Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

[Guest guest]

,I missed it the first time I read the book but, on page 224, it tells how to give the HC remotely. Basically, you do it to yourself (although I insert my son and his issues in it) and, when it is done, I verbally send it to him. I know, it sounds like it shouldn't work as well to me but evidently it does. I just started using it remotely yesterday so I don't have any real experience with it. Both of my kids are older so I pay them (yes, I know, ridiculous) to do it with me twice a day. At least we are doing it and it does seem to be working. Les' eye rolling is gone again and 's moods and depression are improving. My various issues seem to be under control also but I am working on some new ones. With families like ours, there is no shortage of issue to work on. We will be doing it

for quite a while; I doubt that seizures will be a quick fix.It seems that improvements do come in spurts. . . nothing for a week then a bunch of improvements.It is interesting to note that Ben , MD (the co-author of HC) originally began the HC when he was so weak with Lou Gehrig's Disease that he could barely speak and then saw no improvement whatsoever for 6 weeks. Then, in the course of 2 weeks, all his symptoms went away and he has now been symptom free for 6 years. So, I guess, the moral of that story is to stick with it. sallyFrom:

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 12:20:58 AMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Hi Sally,I wondered how you are using the healing code on your children. I am still reading the book, but so far he talks about doing the HC on yourself if you are using it to heal someone else. So I was wondering if you use the hand positions on your kids or are you doing it on yourself for your kids (does that question make sense). I want to use it for my autistic daughter, but not sure if one way is more effective than the other. Thanks for sharing your experiences with us. Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedicalTo:

mb12 valtrex Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM

I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be able to isolate what was working.'s seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less

than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.sallyTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PMSubject:

Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak.

Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see.

We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

[Guest guest]

,I missed it the first time I read the book but, on page 224, it tells how to give the HC remotely. Basically, you do it to yourself (although I insert my son and his issues in it) and, when it is done, I verbally send it to him. I know, it sounds like it shouldn't work as well to me but evidently it does. I just started using it remotely yesterday so I don't have any real experience with it. Both of my kids are older so I pay them (yes, I know, ridiculous) to do it with me twice a day. At least we are doing it and it does seem to be working. Les' eye rolling is gone again and 's moods and depression are improving. My various issues seem to be under control also but I am working on some new ones. With families like ours, there is no shortage of issue to work on. We will be doing it

for quite a while; I doubt that seizures will be a quick fix.It seems that improvements do come in spurts. . . nothing for a week then a bunch of improvements.It is interesting to note that Ben , MD (the co-author of HC) originally began the HC when he was so weak with Lou Gehrig's Disease that he could barely speak and then saw no improvement whatsoever for 6 weeks. Then, in the course of 2 weeks, all his symptoms went away and he has now been symptom free for 6 years. So, I guess, the moral of that story is to stick with it. sallyFrom:

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 12:20:58 AMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Hi Sally,I wondered how you are using the healing code on your children. I am still reading the book, but so far he talks about doing the HC on yourself if you are using it to heal someone else. So I was wondering if you use the hand positions on your kids or are you doing it on yourself for your kids (does that question make sense). I want to use it for my autistic daughter, but not sure if one way is more effective than the other. Thanks for sharing your experiences with us. Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedicalTo:

mb12 valtrex Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM

I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be able to isolate what was working.'s seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less

than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.sallyTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PMSubject:

Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak.

Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see.

We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

[Guest guest]

,I missed it the first time I read the book but, on page 224, it tells how to give the HC remotely. Basically, you do it to yourself (although I insert my son and his issues in it) and, when it is done, I verbally send it to him. I know, it sounds like it shouldn't work as well to me but evidently it does. I just started using it remotely yesterday so I don't have any real experience with it. Both of my kids are older so I pay them (yes, I know, ridiculous) to do it with me twice a day. At least we are doing it and it does seem to be working. Les' eye rolling is gone again and 's moods and depression are improving. My various issues seem to be under control also but I am working on some new ones. With families like ours, there is no shortage of issue to work on. We will be doing it

for quite a while; I doubt that seizures will be a quick fix.It seems that improvements do come in spurts. . . nothing for a week then a bunch of improvements.It is interesting to note that Ben , MD (the co-author of HC) originally began the HC when he was so weak with Lou Gehrig's Disease that he could barely speak and then saw no improvement whatsoever for 6 weeks. Then, in the course of 2 weeks, all his symptoms went away and he has now been symptom free for 6 years. So, I guess, the moral of that story is to stick with it. sallyFrom:

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 12:20:58 AMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Hi Sally,I wondered how you are using the healing code on your children. I am still reading the book, but so far he talks about doing the HC on yourself if you are using it to heal someone else. So I was wondering if you use the hand positions on your kids or are you doing it on yourself for your kids (does that question make sense). I want to use it for my autistic daughter, but not sure if one way is more effective than the other. Thanks for sharing your experiences with us. Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedicalTo:

mb12 valtrex Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM

I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be able to isolate what was working.'s seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less

than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.sallyTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PMSubject:

Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak.

Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see.

We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

[Guest guest]

Gayle,Very interesting. Sounds like you are having similar responses as what we are seeing.What do you mean by " . . he is completely oblivious to his sister and I."? Your idea of grading the symptoms is a good one. I have been keeping a journal but your method is much better.Are you saying that much of the time you are using the remote HC? I am interested in that as I have just started using it remotely and not sure what to expect. Sure would be easier than corralling my son much of the time.sallyTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 4:52:30 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical We're on day 9. I'm doing 3 per day on myself, my daughter (23, NT) and my mom who lives in another state and doing 3-4 per day on my son (16, PANDAS). As indicated in the book, work I do for others is

done through the hand positioning on myself in a very quiet atmosphere. I know from previous training that this is sometimes the most effective route particularly when this type of work is new to you and you struggle with healthy skepticism and doubt. Anytime you have to defend your growing beliefs it has great potential to knock you back a step whether you realize it has or not. My son still isn't in the loop on this and probably won't be anytime soon. My Mom, the consummate skeptic, has had a great response (and has ordered the book). We're still dealing with PANDAS but there is no question that it is having a very favorable effect on him, he notices it and its completely obvious to his sister and I. I'm grading and measuring the symptoms I see everyday in him for the past year and will post

more after the 2 wk point. I've made no other changes to his protocol which has been in place for many months, narrowing the possibility that any improvement can be due to other adjuncts. Just wanted to write in support of doing the code on yourself (alone) instead of on the intended person if you feel that in any way you have to justify or defend what you are doing. Later, if successful, you can worry about educating friends and family but avoid that during your own learning period. GayleTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 11:46:38 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical Thank you Sally for responding with results that can be quantified. It is more plausible when someone admits it isn't a "Cure All" and gives some symptoms that have been eliminated or reduced, with a expectation of getting results verified by a doctor later. I know positive thoughts can alter a person and don't want to denegrate anyone who believes in alternative medicine, but I also know

people who have put all their eggs in that basket and been disappointed. Thank you again for giving us more insight. > > > Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical > To: mb12 valtrex > Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask > him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be > able to isolate what was working. > > 's

seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now. > > For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less > than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to

have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting. > > I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations. > > sally > > > To: mb12 valtrex > Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PM > Subject: > Re: Healing Code biomedical > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see

through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. > > > > Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. > > > > We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the

gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration> >

[Guest guest]

