Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 In a message dated 12/6/2004 4:56:46 PM Central Standard Time, hatfield@... writes: Bernie, This illustrates the thing that I think a lot of people have missed or are missing. The ideology behind a SoP, in my mind, is not neccessarily a horrible thing, this 'specific document', with it's 'specific wording' is what I disagree with. I am also very curious how it will be transitioned in. Mike Hey Mike, Guess what. I disagree and agree with you. I agree this document sucks. But I disagree about needing a Scope of Practice. Minimum level of training would be better. But I don't know what to call it. Tom LeNeveu Learning Paramedic EMStock2004 was a RESOUNDING SUCCESS... Come See us Next year. _www.emstock.com_ (http://www.emstock.com/) _www.temsf.org_ (http://www.temsf.org/) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 In a message dated 12/6/2004 4:56:46 PM Central Standard Time, hatfield@... writes: Bernie, This illustrates the thing that I think a lot of people have missed or are missing. The ideology behind a SoP, in my mind, is not neccessarily a horrible thing, this 'specific document', with it's 'specific wording' is what I disagree with. I am also very curious how it will be transitioned in. Mike Hey Mike, Guess what. I disagree and agree with you. I agree this document sucks. But I disagree about needing a Scope of Practice. Minimum level of training would be better. But I don't know what to call it. Tom LeNeveu Learning Paramedic EMStock2004 was a RESOUNDING SUCCESS... Come See us Next year. _www.emstock.com_ (http://www.emstock.com/) _www.temsf.org_ (http://www.temsf.org/) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 In a message dated 12/6/2004 4:56:46 PM Central Standard Time, hatfield@... writes: Bernie, This illustrates the thing that I think a lot of people have missed or are missing. The ideology behind a SoP, in my mind, is not neccessarily a horrible thing, this 'specific document', with it's 'specific wording' is what I disagree with. I am also very curious how it will be transitioned in. Mike Hey Mike, Guess what. I disagree and agree with you. I agree this document sucks. But I disagree about needing a Scope of Practice. Minimum level of training would be better. But I don't know what to call it. Tom LeNeveu Learning Paramedic EMStock2004 was a RESOUNDING SUCCESS... Come See us Next year. _www.emstock.com_ (http://www.emstock.com/) _www.temsf.org_ (http://www.temsf.org/) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 Kenny writes: " As I have posted, if the NSoP passed tomorrow in its current form, very few systems would feel the effects. DFR would continue to run the same calls they are running today and would provide the same level of care. " And that's the crux of the matter, isn't it? You see, what's right for Dallas Fire Rescue is NOT what's right for Shackelford County EMS. The SoP document crams us all into the same cage. Let Dallas do what it wants to, but also let the rest of us do what we NEED to do, and it's not the same thing necessarily that's right for Dallas. GG E.(Gene) Gandy POB 1651 Albany, TX 76430 wegandy1938@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 Kenny writes: " As I have posted, if the NSoP passed tomorrow in its current form, very few systems would feel the effects. DFR would continue to run the same calls they are running today and would provide the same level of care. " And that's the crux of the matter, isn't it? You see, what's right for Dallas Fire Rescue is NOT what's right for Shackelford County EMS. The SoP document crams us all into the same cage. Let Dallas do what it wants to, but also let the rest of us do what we NEED to do, and it's not the same thing necessarily that's right for Dallas. GG E.(Gene) Gandy POB 1651 Albany, TX 76430 wegandy1938@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 Kenny writes: " As I have posted, if the NSoP passed tomorrow in its current form, very few systems would feel the effects. DFR would continue to run the same calls they are running today and would provide the same level of care. " And that's the crux of the matter, isn't it? You see, what's right for Dallas Fire Rescue is NOT what's right for Shackelford County EMS. The SoP document crams us all into the same cage. Let Dallas do what it wants to, but also let the rest of us do what we NEED to do, and it's not the same thing necessarily that's right for Dallas. GG E.(Gene) Gandy POB 1651 Albany, TX 76430 wegandy1938@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 Alfonso, That is true I may have missed the boat but I am not talking about 3 or 5 years from now. What about 10 years from now when most of the folks currently certified leave the business or retire. Then what? The issue is still there, how do we pay for all this?? Bernie Stafford EMTP Re: National Standards (Long) > Another huge issue, who pays??? You have worked for a private ambulance > provider, can you see a private service paying for a BA in Paramedicine. I > can't....even a department like Dallas Fire Rescue wouldn't have the budget > to continue the current level of care they offer under the current National > SOP. What about the rural volunteer department that sends a few to Paramedic > school with grant money. Is that kind of funding going to be there to have > those 2 medics get a BA? You missed the boat entirely. A current paramedic will still be a paramedic, just one level below the highest level of pre-hospital