Re: preliminary results...

[Guest guest]

And your GLR was 133?

_____

From: blind-diabetics

[mailto:blind-diabetics ] On Behalf Of Harry Bates

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:41 PM

To: blind-diabetics

Subject: preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

And your GLR was 133?

_____

From: blind-diabetics

[mailto:blind-diabetics ] On Behalf Of Harry Bates

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:41 PM

To: blind-diabetics

Subject: preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

And your GLR was 133?

_____

From: blind-diabetics

[mailto:blind-diabetics ] On Behalf Of Harry Bates

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:41 PM

To: blind-diabetics

Subject: preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

Okay Harry! You got me!! What do we have to do to be let in on your

secret? You sure have my interest! Do we need to answer a skill testing

question?

You are a man of many talents!

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

Okay Harry! You got me!! What do we have to do to be let in on your

secret? You sure have my interest! Do we need to answer a skill testing

question?

You are a man of many talents!

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

Okay Harry! You got me!! What do we have to do to be let in on your

secret? You sure have my interest! Do we need to answer a skill testing

question?

You are a man of many talents!

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

I bet you are taking niacin or B 3 I think it is known? your sugar reading

was 105. now $50 for some thing to take that will work and you can get it over

the counter? I would say that could be worth much more then a $50 bill. I heard

that cinnamon will also work to lower your sugar or keep it from going to high.

well I tried that as well and it doesn't work unless you do the rest like eating

low carbs per meal, exercise daily and take your medicine every day and on time.

my A1C was 13 last time I was checked in April around the first of the month.

now I go back this Monday and he says he will put me on insulin if it is still

that high. All you who are on insulin tell me it is actually better to be on the

needle instead of pills because you can bring it down when it goes up to high

and you don't have to feel bad as I have a lot as of late. So guess I won't cry

this time when he brings up insulin by the needle and I will be a big boy and

learn how to give my self a shot. The saw bones probably isn't going to listen

to me with a story about you got a magic pill I can take over the counter and

keep my sugar under control. Probably he will say you are a nut and I'm about as

crazy my self for believing it could be so. o! by the way, my $50 check is in

the mail and on it's way. so time to come clean and fill me in on the magic

wonder drug that will allow me to continue to eat ice cream and piles of

doughnuts!

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic. My

C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no longer

produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other words I am

now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes, I am still a

diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I still have

diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my article Diabetic

Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the cause of practically

all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision loss, amputations, heart

problems and kidney problems. The focus of this article was to prevent the high

glr readings one gets, and some here as well as me may have tried my

recommendations with success or with lots of low sugar readings, since I was

plagued with them quite often two or three times each week. I still maintain glr

spikes, high blood glucose readings are a primary cause of diabetic

complications. Read me clearly here. high blood glucose readings or spikes in

one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic complications. No matter what kind of

diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5 or a type 2 This statement still holds

true. I would try any thing to keep my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I

did for several years. My indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were

totally against having any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr

lower than 70. In the past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69,

I for get which, brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist

equates a low glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on

this point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a new

supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at least I

think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my glr 5.5-6.0

from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking this new

supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So today three

weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play games, so if you

can get within 10 points of my results from a starting point of glr 135, I will

tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you can just send me $50, and I

will tell you its name and how to get itI took 25 grams of carbs and two hours

later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

I bet you are taking niacin or B 3 I think it is known? your sugar reading

was 105. now $50 for some thing to take that will work and you can get it over

the counter? I would say that could be worth much more then a $50 bill. I heard

that cinnamon will also work to lower your sugar or keep it from going to high.

well I tried that as well and it doesn't work unless you do the rest like eating

low carbs per meal, exercise daily and take your medicine every day and on time.

my A1C was 13 last time I was checked in April around the first of the month.

now I go back this Monday and he says he will put me on insulin if it is still

that high. All you who are on insulin tell me it is actually better to be on the

needle instead of pills because you can bring it down when it goes up to high

and you don't have to feel bad as I have a lot as of late. So guess I won't cry

this time when he brings up insulin by the needle and I will be a big boy and

learn how to give my self a shot. The saw bones probably isn't going to listen

to me with a story about you got a magic pill I can take over the counter and

keep my sugar under control. Probably he will say you are a nut and I'm about as

crazy my self for believing it could be so. o! by the way, my $50 check is in

the mail and on it's way. so time to come clean and fill me in on the magic

wonder drug that will allow me to continue to eat ice cream and piles of

doughnuts!

