Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Re: What about confronting my abusers?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Oh ugh. What amanda said. And I'm officially boycotting the BPD family site

starting RIIIIIGHT NOW!

>

>

> If a mentally ill person rapes you, do you not have the right to be angry

> and want to seek retribution? Even if they are sorry they did it and/or

> couldn't help it?

>

> If a mentally ill person kills a college student, does the family not have

> the right to grieve (and be angry) and seek retribution and confront their

> child's killer?

>

> I'm not saying we should not be compassionate to their plight, but since

> when is BPD a get-out-of-jail-free pass for hurting people. Having a

> personality disorder does NOT excuse you from being responsible for your own

> actions. And claiming that those of us who have been hurt and abused,

> physically and mentally, by someone who has BPD do not have the right to

> confront our abusers or to be angry about it is offensive.

>

> If BPD family does not want the people with BPD on their site to have to

> deal with those who have been abused by BPDs, then they should have it be a

> people with BPD only site. Period. It's one thing to moderate a discussion

> and try to keep it civil while those with BPD and those without it freely

> discuss their experience and their emotions about it, it's another to ban

> someone simply because they believe they have the right to confront their

> abuser and be angry. As long as you're not personally bashing someone on

> their forum, they should not be banning you.

>

> I've only been on BPD family once, and I didn't particularly like it. I

> prefer to be in a BPD free zone so I know I can say things openly, even mean

> things, and not be judged, because you all know what I am going through, and

> that the only way to recover is to express even the meanest things I feel.

>

> You know, the moderators there can't be in the dark on the fact that if you

> have a site where BPDs and nonBPDs are co-mingling is going to have some

> strife and disagreement. If they are, well then, I don't see how they are

> really helping anyone.

>

>

>

>

>

> >

> > " The Adult Survivors of Child Abuse " is an organization that offers both

> on-line and in-person support groups for those who were emotionally,

> physically or sexually abused, neglected, exploited, etc., by their parents

> or other family members as a child.

> >

> > Here's their link. They have a 21-step program " Survivor To Thriver "

> (with manual) for overcoming the damage done and getting on with one's life;

> there is a sort-of-interactive version of their program manual available

> online and they have an on-line support forum like this one in addition to

> in-person meet ups.

> >

> > www.ascasupport.org/

> >

> > I was skimming through their manual when I came across this section:

> >

> > " Chapter 1, Pg 13: What About Confronting My Abusers?

> > This is a very difficult question, and one that only you can answer for

> yourself. Step 18 of ASCA reads: " I have resolved the abuse with my

> offenders to the extent that is acceptable to me. " For some survivors, this

> means an internal coming to terms with the abuse and the abuser(s) but does

> not involve direct confrontation. For others, it means direct confrontation,

> either face-to-face or by letter or phone. *For still others it may mean

> writing articles, stories, newspaper op-ed pieces or by speaking out in

> public gatherings. And for still others it may mean pursuing legal action to

> gain restitution for the abuse suffered.* Every survivor is different in

> his/her need to confront the abuser(s). Neither ASCA nor THE MORRIS CENTER

> has a policy or position on confrontation. Instead, we believe that each

> survivor must make this choice individually. We do, however,encourage

> survivors to think carefully about their options and the consequences of

> their choices. "

> >

> > I find it SO validating that choosing to speak out publicly against child

> abuse (including advocating that child abusers be held accountable for their

> actions, that pursuing legal action and recompense can work for some,

> pointing out that those who are unable to control their negative, damaging

> acting-out behaviors are too mentally ill to be raising children, etc.) is

> listed as a good way for the former victims of child abuse to gain healing

> and resolution... and I find it particularly validating because I was banned

> at bpdfamily.com for advocating that!

> >

> > AND I find it highly ironic that bpdfamily.com posts this same ASCA

> 21-step recovery program manual at their site!

> >

> > I was told that I was banned because I was too stuck in anger, that

> advocating confrontation of the abuser and pursuing legal action against the

> abuser (who happen to be parents who have bpd) was " unhealthy " for the

> children of bpd parents and " insensitive " to and " lacking in compassion " for

> those with bpd.

> >

> > So, I can only conclude that the owners and/or moderators at

> bpdfamily.com must have a different agenda regarding tolerance,

> reconciliation and forgiveness RE the adult children of abusive bpd parents

> than they do for those in chosen relationships with a person with bpd (where

> the emphasis seems to be on self-preservation and detachment instead of

> reconciliation and forgiveness.)

> >

> > Why there is a different policy, I have no idea!

> >

> > But I have to admit that I feel angry about being banned because it feels

> unfair to me, and I guess I am sensitive about unfairness.