care. -aro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 Alfonso, That is true I may have missed the boat but I am not talking about 3 or 5 years from now. What about 10 years from now when most of the folks currently certified leave the business or retire. Then what? The issue is still there, how do we pay for all this?? Bernie Stafford EMTP Re: National Standards (Long) > Another huge issue, who pays??? You have worked for a private ambulance > provider, can you see a private service paying for a BA in Paramedicine. I > can't....even a department like Dallas Fire Rescue wouldn't have the budget > to continue the current level of care they offer under the current National > SOP. What about the rural volunteer department that sends a few to Paramedic > school with grant money. Is that kind of funding going to be there to have > those 2 medics get a BA? You missed the boat entirely. A current paramedic will still be a paramedic, just one level below the highest level of pre-hospital care. -aro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 Alfonso, That is true I may have missed the boat but I am not talking about 3 or 5 years from now. What about 10 years from now when most of the folks currently certified leave the business or retire. Then what? The issue is still there, how do we pay for all this?? Bernie Stafford EMTP Re: National Standards (Long) > Another huge issue, who pays??? You have worked for a private ambulance > provider, can you see a private service paying for a BA in Paramedicine. I > can't....even a department like Dallas Fire Rescue wouldn't have the budget > to continue the current level of care they offer under the current National > SOP. What about the rural volunteer department that sends a few to Paramedic > school with grant money. Is that kind of funding going to be there to have > those 2 medics get a BA? You missed the boat entirely. A current paramedic will still be a paramedic, just one level below the highest level of pre-hospital care. -aro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 Alfonso, That may be true and I hope our paramedics are better educated in ten years. I have been doing my part to improve the education of all levels of our providers. But again who is going to pay for that education and what provider is going to give the salary that degreed paramedic deserves. Look at the current funding of most EMS providers today, Medicare and insurance cutbacks have caused the demise of numerous services and several of the big national providers were on the brink of going out of business. How are they going to pay that kind of salary unless EMS changes overall, better education is a cornerstone for progression of our chosen profession. We don't need to scrape the Nation SOP just modify it to a document that fits our needs. Right now I don't see that in the current format. Bernie Stafford EMTP Re: National Standards (Long) > > > > > > > Another huge issue, who pays??? You have worked for a private ambulance > > provider, can you see a private service paying for a BA in > Paramedicine. I > > can't....even a department like Dallas Fire Rescue wouldn't have the > budget > > to continue the current level of care they offer under the current > National > > SOP. What about the rural volunteer department that sends a few to > Paramedic > > school with grant money. Is that kind of funding going to be there > to have > > those 2 medics get a BA? > > You missed the boat entirely. A current paramedic will still be a > paramedic, just one level below the highest level of pre-hospital care. > > -aro > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 This just reminds of something I heard quoted from Abe Lincoln. He said, If I had to justify all attacks leveled at this office, then this office would be closed for all other business. I do the best I can, the very best I know how, and I will keep on doing this right down to the very end. Then if the ends brings me out all wrong, then 10 angles swearing I had been right would make no difference, but if the end brings me out all right, then this now will amount to nothing. " Alfonso R. Ochoa " wrote: Ten years from now, new students will want to spend four years in school to become a paramedic if we get the recognition we deserve. Ultimately, it's the individual that pays for his/her education. -aro > Alfonso, > > That is true I may have missed the boat but I am not talking about 3 or 5 > years from now. What about 10 years from now when most of the folks > currently certified leave the business or retire. Then what? The issue is > still there, how do we pay for all this?? > > Bernie Stafford EMTP > > Re: National Standards (Long) > > > > > > > Another huge issue, who pays??? You have worked for a private ambulance > > provider, can you see a private service paying for a BA in > Paramedicine. I > > can't....even a department like Dallas Fire Rescue wouldn't have the > budget > > to continue the current level of care they offer under the current > National > > SOP. What about the rural volunteer department that sends a few to > Paramedic > > school with grant money. Is that kind of funding going to be there > to have > > those 2 medics get a BA? > > You missed the boat entirely. A current paramedic will still be a > paramedic, just one level below the highest level of pre-hospital care. > > -aro > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 This just reminds of something I heard quoted from Abe Lincoln. He said, If I had to justify all attacks leveled at this office, then