Guest guest Posted December 19, 2002 Report Share Posted December 19, 2002 Hi Patti Thanks for forwarding this. It seems the real issue then is when there are too many calories. Were you giving Katera extra protein that resulted in extra calories? Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't see that given the correct calorie allowance and ratio, that SWAPPING some of the carbohydrate for protein would increase the availability of glucose, and hence weight. I would think it to be the opposite as the % of carbohydrate converted to glucose (50-60% I think) is much higher than the % of protein (20%). The more I try to figure this out, the more confusing it gets! Jill >Dear Patti, >The reason you don't need to give extra protein is because it will just >turn to glucose. Protein will be used as fuel (glucose) if the body >doesn't need it for protein purposes. 25% of all protein gets converted to >glucose anyway. So the same goes for fat (only 10% usually converts to >glucose). If we provide too many calories despite that it is ketogenic, it >still will convert to glucose, thus increasing glucose levels and adding >weight which promotes even more calories that may not be necessary which >will then turn to glucose....I hope this makes sense. >Happy Holidays, > > > -----Original Message---- > > , > Would you refresh my memory on something? Remember that we had a > problem with Katera having gained too much weight.... and so we cut her > calories back..... but you also advised me to cut the protein back. I had > increased it on my own .... up to 1.2 gms per kilo...... but because of > her weight gain, you advised taking it back to around 1 gm per kilo, > which I did do. But I can't remember why you said the increased protein > could have backfired on us..... what the reasoning was. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2002 Report Share Posted December 19, 2002 Jill, Well, I had also increased calories, lowered the ratio..... and had upped the protein in order help her growth and to avoid just having her get more carbs.... my decision. (Too many things at once for one thing.) Being on a lower ratio is tricky because she is hungrier due to getting more carbs and not being in such deep ketosis. I felt sorry for her and increased by 50 calories per day. I think what really waylaid us was that Katera had back surgery in June for a condition that had caused her a lot of pain and restricted mobility for a number of months prior.... so between that and inactivity after the surgery, the calorie increase was inappropriate (she actually was using fewer calories despite the hunger) and she ended up gaining a lot, very quickly. had me keep the low ratio (2:1) but cut the calories back and put the protein back to 1 gm per kilo. So, yes, you're right...... total calories is really a big thing. But there is also something else to it..... keeping that balance..... and I think even Freeman's book talks about why it matters.... that you can't just trade carb for protein. (Don't know for sure what he says, I loaned my copy to someone recently.) I think it was my mistake in thinking that extra protein would go directly to helping her grow.... when in fact, at least according to , it's just being in the state of ketosis that is holding her growth back..... increasing protein over the basic need was just being turned to glucose. I know..... I'm a little confused, too. I think I'm getting a glimmer of understanding, though. From how I read 's post, it sounds to me like she's saying 25% of all protein turns to glucose anyway...... but protein in excess of the body's bottom line needs will ALL turn to glucose. That's what I think she was meaning. I'll have to discuss it with her further next time I see her. Patti Re: ] Dietician answers protein question Hi Patti Thanks for forwarding this. It seems the real issue then is when there are too many calories. Were you giving Katera extra protein that resulted in extra calories? Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't see that given the correct calorie allowance and ratio, that SWAPPING some of the carbohydrate for protein would increase the availability of glucose, and hence weight. I would think it to be the opposite as the % of carbohydrate converted to glucose (50-60% I think) is much higher than the % of protein (20%). The more I try to figure this out, the more confusing it gets! Jill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2002 Report Share Posted December 20, 2002 I think I also heard that if the body doesn't have enough carbs, then it will start breaking down in a different way...maybe it needs carbs for muscle mass? Not sure. But I know I heard that you have to have a certain amount of carbs. Little enough that a keto kid gets and if you make it less it's not supposed to be good. (very vague answer ..sorry) - Ann ( ex keto kid.. 10 y.o.) > Jill, > Well, I had also increased calories, lowered the ratio..... and had upped the protein in order help her growth and to avoid just having her get more carbs.... my decision. (Too many things at once for one thing.) Being on a lower ratio is tricky because she is hungrier due to getting more carbs and not being in such deep ketosis. I felt sorry for her and increased by 50 calories per day. I think what really waylaid us was that Katera had back surgery in June for a condition that had caused her a lot of pain and restricted mobility for a number of months prior.... so between that and inactivity after the surgery, the calorie increase was inappropriate (she actually was using fewer calories despite the hunger) and she ended up gaining a lot, very