? > That's ridiculous. Being angry and being vengeful are two different things. > > Expressing anger in healthy ways is essential to being a healthy person. To > suppress our anger will put us in the same boat as our BPD relatives--who > cannot express emotions appropriately. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 I'm not sure I have the right to re-post the bulk of an entire thread that originated at another support group (Randi?) but I'll share that your sentiment of " Are you kidding me? " was expressed often in various ways by various members. I share that sentiment! There are many such groups on the Internet now, some are mixed: for both those with bpd and the family members of those with bpd, and others are exclusively for one or the other. Its the mixed forums that seem to have generated the most intense (and in some cases vitriolic) debate. It just seems logical to me to separate the groups, because if one has bpd and is easily triggered by criticism, then reading about horrific abuse and injuries perpetrated by those with bpd and the resulting righteous indignation by the victims would indeed be highly triggering. However, I do think that its important for us adult survivors of child abuse to speak out in public forums about the fact that our bpd/npd or Cluster B parents did commit emotional and physical and even sexual abuse on us. According to Randi (the list owner here and author of Stop Walking On Eggshells and other books) high-functioning bpds are *virtually invisible* to the psychiatric community because they don't seek treatment, and these high-functioning personality-disordered parents are the ones committing the insidious, covert abuse that does just as much damage (if not more) than the overt, obvious physical abusers. So, when you get a chance on a public forum like the comments section at the NY Times RE an article about bpd, or at Psychology Today, or other public e-zines, speak up. The general population and the psychiatric community needs to be more aware that much child abuse is perpetrated by mentally ill parents (including bpd parents) and alcoholic/substance abusing parents who may also be very high-functioning, so its covert abuse, and the children endure it, alone and voiceless. -Annie > > I would have liked to read that thread. A similar thing happened on the general WTO thread. A woman came on a thread about something and posted a general comment that everyone was being very negative about BPD and she was here to find help and positive reinforcement as she tries to stay with her BPD partner. She came from the point of view of someone who does get to choose whether to stay or go, and had no awareness at all of people who are blood family members, especially KOs, and that we don't always get a choice. At least not until we turn 18--and that means we have to put up with a lot of abuse that we can't say anything about because a lot of the time no one believes us or downplays the situation, like we are bad children and are just complaining about being disciplined or something. > > Other commenters called her out on the fact that a lot of us don't have a safe place to vent or express our anger, and she recognized that she came off as callous. The conversation did take a turn and others started discussing successful strategies for staying with a partner, but I think as KOs we do get overlooked as victims of their abuse sometimes. > > Coming to terms with the illness versus the person with the illness is something I'm having a hard time dealing with right now. And to say I don't have a right to my anger or that it's unfounded, are you KIDDING me?! When my mother attacked me on Christmas, my anger isn't justified at her attempt to her me? My anger towards her for that isn't justified? Isn't legitimate? That's ridiculous. Being angry and being vengeful are two different things. > > Expressing anger in healthy ways is essential to being a healthy person. To suppress our anger will put us in the same boat as our BPD relatives--who cannot express emotions appropriately. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 I'm not sure I have the right to re-post the bulk of an entire thread that originated at another support group (Randi?) but I'll share that your sentiment of " Are you kidding me? " was expressed often in various ways by various members. I share that sentiment! There are many such groups on the Internet now, some are mixed: for both those with bpd and the family members of those with bpd, and others are exclusively for one or the other. Its the mixed forums that seem to have generated the most intense (and in some cases vitriolic) debate. It just seems logical to me to separate the groups, because if one has bpd and is easily triggered by criticism, then reading about horrific abuse and injuries perpetrated by those with bpd and the resulting righteous indignation by the victims would indeed be highly triggering. However, I do think that its important for us adult survivors of child abuse to speak out in public forums about the fact that our bpd/npd or Cluster B parents did commit emotional and physical and even sexual abuse on us. According to Randi (the list owner here and author of Stop Walking On Eggshells and other books) high-functioning bpds are *virtually invisible* to the psychiatric community because they don't seek treatment, and these high-functioning personality-disordered parents are the ones committing the insidious, covert abuse that does just as much damage (if not more) than the overt, obvious physical abusers. So, when you get a chance on a public forum like the comments section at the NY Times RE an article about bpd, or at Psychology Today, or other public e-zines, speak up. The general population and the psychiatric community needs to be more aware that much child abuse is perpetrated by mentally ill parents (including bpd parents) and alcoholic/substance abusing parents who may also be very high-functioning, so its covert abuse, and the children endure it, alone and voiceless. -Annie > > I would have liked to read that thread. A similar thing happened on the general WTO thread. A woman came on a thread about something and posted a general comment that everyone was being very negative about BPD and she