Gayle,Very interesting. Sounds like you are having similar responses as what we are seeing.What do you mean by " . . he is completely oblivious to his sister and I."? Your idea of grading the symptoms is a good one. I have been keeping a journal but your method is much better.Are you saying that much of the time you are using the remote HC? I am interested in that as I have just started using it remotely and not sure what to expect. Sure would be easier than corralling my son much of the time.sallyTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 4:52:30 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical We're on day 9. I'm doing 3 per day on myself, my daughter (23, NT) and my mom who lives in another state and doing 3-4 per day on my son (16, PANDAS). As indicated in the book, work I do for others is

done through the hand positioning on myself in a very quiet atmosphere. I know from previous training that this is sometimes the most effective route particularly when this type of work is new to you and you struggle with healthy skepticism and doubt. Anytime you have to defend your growing beliefs it has great potential to knock you back a step whether you realize it has or not. My son still isn't in the loop on this and probably won't be anytime soon. My Mom, the consummate skeptic, has had a great response (and has ordered the book). We're still dealing with PANDAS but there is no question that it is having a very favorable effect on him, he notices it and its completely obvious to his sister and I. I'm grading and measuring the symptoms I see everyday in him for the past year and will post

more after the 2 wk point. I've made no other changes to his protocol which has been in place for many months, narrowing the possibility that any improvement can be due to other adjuncts. Just wanted to write in support of doing the code on yourself (alone) instead of on the intended person if you feel that in any way you have to justify or defend what you are doing. Later, if successful, you can worry about educating friends and family but avoid that during your own learning period. GayleTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 11:46:38 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical Thank you Sally for responding with results that can be quantified. It is more plausible when someone admits it isn't a "Cure All" and gives some symptoms that have been eliminated or reduced, with a expectation of getting results verified by a doctor later. I know positive thoughts can alter a person and don't want to denegrate anyone who believes in alternative medicine, but I also know

people who have put all their eggs in that basket and been disappointed. Thank you again for giving us more insight. > > > Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical > To: mb12 valtrex > Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask > him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be > able to isolate what was working. > > 's

seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now. > > For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less > than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to

have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting. > > I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations. > > sally > > > To: mb12 valtrex > Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PM > Subject: > Re: Healing Code biomedical > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see

through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. > > > > Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. > > > > We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the

gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration> >

[Guest guest]

Thanks, Sally. I'll try the remote method and if that doesn't work, I'll wrestle my kid to the floor and do it on her I got rid of a bad headache today using the HC, so I am looking forward to trying it on my children. You are definitely right about having many issues in our families....it's hard to know who to try it on first!Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedicalTo:

mb12 valtrex Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM

I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be able to isolate what was working.'s seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less

than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.sallyTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PMSubject:

Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak.

Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see.

We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

[Guest guest]

Thanks, Sally. I'll try the remote method and if that doesn't work, I'll wrestle my kid to the floor and do it on her I got rid of a bad headache today using the HC, so I am looking forward to trying it on my children. You are definitely right about having many issues in our families....it's hard to know who to try it on first!Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedicalTo:

mb12 valtrex Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM

I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be able to isolate what was working.'s seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less

than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.sallyTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PMSubject:

Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak.

Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see.

We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

[Guest guest]

Thanks, Sally. I'll try the remote method and if that doesn't work, I'll wrestle my kid to the floor and do it on her I got rid of a bad headache today using the HC, so I am looking forward to trying it on my children. You are definitely right about having many issues in our families....it's hard to know who to try it on first!Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedicalTo:

mb12 valtrex Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM

I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be able to isolate what was working.'s seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less

than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.sallyTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PMSubject:

Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak.

Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see.

We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

[Guest guest]

Please keep us posted as to your continued efforts and results. I'm doing the code remotely for my son but usually it's in the evening when I'm laying in bed and half the time I fall asleep in the middle I should probably only do the code sitting up!Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedicalTo:

mb12 valtrex Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM

I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be able to isolate what was working.'s seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less

than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.sallyTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PMSubject:

Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak.

Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see.

We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

[Guest guest]

Please keep us posted as to your continued efforts and results. I'm doing the code remotely for my son but usually it's in the evening when I'm laying in bed and half the time I fall asleep in the middle I should probably only do the code sitting up!Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedicalTo:

mb12 valtrex Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM

I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be able to isolate what was working.'s seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less

than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.sallyTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PMSubject:

Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak.

Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see.

We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

[Guest guest]

Hi Sally,His improvements are very obvious to his sister and I. We can clearly see improvement in him. She knows I am up to something but doesn't know exactly what. The only other person in my world who really knows what I'm up to, beyond this forum, is my Mom.I use remote HC ALL of the time with the exception of one that I did on my daughter the 3rd day I was doing it. I do that for the reasons I describe below about having to justify and defend. They don't address this in the book but its a potentially powerful bullet in the foot when you are still learning yourself. It would be one thing if you had to defend it to others but were then going to a practitioner for this who was completely versed in the mechanism by which it works but most of us

don't have that luxury...we are the practitioners...practicing a new discipline..with a new (or returning) mindset to our culture...on our very sick kids. We cannot afford negativity when first starting this. As I said, there will be plenty of time to educate/explain/defend to those around you when YOU fully believe and have some hard data in front of you to continue to motivate you on a bad day. Best wishes,GayleTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 10:36:02 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Gayle,Very interesting. Sounds like you are having similar responses as what we are seeing.What do you mean by " . . he is completely oblivious to his sister and I."? Your idea of grading the symptoms is a good one. I have been keeping a journal but your method is much better.Are you saying that much of the time you are using the remote HC? I am interested in that as I have just started using it remotely and not sure what to expect. Sure would be easier than corralling my son much of the time.sallyFrom: Gayle Owens