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic. My

C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no longer

produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other words I am

now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes, I am still a

diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I still have

diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my article Diabetic

Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the cause of practically

all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision loss, amputations, heart

problems and kidney problems. The focus of this article was to prevent the high

glr readings one gets, and some here as well as me may have tried my

recommendations with success or with lots of low sugar readings, since I was

plagued with them quite often two or three times each week. I still maintain glr

spikes, high blood glucose readings are a primary cause of diabetic

complications. Read me clearly here. high blood glucose readings or spikes in

one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic complications. No matter what kind of

diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5 or a type 2 This statement still holds

true. I would try any thing to keep my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I

did for several years. My indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were

totally against having any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr

lower than 70. In the past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69,

I for get which, brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist

equates a low glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on

this point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a new

supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at least I

think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my glr 5.5-6.0

from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking this new

supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So today three

weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play games, so if you

can get within 10 points of my results from a starting point of glr 135, I will

tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you can just send me $50, and I

will tell you its name and how to get itI took 25 grams of carbs and two hours

later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

I bet you are taking niacin or B 3 I think it is known? your sugar reading

was 105. now $50 for some thing to take that will work and you can get it over

the counter? I would say that could be worth much more then a $50 bill. I heard

that cinnamon will also work to lower your sugar or keep it from going to high.

well I tried that as well and it doesn't work unless you do the rest like eating

low carbs per meal, exercise daily and take your medicine every day and on time.

my A1C was 13 last time I was checked in April around the first of the month.

now I go back this Monday and he says he will put me on insulin if it is still

that high. All you who are on insulin tell me it is actually better to be on the

needle instead of pills because you can bring it down when it goes up to high

and you don't have to feel bad as I have a lot as of late. So guess I won't cry

this time when he brings up insulin by the needle and I will be a big boy and

learn how to give my self a shot. The saw bones probably isn't going to listen

to me with a story about you got a magic pill I can take over the counter and

keep my sugar under control. Probably he will say you are a nut and I'm about as

crazy my self for believing it could be so. o! by the way, my $50 check is in

the mail and on it's way. so time to come clean and fill me in on the magic

wonder drug that will allow me to continue to eat ice cream and piles of

doughnuts!

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic. My

C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no longer

produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other words I am

now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes, I am still a

diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I still have

diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my article Diabetic

Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the cause of practically

all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision loss, amputations, heart

problems and kidney problems. The focus of this article was to prevent the high

glr readings one gets, and some here as well as me may have tried my

recommendations with success or with lots of low sugar readings, since I was

plagued with them quite often two or three times each week. I still maintain glr

spikes, high blood glucose readings are a primary cause of diabetic

complications. Read me clearly here. high blood glucose readings or spikes in

one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic complications. No matter what kind of

diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5 or a type 2 This statement still holds

true. I would try any thing to keep my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I

did for several years. My indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were

totally against having any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr

lower than 70. In the past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69,

I for get which, brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist

equates a low glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on

this point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a new

supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at least I

think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my glr 5.5-6.0

from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking this new

supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So today three

weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play games, so if you

can get within 10 points of my results from a starting point of glr 135, I will

tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you can just send me $50, and I

will tell you its name and how to get itI took 25 grams of carbs and two hours

later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

,

You are only the second response I have had to my post subject title preliminary

results. You missed it by a good bit. Remember I started with a glr of135 and

I took no bolus Humalog. The actual glr two hours after ingesting 25 grams of

carbs was 162.Without Humalog bolus coverage it would have ordinarily rocketed

to 125-150 points above 135. Since this supplement is a commercial product not

covered by medicare or medicaid or canadian health service, I refused to answer

what it is on the list serve out of respect to fellow list members.