was here to find help and positive reinforcement as she tries to stay with her BPD partner. She came from the point of view of someone who does get to choose whether to stay or go, and had no awareness at all of people who are blood family members, especially KOs, and that we don't always get a choice. At least not until we turn 18--and that means we have to put up with a lot of abuse that we can't say anything about because a lot of the time no one believes us or downplays the situation, like we are bad children and are just complaining about being disciplined or something. > > Other commenters called her out on the fact that a lot of us don't have a safe place to vent or express our anger, and she recognized that she came off as callous. The conversation did take a turn and others started discussing successful strategies for staying with a partner, but I think as KOs we do get overlooked as victims of their abuse sometimes. > > Coming to terms with the illness versus the person with the illness is something I'm having a hard time dealing with right now. And to say I don't have a right to my anger or that it's unfounded, are you KIDDING me?! When my mother attacked me on Christmas, my anger isn't justified at her attempt to her me? My anger towards her for that isn't justified? Isn't legitimate? That's ridiculous. Being angry and being vengeful are two different things. > > Expressing anger in healthy ways is essential to being a healthy person. To suppress our anger will put us in the same boat as our BPD relatives--who cannot express emotions appropriately. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 I'm not sure I have the right to re-post the bulk of an entire thread that originated at another support group (Randi?) but I'll share that your sentiment of " Are you kidding me? " was expressed often in various ways by various members. I share that sentiment! There are many such groups on the Internet now, some are mixed: for both those with bpd and the family members of those with bpd, and others are exclusively for one or the other. Its the mixed forums that seem to have generated the most intense (and in some cases vitriolic) debate. It just seems logical to me to separate the groups, because if one has bpd and is easily triggered by criticism, then reading about horrific abuse and injuries perpetrated by those with bpd and the resulting righteous indignation by the victims would indeed be highly triggering. However, I do think that its important for us adult survivors of child abuse to speak out in public forums about the fact that our bpd/npd or Cluster B parents did commit emotional and physical and even sexual abuse on us. According to Randi (the list owner here and author of Stop Walking On Eggshells and other books) high-functioning bpds are *virtually invisible* to the psychiatric community because they don't seek treatment, and these high-functioning personality-disordered parents are the ones committing the insidious, covert abuse that does just as much damage (if not more) than the overt, obvious physical abusers. So, when you get a chance on a public forum like the comments section at the NY Times RE an article about bpd, or at Psychology Today, or other public e-zines, speak up. The general population and the psychiatric community needs to be more aware that much child abuse is perpetrated by mentally ill parents (including bpd parents) and alcoholic/substance abusing parents who may also be very high-functioning, so its covert abuse, and the children endure it, alone and voiceless. -Annie > > I would have liked to read that thread. A similar thing happened on the general WTO thread. A woman came on a thread about something and posted a general comment that everyone was being very negative about BPD and she was here to find help and positive reinforcement as she tries to stay with her BPD partner. She came from the point of view of someone who does get to choose whether to stay or go, and had no awareness at all of people who are blood family members, especially KOs, and that we don't always get a choice. At least not until we turn 18--and that means we have to put up with a lot of abuse that we can't say anything about because a lot of the time no one believes us or downplays the situation, like we are bad children and are just complaining about being disciplined or something. > > Other commenters called her out on the fact that a lot of us don't have a safe place to vent or express our anger, and she recognized that she came off as callous. The conversation did take a turn and others started discussing successful strategies for staying with a partner, but I think as KOs we do get overlooked as victims of their abuse sometimes. > > Coming to terms with the illness versus the person with the illness is something I'm having a hard time dealing with right now. And to say I don't have a right to my anger or that it's unfounded, are you KIDDING me?! When my mother attacked me on Christmas, my anger isn't justified at her attempt to her me? My anger towards her for that isn't justified? Isn't legitimate? That's ridiculous. Being angry and being vengeful are two different things. > > Expressing anger in healthy ways is essential to being a healthy person. To suppress our anger will put us in the same boat as our BPD relatives--who cannot express emotions appropriately. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 Wow Annie, that really saddens me to hear that. Anger in it's self is not an unhealthy emotion! It's not the anger so much as what the person experiencing does with it that can make it " bad " . But yes, I agree, I was also not allowed to express anger at all. It's taken me years to get there, and even still I always cry when I'm super angry. ly it saddens me that they would take such a negative view point on anger. Anger is a normal emotion and there are healthy ways to express it. Sadly most KOs probably had to learn how to express it because it was forbidden. And to make it forbidden on a list is not really fair. Healthy anger is good. Mia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 Wow Annie, that really saddens me to hear that. Anger in it's self is not an unhealthy emotion! It's not the anger so much as what the person experiencing does with it that can make it " bad " . But yes, I agree, I was also not allowed to express anger at all. It's taken me years to get there, and even still I always cry when I'm super angry. ly it saddens me that they would take such a negative view point on anger. Anger is a normal emotion and there are healthy ways to express it. Sadly most KOs probably had to learn how to express it because it was forbidden. And to make it forbidden on a list is not really fair. Healthy anger is good. Mia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 My therapist that I had before I moved out of state did say that anger is a normal, healthy emotion. I think as KOs we would think otherwise because of our nadas/fadas telling us otherwise... maybe not with words, but in other, non-verbal ways as well. And it's good that you can feel the anger, Jill. Nothing wrong with acknowledging it and knowing what it is instead of mislabeling it as guilt, hurt, confusion, etc. But that's where it ends up when we can't put it in the box that says " anger " . Nothing at all wrong with being angry, IMO. It's what you do with it. But in it's self, nope. Anger is not a bad thing. Mia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 Do you remember that book " Brightsided " ? I think this mentality of trying to make everything positive and refusing to acknowledge real negative events and reactions about everything in American culture is part of what is at play here. The talk of forgiveness and letting go of anger is treated as superior and those who still want to express their valid feelings are treated as needing to " let go " and be more positive. It is maddening but it all comes down to the moderators on a particular group what the tone ends up being. I was once on a wonderful group for social anxiety where people shared real and raw stories of their experiences. The mods changed to some sunshine and light folks and people shut down, stopped being so honest, and in general the group became less healing and open. So anywho, I hear ya. > > I was following a very lively and impassioned thread of discussion regarding the question " Do the family members of those with bpd show enough compassion for the bpd? " over at another group, bpdfamily.com. > > That thread was moved, then locked, then it vanished altogether. Fortunately, I was able to copy and save most of it. > > The thread had provoked a large number of responses from many members because the original short essays that began the thread (and the moderator who posted the essays, in his his own comments) implied that family members need to show more compassion toward their bpd relative and that expressing anger towards those with bpd who have been abusive to us is inappropriate. > > The replies were all so very well-considered, intelligent and thoughtful, and were not insulting or cruel: just extremely frank and honest. The most common sentiment expressed was that the KOs *have been* (and in some cases still are) showing much compassion for *decades* toward their abusive bpd parent, and the only result was more abuse. Many of the posters shared that they had been forbidden to show any anger about their mistreatment (or forbidden to express anger at all, ever) and they now felt that finally they had a safe place to openly speak of their hurt, their anger and their outrage and receive compassionate validation and support for their wounded child. > > The moderators, though, kept attempting to reintroduce the idea that anger is wrong, anger is unhealthy, anger is inappropriate, etc. > > The point I wanted to make, is that it still surprises me that *even in forums and Groups that exist to support the healing of those who were abused by mentally ill parents* it is still " politically incorrect " to lay the blame for committing abuse at the feet of the abuser *because the abuser is mentally ill.* Go figure! > > The overwhelming consensus by the member/posters was that it is healthy, empowering, and appropriate to feel angry about being chronically abused and unrescued, and it helps the adult survivor of child abuse heal, because its a natural part of the grieving process, AND its healthy to direct the anger at the source: at the perpetrator of the abuse, and making the abuser accountable for their acts. NOT for the purposes of revenge, but for the purposes of feeling that its finally OK for the victims to speak their truth and get validation, and to gain protection from further abuse. > > But, like I said, that thread at that Forum has been magically poofed out of existence. I find that both interesting and disturbing. > > -Annie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 Do you remember that book " Brightsided " ? I think this mentality of trying to make everything positive and refusing to acknowledge real negative events and reactions about everything in American culture is part of what is at play here. The talk of forgiveness and letting go of anger is treated as superior and those who still want to express their valid feelings are treated as needing to " let go " and be more positive. It is maddening but it all comes down to the moderators on a particular group what the tone ends up being. I was once on a wonderful group for social anxiety where people shared real and raw stories of their experiences. The mods changed to some sunshine and light folks and people shut down, stopped being so honest, and in general the group became less healing and open. So anywho, I hear ya. > > I was following a very lively and impassioned thread of discussion regarding the question " Do the family members of those with bpd show enough compassion for the bpd? " over at another group, bpdfamily.com. > > That thread was moved, then locked, then it vanished altogether. Fortunately, I was able to copy and save most of it. > > The thread had provoked a large number of responses from many members because the original short essays that began the thread (and the moderator who posted the essays, in his his own comments) implied that family members need to show more compassion toward their bpd relative and that expressing anger towards those with bpd who have been abusive to us is inappropriate. > > The replies were all so very well-considered, intelligent and