> >

> > But, I can share my thoughts freely here and I AM grateful for that.

> >

> > -Annie

> >

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very well said, . I couldn't agree more.

Mia

>

>

> If a mentally ill person rapes you, do you not have the right to be angry

> and want to seek retribution? Even if they are sorry they did it and/or

> couldn't help it?

>

> If a mentally ill person kills a college student, does the family not have

> the right to grieve (and be angry) and seek retribution and confront their

> child's killer?

>

> I'm not saying we should not be compassionate to their plight, but since

> when is BPD a get-out-of-jail-free pass for hurting people. Having a

> personality disorder does NOT excuse you from being responsible for your own

> actions. And claiming that those of us who have been hurt and abused,

> physically and mentally, by someone who has BPD do not have the right to

> confront our abusers or to be angry about it is offensive.

>

> If BPD family does not want the people with BPD on their site to have to

> deal with those who have been abused by BPDs, then they should have it be a

> people with BPD only site. Period. It's one thing to moderate a discussion

> and try to keep it civil while those with BPD and those without it freely

> discuss their experience and their emotions about it, it's another to ban

> someone simply because they believe they have the right to confront their

> abuser and be angry. As long as you're not personally bashing someone on

> their forum, they should not be banning you.

>

> I've only been on BPD family once, and I didn't particularly like it. I

> prefer to be in a BPD free zone so I know I can say things openly, even mean

> things, and not be judged, because you all know what I am going through, and

> that the only way to recover is to express even the meanest things I feel.

>

> You know, the moderators there can't be in the dark on the fact that if you

> have a site where BPDs and nonBPDs are co-mingling is going to have some

> strife and disagreement. If they are, well then, I don't see how they are

> really helping anyone.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A huge part of me would love to confront my nada, but why bother? She

wouldn't hear me, would have an excuse or wouldn't remember anyway.

I might do something my T recommended. Simple stuff, really... write a

letter to her but don't really send it. Just to get the emotion out. I'd

be tempted to send it though... would have to mail it to a friend first to

have her mail it from her house so nada wouldn't see the city postmark on

the envelope. Stupid, huh?

Mia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A huge part of me would love to confront my nada, but why bother? She

wouldn't hear me, would have an excuse or wouldn't remember anyway.

I might do something my T recommended. Simple stuff, really... write a

letter to her but don't really send it. Just to get the emotion out. I'd

be tempted to send it though... would have to mail it to a friend first to

have her mail it from her house so nada wouldn't see the city postmark on

the envelope. Stupid, huh?

Mia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A huge part of me would love to confront my nada, but why bother? She

wouldn't hear me, would have an excuse or wouldn't remember anyway.

I might do something my T recommended. Simple stuff, really... write a

letter to her but don't really send it. Just to get the emotion out. I'd

be tempted to send it though... would have to mail it to a friend first to

have her mail it from her house so nada wouldn't see the city postmark on

the envelope. Stupid, huh?

Mia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not so stupid. I have similar thoughts, actually. Not to the point where i

can write to Fada a letter and not send it, but rather for my siblings since

fada and nada won't let them see anything I send. If I sent it through a

friend first, then perhaps they'd be able to read it before fada and nada

got a chance to realize what happened.

>.<

At any rate, for me, journaling helps. When a thought strikes, I'll write it

down. Haven't done an actual letter yet, 'cause I'm not ready, but bits and

pieces.

Holly

>

>

> A huge part of me would love to confront my nada, but why bother? She

> wouldn't hear me, would have an excuse or wouldn't remember anyway.

>

> I might do something my T recommended. Simple stuff, really... write a

> letter to her but don't really send it. Just to get the emotion out. I'd

> be tempted to send it though... would have to mail it to a friend first to

> have her mail it from her house so nada wouldn't see the city postmark on

> the envelope. Stupid, huh?

>

> Mia

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not so stupid. I have similar thoughts, actually. Not to the point where i

can write to Fada a letter and not send it, but rather for my siblings since

fada and nada won't let them see anything I send. If I sent it through a

friend first, then perhaps they'd be able to read it before fada and nada

got a chance to realize what happened.

>.<

At any rate, for me, journaling helps. When a thought strikes, I'll write it

down. Haven't done an actual letter yet, 'cause I'm not ready, but bits and

pieces.

Holly

>

>

> A huge part of me would love to confront my nada, but why bother? She

> wouldn't hear me, would have an excuse or wouldn't remember anyway.

