Guest guest Posted April 27, 1999 Report Share Posted April 27, 1999 http://www.nolalive.com/speced/homewreckers/index.html Scientific disagreements flare Part 2 Some scientists working for competing chemical companies also question how a chitin-inhibiting chemical could kill the queen termite, since she doesn't molt. Su says she starves when the termites that feed her die. Another point of disagreement is whether Sentricon should be used by itself. Dow wants to establish its baiting system as the primary weapon against termites and doesn't like its operators to treat with other chemicals when it uses Sentricon, a recommendation some pest-control operators are ignoring. They are combining it with new liquid chemical treatments. Ed , president of Terminix's New Orleans franchise, even is offering state-approved damage guarantees to those who use that combination, in certain circumstances. Block the termites' way in, send in poison with others Spokesmen for competing baits say their products are at least as effective as Sentricon, and claim they work faster because Sentricon doesn't kill until termites molt. But these baits also have down sides. FMC Corp. was aware of research by Dow and Su, and knew from its own marketing data that consumers could be expected to embrace the new bait. But its system differs from Sentricon in several key ways. FMC was not convinced that abandoning the chemical barrier was the best strategy, so it recommends using its baits with either traditional barrier termiticides or new chemicals that kill termites without repelling them. The active ingredient in the FMC bait is sulfluramid, a slow-acting stomach poison less dangerous to humans than Mirex. Like hexaflumuron, FMC's bait is used in small enough quantities that it poses little hazard to non-targeted insects and other wildlife. Sulfluramid disrupts the insect's metabolism, its ability to transform the energy contained in food into nerve impulses. ''The termite quits feeding, quits moving, stands around and in a few days dies,'' said Jim Ballard, pesticides technology manager for FMC. Workers check the FirstLine monitors, which come in above-ground as well as below-ground models, every two weeks until termites enter the monitor or it's clear they are not present. When termites show up, poison bait tubes are pushed into the ground around the monitors. Dow's system is based on the notion that termites forage randomly - an idea supported by Su and some other entomologists - so placing bait stations at regular, 15-foot to 20-foot intervals is a logical way to assure termites will find the bait. ''Termites don't forage randomly. They follow moisture gradients, objects, imperfections.'' - JIM BALLARD, pesticides technology manager for FMC FMC follows a different philosophy. Entomologists doing research for the company, including Louisiana State University entomologist Gregg , believe termites follow specific cues in searching for food, and recommend placing baits in areas where termites are likely to be found. ''Termites don't forage randomly,'' Ballard said. ''They follow moisture gradients, objects, imperfections.'' Another new entry to the bait war is Ensystex. Its Labyrinth bait uses another chitin-inhibiting chemical called diflubenzuron. The North Carolina-based company hopes to get use of the bait approved in Louisiana this fall, company president Ken Kendall said. The bait station uses four wooden strips around a hollow monitoring station. When termites begin eating the wood, the pest-control operator puts the cardboard bait into the hollow area. Kendall said this approach lessens the chance that the operator will disturb termites feeding at the station. But this method also may have its flaws. One study by Su indicated that while subterranean termites native to Louisiana would be killed by diflubenzuron, Formosan termites wouldn't eat such a bait. Kendall disputes that claim, saying his company's laboratory tests with Formosan termites show they do indeed eat the impregnated cardboard bait. Lingering poison disrupts termite nervous system Meanwhile, it is Bayer's liquid termiticide Premise that seems to be filling the gap between baits and the older pesticides: a chemical that comes close to creating the traditional barrier, and yet works a little like the baits in killing termites slowly. Premise disrupts the production of chemicals that make the nervous system work, just like chlordane. But unlike chlordane, Premise seems only to act as a poison on insects, not other animals. It also does not give off smelly fumes like old-style pesticides, and pest-control workers don't need to wear protective respirators during its application. Gregg Storey, pest-control marketing product manager for Bayer Corp., said Premise creates a ''treated zone'' that disrupts the behavior of termites. They stop eating, feeding others in the colony and grooming each other. When first applied, Premise is strong enough to kill termites outright. Over time, as it breaks down, the chemical's behavioral effects cause termites to be killed by fungus and disease. ''As a colony, termites are very strong, a superorganism,'' he said. ''But when they're alone and not functioning together, they're pretty wimpy in defending against infection.'' The company originally hoped it had discovered a potential bait poison, but soon learned that the disruption in behavior caused by Premise makes it difficult to guarantee the material will be carried back to the nest by insects. © 1998, The Times-Picayune. Used with permission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.