Guest guest Posted March 17, 2002 Report Share Posted March 17, 2002 >>>>I don't know the answer to your question but I do know that the levels of mercury in deep sea fish *has not* changed in the past 100 years or so. So the argument that we have more pollution now causing greater levels of mercury toxicity is fallacious in regards to saltwater fish. It is an assumption that has never been borne out by the facts. ***bianca, you are the second person to post about this. Are you referring to the same museum study that someone else referred to? The one UC references? If so, do you have any idea what the sample size was of that study? Also, do you know what type of mercury was found in the old specimens and what type is found in the same species of deep ocean fish today? >>>>Second, pollution of any kind is handled in a remarkably different way by the ocean as opposed to freshwater bodies. The ocean is remarkable in terms of regenerating itself in the wake of man made pollution disasters despite what many environmental groups proclaim. I sat in a conference several years ago listening to a group of scientists etc., remark at how flabbergasted they were because of the actual aftermath of the Exxon oil spill (the ocean had " cleaned " itself up) as opposed to what they expected. Several speakers remarked on how environmentalists are long on rhetoric and short on good science. ****Do you recall any of the specifics on *how* the ocean cleans itself up? I find this notion very interesting, but, I imagine the ocean's ability to *clean itself up* is finite. It has been found that many ocean fish contain toxins from industry other than mercury - PCBs, and dioxin come to mind. This is not just based on the work of environment groups either. I posted many links on this last week. Unless the various government agencies around the world and the environmental organizations are conspiring in a major scam to make the public think many ocean fish have unhealthy levels of various chemical compounds, I can't help but think that human generated pollution has indeed caused many fish to carry toxic levels of these compounds. If you have any evidence to the contrary, please share it, as I'd love to eat more fish knowing that it's safe. And I bet I'm not the only one Suze Fisher Web Design & Development http://www.suscom-maine.net/~cfisher/ mailto:cfisher@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.