However I will answer to individual inquiries like yours. If you wish the name

of this supplement just send me another message, and I will tell you what it is.

I do not want to be accused of advertising products not covered by insurance,

since I am quite sure this product will cost individuals approximately $50 per

month to possess and use it. I don't know if this product will work for you,

but I suspect it may. Do the calculation and make me a private email for the

name of the product.

Love and hope, Harry

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

,

You are only the second response I have had to my post subject title preliminary

results. You missed it by a good bit. Remember I started with a glr of135 and

I took no bolus Humalog. The actual glr two hours after ingesting 25 grams of

carbs was 162.Without Humalog bolus coverage it would have ordinarily rocketed

to 125-150 points above 135. Since this supplement is a commercial product not

covered by medicare or medicaid or canadian health service, I refused to answer

what it is on the list serve out of respect to fellow list members.

However I will answer to individual inquiries like yours. If you wish the name

of this supplement just send me another message, and I will tell you what it is.

I do not want to be accused of advertising products not covered by insurance,

since I am quite sure this product will cost individuals approximately $50 per

month to possess and use it. I don't know if this product will work for you,

but I suspect it may. Do the calculation and make me a private email for the

name of the product.

Love and hope, Harry

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

,

You are only the second response I have had to my post subject title preliminary

results. You missed it by a good bit. Remember I started with a glr of135 and

I took no bolus Humalog. The actual glr two hours after ingesting 25 grams of

carbs was 162.Without Humalog bolus coverage it would have ordinarily rocketed

to 125-150 points above 135. Since this supplement is a commercial product not

covered by medicare or medicaid or canadian health service, I refused to answer

what it is on the list serve out of respect to fellow list members.

However I will answer to individual inquiries like yours. If you wish the name

of this supplement just send me another message, and I will tell you what it is.

I do not want to be accused of advertising products not covered by insurance,

since I am quite sure this product will cost individuals approximately $50 per

month to possess and use it. I don't know if this product will work for you,

but I suspect it may. Do the calculation and make me a private email for the

name of the product.

Love and hope, Harry

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

Hi Harry,

Even if your pancreas produces little insulin now it's still important

to differentiate Type 1 and Type 2, because Type 2s deal with insulin

resistance which Type 1s typically don't deal with. But it's true the

treatment is basically identical for long-term Type 2s as it is for Type 1s.

Do you mean you took a supplement which kept your glucose readings down

even without taking insulin to cover carbohydrates?

Jen

>

> Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a

> new finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2

> diabetic. My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly

> my pancreas no longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while

> mentioning. In other words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no

> matter how one cuts it. Yes, I am still a diabetic whether I am called

> a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I still have diabetes. I wish I

> didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my article Diabetic Doater with

> the members here, and in it I warned about the cause of practically

> all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision loss, amputations,

> heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this article was to

> prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well as me

> may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

> sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three

> times each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose

> readings are a primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me

> clearly here. high blood glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is

> the primary cause of diabetic complications. No matter what kind of

> diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5 or a type 2 This statement still

> holds true. I would try any thing to keep my A1C in the normal range

> 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My indocrinologist, Dr. Welch

> as well as my wife were totally against having any low sugar

> reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the past

> almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

> brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates

> a low glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her

> on this point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as

> three heart attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I

> gave up trying to achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C

> readings. It now runs much higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid

> those glr spikes. You name it: exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat,

> high fat, prayers, meditations, various supplements, cursing, and even

> sex. None of them worked. I started taking a new supplement three or

> four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at least I think so.

> In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my glr 5.5-6.0

> from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking this new

> supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

> today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to

> play games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a

> starting point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new

> supplement. Or you can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name

> and how to get itI took 25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr

> was.....

> Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Harry,

Even if your pancreas produces little insulin now it's still important

to differentiate Type 1 and Type 2, because Type 2s deal with insulin

resistance which Type 1s typically don't deal with. But it's true the

treatment is basically identical for long-term Type 2s as it is for Type 1s.

