Fwd: [CasiClubhouse] pdf: Wakefield 2006 challenge re-challenge by vaccines w...

[Guest guest]

From: binstock@...Reply-to: CasiClubhouse Sent: 2/28/2010 2:42:38 P.M. Eastern Standard TimeSubj: [CasiClubhouse] pdf: Wakefield 2006 challenge re-challenge by vaccines with M

Once upon a time, the IOM challenged Andy in regard to growth-curve disturbances induced by the MMR. Andy was told his data would be more important if children re-challenged (by receiving a 2nd MMR) would manifest similar impairments. He did that project, found that the 2nd challenge (ie, re-challenge) induced a similar glitch in growth curves - and some parents reported things like, lost the child forever after 2nd MMR. Note that Andy didn't request the 2nd MMR but was able to find kids who had had problems after 2nd MMR. His 2006 study goes further:Gastrointestinal comorbidity, autistic regression and Measles-containing vaccines: positive re-challenge and biological gradientWakefield et al 2006http://www.wesupportandywakefield.com/documents/man796_802.pdfBy the way, some time after Andy had presented is re-challenge findings to the IOM, he was told (by the IOM) that they had lost his presentation. .

[Guest guest]

From: binstock@...Reply-to: CasiClubhouse Sent: 2/28/2010 2:42:38 P.M. Eastern Standard TimeSubj: [CasiClubhouse] pdf: Wakefield 2006 challenge re-challenge by vaccines with M

Once upon a time, the IOM challenged Andy in regard to growth-curve disturbances induced by the MMR. Andy was told his data would be more important if children re-challenged (by receiving a 2nd MMR) would manifest similar impairments. He did that project, found that the 2nd challenge (ie, re-challenge) induced a similar glitch in growth curves - and some parents reported things like, lost the child forever after 2nd MMR. Note that Andy didn't request the 2nd MMR but was able to find kids who had had problems after 2nd MMR. His 2006 study goes further:Gastrointestinal comorbidity, autistic regression and Measles-containing vaccines: positive re-challenge and biological gradientWakefield et al 2006http://www.wesupportandywakefield.com/documents/man796_802.pdfBy the way, some time after Andy had presented is re-challenge findings to the IOM, he was told (by the IOM) that they had lost his presentation. .

[Guest guest]

From: binstock@...Reply-to: CasiClubhouse Sent: 2/28/2010 2:42:38 P.M. Eastern Standard TimeSubj: [CasiClubhouse] pdf: Wakefield 2006 challenge re-challenge by vaccines with M

Once upon a time, the IOM challenged Andy in regard to growth-curve disturbances induced by the MMR. Andy was told his data would be more important if children re-challenged (by receiving a 2nd MMR) would manifest similar impairments. He did that project, found that the 2nd challenge (ie, re-challenge) induced a similar glitch in growth curves - and some parents reported things like, lost the child forever after 2nd MMR. Note that Andy didn't request the 2nd MMR but was able to find kids who had had problems after 2nd MMR. His 2006 study goes further:Gastrointestinal comorbidity, autistic regression and Measles-containing vaccines: positive re-challenge and biological gradientWakefield et al 2006http://www.wesupportandywakefield.com/documents/man796_802.pdfBy the way, some time after Andy had presented is re-challenge findings to the IOM, he was told (by the IOM) that they had lost his presentation. .