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 4:52:30 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical We're on day 9. I'm doing 3 per day on myself, my daughter (23, NT) and my mom who lives in another state and doing 3-4 per day on my son (16, PANDAS). As indicated in the book, work I do for others is

done through the hand positioning on myself in a very quiet atmosphere. I know from previous training that this is sometimes the most effective route particularly when this type of work is new to you and you struggle with healthy skepticism and doubt. Anytime you have to defend your growing beliefs it has great potential to knock you back a step whether you realize it has or not. My son still isn't in the loop on this and probably won't be anytime soon. My Mom, the consummate skeptic, has had a great response (and has ordered the book). We're still dealing with PANDAS but there is no question that it is having a very favorable effect on him, he notices it and its completely obvious to his sister and I. I'm grading and measuring the symptoms I see everyday in him for the past year and will post

more after the 2 wk point. I've made no other changes to his protocol which has been in place for many months, narrowing the possibility that any improvement can be due to other adjuncts. Just wanted to write in support of doing the code on yourself (alone) instead of on the intended person if you feel that in any way you have to justify or defend what you are doing. Later, if successful, you can worry about educating friends and family but avoid that during your own learning period. GayleTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 11:46:38 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical Thank you Sally for responding with results that can be quantified. It is more plausible when someone admits it isn't a "Cure All" and gives some symptoms that have been eliminated or reduced, with a expectation of getting results verified by a doctor later. I know positive thoughts can alter a person and don't want to denegrate anyone who believes in alternative medicine, but I

also know

people who have put all their eggs in that basket and been disappointed. Thank you again for giving us more insight. > > > Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical > To: mb12 valtrex > Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask > him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be > able to isolate what was working. > > 's

seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now. > > For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less > than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to

have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting. > > I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations. > > sally > > > To: mb12 valtrex > Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PM > Subject: > Re: Healing Code biomedical > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see

through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. > > > > Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. > > > > We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the

gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration> >

[Guest guest]

Hi Sally,His improvements are very obvious to his sister and I. We can clearly see improvement in him. She knows I am up to something but doesn't know exactly what. The only other person in my world who really knows what I'm up to, beyond this forum, is my Mom.I use remote HC ALL of the time with the exception of one that I did on my daughter the 3rd day I was doing it. I do that for the reasons I describe below about having to justify and defend. They don't address this in the book but its a potentially powerful bullet in the foot when you are still learning yourself. It would be one thing if you had to defend it to others but were then going to a practitioner for this who was completely versed in the mechanism by which it works but most of us

don't have that luxury...we are the practitioners...practicing a new discipline..with a new (or returning) mindset to our culture...on our very sick kids. We cannot afford negativity when first starting this. As I said, there will be plenty of time to educate/explain/defend to those around you when YOU fully believe and have some hard data in front of you to continue to motivate you on a bad day. Best wishes,GayleTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 10:36:02 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Gayle,Very interesting. Sounds like you are having similar responses as what we are seeing.What do you mean by " . . he is completely oblivious to his sister and I."? Your idea of grading the symptoms is a good one. I have been keeping a journal but your method is much better.Are you saying that much of the time you are using the remote HC? I am interested in that as I have just started using it remotely and not sure what to expect. Sure would be easier than corralling my son much of the time.sallyFrom: Gayle Owens

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 4:52:30 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical We're on day 9. I'm doing 3 per day on myself, my daughter (23, NT) and my mom who lives in another state and doing 3-4 per day on my son (16, PANDAS). As indicated in the book, work I do for others is

done through the hand positioning on myself in a very quiet atmosphere. I know from previous training that this is sometimes the most effective route particularly when this type of work is new to you and you struggle with healthy skepticism and doubt. Anytime you have to defend your growing beliefs it has great potential to knock you back a step whether you realize it has or not. My son still isn't in the loop on this and probably won't be anytime soon. My Mom, the consummate skeptic, has had a great response (and has ordered the book). We're still dealing with PANDAS but there is no question that it is having a very favorable effect on him, he notices it and its completely obvious to his sister and I. I'm grading and measuring the symptoms I see everyday in him for the past year and will post

more after the 2 wk point. I've made no other changes to his protocol which has been in place for many months, narrowing the possibility that any improvement can be due to other adjuncts. Just wanted to write in support of doing the code on yourself (alone) instead of on the intended person if you feel that in any way you have to justify or defend what you are doing. Later, if successful, you can worry about educating friends and family but avoid that during your own learning period. GayleTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 11:46:38 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical Thank you Sally for responding with results that can be quantified. It is more plausible when someone admits it isn't a "Cure All" and gives some symptoms that have been eliminated or reduced, with a expectation of getting results verified by a doctor later. I know positive thoughts can alter a person and don't want to denegrate anyone who believes in alternative medicine, but I

also know

people who have put all their eggs in that basket and been disappointed. Thank you again for giving us more insight. > > > Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical > To: mb12 valtrex > Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask > him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be > able to isolate what was working. > > 's

seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now. > > For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less > than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to

have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting. > > I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations. > > sally > > > To: mb12 valtrex > Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PM > Subject: > Re: Healing Code biomedical > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see

through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. > > > > Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. > > > > We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the

gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration> >

[Guest guest]

Hi Sally,His improvements are very obvious to his sister and I. We can clearly see improvement in him. She knows I am up to something but doesn't know exactly what. The only other person in my world who really knows what I'm up to, beyond this forum, is my Mom.I use remote HC ALL of the time with the exception of one that I did on my daughter the 3rd day I was doing it. I do that for the reasons I describe below about having to justify and defend. They don't address this in the book but its a potentially powerful bullet in the foot when you are still learning yourself. It would be one thing if you had to defend it to others but were then going to a practitioner for this who was completely versed in the mechanism by which it works but most of us

don't have that luxury...we are the practitioners...practicing a new discipline..with a new (or returning) mindset to our culture...on our very sick kids. We cannot afford negativity when first starting this. As I said, there will be plenty of time to educate/explain/defend to those around you when YOU fully believe and have some hard data in front of you to continue to motivate you on a bad day. Best wishes,GayleTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 10:36:02 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Gayle,Very interesting. Sounds like you are having similar responses as what we are seeing.What do you mean by " . . he is completely oblivious to his sister and I."? Your idea of grading the symptoms is a good one. I have been keeping a journal but your method is much better.Are you saying that much of the time you are using the remote HC? I am interested in that as I have just started using it remotely and not sure what to expect. Sure would be easier than corralling my son much of the time.sallyFrom: Gayle Owens