Do you mean you took a supplement which kept your glucose readings down

even without taking insulin to cover carbohydrates?

Jen

>

> Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a

> new finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2

> diabetic. My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly

> my pancreas no longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while

> mentioning. In other words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no

> matter how one cuts it. Yes, I am still a diabetic whether I am called

> a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I still have diabetes. I wish I

> didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my article Diabetic Doater with

> the members here, and in it I warned about the cause of practically

> all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision loss, amputations,

> heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this article was to

> prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well as me

> may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

> sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three

> times each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose

> readings are a primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me

> clearly here. high blood glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is

> the primary cause of diabetic complications. No matter what kind of

> diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5 or a type 2 This statement still

> holds true. I would try any thing to keep my A1C in the normal range

> 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My indocrinologist, Dr. Welch

> as well as my wife were totally against having any low sugar

> reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the past

> almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

> brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates

> a low glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her

> on this point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as

> three heart attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I

> gave up trying to achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C

> readings. It now runs much higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid

> those glr spikes. You name it: exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat,

> high fat, prayers, meditations, various supplements, cursing, and even

> sex. None of them worked. I started taking a new supplement three or

> four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at least I think so.

> In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my glr 5.5-6.0

> from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking this new

> supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

> today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to

> play games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a

> starting point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new

> supplement. Or you can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name

> and how to get itI took 25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr

> was.....

> Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Harry,

Even if your pancreas produces little insulin now it's still important

to differentiate Type 1 and Type 2, because Type 2s deal with insulin

resistance which Type 1s typically don't deal with. But it's true the

treatment is basically identical for long-term Type 2s as it is for Type 1s.

Do you mean you took a supplement which kept your glucose readings down

even without taking insulin to cover carbohydrates?

Jen

>

> Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a

> new finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2

> diabetic. My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly

> my pancreas no longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while

> mentioning. In other words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no

> matter how one cuts it. Yes, I am still a diabetic whether I am called

> a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I still have diabetes. I wish I

> didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my article Diabetic Doater with

> the members here, and in it I warned about the cause of practically

> all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision loss, amputations,

> heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this article was to

> prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well as me

> may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

> sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three

> times each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose

> readings are a primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me

> clearly here. high blood glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is

> the primary cause of diabetic complications. No matter what kind of

> diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5 or a type 2 This statement still

> holds true. I would try any thing to keep my A1C in the normal range

> 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My indocrinologist, Dr. Welch

> as well as my wife were totally against having any low sugar

> reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the past

> almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

> brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates

> a low glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her

> on this point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as

> three heart attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I

> gave up trying to achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C

> readings. It now runs much higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid

> those glr spikes. You name it: exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat,

> high fat, prayers, meditations, various supplements, cursing, and even

> sex. None of them worked. I started taking a new supplement three or

> four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at least I think so.

> In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my glr 5.5-6.0

> from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking this new

> supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

> today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to

> play games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a

> starting point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new

> supplement. Or you can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name

> and how to get itI took 25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr

> was.....

> Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Harry,

I can't seem to find your email address!

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas

no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it.

Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1,

I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about

the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as

well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three

times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type

1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get

which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a

low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs

much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations,

various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking

a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or

at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud!

So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to

play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

Harry,

I can't seem to find your email address!

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas

no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it.

Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1,

I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about

the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as

well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three

times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type

1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get

which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a

low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs

much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations,

various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking

a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or

at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud!

So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to

play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

Harry,

I can't seem to find your email address!

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas

no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it.

Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1,

I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about

the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as

well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three

times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type

1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get

which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a

low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs

much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations,

various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking

a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or

at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud!

So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to

play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

Thanks harry. I am interested. I don't know if any supplement will help or

not as I am type 1 and on dialysis, but please give me the name.

Best wishes to you!

