Guest guest Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 From a silent sister OSEL - Research Program Areas - Host Responses: Tissue-Materials ... The data on potential adverse effects of medical device materials and chemicals gathered ... bisphenol A, endocrine disruptors) released from medical device ... http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/osel/programareas/Tissuematerials.html - 21k - similar pages Updated January 27, 2005 Program Area: Host Responses: Tissue-Materials Interactions, Tissue-Device Interactions Scope: The OSEL "Host Responses: Tissue-Materials Interactions, Tissue-Devices Interactions" Program encompasses an interconnected program of laboratory research, risk assessment, and standards development activities designed to provide a scientific basis for regulatory decision making in CDRH. The data on potential adverse effects of medical device materials and chemicals gathered from pre-clinical experimental approaches in this Program are used to reduce uncertainties in assessing risks to patients exposed to physical and chemical insults, and protect their health. Background: In 1983, the Bureau of Radiological Health and the Bureau of Medical Devices were merged into the Center for Devices and Radiological Health. This merger presented the new Center with a disparity between the research programs devoted to radiation issues and those devoted to medical device issues. In addition, a discontinuity existed between classical chemical toxicology and the potential adverse health effects posed by exposure to medical devices. To address this need, OSEL expanded the existing radiation research program to include medical device toxicology. More recently, the program has evolved to address the development of toxicological and microbiological approaches to risk assessment and investigation of biological issues relating to infection control and tissue-engineered medical products (TEMPs). Program Description: The "Host Responses: Tissue-Materials Interactions, Tissue-Device Interactions" research program encompasses two major areas: 1) Biological Effects of Chemicals and Medical Device Materials, and 2) Infection Control. 1) Biological Effects of Chemicals and Medical Device Materials OSEL is conducting a wide range of projects designed to examine the biological effects of chemicals released, intentionally or unintentionally, from medical device materials or the tissue-device interactions themselves. The general goals of these studies are to evaluate the safety of these chemicals and materials and to develop or refine test methods that improve preclinical testing of device materials. Studies in this area fall into several subcategories: Immunological/ Inflammatory/ Proliferative effects. OSEL is conducting research to examine the immunological, inflammatory, and proliferative effects of materials and chemicals released from materials, including examination of the stimulation of chronic inflammation by particles using both in vitro and in vivo models, and the induction of allergic responses by material constituents, such as natural rubber latex proteins and metals. In addition, OSEL is conducting research on the ability of compounds incorporated into a device (e. g., drug-eluting coronary stents) that are intentionally released in order to mitigate inflammatory or cell proliferative responses induced by the device. Toxicity of compounds released from medical device materials. OSEL is involved in investigation of the adverse effects of compounds (e. g., metals, DEHP, ethylene oxide, bisphenol A, endocrine disruptors) released from medical device materials using small and large animal models, the development of toxicity tests specific for medical device materials (e. g., polymers that cure in situ), and the development of biomarkers to detect early cell and tissue damage caused by compounds released from devices. Biological effects of nanotechnology products and tissue engineered medical products (TEMPs). The development of TEMPs and nanoparticles in health care delivery is at the cutting edge of medical device technology. OSEL is developing test methods to examine the potential tissue interactions of these materials and medical devices, such as TEMPs scaffold materials and nanoparticles, in patients receiving the device and on the cells and tissues that are components of the device. 2) Infection Control Infection at the site of an implanted device represents a potentially devastating event, often requiring surgical intervention to remove the device. Prevention of infection is the key to infection control and a wide range of CDRH-regulated devices are required to ensure sterility in surgical procedures. OSEL scientists have addressed the issues of infection control through the development of cleaning procedures for new and reusable devices; examination of disinfection and sterilization equipment and procedures; assessment of chemical sterilant residuals on devices; development of test methods to ensure that barriers such as surgical drapes, gowns and gloves are tested for effectiveness in preventing transmission of microorganisms; and evaluation of the impact of bacterial adherence to materials (biofilms and endotoxins) on infection risks. Relevance to FDA And Public Health Impact: The experimental studies in this laboratory research program generate independent data for use in assessing toxicological risks and for developing standards and guidance documents. OSEL remains at the forefront in medical device toxicology and for developing methods for risk assessment. Specifically, OSEL serves as an independent source of data on medical device toxicology and risk assessment for risk managers in CDRH Offices. These data and risk assessment provide a scientific basis for development of important pre-clinical and post-market activities, such as development of ASTM standards for testing biological responses to particles both in vivo (F1904-98) and in vitro (F1903-98), ISO standards (e. g., ISO 10993-17) for establishing tolerable intake values, Federal rule-making (e. g., for natural rubber latex protein content in gloves and condoms), and for risk management decision-making in the Center (e. g., FDA Public Health Notification for DEHP in medical plastics). Five Year Objectives: Long-term objectives include: 1) develop and establish test methods and models for evaluation of potential adverse effects of medical device materials, and medical devices, including elucidation of new, clinically relevant, and sensitive biomarkers to predict adverse effects in the preclinical stages of product development, and 2) characterize the potential adverse effects using pre-clinical laboratory models and utilizing the data to predict the likelihood of adverse effects in humans. Project Abstracts: Abstract -Toxicity of Chemicals released from Medical Device Materials FDA is concerned with the biological effects of low levels of chemicals released, intentionally or unintentionally, from medical device materials. For example, medical devices that contain plastics are used in a large variety of medical procedures preformed in clinical and hospital settings. During certain medical procedures, the possibility exists of exposure of patients to chemicals that could leach out of the plastics; these plastics include IV and blood bags, where the chemicals could leach from the plastic and into the solution inside the bag. Recently, there has been public and Congressional concern about "endocrine disruptor" compounds, such as DEHP and bisphenol A, that can release from medical plastics and potentially disrupt normal hormonal function, even at very low doses. Chemicals (such as metals and polymers) released from orthopedic implants could leach directly into the body and blood of patients. Medical devices may release chemicals used in manufacturing (accelerants used for making latex gloves) or sterilization (ethylene oxide residues) of medical products. In many cases, the doses received by patients are unknown, but are likely to be small; however, the exposure of patients that could exist for extended time spans is of concern. In OSEL labs, we want to determine and understand 1) which chemicals are released from or leach out of medical products and at what rate, 2) the dose to the patient, 3) the adverse effects of the chemicals in laboratory models (in vivo and in vitro), and 4) the tolerable intake levels for these chemicals in patients to protect their health using the information gathered from this research project. The benefits of this research to FDA/ CDRH include the discovery of new biomarkers/ endpoints that are more sensitive to low doses of chemicals that will 1) allow us in the preclinical laboratory and regulatory setting to predict which chemicals released will have adverse effects, and 2) ultimately allow physicians in the clinical setting to intervene at an early stage to protect patients' health. Abstract -Preclinical assessment of cardiovascular devices and adjunctive therapies OSEL investigates the safety and effectiveness of a range of interventional cardiovascular and minimally invasive devices and related adjunctive therapeutics using various swine models. An integral part of these investigations is the assessment of the animal models currently used and the development of more predictive models of device use and related failure modes. Together, these models and the study of the models addresses the problems of identification and assessment of regulatory science issues associated with novel interventional and combination therapeutics. The models under study include normal swine as well as animals with vasculopathy induced by obesity (atherogenic high fat/ high cholesterol diets), mechanical manipulation (balloon angioplasty or stenting), hormonal manipulation (castration, hormone replacement therapy), hemodynamic alterations (vascular ligation, fistulas) and/ or metabolic manipulation (diabetes mellitus). The results of these studies 1) define preclinical regulatory issues for current and emerging technologies, including device and combination products for the treatment of primary cardiovascular disease, vascular restenosis resulting from medical intervention, and thermal ablative technologies, 2) identify the critical safety issues for current and emerging technologies based on failure modes analysis, and 3) directly impact on the effectiveness and consistency of the Center's preclinical review of device applications prior to entry into clinical trials and market access. Abstract – Biological Effects