thoughtful, and were not insulting or cruel: just extremely frank and honest. The most common sentiment expressed was that the KOs *have been* (and in some cases still are) showing much compassion for *decades* toward their abusive bpd parent, and the only result was more abuse. Many of the posters shared that they had been forbidden to show any anger about their mistreatment (or forbidden to express anger at all, ever) and they now felt that finally they had a safe place to openly speak of their hurt, their anger and their outrage and receive compassionate validation and support for their wounded child. > > The moderators, though, kept attempting to reintroduce the idea that anger is wrong, anger is unhealthy, anger is inappropriate, etc. > > The point I wanted to make, is that it still surprises me that *even in forums and Groups that exist to support the healing of those who were abused by mentally ill parents* it is still " politically incorrect " to lay the blame for committing abuse at the feet of the abuser *because the abuser is mentally ill.* Go figure! > > The overwhelming consensus by the member/posters was that it is healthy, empowering, and appropriate to feel angry about being chronically abused and unrescued, and it helps the adult survivor of child abuse heal, because its a natural part of the grieving process, AND its healthy to direct the anger at the source: at the perpetrator of the abuse, and making the abuser accountable for their acts. NOT for the purposes of revenge, but for the purposes of feeling that its finally OK for the victims to speak their truth and get validation, and to gain protection from further abuse. > > But, like I said, that thread at that Forum has been magically poofed out of existence. I find that both interesting and disturbing. > > -Annie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 Do you remember that book " Brightsided " ? I think this mentality of trying to make everything positive and refusing to acknowledge real negative events and reactions about everything in American culture is part of what is at play here. The talk of forgiveness and letting go of anger is treated as superior and those who still want to express their valid feelings are treated as needing to " let go " and be more positive. It is maddening but it all comes down to the moderators on a particular group what the tone ends up being. I was once on a wonderful group for social anxiety where people shared real and raw stories of their experiences. The mods changed to some sunshine and light folks and people shut down, stopped being so honest, and in general the group became less healing and open. So anywho, I hear ya. > > I was following a very lively and impassioned thread of discussion regarding the question " Do the family members of those with bpd show enough compassion for the bpd? " over at another group, bpdfamily.com. > > That thread was moved, then locked, then it vanished altogether. Fortunately, I was able to copy and save most of it. > > The thread had provoked a large number of responses from many members because the original short essays that began the thread (and the moderator who posted the essays, in his his own comments) implied that family members need to show more compassion toward their bpd relative and that expressing anger towards those with bpd who have been abusive to us is inappropriate. > > The replies were all so very well-considered, intelligent and thoughtful, and were not insulting or cruel: just extremely frank and honest. The most common sentiment expressed was that the KOs *have been* (and in some cases still are) showing much compassion for *decades* toward their abusive bpd parent, and the only result was more abuse. Many of the posters shared that they had been forbidden to show any anger about their mistreatment (or forbidden to express anger at all, ever) and they now felt that finally they had a safe place to openly speak of their hurt, their anger and their outrage and receive compassionate validation and support for their wounded child. > > The moderators, though, kept attempting to reintroduce the idea that anger is wrong, anger is unhealthy, anger is inappropriate, etc. > > The point I wanted to make, is that it still surprises me that *even in forums and Groups that exist to support the healing of those who were abused by mentally ill parents* it is still " politically incorrect " to lay the blame for committing abuse at the feet of the abuser *because the abuser is mentally ill.* Go figure! > > The overwhelming consensus by the member/posters was that it is healthy, empowering, and appropriate to feel angry about being chronically abused and unrescued, and it helps the adult survivor of child abuse heal, because its a natural part of the grieving process, AND its healthy to direct the anger at the source: at the perpetrator of the abuse, and making the abuser accountable for their acts. NOT for the purposes of revenge, but for the purposes of feeling that its finally OK for the victims to speak their truth and get validation, and to gain protection from further abuse. > > But, like I said, that thread at that Forum has been magically poofed out of existence. I find that both interesting and disturbing. > > -Annie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 ((((Jill)))) Your dad has to make the decision on how he acts towards you too. It's so sad that he allowed your stepnada to treat you that way. He does have control over his behavior, and it's not acceptable IMO. I think the BPD has a way of putting everyone into a FOG but yes, I do believe he has the control. Treat yourself with the love & respect you deserve because you do deserve it! =) Mia > > > Mia, > > I had never thought about that--the guilt and hurt I felt might actually be > anger, mislabeled. It's interesting that I can look back at the same event > that used to trigger hurt and pain, and now that I know it's NOT my fault, > I'm angry. You'd think, though, that because bpd is the real cause, I'd be > more compassionate. But I'm not. I keep thinking about how much better Dad > treated me before he married the stepnada, and that doesn't seem right. It > seems like he should have more control over his behavior. And I think about > how