this office would be closed for all other business. I do the best I can, the very best I know how, and I will keep on doing this right down to the very end. Then if the ends brings me out all wrong, then 10 angles swearing I had been right would make no difference, but if the end brings me out all right, then this now will amount to nothing. " Alfonso R. Ochoa " wrote: Ten years from now, new students will want to spend four years in school to become a paramedic if we get the recognition we deserve. Ultimately, it's the individual that pays for his/her education. -aro > Alfonso, > > That is true I may have missed the boat but I am not talking about 3 or 5 > years from now. What about 10 years from now when most of the folks > currently certified leave the business or retire. Then what? The issue is > still there, how do we pay for all this?? > > Bernie Stafford EMTP > > Re: National Standards (Long) > > > > > > > Another huge issue, who pays??? You have worked for a private ambulance > > provider, can you see a private service paying for a BA in > Paramedicine. I > > can't....even a department like Dallas Fire Rescue wouldn't have the > budget > > to continue the current level of care they offer under the current > National > > SOP. What about the rural volunteer department that sends a few to > Paramedic > > school with grant money. Is that kind of funding going to be there > to have > > those 2 medics get a BA? > > You missed the boat entirely. A current paramedic will still be a > paramedic, just one level below the highest level of pre-hospital care. > > -aro > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 This just reminds of something I heard quoted from Abe Lincoln. He said, If I had to justify all attacks leveled at this office, then this office would be closed for all other business. I do the best I can, the very best I know how, and I will keep on doing this right down to the very end. Then if the ends brings me out all wrong, then 10 angles swearing I had been right would make no difference, but if the end brings me out all right, then this now will amount to nothing. " Alfonso R. Ochoa " wrote: Ten years from now, new students will want to spend four years in school to become a paramedic if we get the recognition we deserve. Ultimately, it's the individual that pays for his/her education. -aro > Alfonso, > > That is true I may have missed the boat but I am not talking about 3 or 5 > years from now. What about 10 years from now when most of the folks > currently certified leave the business or retire. Then what? The issue is > still there, how do we pay for all this?? > > Bernie Stafford EMTP > > Re: National Standards (Long) > > > > > > > Another huge issue, who pays??? You have worked for a private ambulance > > provider, can you see a private service paying for a BA in > Paramedicine. I > > can't....even a department like Dallas Fire Rescue wouldn't have the > budget > > to continue the current level of care they offer under the current > National > > SOP. What about the rural volunteer department that sends a few to > Paramedic > > school with grant money. Is that kind of funding going to be there > to have > > those 2 medics get a BA? > > You missed the boat entirely. A current paramedic will still be a > paramedic, just one level below the highest level of pre-hospital care. > > -aro > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 >>From: Bernie Stafford >>We don't need to scrape the Nation SOP just modify it to a document that >>fits our needs. Right now I don't see that in the current format. Bernie, This illustrates the thing that I think a lot of people have missed or are missing. The ideology behind a SoP, in my mind, is not neccessarily a horrible thing, this 'specific document', with it's 'specific wording' is what I disagree with. I am also very curious how it will be transitioned in. Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 Sorry,I forgot to sign this post. My memory about the exact statement from may not be right, but you get the jest. wrote: This just reminds of something I heard quoted from Abe Lincoln. He said, If I had to justify all attacks leveled at this office, then this office would be closed for all other business. I do the best I can, the very best I know how, and I will keep on doing this right down to the very end. Then if the ends brings me out all wrong, then 10 angles swearing I had been right would make no difference, but if the end brings me out all right, then this now will amount to nothing. " Alfonso R. Ochoa " wrote: Ten years from now, new students will want to spend four years in school to become a paramedic if we get the recognition we deserve. Ultimately, it's the individual that pays for his/her education. -aro > Alfonso, > > That is true I may have missed the boat but I am not talking about 3 or 5 > years from now. What about 10 years from now when most of the folks > currently certified leave the business or retire. Then what? The issue is > still there, how do we pay for all this?? > > Bernie Stafford EMTP > > Re: National Standards (Long) > > > > > > > Another huge issue, who pays??? You have worked for a private ambulance > > provider, can you see a private service paying for a BA in > Paramedicine. I > > can't....even a department like Dallas Fire Rescue wouldn't have the > budget > > to continue the current level of care they offer under the current > National > > SOP. What about the rural volunteer department that sends a few to > Paramedic > > school with