Guest guest Posted December 1, 2010 Report Share Posted December 1, 2010 A new study of 27 meters. Those brands with speech we have discussed are not among them. However because they derive from taiwan technology looking at the meters from taiwan can be suggestive only because we don't know if any of them have the same technology. Most failed to meet minimal standards. Here is the news report, followed by a bit of it, followed by a link to the research paper. http://www.healthcentral.com/diabetes/c/17/125125/comparing-accuracy In my 15 years of following diabetes developments I haven't seen a single scientific comparison of the blood glucose meters that we have to work with. Until now. And now we have a study that compares meters from the major brands as well as some minor ones. The study compared 27 blood glucose monitoring systems including systems from the big four on the American market, LifeScan, Roche, Bayer, and Abbott. These are the four companies that seem to have a lock on reimbursement from almost all medical insurance plans. Here is the research paper: http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1089/dia.2009.0128. XB IC|XC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.