>

> I might do something my T recommended. Simple stuff, really... write a

> letter to her but don't really send it. Just to get the emotion out. I'd

> be tempted to send it though... would have to mail it to a friend first to

> have her mail it from her house so nada wouldn't see the city postmark on

> the envelope. Stupid, huh?

>

> Mia

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh , I totally got your point. I have thought before that it would be

nice to be able to confront nada and I do agree that people should have that

right, but in my case I think it's pointless. Which is why I'll probably do

a letter to her that never gets sent.

Mia

>

>

> Let me clarify:

>

> I'm not suggesting that we all go confronting our nadas and fadas, because

> I don't see the use in it either, since, at least my nada, will never see

> what she's done. However, my point is mainly that we have the right to be

> angry and want to confront--it's a justifiable response. It's not fair for

> someone to invalidate our feelings of anger about what was done to us

> because the person who did it has BPD. Yes, the diagnosis might mean we have

> to deal with the anger in different ways, or confront it in different

> ways--like speaking out against child abuse or lobbying for better mental

> health care, etc.--but my point was just that banning someone from a board

> because they are angry at what has been done to them is wrong and unfair.

> They should be angry, and they come to the forum to learn how to deal with

> that anger (I mean at BPDfamily.org), not to be told they just have to get

> over it.

>

>

>

>

>

> >

> > A huge part of me would love to confront my nada, but why bother? She

> > wouldn't hear me, would have an excuse or wouldn't remember anyway.

> >

> > I might do something my T recommended. Simple stuff, really... write a

> > letter to her but don't really send it. Just to get the emotion out. I'd

> > be tempted to send it though... would have to mail it to a friend first

> to

> > have her mail it from her house so nada wouldn't see the city postmark on

> > the envelope. Stupid, huh?

> >

> > Mia

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh , I totally got your point. I have thought before that it would be

nice to be able to confront nada and I do agree that people should have that

right, but in my case I think it's pointless. Which is why I'll probably do

a letter to her that never gets sent.

Mia

>

>

> Let me clarify:

>

> I'm not suggesting that we all go confronting our nadas and fadas, because

> I don't see the use in it either, since, at least my nada, will never see

> what she's done. However, my point is mainly that we have the right to be

> angry and want to confront--it's a justifiable response. It's not fair for

> someone to invalidate our feelings of anger about what was done to us

> because the person who did it has BPD. Yes, the diagnosis might mean we have

> to deal with the anger in different ways, or confront it in different

> ways--like speaking out against child abuse or lobbying for better mental

> health care, etc.--but my point was just that banning someone from a board

> because they are angry at what has been done to them is wrong and unfair.

> They should be angry, and they come to the forum to learn how to deal with

> that anger (I mean at BPDfamily.org), not to be told they just have to get

> over it.

>

>

>

>

>

> >

> > A huge part of me would love to confront my nada, but why bother? She

> > wouldn't hear me, would have an excuse or wouldn't remember anyway.

> >

> > I might do something my T recommended. Simple stuff, really... write a

> > letter to her but don't really send it. Just to get the emotion out. I'd

> > be tempted to send it though... would have to mail it to a friend first

> to

> > have her mail it from her house so nada wouldn't see the city postmark on

> > the envelope. Stupid, huh?

> >

> > Mia

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh , I totally got your point. I have thought before that it would be

nice to be able to confront nada and I do agree that people should have that

right, but in my case I think it's pointless. Which is why I'll probably do

a letter to her that never gets sent.

Mia

>

>

> Let me clarify:

>

> I'm not suggesting that we all go confronting our nadas and fadas, because

> I don't see the use in it either, since, at least my nada, will never see

> what she's done. However, my point is mainly that we have the right to be

> angry and want to confront--it's a justifiable response. It's not fair for

> someone to invalidate our feelings of anger about what was done to us

> because the person who did it has BPD. Yes, the diagnosis might mean we have

> to deal with the anger in different ways, or confront it in different

> ways--like speaking out against child abuse or lobbying for better mental

> health care, etc.--but my point was just that banning someone from a board

> because they are angry at what has been done to them is wrong and unfair.

> They should be angry, and they come to the forum to learn how to deal with

> that anger (I mean at BPDfamily.org), not to be told they just have to get

> over it.

>

>

>

>

>

> >

> > A huge part of me would love to confront my nada, but why bother? She

> > wouldn't hear me, would have an excuse or wouldn't remember anyway.

> >

> > I might do something my T recommended. Simple stuff, really... write a

> > letter to her but don't really send it. Just to get the emotion out. I'd

> > be tempted to send it though... would have to mail it to a friend first

> to

> > have her mail it from her house so nada wouldn't see the city postmark on

> > the envelope. Stupid, huh?

> >

> > Mia

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...