grant money. Is that kind of funding going to be there > to have > > those 2 medics get a BA? > > You missed the boat entirely. A current paramedic will still be a > paramedic, just one level below the highest level of pre-hospital care. > > -aro > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 Sorry,I forgot to sign this post. My memory about the exact statement from may not be right, but you get the jest. wrote: This just reminds of something I heard quoted from Abe Lincoln. He said, If I had to justify all attacks leveled at this office, then this office would be closed for all other business. I do the best I can, the very best I know how, and I will keep on doing this right down to the very end. Then if the ends brings me out all wrong, then 10 angles swearing I had been right would make no difference, but if the end brings me out all right, then this now will amount to nothing. " Alfonso R. Ochoa " wrote: Ten years from now, new students will want to spend four years in school to become a paramedic if we get the recognition we deserve. Ultimately, it's the individual that pays for his/her education. -aro > Alfonso, > > That is true I may have missed the boat but I am not talking about 3 or 5 > years from now. What about 10 years from now when most of the folks > currently certified leave the business or retire. Then what? The issue is > still there, how do we pay for all this?? > > Bernie Stafford EMTP > > Re: National Standards (Long) > > > > > > > Another huge issue, who pays??? You have worked for a private ambulance > > provider, can you see a private service paying for a BA in > Paramedicine. I > > can't....even a department like Dallas Fire Rescue wouldn't have the > budget > > to continue the current level of care they offer under the current > National > > SOP. What about the rural volunteer department that sends a few to > Paramedic > > school with grant money. Is that kind of funding going to be there > to have > > those 2 medics get a BA? > > You missed the boat entirely. A current paramedic will still be a > paramedic, just one level below the highest level of pre-hospital care. > > -aro > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 Sorry,I forgot to sign this post. My memory about the exact statement from may not be right, but you get the jest. wrote: This just reminds of something I heard quoted from Abe Lincoln. He said, If I had to justify all attacks leveled at this office, then this office would be closed for all other business. I do the best I can, the very best I know how, and I will keep on doing this right down to the very end. Then if the ends brings me out all wrong, then 10 angles swearing I had been right would make no difference, but if the end brings me out all right, then this now will amount to nothing. " Alfonso R. Ochoa " wrote: Ten years from now, new students will want to spend four years in school to become a paramedic if we get the recognition we deserve. Ultimately, it's the individual that pays for his/her education. -aro > Alfonso, > > That is true I may have missed the boat but I am not talking about 3 or 5 > years from now. What about 10 years from now when most of the folks > currently certified leave the business or retire. Then what? The issue is > still there, how do we pay for all this?? > > Bernie Stafford EMTP > > Re: National Standards (Long) > > > > > > > Another huge issue, who pays??? You have worked for a private ambulance > > provider, can you see a private service paying for a BA in > Paramedicine. I > > can't....even a department like Dallas Fire Rescue wouldn't have the > budget > > to continue the current level of care they offer under the current > National > > SOP. What about the rural volunteer department that sends a few to > Paramedic > > school with grant money. Is that kind of funding going to be there > to have > > those 2 medics get a BA? > > You missed the boat entirely. A current paramedic will still be a > paramedic, just one level below the highest level of pre-hospital care. > > -aro > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 " And that's the crux of the matter, isn't it? You see, what's right for Dallas Fire Rescue is NOT what's right for Shackelford County EMS. The SoP document crams us all into the same cage. " The SoP has nothing to do with what area you work in, and it doesn't cram anyone into a cage. Does working in a rural area somehow make you more qualified to use more invasive techniques in treating your patient? Did you go to a better Paramedic school than the DFR people did? If not, than the urban/rural analysis has absolutely no relevance. People are arguing the fine points of this into oblivion. If you think that surgical airways and RSI should be part of the Paramedic SoP, great! I do too. Let's work to change that. This document does concern the minimum amount of education required before an individual can perform certain procedures. I happen to think that Paramedics should be allowed to everything that you are doing today, Gene, and I hope the SoP will reflect that. But at what point is a seminar and medical director approval not good enough to perform advanced skills? Should a Paramedic who didn't have Anatomy and Physiology be allowed to suture wounds after some alphabet soup course when they probably have very little knowledge of the integument? Can a workshop make you competent in extensor tendon repair? DPL? Tube thoracostomy? Does the " Pelvic Exams for Lonely Practitioners " class make someone a competent gynecologist? It's