_____

From: blind-diabetics

[mailto:blind-diabetics ] On Behalf Of Harry Bates

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:40 PM

To: blind-diabetics

Subject: Re: preliminary results...

,

You are only the second response I have had to my post subject title

preliminary results. You missed it by a good bit. Remember I started with a

glr of135 and I took no bolus Humalog. The actual glr two hours after

ingesting 25 grams of carbs was 162.Without Humalog bolus coverage it would

have ordinarily rocketed to 125-150 points above 135. Since this supplement

is a commercial product not covered by medicare or medicaid or canadian

health service, I refused to answer what it is on the list serve out of

respect to fellow list members.

However I will answer to individual inquiries like yours. If you wish the

name of this supplement just send me another message, and I will tell you

what it is.

I do not want to be accused of advertising products not covered by

insurance, since I am quite sure this product will cost individuals

approximately $50 per month to possess and use it. I don't know if this

product will work for you, but I suspect it may. Do the calculation and make

me a private email for the name of the product.

Love and hope, Harry

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

Thanks harry. I am interested. I don't know if any supplement will help or

not as I am type 1 and on dialysis, but please give me the name.

Best wishes to you!

_____

From: blind-diabetics

[mailto:blind-diabetics ] On Behalf Of Harry Bates

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:40 PM

To: blind-diabetics

Subject: Re: preliminary results...

,

You are only the second response I have had to my post subject title

preliminary results. You missed it by a good bit. Remember I started with a

glr of135 and I took no bolus Humalog. The actual glr two hours after

ingesting 25 grams of carbs was 162.Without Humalog bolus coverage it would

have ordinarily rocketed to 125-150 points above 135. Since this supplement

is a commercial product not covered by medicare or medicaid or canadian

health service, I refused to answer what it is on the list serve out of

respect to fellow list members.

However I will answer to individual inquiries like yours. If you wish the

name of this supplement just send me another message, and I will tell you

what it is.

I do not want to be accused of advertising products not covered by

insurance, since I am quite sure this product will cost individuals

approximately $50 per month to possess and use it. I don't know if this

product will work for you, but I suspect it may. Do the calculation and make

me a private email for the name of the product.

Love and hope, Harry

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

Thanks harry. I am interested. I don't know if any supplement will help or

not as I am type 1 and on dialysis, but please give me the name.

Best wishes to you!

_____

From: blind-diabetics

[mailto:blind-diabetics ] On Behalf Of Harry Bates

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:40 PM

To: blind-diabetics

Subject: Re: preliminary results...

,

You are only the second response I have had to my post subject title

preliminary results. You missed it by a good bit. Remember I started with a

glr of135 and I took no bolus Humalog. The actual glr two hours after

ingesting 25 grams of carbs was 162.Without Humalog bolus coverage it would

have ordinarily rocketed to 125-150 points above 135. Since this supplement

is a commercial product not covered by medicare or medicaid or canadian

health service, I refused to answer what it is on the list serve out of

respect to fellow list members.

However I will answer to individual inquiries like yours. If you wish the

name of this supplement just send me another message, and I will tell you

what it is.

I do not want to be accused of advertising products not covered by

insurance, since I am quite sure this product will cost individuals

approximately $50 per month to possess and use it. I don't know if this

product will work for you, but I suspect it may. Do the calculation and make

me a private email for the name of the product.

Love and hope, Harry

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud! So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

Mark, you are the stud. Vivian welcome aboard. Unfortunately, I cannot tell you

the name of the product on this list serve, since it might violate some unstated

rule about advertising for a product. I know some products have been mentioned

here before, and I will just name a few like: Humalog insulin, Novolog insulin,

Lantus insulin, and a couple of kinds of insulin pumps, whatever these devices

are called, as well as the count-a-dose. I know we have talked about different

kinds of glucose monitors like the prodigy voice, the solo and others.Of course

we can talk about different foods since they will have a direct baring on our

glucose levels. is an expert regarding foods and recipes, and I do not

believe he will be able to get this product in Canada via the health service,

since it is a commercial supplement not covered by insurance of any kind as far

as I know. If you cannot afford $50 per month out of your pocket then this

product is not for you.So if you wish to know the name of this product, you will

just have to add my name to your address book and send me a private email

message. I will answer each and every private email I receive with the answers

you seek. I don't know if this product will work for you. Right now it is

working for me, and if I were to have numbers like Vivian's I would try to

scrape up the money to give it a try. I can tell you some of the propaganda

about the product, which has nothing to do with what type of a diabetic you are.