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 4:52:30 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical We're on day 9. I'm doing 3 per day on myself, my daughter (23, NT) and my mom who lives in another state and doing 3-4 per day on my son (16, PANDAS). As indicated in the book, work I do for others is

done through the hand positioning on myself in a very quiet atmosphere. I know from previous training that this is sometimes the most effective route particularly when this type of work is new to you and you struggle with healthy skepticism and doubt. Anytime you have to defend your growing beliefs it has great potential to knock you back a step whether you realize it has or not. My son still isn't in the loop on this and probably won't be anytime soon. My Mom, the consummate skeptic, has had a great response (and has ordered the book). We're still dealing with PANDAS but there is no question that it is having a very favorable effect on him, he notices it and its completely obvious to his sister and I. I'm grading and measuring the symptoms I see everyday in him for the past year and will post

more after the 2 wk point. I've made no other changes to his protocol which has been in place for many months, narrowing the possibility that any improvement can be due to other adjuncts. Just wanted to write in support of doing the code on yourself (alone) instead of on the intended person if you feel that in any way you have to justify or defend what you are doing. Later, if successful, you can worry about educating friends and family but avoid that during your own learning period. GayleTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 11:46:38 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical Thank you Sally for responding with results that can be quantified. It is more plausible when someone admits it isn't a "Cure All" and gives some symptoms that have been eliminated or reduced, with a expectation of getting results verified by a doctor later. I know positive thoughts can alter a person and don't want to denegrate anyone who believes in alternative medicine, but I

also know

people who have put all their eggs in that basket and been disappointed. Thank you again for giving us more insight. > > > Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical > To: mb12 valtrex > Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask > him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be > able to isolate what was working. > > 's

seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now. > > For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less > than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to

have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting. > > I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations. > > sally > > > To: mb12 valtrex > Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PM > Subject: > Re: Healing Code biomedical > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see

through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. > > > > Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. > > > > We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the

gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration> >

[Guest guest]

Judy,

If I had the book, I would GIVE it to you. Desperate times call for desperate measures....Go to and Noble, find the book, cuddle up in a chair and read as much as you can. Return at a later date when the money is there to buy it : ) I know what it's like to have $1.55 in the bank ; )

-Tammy

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Thu, January 6, 2011 10:23:29 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical

 Anyone live south of Boston that I may borrow this book and return within a week of reading it. I have a $1.55 in the bank and I don't see anymore money coming into my house to purchase this book. I have been doing biomedical, diet, supps, vitamins for 10 years now and am always open minded to learn more ways to help these kids. I am intrigued by all the posts on this subject matter. I am a grandmother raising/adopted her grandson with PDD.

Thank you kindly,

Judy

```````````````

,I missed it the first time I read the book but, on page 224, it tells how to give the HC remotely. Basically, you do it to yourself (although I insert my son and his issues in it) and, when it is done, I verbally send it to him. I know, it sounds like it shouldn't work as well to me but evidently it does. I just started using it remotely yesterday so I don't have any real experience with it. Both of my kids are older so I pay them (yes, I know, ridiculous) to do it with me twice a day. At least we are doing it and it does seem to be working. Les' eye rolling is gone again and 's moods and depression are improving. My various issues seem to be under control also but I am working on some new ones. With families like ours, there is no shortage of issue to work on. We will be doing it for quite a while; I doubt that seizures will be a quick fix.It seems

that improvements do come in spurts. . . nothing for a week then a bunch of improvements.It is interesting to note that Ben , MD (the co-author of HC) originally began the HC when he was so weak with Lou Gehrig's Disease that he could barely speak and then saw no improvement whatsoever for 6 weeks. Then, in the course of 2 weeks, all his symptoms went away and he has now been symptom free for 6 years. So, I guess, the moral of that story is to stick with it. sally

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 12:20:58 AMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Hi Sally, I wondered how you are using the healing code on your children. I am still reading the book, but so far he talks about doing the HC on yourself if you are using it to heal someone else. So I was wondering if you use the hand positions on your kids or are you doing it on yourself for your kids (does that question make sense). I want to use it for my autistic daughter, but not sure if one way is more effective than the other.

Thanks for sharing your experiences with us.

Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedicalTo: mb12 valtrex Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM

I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be able to isolate what was working.'s seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but

the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.sally

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying

the results you see. We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3361 - Release Date: 01/05/11 07:00:00

[Guest guest]

Judy,

If I had the book, I would GIVE it to you. Desperate times call for desperate measures....Go to and Noble, find the book, cuddle up in a chair and read as much as you can. Return at a later date when the money is there to buy it : ) I know what it's like to have $1.55 in the bank ; )

-Tammy

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Thu, January 6, 2011 10:23:29 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical

 Anyone live south of Boston that I may borrow this book and return within a week of reading it. I have a $1.55 in the bank and I don't see anymore money coming into my house to purchase this book. I have been doing biomedical, diet, supps, vitamins for 10 years now and am always open minded to learn more ways to help these kids. I am intrigued by all the posts on this subject matter. I am a grandmother raising/adopted her grandson with PDD.

Thank you kindly,

Judy

```````````````

,I missed it the first time I read the book but, on page 224, it tells how to give the HC remotely. Basically, you do it to yourself (although I insert my son and his issues in it) and, when it is done, I verbally send it to him. I know, it sounds like it shouldn't work as well to me but evidently it does. I just started using it remotely yesterday so I don't have any real experience with it. Both of my kids are older so I pay them (yes, I know, ridiculous) to do it with me twice a day. At least we are doing it and it does seem to be working. Les' eye rolling is gone again and 's moods and depression are improving. My various issues seem to be under control also but I am working on some new ones. With families like ours, there is no shortage of issue to work on. We will be doing it for quite a while; I doubt that seizures will be a quick fix.It seems

that improvements do come in spurts. . . nothing for a week then a bunch of improvements.It is interesting to note that Ben , MD (the co-author of HC) originally began the HC when he was so weak with Lou Gehrig's Disease that he could barely speak and then saw no improvement whatsoever for 6 weeks. Then, in the course of 2 weeks, all his symptoms went away and he has now been symptom free for 6 years. So, I guess, the moral of that story is to stick with it. sally

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 12:20:58 AMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Hi Sally, I wondered how you are using the healing code on your children. I am still reading the book, but so far he talks about doing the HC on yourself if you are using it to heal someone else. So I was wondering if you use the hand positions on your kids or are you doing it on yourself for your kids (does that question make sense). I want to use it for my autistic daughter, but not sure if one way is more effective than the other.

