Guest guest Posted March 8, 2002 Report Share Posted March 8, 2002 Is scary, . Whats scarier is that news and advertising knows that people can believe just about anything to be true after hearing it repeated for less than a dozen times. The disease and pharmaceutical news and ads alone should drive anyone to search out better health before they're reduced to whats being said. Wanita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2002 Report Share Posted March 8, 2002 P.S. Another consideration,as this is from Germany is the recall of , class action lawsuits and bad publicity for Baycol, a cholesterol lowering drug. Made by Bayer, a German corporation. Bayer also thought they were the shoe in for Cipro, the anthrax drug. That contract was given to a Canadian drug corp. Wanita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2002 Report Share Posted March 8, 2002 Wanita wrote: >Is scary, . Whats scarier is that news and advertising knows that people >can believe just about anything to be true after hearing it repeated for less >than a dozen times. Does that include what's on this group? <weg> > The disease and pharmaceutical news and ads alone should >drive anyone to search out better health before they're reduced to whats being >said. I don't think we have to push the panic button quite yet. Europe is several steps ahead of us in Internet censorship and censorship in general (see the new French anti-cult law). But this bears looking at. Here in the US our approach is a little different. We'll let you make up your own mind about health. But it you try to do anything about your decision, and it involves somebody else, forget it! We're not trusted to make decisions about raw milk, medical marijuana, or a plethora of other health issues. And as long as people expect governments to save them from their own mistakes, we'll never be free of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2002 Report Share Posted March 8, 2002 Quick wrote: > Does that include what's on this group? <weg> I hope you feel very very bad. I had to spend far too much time to figure out that <weg> apparently means wicked evil grin...which I might add, can also be communicated like this X-} I know this is off-topic, but I figured that there had to be at least a few other people who have been trying to figure out what the heck <weg> meant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2002 Report Share Posted March 8, 2002 At 04:20 PM 3/8/02 -0500, you wrote: >Wanita wrote: >>Is scary, . Whats scarier is that news and advertising knows that people >>can believe just about anything to be true after hearing it repeated for less >>than a dozen times. > >Does that include what's on this group? <weg> Oh, no. There's common sense here. > >Here in the US our approach is a little different. We'll let you make >up your own mind about health. But it you try to do anything about >your decision, and it involves somebody else, forget it! We're not >trusted to make decisions about raw milk, medical marijuana, or a >plethora of other health issues. And as long as people expect >governments to save them from their own mistakes, we'll never be free >of that. More common sense :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2002 Report Share Posted March 9, 2002 A good place to find explanations of abbreviations is http://www.atomica.com or http://acronymfinder.com that atomica uses. Roman Kroyer wrote: > Quick wrote: > > Does that include what's on this group? <weg> > > I hope you feel very very bad. I had to spend far too much time to figure > out that <weg> apparently means wicked evil grin...which I might add, can > also be communicated like this X-} > > I know this is off-topic, but I figured that there had to be at least a few > other people who have been trying to figure out what the heck <weg> meant. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2002 Report Share Posted March 11, 2002 On Fri, 8 Mar 2002 16:20:37 -0500 Quick <jaq@...> writes: Here in the US our approach is a little different. We'll let you make up your own mind about health. But it you try to do anything about your decision, and it involves somebody else, forget it! We're not trusted to make decisions about raw milk, medical marijuana, or a plethora of other health issues. *And as long as people expect governments to save them from their own mistakes, we'll never be free of that.* , There is profound truth in your statement above. I hope people don't miss it. Until we take responsibility for our own lives and our *own decisions*, we will forever be at the mercy of the " regulators " and what *they* believe is best for us. Bianca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.