akin to a call where you tell a child's mother that you are going to suture a simple laceration on the kid's leg. When they ask if you are a doctor, you tell them, " No, but I did go to class every Tuesday and Thursday for a whole nine months and then I went to this class on suturing for a week " . Yeah, and I stayed at a Holliday Inn Express last night. - Lancaster Re: Re: National Standards (Long) Kenny writes: " As I have posted, if the NSoP passed tomorrow in its current form, very few systems would feel the effects. DFR would continue to run the same calls they are running today and would provide the same level of care. " And that's the crux of the matter, isn't it? You see, what's right for Dallas Fire Rescue is NOT what's right for Shackelford County EMS. The SoP document crams us all into the same cage. Let Dallas do what it wants to, but also let the rest of us do what we NEED to do, and it's not the same thing necessarily that's right for Dallas. GG E.(Gene) Gandy POB 1651 Albany, TX 76430 wegandy1938@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 " And that's the crux of the matter, isn't it? You see, what's right for Dallas Fire Rescue is NOT what's right for Shackelford County EMS. The SoP document crams us all into the same cage. " The SoP has nothing to do with what area you work in, and it doesn't cram anyone into a cage. Does working in a rural area somehow make you more qualified to use more invasive techniques in treating your patient? Did you go to a better Paramedic school than the DFR people did? If not, than the urban/rural analysis has absolutely no relevance. People are arguing the fine points of this into oblivion. If you think that surgical airways and RSI should be part of the Paramedic SoP, great! I do too. Let's work to change that. This document does concern the minimum amount of education required before an individual can perform certain procedures. I happen to think that Paramedics should be allowed to everything that you are doing today, Gene, and I hope the SoP will reflect that. But at what point is a seminar and medical director approval not good enough to perform advanced skills? Should a Paramedic who didn't have Anatomy and Physiology be allowed to suture wounds after some alphabet soup course when they probably have very little knowledge of the integument? Can a workshop make you competent in extensor tendon repair? DPL? Tube thoracostomy? Does the " Pelvic Exams for Lonely Practitioners " class make someone a competent gynecologist? It's akin to a call where you tell a child's mother that you are going to suture a simple laceration on the kid's leg. When they ask if you are a doctor, you tell them, " No, but I did go to class every Tuesday and Thursday for a whole nine months and then I went to this class on suturing for a week " . Yeah, and I stayed at a Holliday Inn Express last night. - Lancaster Re: Re: National Standards (Long) Kenny writes: " As I have posted, if the NSoP passed tomorrow in its current form, very few systems would feel the effects. DFR would continue to run the same calls they are running today and would provide the same level of care. " And that's the crux of the matter, isn't it? You see, what's right for Dallas Fire Rescue is NOT what's right for Shackelford County EMS. The SoP document crams us all into the same cage. Let Dallas do what it wants to, but also let the rest of us do what we NEED to do, and it's not the same thing necessarily that's right for Dallas. GG E.(Gene) Gandy POB 1651 Albany, TX 76430 wegandy1938@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 " And that's the crux of the matter, isn't it? You see, what's right for Dallas Fire Rescue is NOT what's right for Shackelford County EMS. The SoP document crams us all into the same cage. " The SoP has nothing to do with what area you work in, and it doesn't cram anyone into a cage. Does working in a rural area somehow make you more qualified to use more invasive techniques in treating your patient? Did you go to a better Paramedic school than the DFR people did? If not, than the urban/rural analysis has absolutely no relevance. People are arguing the fine points of this into oblivion. If you think that surgical airways and RSI should be part of the Paramedic SoP, great! I do too. Let's work to change that. This document does concern the minimum amount of education required before an individual can perform certain procedures. I happen to think that Paramedics should be allowed to everything that you are doing today, Gene, and I hope the SoP will reflect that. But at what point is a seminar and medical director approval not good enough to perform advanced skills? Should a Paramedic who didn't have Anatomy and Physiology be allowed to suture wounds after some alphabet soup course when they probably have very little knowledge of the integument? Can a workshop make you competent in extensor tendon repair? DPL? Tube thoracostomy? Does the " Pelvic Exams for Lonely Practitioners " class make someone a competent gynecologist? It's akin to a call where you tell a child's mother that you are going to suture a simple laceration on the kid's leg. When they ask if you are a doctor, you tell them, " No, but I did go to class every Tuesday and Thursday for a whole nine months and then I went to this class on suturing for a week " . Yeah, and I stayed at a Holliday Inn Express last night. - Lancaster Re: Re: National Standards (Long) Kenny writes: " As I have posted, if the NSoP passed tomorrow in its current form, very few systems would feel the effects. DFR would continue to run the same calls they are running today and would provide the same level of care. " And that's the crux of the matter, isn't it? You see, what's right for Dallas Fire Rescue is NOT what's right for Shackelford County EMS. The SoP document crams us all into the same cage. Let Dallas do what it wants to, but also let the rest of us do what we NEED to do, and it's not the same thing necessarily that's right for Dallas. GG E.