Nutritionalist have discovered seveeral pathways that carbohydrates take to be

turned into pure glucose used by your body.This product stimulates your body to

produce enzymes that utilizes one or two of these pathways. So send me a

private email not connected to this list serve if you wish to know. Remember

insulin is a storage hormone, and it works every time it is tried whether or not

your body produces it. Any excess glucose in your body system not used by your

whole body is converted to fat by your insulin.

hth, Harry

[Guest guest]

Mark, you are the stud. Vivian welcome aboard. Unfortunately, I cannot tell you

the name of the product on this list serve, since it might violate some unstated

rule about advertising for a product. I know some products have been mentioned

here before, and I will just name a few like: Humalog insulin, Novolog insulin,

Lantus insulin, and a couple of kinds of insulin pumps, whatever these devices

are called, as well as the count-a-dose. I know we have talked about different

kinds of glucose monitors like the prodigy voice, the solo and others.Of course

we can talk about different foods since they will have a direct baring on our

glucose levels. is an expert regarding foods and recipes, and I do not

believe he will be able to get this product in Canada via the health service,

since it is a commercial supplement not covered by insurance of any kind as far

as I know. If you cannot afford $50 per month out of your pocket then this

product is not for you.So if you wish to know the name of this product, you will

just have to add my name to your address book and send me a private email

message. I will answer each and every private email I receive with the answers

you seek. I don't know if this product will work for you. Right now it is

working for me, and if I were to have numbers like Vivian's I would try to

scrape up the money to give it a try. I can tell you some of the propaganda

about the product, which has nothing to do with what type of a diabetic you are.

Nutritionalist have discovered seveeral pathways that carbohydrates take to be

turned into pure glucose used by your body.This product stimulates your body to

produce enzymes that utilizes one or two of these pathways. So send me a

private email not connected to this list serve if you wish to know. Remember

insulin is a storage hormone, and it works every time it is tried whether or not

your body produces it. Any excess glucose in your body system not used by your

whole body is converted to fat by your insulin.

hth, Harry

[Guest guest]

, my email address is:

lindaharrybates@...

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas

no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it.

Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1,

I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about

the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as

well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three

times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type

1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get

which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a

low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs

much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations,

various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking

a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or

at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud!

So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to

play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

[Guest guest]

, my email address is:

lindaharrybates@...

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic.

My C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas

no

longer produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other

words I am now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it.

Yes,

I am still a diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1,

I

still have diabetes. I wish I didn't, but it is what it is. I shared my

article Diabetic Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about

the

cause of practically all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision

loss, amputations, heart problems and kidney problems. The focus of this

article was to prevent the high glr readings one gets, and some here as

well

as me may have tried my recommendations with success or with lots of low

sugar readings, since I was plagued with them quite often two or three

times

each week. I still maintain glr spikes, high blood glucose readings are a

primary cause of diabetic complications. Read me clearly here. high blood

glucose readings or spikes in one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic

complications. No matter what kind of diabetic you are a type 1, a type

1.5

or a type 2 This statement still holds true. I would try any thing to keep

my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I did for several years. My

indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were totally against having

any low sugar reactions, which they defined as a glr lower than 70. In the

past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69, I for get

which,

brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist equates a

low

glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on this

point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs

much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations,

various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking

a

new supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or

at

least I think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my

glr 5.5-6.0 from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking

this new supplement for four or five days, I figured it was another dud!

So

today three weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to

play

games, so if you can get within 10 points of my results from a starting

point of glr 135, I will tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you

can just send me $50, and I will tell you its name and how to get itI took

25 grams of carbs and two hours later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.