Thanks for sharing your experiences with us.

Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedicalTo: mb12 valtrex Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM

I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be able to isolate what was working.'s seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but

the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.sally

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying

the results you see. We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3361 - Release Date: 01/05/11 07:00:00

[Guest guest]

Gayle and others using the healing code,

I am reading the book now and have a big question. What do you visualize when doing the codes? I'm not quite sure what to focus on. If I do it for my son, do I visualize what I want to see from him or do I visualize the issues and send loving energy to them?

Thanks,

Kerri

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 5:52:30 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

We're on day 9. I'm doing 3 per day on myself, my daughter (23, NT) and my mom who lives in another state and doing 3-4 per day on my son (16, PANDAS). As indicated in the book, work I do for others is done through the hand positioning on myself in a very quiet atmosphere. I know from previous training that this is sometimes the most effective route particularly when this type of work is new to you and you struggle with healthy skepticism and doubt. Anytime you have to defend your growing beliefs it has great potential to knock you back a step whether you realize it has or not. My son still isn't in the loop on this and probably won't be anytime soon. My Mom, the consummate skeptic, has had a great response (and has ordered the book).

We're still dealing with PANDAS but there is no question that it is having a very favorable effect on him, he notices it and its completely obvious to his sister and I. I'm grading and measuring the symptoms I see everyday in him for the past year and will post more after the 2 wk point. I've made no other changes to his protocol which has been in place for many months, narrowing the possibility that any improvement can be due to other adjuncts.

Just wanted to write in support of doing the code on yourself (alone) instead of on the intended person if you feel that in any way you have to justify or defend what you are doing. Later, if successful, you can worry about educating friends and family but avoid that during your own learning period.

Gayle

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 11:46:38 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Thank you Sally for responding with results that can be quantified. It is more plausible when someone admits it isn't a "Cure All" and gives some symptoms that have been eliminated or reduced, with a expectation of getting results verified by a doctor later. I know positive thoughts can alter a person and don't want to denegrate anyone who believes in alternative medicine, but I also know people who have put all their eggs in that basket and been disappointed. Thank you again for giving us more insight.> > > Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical> To: mb12 valtrex > Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > >

> I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask > him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be > able to isolate what was working.> > 's seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had

gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.> > For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less> than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.> > I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.> > sally> > > To: mb12 valtrex > Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PM> Subject:> Re: Healing Code biomedical> > > > > > > > >

> Â > > > > > > > I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. > > > > Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do

something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. > > > > We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>>

[Guest guest]

Gayle and others using the healing code,

I am reading the book now and have a big question. What do you visualize when doing the codes? I'm not quite sure what to focus on. If I do it for my son, do I visualize what I want to see from him or do I visualize the issues and send loving energy to them?

Thanks,

Kerri

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 5:52:30 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

We're on day 9. I'm doing 3 per day on myself, my daughter (23, NT) and my mom who lives in another state and doing 3-4 per day on my son (16, PANDAS). As indicated in the book, work I do for others is done through the hand positioning on myself in a very quiet atmosphere. I know from previous training that this is sometimes the most effective route particularly when this type of work is new to you and you struggle with healthy skepticism and doubt. Anytime you have to defend your growing beliefs it has great potential to knock you back a step whether you realize it has or not. My son still isn't in the loop on this and probably won't be anytime soon. My Mom, the consummate skeptic, has had a great response (and has ordered the book).

We're still dealing with PANDAS but there is no question that it is having a very favorable effect on him, he notices it and its completely obvious to his sister and I. I'm grading and measuring the symptoms I see everyday in him for the past year and will post more after the 2 wk point. I've made no other changes to his protocol which has been in place for many months, narrowing the possibility that any improvement can be due to other adjuncts.

Just wanted to write in support of doing the code on yourself (alone) instead of on the intended person if you feel that in any way you have to justify or defend what you are doing. Later, if successful, you can worry about educating friends and family but avoid that during your own learning period.

Gayle

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 11:46:38 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Thank you Sally for responding with results that can be quantified. It is more plausible when someone admits it isn't a "Cure All" and gives some symptoms that have been eliminated or reduced, with a expectation of getting results verified by a doctor later. I know positive thoughts can alter a person and don't want to denegrate anyone who believes in alternative medicine, but I also know people who have put all their eggs in that basket and been disappointed. Thank you again for giving us more insight.> > > Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical> To: mb12 valtrex > Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > >

> I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask > him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be > able to isolate what was working.> > 's seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had

gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.> > For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less> than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.> > I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.> > sally> > > To: mb12 valtrex > Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PM> Subject:> Re: Healing Code biomedical> > > > > > > > >

> Â > > > > > > > I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. > > > > Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do

something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. > > > > We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>>

[Guest guest]

Gayle and others using the healing code,

I am reading the book now and have a big question. What do you visualize when doing the codes? I'm not quite sure what to focus on. If I do it for my son, do I visualize what I want to see from him or do I visualize the issues and send loving energy to them?

Thanks,

Kerri

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 5:52:30 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

We're on day 9. I'm doing 3 per day on myself, my daughter (23, NT) and my mom who lives in another state and doing 3-4 per day on my son (16, PANDAS). As indicated in the book, work I do for others is done through the hand positioning on myself in a very quiet atmosphere. I know from previous training that this is sometimes the most effective route particularly when this type of work is new to you and you struggle with healthy skepticism and doubt. Anytime you have to defend your growing beliefs it has great potential to knock you back a step whether you realize it has or not. My son still isn't in the loop on this and probably won't be anytime soon. My Mom, the consummate skeptic, has had a great response (and has ordered the book).

We're still dealing with PANDAS but there is no question that it is having a very favorable effect on him, he notices it and its completely obvious to his sister and I. I'm grading and measuring the symptoms I see everyday in him for the past year and will post more after the 2 wk point. I've made no other changes to his protocol which has been in place for many months, narrowing the possibility that any improvement can be due to other adjuncts.

