Guest guest Posted June 18, 2008 Report Share Posted June 18, 2008 Dear ,, I'm looking at your e-mail address. Per chance do you have a horse? I ride a beautiful Haflinger mare named Penny and a handsome Percheron/Appaloosa cross named Maverick.I started riding when I was 36, that was four years ago. These beautiful creatures in addition to 2 beautiful Belgian mares named Roxy and have brought me back from a life that was a complete and living hell. Check out www.ridetheranch.com and you'll see a virtual sleigh ride. The team pulling the sleigh is Roxy and .They've shown me what is truly beautiful and what is truly important in life. That would be the wellness and happiness of me. Yes, you are the most important person in your life., I know you are getting a lot of friction about getting your silicone implants and it must feel almost embarrassing to have people be so against you getting them. It's okay to say you feel this way. You are where I was 20 years ago. I was so flat chested it was horrible. AAA batteries were bigger than my AAA size cup boobs. I married a man that talked me into getting them and made me feel so bad about myself that I thought this was the only way to get him to love me.I believe everything happens for a reason, I truly do. This is your opportunity to have the information and research that I never got. You have the opportunity to make an informed decision and to show how mature you truly are at 19. The biggest fact is that between the ages of 25 - 30, you will have to undergo another surgery to get your implants either removed permanently or replaced. This means you will have to have $10,000 to $15,000 for this surgery. You have to ask yourself if you really want to spend this kind money every 5 - 10 years. You also have to ask yourself if you really want this surgery every 5 - 10 years.Please ask your surgeon about his thoughts about this. It would be interesting to hear what he has to say. I can give you the name of my surgeon who will confirm that implants are not lifetime devices. Please let me know. I didn't have this information. I didn't know these aren't lifetime devices. Due my leaving them in for 20 years, I almost died as a result last August. I was rushed into the ER with a 102.4 degree temperature and ended up in emergency surgery. Most surgeons don't know how to deal with complications from implants. I was told from my implanting surgeon that there was nothing wrong with me. The surgeon that ended up helping me and saving my life was shocked that I was told I didn't have a problem.I had what's called a late stage hematoma. What that means around the same time I was battling uterine cancer (at age 29), old blood and various other gross bodily fluids pooled up in my right breast. My right breast grew to 4 times it's original size. If you knock on your knee cap that's how hard it was. I know you are going to hear all sorts of horror stories of what can happen if you get silicone implants. You may think that none of these horrible things could happen to you. I never thought any of those bad things could happen to me.I never thought,I would be in agonizing pain following surgery,I would hate myself and the feelings of falseness I had,I would have uterine cancer at age 29,I would have hypothyroidism at age 21,I would have a right breast that became swollen to 4 times it's size and have to get my implants removed,I would have complications following my explant surgery,I would have had 17 surgeries over the past 20 years for various problems,I would have necrosis (tissue death) in my right breast,I would contract a staph infection which would almost kill me,I would have problems getting the cavity to close in my right breast where the implant was,I would have nurses, sometimes twice daily coming in to open pack my breast wound to ensure another seroma/hematoma wouldn't form over the course of one year,I would miss my original small boobs so much,I would experience the happiest day of my life when I finally got the implants removed.Despite having such a long period of recovery and that it looks like I may have yet another seroma/hematoma, I don't regret getting my implants out. The only thing I do regret is getting them to begin with.Canada is about to ban silicone implants. Here's an article below about them., please feel free to e-mail me, even privately at prowlermeow@....I won't betray any confidences, I just want to help you.Hugs & hope,Tracihttp://www.canada. com/topics/ news/story. html?id=b0eeb176 -6b3d-4a3e- bb18-29033eb044c cOttawa prepared to slap toxic label on widely used chemicals Schmidt , Canwest News Service Published: Friday, May 16OTTAWA - The federal government announced Friday it intends to slap a toxic label on a bunch of chemicals used in everyday products from chewing gum to cosmetics as well as in controversial devices like silicone breast implants because they are either harmful to human health or the environment. The 11 chemicals include Vinyl acetate, a carcinogen used as a base in chewing gum, and Cyclohexasiloxane, used as building blocks of silicone used in breast implants.If industry fails to offer new information within 60 days to reverse course, Ottawa will classify these chemicals as toxic and kick start a process that could lead to a ban in certain products, as with bisphenol A in baby bottles. Silicone breast implants were pulled from the market in Canada in 1992 amid concerns they were unsafe for women. In 2006, they were once again made freely