well both of them treat my stepsister (she fits the description of a > golden child), and that makes it seem even more like their treatment of me > is a choice and not pre-determined by the disease. > > Thank you for your insights! > > Jill > > > > > > My therapist that I had before I moved out of state did say that anger is > a > > normal, healthy emotion. I think as KOs we would think otherwise because > of > > our nadas/fadas telling us otherwise... maybe not with words, but in > other, > > non-verbal ways as well. > > > > And it's good that you can feel the anger, Jill. Nothing wrong with > > acknowledging it and knowing what it is instead of mislabeling it as > guilt, > > hurt, confusion, etc. But that's where it ends up when we can't put it in > > the box that says " anger " . > > > > Nothing at all wrong with being angry, IMO. It's what you do with it. But > > in it's self, nope. Anger is not a bad thing. > > > > Mia > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 ((((Jill)))) Your dad has to make the decision on how he acts towards you too. It's so sad that he allowed your stepnada to treat you that way. He does have control over his behavior, and it's not acceptable IMO. I think the BPD has a way of putting everyone into a FOG but yes, I do believe he has the control. Treat yourself with the love & respect you deserve because you do deserve it! =) Mia > > > Mia, > > I had never thought about that--the guilt and hurt I felt might actually be > anger, mislabeled. It's interesting that I can look back at the same event > that used to trigger hurt and pain, and now that I know it's NOT my fault, > I'm angry. You'd think, though, that because bpd is the real cause, I'd be > more compassionate. But I'm not. I keep thinking about how much better Dad > treated me before he married the stepnada, and that doesn't seem right. It > seems like he should have more control over his behavior. And I think about > how well both of them treat my stepsister (she fits the description of a > golden child), and that makes it seem even more like their treatment of me > is a choice and not pre-determined by the disease. > > Thank you for your insights! > > Jill > > > > > > My therapist that I had before I moved out of state did say that anger is > a > > normal, healthy emotion. I think as KOs we would think otherwise because > of > > our nadas/fadas telling us otherwise... maybe not with words, but in > other, > > non-verbal ways as well. > > > > And it's good that you can feel the anger, Jill. Nothing wrong with > > acknowledging it and knowing what it is instead of mislabeling it as > guilt, > > hurt, confusion, etc. But that's where it ends up when we can't put it in > > the box that says " anger " . > > > > Nothing at all wrong with being angry, IMO. It's what you do with it. But > > in it's self, nope. Anger is not a bad thing. > > > > Mia > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 I agree with you Annie. You know I have seen this all over the internet and I am trying to understand it rather then nut myself up with anger over it (I did that at first...LOL). One thing that I found on the other support groups I've run across is that the moderators were themselves diagnosed as BPD and I believe they are asking for compassion but true to the diagnosis, they fail to recognize the expression of compassion and love from their non-BPD family and friends. Compassion and love to them seems to me to mean, you will do what I want you to do, you will rescue me only in the manner with which I choose to impose upon you and you will adore and lavish me with undying devotion and love no matter what I say or do or you are wrong, unloving and hateful and I will extract insidious revenge against you (you're all bad). The challenge is non-BPDs are not permitted to be who they are because that act means that they are not being who the BPD wants them to be. This is the crux of the issue...the non-BPDs incredulous because they are standing their loving and showing compassion and being verbally and emotionally beaten for being uncaring, lacking compassion and selfish. It is the BPDs own failure to consider their view is skewed and then add to that the illness created by the BPD in the non-BPD of people pleasing, walking on eggshells, doubting reality and wholly diminished self-esteem from taking the beatings. There is no easy answer. BPDs not in treatment don't get to abuse people and not have them react. See, non-BPDs have rights and they may exercise them however they choose. I think of my own case...I feel so bad for nada, I understand nada completely but with my high-stress life as it is, I am unable to cope with the attacks, the verbal beatings, the fear, guilt, obligation, outbursts etc. I am not strong enough. So, it is what it is. It is lack of understanding that their mental health may in fact be compromised. However, the non-BPDs who do realize their mental health has been compromised get help and begin to heal but only if they can step away from the BPD. If the BPD does not get help, like an alcoholic, they are forever lost - it is such a tragedy...but its not our job to solve it. We did not create it. We can understand it and try to work with it to the best of our ability. If we are angry, we have the right to be angry and we need no support group to validate that and just because moderators would like to avoid the conflict of BPDs or the pain of facing what they created if they are themselves BPD, it doesn't make them right and us wrong. It's a difficult diagnosis...but I always fall back to what I chose for me, personally...I choose to be free of abuse period regardless of the source, regardless of the reason, history, what have you. That's what I need to live a healthy and productive life. Many Blessings to All! Jaie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 I love this thread. I've complained a long while privately that " forgiveness " has become the " new denial " in many circles. It's the dull panacea that puts a halt to all that pesky complaining and cries of pain from victims, real victims, not people playing the card to win points for their side. I asked a rabbi about forgiveness, and he wisely advised that forgiveness is appropriate where there is remorse. If