Just wanted to write in support of doing the code on yourself (alone) instead of on the intended person if you feel that in any way you have to justify or defend what you are doing. Later, if successful, you can worry about educating friends and family but avoid that during your own learning period.

Gayle

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 11:46:38 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Thank you Sally for responding with results that can be quantified. It is more plausible when someone admits it isn't a "Cure All" and gives some symptoms that have been eliminated or reduced, with a expectation of getting results verified by a doctor later. I know positive thoughts can alter a person and don't want to denegrate anyone who believes in alternative medicine, but I also know people who have put all their eggs in that basket and been disappointed. Thank you again for giving us more insight.> > > Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical> To: mb12 valtrex > Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > >

> I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask > him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be > able to isolate what was working.> > 's seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had

gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.> > For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less> than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.> > I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.> > sally> > > To: mb12 valtrex > Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PM> Subject:> Re: Healing Code biomedical> > > > > > > > >

> Â > > > > > > > I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. > > > > Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do

something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. > > > > We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>>

[Guest guest]

Kerri,I've been taught, through this and other disciplines, that it's what you want to see. Visuals work best when they are believable to you, so you start with something that seems legitimate and doable to you depending on what issues you have. i.e. My son has an awful time falling asleep when he's in a PANDAS episode so I have this little visual of him just peacefully out like a light. I see him on his flannel sheets, laying on his side and I imagine from the image I see of him that he fell asleep the minute his head hit the pillow, worn out from a day of being just a average 16 year old. This isn't a huge stretch for me because about half of his life he is an

average kid and does sleep like a brick. Here's another big hint...when you are wallowing around in a visual and boy you know when you are in the zone because it feels so good if you stay too long your mind will start to click into thoughts like "how in the world will I make this happen?" "we've tried everything and nothing has pulled the trigger so far." "what if this doesn't work, too?". When that happens, get out...the session is over. You've done something good for your child and when it taxed your belief system too much for today you had the intelligence to pull out. A couple hours later, go back and do it again. In time, and not much of it, you will see what you believe to be possible expand. If you feel more comfortable focusing on the problem the I would certainly try to visualize it in a victorious way. i.e. a yeast overgrowth being systematically taken over and eradicated by an antifungal and see him as healthier on the outside because of this

victory on the inside. Best wishes to you,GayleTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Thu, January 6, 2011 1:25:58 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Gayle and others using the healing code,

I am reading the book now and have a big question. What do you visualize when doing the codes? I'm not quite sure what to focus on. If I do it for my son, do I visualize what I want to see from him or do I visualize the issues and send loving energy to them?

Thanks,

Kerri

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 5:52:30 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

We're on day 9. I'm doing 3 per day on myself, my daughter (23, NT) and my mom who lives in another state and doing 3-4 per day on my son (16, PANDAS). As indicated in the book, work I do for others is done through the hand positioning on myself in a very quiet atmosphere. I know from previous training that this is sometimes the most effective route particularly when this type of work is new to you and you struggle with healthy skepticism and doubt. Anytime you have to defend your growing beliefs it has great potential to knock you back a step whether you realize it has or not. My son still isn't in the loop on this and probably won't be anytime soon. My Mom, the consummate skeptic, has had a great response (and has ordered the book).

We're still dealing with PANDAS but there is no question that it is having a very favorable effect on him, he notices it and its completely obvious to his sister and I. I'm grading and measuring the symptoms I see everyday in him for the past year and will post more after the 2 wk point. I've made no other changes to his protocol which has been in place for many months, narrowing the possibility that any improvement can be due to other adjuncts.

Just wanted to write in support of doing the code on yourself (alone) instead of on the intended person if you feel that in any way you have to justify or defend what you are doing. Later, if successful, you can worry about educating friends and family but avoid that during your own learning period.

Gayle

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 11:46:38 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Thank you Sally for responding with results that can be quantified. It is more plausible when someone admits it isn't a "Cure All" and gives some symptoms that have been eliminated or reduced, with a expectation of getting results verified by a doctor later. I know positive thoughts can alter a person and don't want to denegrate anyone who believes in alternative medicine, but I also know people who have put all their eggs in that basket and been disappointed. Thank you again for giving us more insight.> > > Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical> To: mb12 valtrex > Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > >

> I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask > him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be > able to isolate what was working.> > 's seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had

gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.> > For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less> than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.> > I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.> > sally> > > To: mb12 valtrex > Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PM> Subject:> Re: Healing Code biomedical> > > > > > > > >

> Â > > > > > > > I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. > > > > Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do

something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. > > > > We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>>

[Guest guest]

Kerri,I've been taught, through this and other disciplines, that it's what you want to see. Visuals work best when they are believable to you, so you start with something that seems legitimate and doable to you depending on what issues you have. i.e. My son has an awful time falling asleep when he's in a PANDAS episode so I have this little visual of him just peacefully out like a light. I see him on his flannel sheets, laying on his side and I imagine from the image I see of him that he fell asleep the minute his head hit the pillow, worn out from a day of being just a average 16 year old. This isn't a huge stretch for me because about half of his life he is an

average kid and does sleep like a brick. Here's another big hint...when you are wallowing around in a visual and boy you know when you are in the zone because it feels so good if you stay too long your mind will start to click into thoughts like "how in the world will I make this happen?" "we've tried everything and nothing has pulled the trigger so far." "what if this doesn't work, too?". When that happens, get out...the session is over. You've done something good for your child and when it taxed your belief system too much for today you had the intelligence to pull out. A couple hours later, go back and do it again. In time, and not much of it, you will see what you believe to be possible expand. If you feel more comfortable focusing on the problem the I would certainly try to visualize it in a victorious way. i.e. a yeast overgrowth being systematically taken over and eradicated by an antifungal and see him as healthier on the outside because of this

victory on the inside. Best wishes to you,GayleTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Thu, January 6, 2011 1:25:58 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Gayle and others using the healing code,

I am reading the book now and have a big question. What do you visualize when doing the codes? I'm not quite sure what to focus on. If I do it for my son, do I visualize what I want to see from him or do I visualize the issues and send loving energy to them?

Thanks,

Kerri

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 5:52:30 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

We're on day 9. I'm doing 3 per day on myself, my daughter (23, NT) and my mom who lives in another state and doing 3-4 per day on my son (16, PANDAS). As indicated in the book, work I do for others is done through the hand positioning on myself in a very quiet atmosphere. I know from previous training that this is sometimes the most effective route particularly when this type of work is new to you and you struggle with healthy skepticism and doubt. Anytime you have to defend your growing beliefs it has great potential to knock you back a step whether you realize it has or not. My son still isn't in the loop on this and probably won't be anytime soon. My Mom, the consummate skeptic, has had a great response (and has ordered the book).

