Guest guest Posted August 14, 2000 Report Share Posted August 14, 2000 Hey all, I received numerous requests to report on my PhotoDerm treatments. I apologize for not responding personally to each missive, but I have been occupied with my relocation to Connecticut and working in a laboratory prior to the commencement of medical school. Nevertheless, I am pleased that my reports could be of such benefit to so many fellow rosaceans and will belatedly continue my synopses at this juncture. In case you didn't peruse my first installment, follow this link before reading the preceding post: /message/rosacea-support/18707 I was scheduled for my second PhotoDerm session with Dr. Zenda -Lat in Paramus, NJ on Friday, 30 June at 11:30 A.M. After arriving at her office, I was rapidly ushered into her waiting room to visualize my photographs from the previous session undertaken three weeks to the date as well as to snap photographs prior to my second session. Over the course of three weeks, I noticed a reduction in the intensity of erythema in the facial T region. However, I was pleasantly surprised when the digital photographs taken at the prior session were compared with the subsequent snapshots. There was a significant reduction in erythema, particularly along my upper cheeks. I also appreciated that Dr. -Lat and her nurse did not attempt to convince me that there was a putative reduction in redness, as was the case during my treatments under Dr. Jay's auspices. She merely showed me the pictures and allowed me to evaluate the progress without unwanted comments from the peanut gallery. After viewing the photographs, Dr. -Lat and I proceeded to the treatment room. In accordance with Dr. Bitter, Sr.'s protocol, she informed me that the 570 filter would be employed, as the first session comprised pulses using only the 550 filter. Additionally, she asked me if I had any side effects from the first session; I answered in the negative. Therefore, she decided to increase the energy fluence from 35 J/cm2 to 42 J/cm2 on the Epilight machine. She also informed me that her husband Dr. Emmanuel Lat, who accompanied her to California for training from Dr. Bitter, Sr., would be performing this treatment. He is a very congenial doctor and possesses a sharp sense of humor. However, Dr. -Lat remained in the treatment room throughout the session. She whipped out the Nioxin and induced a flush; I immediately felt the tingling sensation of heat rush to the T zone. At this point, Dr. Lat charged up the PhotoDerm crystal and the treatment began. Dr. Lat treated my entire face during this session, even non-rosacea areas like my forehead and cheeks. During the session, I could smell some burning but paid little attention to it at the time. The beard region was being blasted during this session, and, in retrospect, I realized that the noxious burning odor was the smell of hair follicles being burnt. This treatment eliminated considerable areas of stubble along my cheeks, but I am not terribly concerned about this loss, as I have never sported a beard nor intend to in the foreseeable future. Nonetheless, is this hair loss temporary? From information gleaned from Dr. Nase's posts, it seems probable that such hair loss may be permanent. Nevertheless, I experienced no bruising, swelling or blistering during this session; the only side effect was transient erythema in the area of treatment that subsided within several hours. However, I would not be able to claim the same after my third session, and I will report on that session very shortly. Sincerely yours, Mark ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.