the offending person is remorseful, aware of how they have wronged you, and humbly asking for forgiveness, then it's appropriate to extend forgiveness. Small instances, say, where children make mistakes, or someone doesn't see me and say hello or whatever, these kinds of things are forgiven on a daily basis without remorse from the other side. The small child doesn't have capacity for remorse. How can an adult be remorseful over a small oversight they don't even know about? Better to let these go. But the big stuff like the transgressions of Nada and Fada, despite how many times they've been pointed out, forgiveness is not appropriate. Not only was there no remorse, there was a willful, ongoing campaign to deny any wrongdoing--to paint them as 100% right and me 100% wrong. We KOs cannot heal until we face and understand the truth of how our childhoods have been robbed and betrayed. Our anger is the first line of defense, pointing to the truth, ensuring we never let our guards down and forget. In my experience, that is the way to healing. AFB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 I'm in the camp that feelings are feelings, and they are neither right or wrong, that its unhealthy for a person to deny their feelings (didn't we get enough of that growing up?), and the only way to get rid of the anger is to allow it to surface, roll around in it for a while, then take a shower and rinse it off. At least that has worked for me. At age 50, I was complaining constantly about my childhood, to whomever would listen. Having dealt with it all, here I am 4 years later freed of those emotions because they're gone. I was in the WTOGrandparent group for a while and there was a lot of controversy in that group between the mothers of BPDs vs the mothers-in-laws of BPDs. The mothers were all for being compassionate and in my opinion enabling towards their daughters while the MILs were angry and grief stricken over becoming ostracized from their sons and grandchildren, now stockholmed by these tyrannical women. The mothers of BPD took offense when the MILs expressed their anger and truly that group needs to be divided into two, one for parents of BPD, another for inlaws of BPD, for their issues are quite different. I spent 25 years of my adult life being kind and compassionate to my BPD mother. She viewed me as weak and in her mind I gave her permission to abuse me. For 2 years now I've been withdrawing from and setting boundaries within the relationship. She's been on Good Behavior now since Thanksgiving and I believe she's figured out that if she doesn't be nice to me, she'll never see me, her only child, again. I spent 5 years people-pleasing my BPD DIL. Again, I was viewed as weak and she thrived on abusing me. We put our foot down last year and refused to attend her birthday party because she's blown us off on special occasions for two years. My husband was very frank with my son that we were not going to be treated like this any more. It forced our son to open his eyes and progress is slowly being made. Children do not understand how it feels when they hit or bite, until someone does it back to them. BPDs are emotional children and until you allow them to feel the pain they dish out, they'll keep right on doing it. From my experience, compassion does not work on BPD, in their minds compassion = permission. > > I was following a very lively and impassioned thread of discussion regarding the question " Do the family members of those with bpd show enough compassion for the bpd? " over at another group, bpdfamily.com. > > That thread was moved, then locked, then it vanished altogether. Fortunately, I was able to copy and save most of it. > > The thread had provoked a large number of responses from many members because the original short essays that began the thread (and the moderator who posted the essays, in his his own comments) implied that family members need to show more compassion toward their bpd relative and that expressing anger towards those with bpd who have been abusive to us is inappropriate. > > The replies were all so very well-considered, intelligent and thoughtful, and were not insulting or cruel: just extremely frank and honest. The most common sentiment expressed was that the KOs *have been* (and in some cases still are) showing much compassion for *decades* toward their abusive bpd parent, and the only result was more abuse. Many of the posters shared that they had been forbidden to show any anger about their mistreatment (or forbidden to express anger at all, ever) and they now felt that finally they had a safe place to openly speak of their hurt, their anger and their outrage and receive compassionate validation and support for their wounded child. > > The moderators, though, kept attempting to reintroduce the idea that anger is wrong, anger is unhealthy, anger is inappropriate, etc. > > The point I wanted to make, is that it still surprises me that *even in forums and Groups that exist to support the healing of those who were abused by mentally ill parents* it is still " politically incorrect " to lay the blame for committing abuse at the feet of the abuser *because the abuser is mentally ill.* Go figure! > > The overwhelming consensus by the member/posters was that it is healthy, empowering, and appropriate to feel angry about being chronically abused and unrescued, and it helps the adult survivor of child abuse heal, because its a natural part of the grieving process, AND its healthy to direct the anger at the source: at the perpetrator of the abuse, and making the abuser accountable for their acts. NOT for the purposes of revenge, but for the purposes of feeling that its finally OK for the victims to speak their truth and get validation, and to gain protection from further abuse. > > But, like I said, that thread at that Forum has been magically poofed out of existence. I find that both interesting and disturbing. > > -Annie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 I'm in the camp that feelings are feelings, and they are neither right or wrong, that its unhealthy for a person to deny their feelings (didn't we get enough of that growing up?), and the only way to get rid of the anger is to allow it to surface, roll around in it for a while, then