of TEMPS Materials and Nanoparticles The development of TEMPs introduces a variety of new materials, not previously used in prosthetic devices, or familiar materials used for new clinical indications, whose conditions for safe and effective use must be evaluated and established. Materials used as scaffolds to support tissue for repair or to promote regeneration of host tissues, include polymeric and natural materials, such as alginates and chitosans. The field of nanotechnology is closely linked to TEMPs and involves man-made and natural materials used for TEMPs scaffolds comprised of nanoparticles (less than 100 nm). Nanoparticles formed by mechanical stresses on the device migrate to various tissues, e. g., brain, initiating proliferative, inflammatory or other untoward responses, which may have a long-term impact on the host, such as alterations in immune status, development of chronic inflammation, or tumor development. OSEL develops experimental in vivo and in vitro models for preclinical evaluation of TEMPs scaffold materials (and chemicals released from them) and nanoparticles in order to predict potential adverse effects on patients, and to understand the mechanisms by which these work and how to ensure that the products are safe and effective. The biological behavior (transport, fate, and effects) of nanoparticles is poorly understood and OSEL will be required to develop methods to fill critical knowledge gaps in this area. Products of concern that contain nanoparticles include sunscreens and TEMPs scaffold materials. In OSEL laboratories, two major approaches have been developed to evaluate biological effects of these materials -an in vivo animal model to examine the chronic proliferative, inflammatory, and immunotoxic responses of TEMPs materials and nanoparticles, and an in vitro cell culture approach to evaluate responses in specific cells and tissues. Target tissues for various materials are determined based on the nanoparticles distribution in animals exposed to particles. The evaluation of biological responses in cell cultures includes analyses and validation of specific responses to injected materials, as well as an indication of the general functional activity of critical cell types, such as macrophages, lymphocytes and eosinophils. Specific cellular and molecular effects of injected materials may represent useful preclinical and clinical biomarkers for predicting potential chronic proliferative and inflammatory responses and development of various chronic immunological diseases. Abstract – Reuse and Infection Control As hospitals and healthcare facilities seek to reduce the cost of medical procedures, devices once developed for single-use, are now being reprocessed and reused many times over. Reprocessing may be performed by the healthcare facility or the device may be shipped to a third-party reprocessor. Examples of devices that are reprocessed include surgical saw blades, ultrasound probes, laparoscopy scissors, electrosurgical electrodes and biopsy forceps. Concern over the reprocessing of single-use devices includes the possible transmission of human adventitious agents (HIV, hepatitis, etc.) and dangerous device malfunctions because of material breakdown due to multiple cleanings and multiple use of a device that was initially designed to be used only once. OSEL leads FDA's effort to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cleaning protocols and in developing proposed test soils for validation of cleaning protocols. A validated cleaning protocol is necessary in order to present the device for proper sterilization. A used device, whether intended for single use or reuse, is exposed to biological matter, e. g., tissue, blood, body fluids, and microorganisms. If the biological material is not removed immediately from the device, it provides a nidus for microorganism growth and the development of biofilm. Formation of biofilm presents a tenacious barrier to effective cleaning and sterilization. To confront these issues, adequate and validated cleaning methods must be conducted to remove this matter and prevent it from being transmitted by the device when it is reused the next patient. OSEL/ HSB researchers evaluate cleaning protocols, develop "test soils" for validation of cleaning protocols, and develop methods to prevent or breach biofilm. This involves laboratory work on single use devices, simulation soiling of devices, reviews of submissions from reprocessors, and literature updates. OSEL also addresses the proper cleaning of reused medical devices and safety of patients exposed to reused medical devices by actively contributing to development of international standards. A well-defined standard is necessary if both the reprocessors of medical devices and the regulatory agencies that protect the public health are to agree on compliance with existing FDA policies or to set new standards for how to reprocess used devices. Updated January 27, 2005 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.1/1464 - Release Date: 5/24/2008 8:56 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.1/1464 - Release Date: 5/24/2008 8:56 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.4/1478 - Release Date: 6/2/2008 7:12 AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.