We're still dealing with PANDAS but there is no question that it is having a very favorable effect on him, he notices it and its completely obvious to his sister and I. I'm grading and measuring the symptoms I see everyday in him for the past year and will post more after the 2 wk point. I've made no other changes to his protocol which has been in place for many months, narrowing the possibility that any improvement can be due to other adjuncts.

Just wanted to write in support of doing the code on yourself (alone) instead of on the intended person if you feel that in any way you have to justify or defend what you are doing. Later, if successful, you can worry about educating friends and family but avoid that during your own learning period.

Gayle

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 11:46:38 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Thank you Sally for responding with results that can be quantified. It is more plausible when someone admits it isn't a "Cure All" and gives some symptoms that have been eliminated or reduced, with a expectation of getting results verified by a doctor later. I know positive thoughts can alter a person and don't want to denegrate anyone who believes in alternative medicine, but I also know people who have put all their eggs in that basket and been disappointed. Thank you again for giving us more insight.> > > Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical> To: mb12 valtrex > Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > >

> I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask > him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be > able to isolate what was working.> > 's seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had

gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.> > For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less> than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.> > I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.> > sally> > > To: mb12 valtrex > Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PM> Subject:> Re: Healing Code biomedical> > > > > > > > >

> Â > > > > > > > I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. > > > > Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do

something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. > > > > We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>>

[Guest guest]

Kerri,I've been taught, through this and other disciplines, that it's what you want to see. Visuals work best when they are believable to you, so you start with something that seems legitimate and doable to you depending on what issues you have. i.e. My son has an awful time falling asleep when he's in a PANDAS episode so I have this little visual of him just peacefully out like a light. I see him on his flannel sheets, laying on his side and I imagine from the image I see of him that he fell asleep the minute his head hit the pillow, worn out from a day of being just a average 16 year old. This isn't a huge stretch for me because about half of his life he is an

average kid and does sleep like a brick. Here's another big hint...when you are wallowing around in a visual and boy you know when you are in the zone because it feels so good if you stay too long your mind will start to click into thoughts like "how in the world will I make this happen?" "we've tried everything and nothing has pulled the trigger so far." "what if this doesn't work, too?". When that happens, get out...the session is over. You've done something good for your child and when it taxed your belief system too much for today you had the intelligence to pull out. A couple hours later, go back and do it again. In time, and not much of it, you will see what you believe to be possible expand. If you feel more comfortable focusing on the problem the I would certainly try to visualize it in a victorious way. i.e. a yeast overgrowth being systematically taken over and eradicated by an antifungal and see him as healthier on the outside because of this

victory on the inside. Best wishes to you,GayleTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Thu, January 6, 2011 1:25:58 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Gayle and others using the healing code,

I am reading the book now and have a big question. What do you visualize when doing the codes? I'm not quite sure what to focus on. If I do it for my son, do I visualize what I want to see from him or do I visualize the issues and send loving energy to them?

Thanks,

Kerri

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 5:52:30 PMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

We're on day 9. I'm doing 3 per day on myself, my daughter (23, NT) and my mom who lives in another state and doing 3-4 per day on my son (16, PANDAS). As indicated in the book, work I do for others is done through the hand positioning on myself in a very quiet atmosphere. I know from previous training that this is sometimes the most effective route particularly when this type of work is new to you and you struggle with healthy skepticism and doubt. Anytime you have to defend your growing beliefs it has great potential to knock you back a step whether you realize it has or not. My son still isn't in the loop on this and probably won't be anytime soon. My Mom, the consummate skeptic, has had a great response (and has ordered the book).

We're still dealing with PANDAS but there is no question that it is having a very favorable effect on him, he notices it and its completely obvious to his sister and I. I'm grading and measuring the symptoms I see everyday in him for the past year and will post more after the 2 wk point. I've made no other changes to his protocol which has been in place for many months, narrowing the possibility that any improvement can be due to other adjuncts.

Just wanted to write in support of doing the code on yourself (alone) instead of on the intended person if you feel that in any way you have to justify or defend what you are doing. Later, if successful, you can worry about educating friends and family but avoid that during your own learning period.

Gayle

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 11:46:38 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Thank you Sally for responding with results that can be quantified. It is more plausible when someone admits it isn't a "Cure All" and gives some symptoms that have been eliminated or reduced, with a expectation of getting results verified by a doctor later. I know positive thoughts can alter a person and don't want to denegrate anyone who believes in alternative medicine, but I also know people who have put all their eggs in that basket and been disappointed. Thank you again for giving us more insight.> > > Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical> To: mb12 valtrex > Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > >

> I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask > him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be > able to isolate what was working.> > 's seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had

gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.> > For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less> than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.> > I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.> > sally> > > To: mb12 valtrex > Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PM> Subject:> Re: Healing Code biomedical> > > > > > > > >

> Â > > > > > > > I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. > > > > Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do

something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. > > > > We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>>

[Guest guest]

Judy,What is your mailing address? I will be happy to have a book sent to you from Amazon. My results here are incredible and it works for everyone, all the time, with very few exceptions. You need the book.I will be posting about this soon on our group.sallyTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Thu, January 6, 2011 9:23:29 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical



Anyone live south of Boston that I may borrow this book and return within a week of reading it. I have a $1.55 in the bank and I don't see anymore money coming into my house to purchase this book. I have been doing biomedical, diet, supps, vitamins for 10 years now and am always open minded to learn more ways to help these kids. I am intrigued by all the posts on this subject matter. I am a grandmother raising/adopted her grandson with PDD.