take a shower and rinse it off. At least that has worked for me. At age 50, I was complaining constantly about my childhood, to whomever would listen. Having dealt with it all, here I am 4 years later freed of those emotions because they're gone. I was in the WTOGrandparent group for a while and there was a lot of controversy in that group between the mothers of BPDs vs the mothers-in-laws of BPDs. The mothers were all for being compassionate and in my opinion enabling towards their daughters while the MILs were angry and grief stricken over becoming ostracized from their sons and grandchildren, now stockholmed by these tyrannical women. The mothers of BPD took offense when the MILs expressed their anger and truly that group needs to be divided into two, one for parents of BPD, another for inlaws of BPD, for their issues are quite different. I spent 25 years of my adult life being kind and compassionate to my BPD mother. She viewed me as weak and in her mind I gave her permission to abuse me. For 2 years now I've been withdrawing from and setting boundaries within the relationship. She's been on Good Behavior now since Thanksgiving and I believe she's figured out that if she doesn't be nice to me, she'll never see me, her only child, again. I spent 5 years people-pleasing my BPD DIL. Again, I was viewed as weak and she thrived on abusing me. We put our foot down last year and refused to attend her birthday party because she's blown us off on special occasions for two years. My husband was very frank with my son that we were not going to be treated like this any more. It forced our son to open his eyes and progress is slowly being made. Children do not understand how it feels when they hit or bite, until someone does it back to them. BPDs are emotional children and until you allow them to feel the pain they dish out, they'll keep right on doing it. From my experience, compassion does not work on BPD, in their minds compassion = permission. > > I was following a very lively and impassioned thread of discussion regarding the question " Do the family members of those with bpd show enough compassion for the bpd? " over at another group, bpdfamily.com. > > That thread was moved, then locked, then it vanished altogether. Fortunately, I was able to copy and save most of it. > > The thread had provoked a large number of responses from many members because the original short essays that began the thread (and the moderator who posted the essays, in his his own comments) implied that family members need to show more compassion toward their bpd relative and that expressing anger towards those with bpd who have been abusive to us is inappropriate. > > The replies were all so very well-considered, intelligent and thoughtful, and were not insulting or cruel: just extremely frank and honest. The most common sentiment expressed was that the KOs *have been* (and in some cases still are) showing much compassion for *decades* toward their abusive bpd parent, and the only result was more abuse. Many of the posters shared that they had been forbidden to show any anger about their mistreatment (or forbidden to express anger at all, ever) and they now felt that finally they had a safe place to openly speak of their hurt, their anger and their outrage and receive compassionate validation and support for their wounded child. > > The moderators, though, kept attempting to reintroduce the idea that anger is wrong, anger is unhealthy, anger is inappropriate, etc. > > The point I wanted to make, is that it still surprises me that *even in forums and Groups that exist to support the healing of those who were abused by mentally ill parents* it is still " politically incorrect " to lay the blame for committing abuse at the feet of the abuser *because the abuser is mentally ill.* Go figure! > > The overwhelming consensus by the member/posters was that it is healthy, empowering, and appropriate to feel angry about being chronically abused and unrescued, and it helps the adult survivor of child abuse heal, because its a natural part of the grieving process, AND its healthy to direct the anger at the source: at the perpetrator of the abuse, and making the abuser accountable for their acts. NOT for the purposes of revenge, but for the purposes of feeling that its finally OK for the victims to speak their truth and get validation, and to gain protection from further abuse. > > But, like I said, that thread at that Forum has been magically poofed out of existence. I find that both interesting and disturbing. > > -Annie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 Another thought: The place that I've found in myself is probably best called " acceptance. " I acknowledge the dysfunction of my family, I don't deny it or brush feelings away, I accept, clear-eyed that it happened. I don't need to go any further than that. With acceptance, I find peace. If I want to go back and dredge up anger, I can do that, but acceptance seems to put it gently to bed, allows me to turn my focus to other, productive things, like living my life to the fullest. I don't need to boomerang between anger and forgiveness. I just accept and move on. AFB -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 Another thought: The place that I've found in myself is probably best called " acceptance. " I acknowledge the dysfunction of my family, I don't deny it or brush feelings away, I accept, clear-eyed that it happened. I don't need to go any further than that. With acceptance, I find peace. If I want to go back and dredge up anger, I can do that, but acceptance seems to put it gently to bed, allows me to turn my focus to other, productive things, like living my life to the fullest. I don't need to boomerang between anger and forgiveness. I just accept and move on. AFB -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 It's one thing to forgive and walk away. It's quite another to forgive and then continue to let the person abuse you, which we KOs are forced to do our entire lives. Forgiving someone doesn't mean that their behavior won't make you angry again when it re-emerges or that you should go right back to letting someone hurt you. There's a difference between forgiving and sitting back and letting someone continue to abuse you. That's what these " forgiveness/brightside " folks seem to be preaching to me. Not forgiveness; because I can forgive my mother. I can understand that it's a coping mechanism because of the awful incestual molestation that occured when she was a child, and her own mother refused to help her. I have complete compassion for her. But she's like a wounded animal. And while I feel sorry for a wounded animal and can forgive it for it's frightened behavior, I also am not going to stick my hand in its cage and let it bite my fingers off. Forgiveness doesn't mean we have to continue our relationships with the BPDs in our lives. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 It's one thing to forgive and walk away. It's quite another to forgive and then continue to let the person abuse you, which we KOs are forced to do our entire lives. Forgiving someone doesn't mean that their behavior won't make you angry again when it re-emerges or that you should go right back to letting someone hurt you. There's a difference between forgiving and sitting back and letting someone continue to abuse you. That's what these " forgiveness/brightside " folks seem to be preaching to me. Not forgiveness; because I can forgive my mother. I can understand that it's a coping mechanism because of the awful incestual molestation that occured when she was a child, and her own mother refused to help her. I have complete compassion for her. But she's like a wounded animal. And while I feel sorry for a wounded animal and can forgive it for it's frightened behavior, I also am not going to stick my hand in its cage and let it bite my fingers off. Forgiveness doesn't mean we have to continue our relationships with the BPDs in our lives. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 It's one thing to forgive and walk away. It's quite another to forgive and then continue to let the person abuse you, which we KOs are forced to do our entire lives. Forgiving someone doesn't mean that their behavior won't make you angry again when it re-emerges or that you should go right back to letting someone hurt you. There's a difference between forgiving and sitting back and letting someone continue to abuse you. That's what these " forgiveness/brightside " folks seem to be preaching to me. Not forgiveness; because I can forgive my mother. I can understand that it's a coping mechanism because of the awful incestual molestation that occured when she was a child, and her own mother refused to help her. I have complete compassion for her. But she's like a wounded animal. And while I feel sorry for a wounded animal and can forgive it for it's frightened behavior, I also am not going to stick my hand in its cage and let it bite my fingers off. Forgiveness doesn't mean we have to continue our relationships with the BPDs in our lives. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 Brilliantly said! I'm currently very LC and debating NC with Nada. What has been swirling inside of me (after 2+ years of weekly therapy with an excellent therapist) is this: I can choose the relationship I will have with Nada. She'll always continue to bite me when she's in BPD mode... but I don't have to have to put my hand in her cage when she's snarling.. just because she wants to bite me. Hmmm... novel concept, this whole thing of " me first and by my choices. " I didn't know I could choose. It was always about what SHE wanted. Now it's about what I want. Freedom. Lynnette > > It's one thing to forgive and walk away. It's quite another to forgive and then continue to let the person abuse you, which we KOs are forced to do our entire lives. > > Forgiving someone doesn't mean that their behavior won't make you angry again when it re-emerges or that you should go right back to letting someone hurt you. There's a difference between forgiving and sitting back and letting someone continue to abuse you. That's what these " forgiveness/brightside " folks seem to be preaching to me. Not forgiveness; because I can forgive my mother. I can understand that it's a coping mechanism because of the awful incestual molestation that occured when she was a child, and her own mother refused to help her. I have complete compassion for her. But she's like a wounded animal. And while I feel sorry for a wounded animal and can forgive it for it's frightened behavior, I also am not going to stick my hand in its cage and let it bite my fingers off. > > Forgiveness doesn't mean we have to continue our relationships with the BPDs in our lives. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 Brilliantly said! I'm currently very LC and debating NC with Nada. What has been swirling inside of me (after 2+ years of weekly therapy with an excellent therapist) is this: I can choose the relationship I will have with Nada. She'll always continue to bite me when she's in BPD mode... but I don't have to have to put my hand in her cage when she's snarling.. just because she wants to bite me. Hmmm... novel concept, this whole thing of " me first and by my choices. " I didn't know I could choose. It was always about what SHE wanted. Now it's about what I want. Freedom. Lynnette > > It's one thing to forgive and walk away. It's quite another to forgive and then continue to let the person abuse you, which we KOs are forced to do our entire lives. > > Forgiving someone doesn't mean that their behavior won't make you angry again when it re-emerges or that you should go right back to letting someone hurt you. There's a difference between forgiving and sitting back and letting someone continue to abuse you. That's what these " forgiveness/brightside " folks seem to be preaching to me. Not forgiveness; because I can forgive my mother. I can understand that it's a coping mechanism because of the awful incestual molestation that occured when she was a child, and her own mother refused to help her. I have complete compassion for her. But she's like a wounded animal. And while I feel sorry for a wounded animal and can forgive it for it's frightened behavior, I also am not going to stick my hand in its cage and let it bite my fingers off. > > Forgiveness doesn't mean we have to continue our relationships with the BPDs in our lives. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.