Re: preliminary results...

April 29, 2011

harry, i think there is suppose to be more to this email, question. tell us

more, thanks, karen hughes

preliminary results...

Most folks here know I am long winded, but I will briefly talk about a new

finding for me. I am a research scientist. I am a formerly type2 diabetic. My

C-peptide test a couple or three years ago stated clearly my pancreas no longer

produces enough insulin to make it worth while mentioning. In other words I am

now an insulin dependent diabetic no matter how one cuts it. Yes, I am still a

diabetic whether I am called a type2, a type1.5 or a type 1, I still have

diabetes. I wish I didn't, but i t is what it is. I shared my article Diabetic

Doater with the members here, and in it I warned about the cause of practically

all diabetic complications like, blindness, vision loss, amputations, heart

problems and kidney problems. The focus of this article was to prevent the high

glr readings one gets, and some here as well as me may have tried my

recommendations with success or with lots of low sugar readings, since I was

plagued with them quite often two or three times each week. I still maintain glr

spikes, high blood glucose readings are a primary cause of diabetic

complications. Read me clearly here. high blood glucose readings or spikes in

one's glr is the primary cause of diabetic complications. No matter what kind of

diabetic you are a type 1, a type 1.5 or a type 2 This statement still holds

true. I would try any thing to keep my A1C in the normal range 4.2-5.2, which I

did for several years. My indocrinologist, Dr. Welch as well as my wife were

totally against having any low sugar reactions , which they defined as a glr

lower than 70. In the past almost year I have only had one which was a 68 or 69,

I for get which, brainn damage you know is the cause, since my indocrinologist

equates a low glr as being the same as a stroke. Of course I differ with her on

this point, since I have had at least two minor strokes as well as three heart

attacks, and a low glr feels nothing like a stroke. So I gave up trying to

achieve the normal person, the non-diabetic, A1C readings. It now runs much

higher. Yes, I would try any thing to avoid those glr spikes. You name it:

exercise, diet, low carbs, low fat, high fat, prayers, meditations, various

supplements, cursing, and even sex. None of them worked. I started taking a new

supplement three or four weeks ago, and damned if it doesn't work or at least I

think so. In the past a single gram of carbohydrate would raise my glr 5.5-6.0

from the present glr provided I took no insulin. After taking this new

supplement for four or five days, I figured it was an other dud! So today three

weeks later I put it to the test, and it passed. I like to play games, so if you

can get within 10 points of my results from a starting point of glr 135, I will

tell you the name of this new supplement. Or you can just send me $50, and I

will tell you its name and how to get itI took 25 grams of carbs and two hours

later my glr was.....

Harry. So lets play. All respondents will get a response from me.

April 30, 2011

Hello, Harry, My name is frances vitulla my email address is

francesv@... could you send me the name of the product

priviately? My p1 a c was 12 point something. I have completely

changed my diet by eating this suip I call diabetic suip but was a

blender brockli suip. I eat 2 or 3 cups a day plus salads and I cut

out all or most starches. For the first time to day my sugar was 108.

In the beginning it was in the three hundreds. You see I went on all

janerics drugs. That's why my sugars went up. Now i'm still on

janerics except I'm taking actos. I went off that drug. What a big

mistake that was. Thank you verry much. again my email address is

francesv@...

Original message:

> Mark, you are the stud. Vivian welcome aboard. Unfortunately, I cannot

> tell you the name of the product on this list serve, since it might

> violate some unstated rule about advertising for a product. I know some

> products have been mentioned here before, and I will just name a few

> like: Humalog insulin, Novolog insulin, Lantus insulin, and a couple of

> kinds of insulin pumps, whatever these devices are called, as well as

> the count-a-dose. I know we have talked about different kinds of

> glucose monitors like the prodigy voice, the solo and others.Of course

> we can talk about different foods since they will have a direct baring

> on our glucose levels. is an expert regarding foods and

> recipes, and I do not believe he will be able to get this product in

> Canada via the health service, since it is a commercial supplement not

> covered by insurance of any kind as far as I know. If you cannot afford

> $50 per month out of your pocket then this product is not for you.So if

> you wish to know the name of this product, you will just have to add my

> name to your address book and send me a private email message. I will

> answer each and every private email I receive with the answers you

> seek. I don't know if this product will work for you. Right now it is

> working for me, and if I were to have numbers like Vivian's I would try

> to scrape up the money to give it a try. I can tell you some of the

> propaganda about the product, which has nothing to do with what type of

> a diabetic you are. Nutritionalist have discovered seveeral pathways

> that carbohydrates take to be turned into pure glucose used by your

> body.This product stimulates your body to produce enzymes that utilizes

> one or two of these pathways. So send me a private email not connected

> to this list serve if you wish to know. Remember insulin is a storage

> hormone, and it works every time it is tried whether or not your body

> produces it. Any excess glucose in your body system not used by your w

> hole body is converted to fat by your insulin.

> hth, Harry

>

April 30, 2011