MOM SPEAKS OUT, seeing that offspring have NO voice ~ Re: [SiliconeKids] Gift to Center Headed by FDA Panel Chairman Raises Questions

[Guest guest]

Thanks and Carolyn!I'd like to note that comes from a medical family . . . - Rogene----- Forwarded Message ----From: CINDY FUCHS-MORRISSEY <cfuchsmorrissey@...> MOTHERS DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE SCIENCE?

Well, THIS mother & very simple MISSOURI housewife, ME, is going to state that: Many mothers across THIS GREAT NATION WHICH HAS BECOME VERY TOXIC ARE stating the truth through what they are saying verbally or in what they write as they have had front row seats observing & dealing with triggers & the symptoms, diseases syndromes or whatever that ARE presenting in their offspring who have been exposed to whatever. THOSE WITH ALL THE HIGHER EDUCATION (like those in this articleof denial or those associated in the Art of Medicine or those who think theyknow it all) WHO HAVE BECOME VERY SELF-SERVING AND GREEDY have made the 'free will choice' to ignore the TRUTH and SCIENTIFIC DATA that IS SHOWING UP IN HUMAN FORM, via their offspring WHO HAVE TAKEN "HITS" from offending triggers~ genetically offending

triggers, for instance like this crapola below.The scientific truth of what IS going on is NOT being documented, NOR tracked in past offspring...I know the Art of Medicine is doing their Children's Study to date but THIS COMES WAY TOO LATE FOR MANY OF US MOMS who are dealing with the outcomes of toxic exposures...like with silicone gel breast implants. By the way, the chemical adjuvancy of breast implant LOT NUMBERS is justanother toxic "hit" for mom, and her innocent offspring. The truth of what hashappened to many offspring was just swept up the rug... And further, the SO-CALLED studies (that have never been produced by the FDA,but they tell ME they have them, but they will NOT show them to PROVE that silicone gel breast implant exposure OF ALL breast implant lot numbers is safe, with acceptable risks in offspring) in the

past, present and into the future have NOT been done in a truly dispassionate manner, NOT been done in a neutral/objective way because NOBODY within the Art of Medicine really wanted to spend the money on noting the truth of what had/has and will happen in the future with our offspring taking "hits" ...via the placental barrier through fetal cells,via breast feeding, and/or with ingestion references of whatever offending trigger, which would include the triggers implicated stated below in this article, as well as with breast implants & the genetics of offspring (IN THE PAST OFFSPRING AS WELL) Track the offspring of the past who have taken HITS from there moms B. implants...THERE IS A PROBLEM! I am telling the truth...there IS A problem with silicone gel breast implants when entangled with genetics-the variants of genes, along with the TIME

FACTOR of exposure of a variety of lot numbers (because of the toxic soup of the implant) and genetics...NOT EVERYONE'S genetics can embrace silicone breast implants. We had wonderful genetics UNTIL WE TOOK HITS of the offending trigger that did our little family in...WELL...not without a fight to uphold medicine, science and research because I will continue to fight this medical bushwhacking ~....studies OF THE PAST failed to note genetics of any patient who took "hits", studies failed to HLA-type and note what happened to MANY OFFSPRING OF THE PAST NOR were there studies that tracked the moms and their offspring...because I can show you all what a silicone gel breast implant birth defect appears like when you have an open gel fill hole that was never properly sealed from the outset of implantation, dumping gel /oil for many years, and that the bovine, electrocautry was used in a oil

contaminated field (WHICH HAD IMPACT ON THE OFFSPRING) when one does have the variants of genes that can be elevated/EXERTED, "turned on"...and the time factor of exposure.So, studies done NOW and in the future will be done to COVER THE TAILS of those within the ART OF MEDICINE = those associated with the art of medicine, who want their studies to fall the way THEY WANT their studies to fall. This is not about highest standards in medicine, science and research...it is NOW middle of the road medicine, science and research or worse, low standards. Science now days is NOT about upholding their oath of First, do no harm for ANY patient, whatever your age may be, it really is set to uphold the oath of First, do NO harm to those who DO the research, science & who writes the paper when their "words of art" is displayed in their medical journals ...They have shown

how they will cover THEIR OWN TAILS 1st , than to really tell the truth...or uphold their oath of First, do no harm to aid the patient who really IS suffering from whatever exposure. THEY DON'T want to be entangled with legal aspects~ WELL, IF ONE WOULD HAVE JUST TOLD THE TRUTH IN THE FIRST PLACE, then one would not have entangled themselves in legal aspects~By the way, Causation of silicone, silicone gel breast implants and other silicone implants is linked to proteins/protein excesses when this junk is entangled with one's genetics/I have been saying this, writing this since the very early 1990's~ the variants of genes, OF KEY GENES that WILL NEVER be able to embrace the chemical adjuvancy of breast implants...genetics is A FOUNDATION, but was NOT the "cause". As WE WITH WISDOM ( this would include mothers, simple ones like