quickly. had me keep the low ratio (2:1) but cut the calories back and put the protein back to 1 gm per kilo. So, yes, you're right...... total calories is really a big thing. But there is also something else to it..... keeping that balance..... and I think even Freeman's book talks about why it matters.... that you can't just trade carb for protein. (Don't know for sure what he says, I loaned my copy to someone recently.) I think it was my mistake in thinking that extra protein would go directly to helping her grow.... when in fact, at least according to , it's just being in the state of ketosis that is holding her growth back..... increasing protein over the basic need was just being turned to glucose. I know..... I'm a little confused, too. I think I'm getting a glimmer of understanding, though. From how I read 's post, it sounds to me like she's saying 25% of all protein turns to glucose anyway...... but protein in excess of the body's bottom line needs will ALL turn to glucose. That's what I think she was meaning. I'll have to discuss it with her further next time I see her. > > Patti > Re: ] Dietician answers protein question > > > Hi Patti > Thanks for forwarding this. > > It seems the real issue then is when there are too many calories. > > Were you giving Katera extra protein that resulted in extra calories? > > Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't see that given the correct calorie > allowance and ratio, that SWAPPING some of the carbohydrate for protein > would increase the availability of glucose, and hence weight. I would > think it to be the opposite as the % of carbohydrate converted to glucose > (50-60% I think) is much higher than the % of protein (20%). > > The more I try to figure this out, the more confusing it gets! > Jill > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 30, 2003 Report Share Posted April 30, 2003 Patti, Found this one tucked away, (25% protein content converted to glucose?) but I think answered again more fully in another email? Will have another look... Re: ] Dietician answers protein question > > > Hi Patti > Thanks for forwarding this. > > It seems the real issue then is when there are too many calories. > > Were you giving Katera extra protein that resulted in extra calories? > > Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't see that given the correct calorie > allowance and ratio, that SWAPPING some of the carbohydrate for protein > would increase the availability of glucose, and hence weight. I would > think it to be the opposite as the % of carbohydrate converted to glucose > (50-60% I think) is much higher than the % of protein (20%). > > The more I try to figure this out, the more confusing it gets! > Jill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 1, 2003 Report Share Posted May 1, 2003 I thought that the statistic meant that 25% of protien COULD be converted to glucose IF body was not given enough carb for its needs. But if enough carb given, there will be no conversion as its not necessary, remembering the body only requires a minimal amount of carb. Thoughts? comments? Patti wrote: > THANK YOU, ...... that's what I was looking for. I can't believe > I didn't save that post. I guess it should all be in the archives > somewhere if we go back into the December posts. That was it, > though...... where she said that 25% of all protein is converted into > glucose but that if you give more than the basic requirement (around 1 > gm per kilo for most of our kids), then ALL of whatever the excess is > will turn to glucose. I remember that being a big shock to me at the > time because I was just thinking " more protein is a good thing " and > wanting Katera to grow. > > Patti > Fw: Re: ] Dietician answers protein question > > > Patti, > Found this one tucked away, (25% protein content converted to > glucose?) but > I think answered again more fully in another email? Will > have > another look... > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 30, 2004 Report Share Posted April 30, 2004 THANK YOU, ...... that's what I was looking for. I can't believe I didn't save that post. I guess it should all be in the archives somewhere if we go back into the December posts. That was it, though...... where she said that 25% of all protein is converted into glucose but that if you give more than the basic requirement (around 1 gm per kilo for most of our kids), then ALL of whatever the excess is will turn to glucose. I remember that being a big shock to me at the time because I was just thinking " more protein is a good thing " and wanting Katera to grow. Patti Fw: Re: ] Dietician answers protein question Patti, Found this one tucked away, (25% protein content converted to glucose?) but I think answered again more fully in another email? Will have another look... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 1, 2004 Report Share Posted May 1, 2004 Hmmm..... that makes sense. Wish I could get a response from our dietician but since we officially took Katera off the diet, I think they removed us from her caseload and I don't get calls back from her. That does make sense...... and illustrates one of the reasons why it's so important to keep some carb in there for those at very high ratios. Patti Re: Re: ] Dietician answers protein question I thought that the statistic meant that 25% of protien COULD be converted to glucose IF body was not given enough carb for its needs. But if enough carb given, there will be no conversion as its not necessary, remembering the body only requires a minimal amount of carb. Thoughts? comments? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.