(Gene) Gandy POB 1651 Albany, TX 76430 wegandy1938@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 From my understanding from reading the NEMSSOP we will still have to have a Medical Director. It is just that our Medical Directors have no say in what we can do if it is not written in the NEMSSOP. So why don't we all get together and SLAM them with letters asking that they consider letting the well qualified Medical Directors continue to do the jobs they do so well. My understanding only 400 people have responded. All our post here are good points on both sides, but they are getting no where. Let stand together for once and voice a big Texas option and see what we can do by uniting together Just my 2 cents for what it is worth.... won't even buy you a piece of bubble gum. But miracles happen everyday. LP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 From my understanding from reading the NEMSSOP we will still have to have a Medical Director. It is just that our Medical Directors have no say in what we can do if it is not written in the NEMSSOP. So why don't we all get together and SLAM them with letters asking that they consider letting the well qualified Medical Directors continue to do the jobs they do so well. My understanding only 400 people have responded. All our post here are good points on both sides, but they are getting no where. Let stand together for once and voice a big Texas option and see what we can do by uniting together Just my 2 cents for what it is worth.... won't even buy you a piece of bubble gum. But miracles happen everyday. LP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2004 Report Share Posted December 8, 2004 We already have a Scope of Practice so to speak, Our Medical Directors decide what it is. As far as minimum training, each state decides that and most of them follow the National DOT guidelines or at least some form of that. BH Re: Re: National Standards (Long) In a message dated 12/6/2004 4:56:46 PM Central Standard Time, hatfield@... writes: Bernie, This illustrates the thing that I think a lot of people have missed or are missing. The ideology behind a SoP, in my mind, is not neccessarily a horrible thing, this 'specific document', with it's 'specific wording' is what I disagree with. I am also very curious how it will be transitioned in. Mike Hey Mike, Guess what. I disagree and agree with you. I agree this document sucks. But I disagree about needing a Scope of Practice. Minimum level of training would be better. But I don't know what to call it. Tom LeNeveu Learning Paramedic EMStock2004 was a RESOUNDING SUCCESS... Come See us Next year. _www.emstock.com_ (http://www.emstock.com/) _www.temsf.org_ (http://www.temsf.org/) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2004 Report Share Posted December 8, 2004 We already have a Scope of Practice so to speak, Our Medical Directors decide what it is. As far as minimum training, each state decides that and most of them follow the National DOT guidelines or at least some form of that. BH Re: Re: National Standards (Long) In a message dated 12/6/2004 4:56:46 PM Central Standard Time, hatfield@... writes: Bernie, This illustrates the thing that I think a lot of people have missed or are missing. The ideology behind a SoP, in my mind, is not neccessarily a horrible thing, this 'specific document', with it's 'specific wording' is what I disagree with. I am also very curious how it will be transitioned in. Mike Hey Mike, Guess what. I disagree and agree with you. I agree this document sucks. But I disagree about needing a Scope of Practice. Minimum level of training would be better. But I don't know what to call it. Tom LeNeveu Learning Paramedic EMStock2004 was a RESOUNDING SUCCESS... Come See us Next year. _www.emstock.com_ (http://www.emstock.com/) _www.temsf.org_ (http://www.temsf.org/) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2004 Report Share Posted December 8, 2004 We already have a Scope of Practice so to speak, Our Medical Directors decide what it is. As far as minimum training, each state decides that and most of them follow the National DOT guidelines or at least some form of that. BH Re: Re: National Standards (Long) In a message dated 12/6/2004 4:56:46 PM Central Standard Time, hatfield@... writes: Bernie, This illustrates the thing that I think a lot of people have missed or are missing. The ideology behind a SoP, in my mind, is not neccessarily a horrible thing, this 'specific document', with it's 'specific wording' is what I disagree with. I am also very curious how it will be transitioned in. Mike Hey Mike, Guess what. I disagree and agree with you. I agree this document sucks. But I disagree about needing a Scope of Practice. Minimum level of training would be better. But I don't know what to call it. Tom LeNeveu Learning Paramedic EMStock2004 was a RESOUNDING SUCCESS... Come See us Next year. _www.emstock.com_ (http://www.emstock.com/) _www.temsf.org_ (http://www.temsf.org/) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.