available.In the case of the synthetic chemicals belonging to the Cyclohexasiloxane family - D4, D5 and D6 - the government is proposing an additional step to ensure their virtual elimination from the environment.In addition to being found in silicone fluids, these synthetic chemicals are found in cleaning compounds, cosmetics and personal care products, including shampoos, creams, lotions, and antiperspirants. D5, in particular, is a common ingredient to give products a silky texture.The government concludes these synthetic chemicals do not pose a risk to human health, but rather should be declared toxic to the environment. "Canadians expect their government to protect the environment from harmful chemicals, and that's why we are taking action," said Environmental Minister Baird.Six of the 11 chemicals are flagged as toxic to human health; the government said it will work with industry to reduce exposures to two of these substances.The health toxins are: Vinyl acetate, used in food additives, paints, sealants and plastics; C.I. Pigment Yellow 34 and Red 103, a colourant used in paints, dyes, inks, and plastics; Thiourea, used in electronic products, insecticides and textiles; isoprene, used in rubber and plastic manufacturing; and Oxirane, used in paints, coatings and adhesives.The announcement comes after a lengthy review of the chemicals under the government's Chemicals Management Plan involving about 200 substances. It is the most comprehensive chemical review currently being undertaken in the world.Mike Patton, spokesman for the Canadian Cosmetics, Toiletries and Fragrances Association, praised the process and welcomed the conclusions."There's nothing in this batch that poses a health concern for us. But our other interest is environmental impact, and we'll work with the government to minimize or eliminate entirely any environmental impact."Thiourea, a carcinogen, used to be a common ingredient in personal-care products, but it hasn't been used by the industry for some time, said Patton.Women health advocates say they'll use this new information to push for a review of the October, 2006, lifting the ban on silicone breast implants.The government's newly released risk assessment of D4, found in silicone breast implants, states the synthetic chemical impairs fertility. It also flags a finding of the Danish Environmental Protection Agency, identifying the liver as a "target organ for D4 exposures."But the government concludes the substance "is not entering the environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that constitute or may constitute a danger in Canada to human life or health."Madeline Bosco, a nurse who is executive director of Canadian Women's Health Network and public appointee to the government's advisory committee on breast implants, says research shows silicone is not well-contained in the implants and diffuses throughout women's bodies."This is extremely good news from my perspective. It helps move the toxicology world, which has already been raising questions about silicone, into the health products process." Epidemiologist Diane Zuckerman, president of the National Research Center for Women & Families based in Washington, characterized Health Canada's decision "confusing and illogical. If D4 is dangerous to the environment, on what basis is the government concluding that it is not dangerous when implanted inside the human body or repeatedly used on the human body?"A more accurate assessment would have been to say that the health hazards are unknown for individual use of products with D4, because they have not been adequately studied. I would think that women of childbearing age would be especially concerned about having breast implants because of possible infertility problems that could result from D4."Silicone implants were pulled from the market in Canada in 1992 amid concerns they were unsafe for women. In October, 2006, Health Canada changed course and made them freely available to women with the caveat that "no medical device is 100 per cent safe." Until then, only breast implants filled with saline were licensed for sale in Canada.The October, 2006 decision came just months after Health Canada's scientific advisory committee said questions "had not been sufficiently addressed" about potential health risks should the gels bleed or leak into women's bodies and about whether the implants increase the risk of auto-immune diseases in the long term.The government is also proposing to list Acid Blue 80, a colourant used in cosmetics and glass cleaner, as toxic to the environment.© Canwest News Service 2008"Feeling down? Saddle up." ~Author Unknown From: Janine <j9doyle@...>Subject: 19 year old daughter getting silicone breast implants Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 11:01 AM I have a 19 year old daughter that is getting silicone implants on July 3. Her father and I have done everything possible to try and talk her out of it. She is financing her surgery through Chase Health. She has been presented with many of your stories. I have attended her plastic surgery appointments and argued with her surgeon. I asked her plastic surgeon yesterday if there is a silicone allergy test that can be performed prior to surgery. He said that there is no known silicone allergy so there is no need for a test. Has anyone ever heard of a silicone allergy test? If any of you would like to email , her email address is mykideatsgrass@ hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.