Guest guest Posted February 27, 2002 Report Share Posted February 27, 2002 this paragraph is wrong. The sentence should read " there is NOT a large difference in quality in going from a predominately raw to a 100% raw diet " Sorry for the typo!!!!!! On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:40:12 -0800 bianca3@... writes: Also his comments that there is a large difference in quality from going to a predominately raw to 100% diet won't find a lot of detractors either. Generally speaking someone whose diet is 85% raw/15% cooked is considered, for all intents and purposes, a raw fooder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.