Thank you kindly,

Judy

```````````````

,I missed it the first time I read the book but, on page 224, it tells how to give the HC remotely. Basically, you do it to yourself (although I insert my son and his issues in it) and, when it is done, I verbally send it to him. I know, it sounds like it shouldn't work as well to me but evidently it does. I just started using it remotely yesterday so I don't have any real experience with it. Both of my kids are older so I pay them (yes, I know, ridiculous) to do it with me twice a day. At least we are doing it and it does seem to be working. Les' eye rolling is gone again and 's moods and depression are improving. My various issues seem to be under control also but I am working on some new ones. With families like ours, there is no shortage of issue to work on. We will be doing it for quite a while; I doubt that seizures will be a quick fix.It seems that improvements do come in spurts. . . nothing for a week then a bunch of improvements.It is interesting to note that Ben , MD (the co-author of HC) originally began the HC when he was so weak with Lou Gehrig's Disease that he could barely speak and then saw no improvement whatsoever for 6 weeks. Then, in the course of 2 weeks, all his symptoms went away and he has now been symptom free for 6 years. So, I guess, the moral of that story is to stick with it. sally

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 12:20:58 AMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Hi Sally,

I wondered how you are using the healing code on your children. I am still reading the book, but so far he talks about doing the HC on yourself if you are using it to heal someone else. So I was wondering if you use the hand positions on your kids or are you doing it on yourself for your kids (does that question make sense). I want to use it for my autistic daughter, but not sure if one way is more effective than the other.

Thanks for sharing your experiences with us.

Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedicalTo: mb12 valtrex Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM

I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be able to isolate what was working.'s seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.sally

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3361 - Release Date: 01/05/11 07:00:00

[Guest guest]

Judy,What is your mailing address? I will be happy to have a book sent to you from Amazon. My results here are incredible and it works for everyone, all the time, with very few exceptions. You need the book.I will be posting about this soon on our group.sallyTo: mb12 valtrex Sent: Thu, January 6, 2011 9:23:29 AMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical



Anyone live south of Boston that I may borrow this book and return within a week of reading it. I have a $1.55 in the bank and I don't see anymore money coming into my house to purchase this book. I have been doing biomedical, diet, supps, vitamins for 10 years now and am always open minded to learn more ways to help these kids. I am intrigued by all the posts on this subject matter. I am a grandmother raising/adopted her grandson with PDD.

Thank you kindly,

Judy

```````````````

,I missed it the first time I read the book but, on page 224, it tells how to give the HC remotely. Basically, you do it to yourself (although I insert my son and his issues in it) and, when it is done, I verbally send it to him. I know, it sounds like it shouldn't work as well to me but evidently it does. I just started using it remotely yesterday so I don't have any real experience with it. Both of my kids are older so I pay them (yes, I know, ridiculous) to do it with me twice a day. At least we are doing it and it does seem to be working. Les' eye rolling is gone again and 's moods and depression are improving. My various issues seem to be under control also but I am working on some new ones. With families like ours, there is no shortage of issue to work on. We will be doing it for quite a while; I doubt that seizures will be a quick fix.It seems that improvements do come in spurts. . . nothing for a week then a bunch of improvements.It is interesting to note that Ben , MD (the co-author of HC) originally began the HC when he was so weak with Lou Gehrig's Disease that he could barely speak and then saw no improvement whatsoever for 6 weeks. Then, in the course of 2 weeks, all his symptoms went away and he has now been symptom free for 6 years. So, I guess, the moral of that story is to stick with it. sally

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 12:20:58 AMSubject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedical

Hi Sally,

I wondered how you are using the healing code on your children. I am still reading the book, but so far he talks about doing the HC on yourself if you are using it to heal someone else. So I was wondering if you use the hand positions on your kids or are you doing it on yourself for your kids (does that question make sense). I want to use it for my autistic daughter, but not sure if one way is more effective than the other.

Thanks for sharing your experiences with us.

Subject: Re: Re: Healing Code biomedicalTo: mb12 valtrex Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 3:43 PM

I do not have enough results that I could take to a doctor and have them evaluate it yet. The supplements are another variable so if I went to a doctor and ask him to decree whether the Code was working, he would probably not be able to isolate what was working.'s seizure tics have gone away, then came back when she was in stress, then went away with more HC, then come back again when she didn't get enough sleep. I don't think I have found the best way of using the Code yet, either. I am still working on it--for myself, for , and for . We are seeing progress, movement is taking place, but our results are not entirely consistent and I still want to try a few different things with it. But this is the first time that I have seen anything effect her tic since I stupidly had amalgam fillings put in (they increased her tic). When I realized they were mercury, I had them removed but the tic had gotten worse and it stayed that way up until now.For me, this is still a work in progress. The Code is working for us. Flawlessly? No. At it's optimum? No, I don't think so. But from my experience with it for less than one month, I can say that what I say when I give the Code does seem to have an impact on the result. And that is consistent with what he says in the book. Interesting.I will post more when I have more experience using the Code and can make recommendations.sally

To: mb12 valtrex Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 8:32:49 PMSubject: Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3361 - Release Date: 01/05/11 07:00:00

[Guest guest]



I've been doing the things that you have sent to me. Was there something else that you were going to send to a few of us? A digital form that you purchased???That it is downloadable??? Where do you live? I am having a hard time doing it for 6 minutes where my lil guy can't sit for that long.

If you send me the book I have no way of repaying you. Do we even live in the same state?

Judy

Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3361 - Release Date: 01/05/11 07:00:00

No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3369 - Release Date: 01/09/11 02:34:00

[Guest guest]



I've been doing the things that you have sent to me. Was there something else that you were going to send to a few of us? A digital form that you purchased???That it is downloadable??? Where do you live? I am having a hard time doing it for 6 minutes where my lil guy can't sit for that long.

If you send me the book I have no way of repaying you. Do we even live in the same state?

Judy

Re: Healing Code biomedical

I'm not offended, just finding it difficult to get a point across. I don't think anyone asked if a DOCTOR supported The Healing Code, but could the doctor CONFIRM the results you see through testing? I know most doctors (other than psychologists) would not subscribe to this type of healing protocol, but that doesn't mean they couldn't test to confirm the results of which you speak. Our own pediatrician is adamant that Gluten Free is not a reliable diet for a toddler, yet I have been doing it since June of last year due to our son's extreme reflux and lack of weight gain. It wasn't until we went to the doctor in the last month that she finally SAW and CONFIRMED that what I was doing was working. His feeding therapist SAW and CONFIRMED that his diet has allowed him to make signficiant cognitive and behavioral improvements. You can do something that a doctor doesn't necessarily agree with or support, and they can confirm your actions by verifying the results you see. We are not asking if your doctor supports it, only if they could verify the results. If the gains are as significant as you said, why not have it verified by a doctor if you trusted the original diagnoses in the first place? <scratches head in frustration>

No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3361 - Release Date: 01/05/11 07:00:00

No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3369 - Release Date: 01/09/11 02:34:00