myself).... as we would with wisdom uphold ones oath of First, do no harm to incorporate the scientific truth that proteins/protein excesses are common in many diseases, (lupus/scleroderma/RA/multiple sclerosis/dermatomyositis/sarcoidosis other diseases of autoimmunity as well as a variety of cancers-multiple myeloma, lung, brain and others....DISEASES primarily those that DO stimulate/exert, turn on the human immune response, via the placental barrier though fetal cells. Via the placental barrier through fetal cells. Breast feeding of triggers, just extra hits to the innocent offspring. Ignorance within the art of medicine HAS BEEN A PROBLEM for a very long time within the Art of Medicine & those who do studies... *****PLEASE NOTE******* YES, they do good things for many patients within the Art of Medicine, but they

totally FELL off the cliff on this one and made the choice to look the other way than to see the scientific truth of what is going on with the patients genetics...NOT GOOD MEDICINE to EXERT/stimulate the human immune response and this IS what IS happening. OH, and the Children's Study that is currently going on in the USA...well, here we go again with more tail covering...denial, and medical words of art...humm, are they going to study silicone gel breast exposed kids--WHAT ABOUT THOSE OF US WHO HAVE KIDS EXPOSED ALREADY from our VERY TOXIC, VERY FAILED breast implants of the past? Mothers across this country/USA, AND AROUND THE WORLD NEED TO UNITE because if we don't moms, (more offspring) are really going to be furthered bushwhacked. It is currently happening now to date, October 19, 2008.I am going to keep saying, stop the hype, it is long

overdue to HLA-type and be more aware of what OUR GENETICS is taking "hits" of with medicines/vaccines/dentistry/medical devices-which includes ALL breast implants as well as what this article below includes. A monkey could see the scientific truth of what has been going on over the past yrs, & this is wrong to bash mothers & say that they don't understand the science... We understand more than ANYONE gives us all credit for... HOW GREAT THOU ART NOT, to those who don't give the credit to mothers across this country for WHAT WE DO KNOW & have observed.......you people who state this just DO NOT want the truth to be known, but she who rocks the cradle DOES rule the world~God IS the Grand Physician, and HE IS the Grand Lawyer too! So, think twice before you damn the mothers of the world~ Take care,

Fuchs-sey/CFM From: saxony01 <saxony01@...>Subject: [siliconeKids] Gift to Center Headed by FDA Panel Chairman Raises Questions" " < >, "SiliconeKids" <siliconekids >Date: Friday, October 17, 2008, 10:36 PM

I have typed this item from Minneapolis Journal and Washington Post into email format, since some of you were unable to open the attachment. Hope this works!!Carolyn Wolf A retired medical supply manufacturer who considers bisphenol A to be "perfectly safe" gave $4 million to the research center headed by the chairman of a Food and Drug Administration panel about to rule on the chemicals's safety. The July donation from Gelman is nearly 50 times the annual budget of the University of Michigan Risk Science Center, where Philbert is founder and co-director. Philbert did not disclose the donation to the FDA, and agency officials learned of it when reporters asked about

it. Norris Alderson, the FDA's associate commissioner for science, looked into the matter and said he was satisfied that there was no conflict of interest because Philbert's salary is not paid by the donation. Gelman said he considers the chemical, which is used to make baby bottles and aluminum can liners, to be safe. Worries about health risks posed by the chemical are exaggerated by "mothers groups and others who don't know the science." Gelman said. He said he had made his views clear to Philbert in several conversations. Philbert denied that. "At no time have the Gelman family or any other interested/disinter ested person, persons, corporations or other entity contacted me or attempted to influence my scientific judgment on the matter," Philbert wrote in an e-mail. Philbert's committee is expected to release

it's opinion this month. It will advise the FDA on a draft assessment released by the agency in September. That draft found that products made with bisphenol A are safe for food storage. The decision of Philbert's committee is expected to have huge implications on the regulation and sale of the chemical in items such as baby bpottles, reusable food containers and plastic wraps. Since the late 1990s, studies have linked bisphenol A to cancer, heart disease, obesity, reproductive failures, and hyperactivity in laboratory animals. Gelman, a retired manufacturer of syringes and medical filtration devices, has fought against government regulation of pollutants for years. He is anti-regulation activist and an out spoken supporter of organizations such as Junk-Science. COM ***(ARE WE

EVER FAMILIAR WITH THIS ORGANIZATION, AS CONCERNING SILICONE BREAST IMPLANTS??!! ) the Cato Institute, and the Competitive Enterprise Institute that attack the credibility of government and academic scientists on such topics as global warming and hazardous chemicals. Gelman said he and Philbert talk often. He said Philbert eventually told him that he did not want to have any more discussions about the subject of bisphenol A because he was concerned about the appearance of impropriety. But, Gelman said, "He knows where I stand." Philbert steadfastly denied any conflict of interest. "Until today, no question has been raised with respect to my impartiality in this matter," he wrote in an e-mail. "I am not open to any undue influence and have taken on this (unwelcome) task with all due diligence and seriousness. " ============ =============

=__________________________________________________